Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Similar documents
Regional Transit System Plan

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

Metrorail and Metrobus Fare Structure Model

This document has been developed to provide context to the Board as part of the strategic planning process. Regional development and travel trends

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Gateway Corridor Transitway

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 15, 2012

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board TPP Workshop August 16, 2017

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board October 18, 2017

MEMORANDUM EXAMPLES FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES NEXT STEPS. Item 3 Long-Range Plan Task Force May 17, 2017

Southwest Corridor Plan Project Update. June 11, 2013

Connecting the Nation's Capital Transportation System

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Regional Transit Framework Study

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Locally Preferred Alternative. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: PHONE: Recommend to Board. Final Action

Report by Customer Service and Operations Committee (A) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

TransAction Plan Draft for Public Comment Spring/Summer 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

WELCOME. Schedule. Contact Information. Please Provide Written Comments

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

APPENDIX N East King County Subarea High Capacity Transit (HCT) Analysis: Approach to Assessing System-Level Alternatives

Title VI Required Service Standards, Policies and Definitions

Developing New Revenue Streams For Transit

NEED ECONOMIC TRANSPORTATION LOCATIONS EXAMPLE

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES

TransAction Plan October 2017

Northern Virginia Region Draft Needs Summary

Travel Demand Forecasting User Guide

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Amendment #1

Blue/Yellow Line Service Realignment

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION PLAN

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. January 29, 2013

SCS Scenario Planning

CHAPTER 3 THE BUILDING BLOCKS POLICIES AND SUPPORTIVE STRATEGIES REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Executive Summary and Staff Recommendation

Introduction. McLennan County Transit Need Study

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

Sound Transit Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Policy

10. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, LEADERSHIP, AND OVERSIGHT GUIDELINES

2035 LRTP Transportation Options Introduction

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

Shaping our future. A summary of BC TRANSIT S STRATEGIC PLAN 2030

1: INTRODUCTION AND PROCESS OVERVIEW

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

SUMMARY REPORT September 11, 2012 DRAFT

Riverview Corridor Pre-Project Development Study

Rail Service Criteria Update

in the Fraser Valley Foundation Paper #4

Transportation and Utilities

What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)?

Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan

Northeast Sector Area Transit Plan. Phase 1: Issues and Opportunities Summary

Safety and Operations Committee. Information Item IV-A. December 13, 2018

Issue Paper on Regional Land Use and Transit Planning (Draft)

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

Rapid Transit in Winnipeg. Winnipeg TOD Summit November 17, 2014

VelociRFTA BRT. Roaring Fork Transportation Authority. Webinar: Transit Planning with a Land Use Lens. August 23, 2011

1560 Broadway, Suite 700, Denver, CO phone

09Scenario Evaluation

CHAPTER 2: Goals, Objectives & Standards

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

REGIONAL EXPRESS RAIL UPDATE

Guiding Principles of the Plan:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Report to Governor-elect Northam From Transition Policy Council on Transportation

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

Who is DRCOG?

An Overview of Transportation Issues in the NY Metro Area July 26, 2010

Commuter Rail Communities Coalition JUNE 12, 2018

2018 Comprehensive Guide Plan Steering Committee. Wednesday, October 11, Minnehaha Room, Minnetonka City Hall. 6:00 8:00 p.m.

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

Evaluation of Alternatives

Chapter 4. Recommendations

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

METRA UP-W LINE. Locally Preferred Alternative Report

VDOT and DRPT MPO and PDC Winter Meeting Amy Inman Planning & Mobility Programs Administrator Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

CHAPTER HIGHLIGHTS GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES 60 SEEKING PUBLIC INPUT TO REFINE SCENARIOS FOR OUR FUTURE 61

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

NEW ORLEANS REGION TRANSIT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SCOPE OF SERVICES. RPC Project LA90X361

Chapter 4: Transportation and Land Use

Coordinating Committee. November 18, 2014

Columbia Pike Transit Initiative

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

Land Use and Planning Resources Report. Final Report to the Minnesota Legislature

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

CHAPTER 4 HIGHLIGHTS GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES 64 SEEKING PUBLIC INPUT TO REFINE SCENARIOS FOR OUR FUTURE 66

Goals, Objectives, and Factors for Consideration. February 23, 2017

WTP 2035 DRAFT STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS

Transcription:

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary nmlkj Action nmlkji Information MEAD Number: Resolution: Yes No nmlkj nmlkji TITLE: Update on Regional Transit System Plan (RTSP) PURPOSE: To provide the Board with information on the Regional Transit System Plan (RTSP), a 30-year vision for a multi-modal regional transit network. DESCRIPTION: Within Metro s current strategic framework, this project supports our goals of delivering quality service, using resources wisely, and maintaining and enhancing Metro`s image by developing a plan for an integrated regional transit system to facilitate the development of complete communities, encourage and accommodate future ridership growth, and maximize access to and availability of transit. The information provided in the presentation will inform the Board of the alignment of the Regional Transit System Plan (RTSP) with Region Forward and the Board s Strategic Plan, findings from the analysis completed to date, and the upcoming tasks and milestones including public outreach. Metro`s principal focus has been on safety, state-of-good-repair, and budget issues. In parallel, growth trends in the Washington, DC region indicate that Metro should also focus on its ability to serve future transit demand in the region. Major system improvement projects to increase capacity have long timelines (10-20 years) to plan, design, fund, and construct, so Metro needs to provide an updated system expansion plan now in order to address capacity constraints that are expected to emerge between 2020 and 2040. The RTSP will address future growth and options for improving and expanding transit service. The plan will be a 30-year vision for an integrated high-capacity, multi-modal transit network to achieve goals and objectives that are closely aligned to Region Forward. This is not the first time that Metro has worked to develop a regional transit plan. In 1999, Metro adopted a Transit Service Expansion Plan, aimed at doubling transit ridership by 2025 and increasing the region`s fixed-guideway miles by 50%. Some of those projects have been implemented, others are planned or

under construction, and others have yet to be undertaken. Now, more than 10 years later, it is time for a fresh look at the future of the region`s transit system that currently has 15 operators. While assessing projects that Metro can undertake itself, the RTSP is operator-neutral because Metro plays an important role in advocating for connections and projects that promote seamless travel across the region and identifying the most promising projects that provide the greatest regional benefit. To date, the project has modeled and analyzed 20+ strategies focused on core capacity, access, surface transit, and new connections to regional activity centers. Staff has met frequently with its multi-jurisdictional Technical Advisory Group, and the presentations have been posted on PlanItMetro.com. Additionally, public outreach will be initiated through public workshops and an online crowd-sourcing tool. The upcoming phase of work on the study will include the evaluation of future transit scenarios. Four initial scenarios will include multiple strategies and projects organized around central questions about the future focus of transit improvements: Scenario 1: Maximize Existing Infrastructure What are the results of moderate changes to the existing system Scenario 2: Expand Surface Transit What are the results from a substantial increase in connected surface transit? Scenario 3: Expand Transit Core Capacity What is the scale of improvement needed to resolve core capacity issues? Scenario 4: Expand Transit Systemwide How much can we change mode share and vehicle miles traveled percapita with a substantial increase in heavy rail? By the end of 2012, staff will prepare preliminary recommendations and a draft plan. Subsequent presentations to the Board are expected during 2012 as the process continues.

. FUNDING IMPACT: No impact on funding for this information item. However, the RTSP will help identify future capital projects to meet ridership growth and improve the quality of service. Project Manager: Mark Kellogg Project Department/Office: PLJD/PLAN RECOMMENDATION: There is no action needed for this information item.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Strategic Planning & Regional Transit System Plan Update Board of Directors Strategic Planning Session April 26, 2012

Purpose Discuss input from stakeholder meetings to date Link Regional Transit System Plan (RTSP) with Strategic Plan Update RTSP 2040 analysis Outline RTSP stakeholder and public engagement approach 2

What Are Stakeholders Saying? Improve Metro is vital to customer service the region Visible progress it doesn t cost is being made anything but the in fixing the payoff is great system let s sustain it Bi Bring Metro s costs under control Planning for the future is important

Regional Strategic Alignment Very Long Term 10-30 Years Metro s Accessibility Contribution: 1. Improving Mobility 2. Connecting Complete Communities 3. Ensuring Financial Sustainability Long Term 2-10 Years Regional Transit System Plan Regional Transit System Plan Metro s Strategic Plan: Mission & Vision Strategic & Operational a Goals Adjust Strategy? Take Action Define What Regional Success Looks Like Adjust Tactics? Measure Results Report Short Term 0-2 Years Strategy Execution Through Metro s Multi-Year Business Plan and Budgets

RTSP Characteristics 30-year vision (2040) Multi-modal regional transit network Operator-neutral to create a seamless customer experience Infrastructure plan for projects that have long development horizons 5

Our Future Rides With Metro Achieving Region Forward s goals/targets g requires improving and expanding transit Extending the system has a direct impact on core capacity. Assuming 10+ years to construct major core capacity projects, a preferred expansion strategy and secure funding needs to be identified in the next 5 years Partnering is needed to prioritize surface transit on roadways and create a multimodal regional transit system. 6

RTSP Evaluation Framework Board Strategic Goals: Improve Mobility in the Region Support Development of Complete Communities Ensure Financial Sustainability RTSP Evaluation Factors Environmental quality, energy efficiency, human health and safety Transit-oriented, mixed-use communities that capture employment and household growth, provide choices Access to and availability of integrated and convenient transit choices High-quality transit that accommodates and encourages future ridership growth Financially viable and sustainable transit 7

Findings from 2040 Base Case Network Regional transit trips are expected to grow by over 30% Base Case Peak Hour Passenger Loads Overcrowding will be most severe leading to Rosslyn and L Enfant Plaza Demand will increase for: Suburban rail station access Circulation within central jurisdictions Suburb-suburb travel 8

What Strategies Does the Region Need? Core Capacity Access Surface Transit New Strategies Strategies Strategies Connections Strategies New rail lines In-fill stations & Enhanced bus Metrorail through the core pedestrian connections priority corridors extensions to activity centers Rail inter-lining Improved Enhanced Commuter rail (providing new pedestrian commuter rail and extensions connections between existing networks bus service rail lines) Enhanced bus priority corridors Park and ride lots with shuttles to rail Enhanced BRT network BRT/LRT/Streetcar extensions 9

Findings from Rail Strategies No single strategy addresses all core capacity issues New lines reduce transfers at key stations ti Interlining increases service flexibility and redundancy, but is mixed in terms of core capacity issues Extensions further strain Metrorail core capacity Extensions relieve park and ride capacity issues at existing end of line stations 10

Findings from Surface Transit Strategies High quality surface transit strategies improve coverage and access to regional activity centers and improve transit share and access to jobs Streetcar: modest core relief Enhanced priority corridors: modest reduction in peak Metrorail loads Transitway (LRT/BRT): mixed results on congested Metrorail links 11

Initial Scenarios Under Analysis Scenario 1: Maximize Existing Infrastructure What are the results of moderate changes to the existing system? Scenario 2: Expand Surface Transit What are the results from a substantial increase in connected surface transit? Scenario 3: Expand Transit Core Capacity What is the scale of improvement needed to resolve core capacity issues? Scenario 4: Expand Transit Systemwide How much can we change mode share and vehicle miles traveled/capita with a substantial increase of heavy rail? 12

Strategic Plan Next Steps Staff drafts strategic plan incorporating stakeholder input May - June Board review and discussion Stakeholder forum/public Outreach Adopt final strategic plan June - July Fall Fall/Winter

Appendix

RTSP Evaluation Factors and Objectives 1: Enhance environmental quality, improve energy efficiency, and protect human health and safety Maximize safety Minimize transportation related emissions and energy use 2: Facilitate transit-oriented, mixed-use communities that capture employment and household growth, providing choices in where to live, work, and play Provide highly hl desirable transit choices to support growth in regional activity centers (RACs) and mixed-use corridors Provide attractive transit options to support existing and planned development outside RACs 15

RTSP Evaluation Factors and Objectives 3: Maximize access to and availability of integrated and convenient transit choices Maximize transit network coverage and improve mobility throughout h t the region Improve availability of and multimodal access to transit stations and stops served by high-frequency, higher-speed service Balance user benefits from transit to residents throughout the region 16

RTSP Evaluation Factors and Objectives 4: Provide a high-quality transit system that accommodates and encourages future ridership growth Maximize transit s competitiveness with the automobile Provide sufficient capacity to serve future demand 5: Provide a financially viable and sustainable transit system that is efficient and effective for the Region Provide transit service that is the best value to the region 17

Scenario 1: Maximize Existing Infrastructure Pedestrian tunnels and other improvements at closely located stations Enhanced priority corridor network Enhanced commuter bus network Transitways (LRT/BRT) Commuter rail connections and service enhancements Infill stations Interline connections

Scenario 2: Expand Surface Transit Pedestrian tunnels and other improvements at closely located stations Enhanced priority corridor network Enhanced commuter bus network Transitway (LRT/BRT) Streetcar network and connections Commuter rail connections and service enhancements

Scenario 3: Expand Transit Core Capacity Pedestrian tunnels and other improvements at closely located stations PCN Plan Streetcar network Commuter rail service enhancements Infill station Interline connections Separate Yellow and Green Lines

Scenario 4: Expand Transit Systemwide Pedestrian tunnels and Infill stations other improvements at Remote park and ride lots closely located stations Separate Yellow and Enhanced priority it Green Lines corridors Separate Blue and Enhanced commuter bus Orange Lines network Metrorail extensions Transitways (LRT/BRT) Beltway links Commuter rail connections and service enhancements