VALUE ENGINEERING FOR TxDOT PROJECT MANAGERS

Similar documents
Why specify Surface Aggregate Classification A (SAC-A)?

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Report on. Texas Bridges. as of September Prepared by the Bridge Division Texas Department of Transportation

ITEM 164 SEEDING FOR EROSION CONTROL

EARLY AGE CRACKING IN HMAC Short Course Gisel Carrasco, P.E., CST-M&P

7.0 Stakeholder and Public Outreach

What happens to your application after you leave it with us?

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL SERVICES DIVISION

Routine Airport Maintenance Program RAMP

Case Histories on Geogrid Reinforced Pavements to Mitigate Problems Associated with Expansive Subgrade Soils

Statewide Connectivity Corridors

IMPACTS OF MIX REJUVENATORS ON PERFORMANCE

Standard Operating Procedure for Complying with CMP Requirements

TWDB Description, Summary & Example of Agency Reports

INTERIM CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS,

DRAFT UTP May Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A. (Amounts in millions) Sum $10,000,000. Grand Total $10,000,000.

20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified

Secondary Analysis of Photochemical Modeling Data Report

E2 D0 U 1 C 3 A E T D IUOCNA A T IL O S N E A R L I E S S E R I E S HUB/DBE/SBE R A I L

Article Construction, Section E. Production Operations, Section 2. Mixing and Discharge of Materials Where We Are Now

Texas Water Issues. Key Points. Texas Groundwater Marketing and Exporting. Texas Water Sources/Uses. Ronald A. Kaiser

Recycled Materials Resource Center

ATTENTION: TP& D, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ENGINEERS MEMORANDUM. TO: District Engineers Date: May 18, 2001

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

RFID Applications for Tolling and Congestion Management

19. Security Classif. (of report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified Form DOT F (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized

The Texas Experience With Crumb Rubber. Dale A. Rand, P.E.

A History of the City Management Profession. Dan Johnson, City Manager City of Richardson, Texas Originally delivered by Terrell Blodgett

Budget Request - Surplus Agricultural Product Grant. House Budget

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

TXDOT Environmental Management System Verification Audit - Results. TxDOT Short Course October 16, 2013

DEPARTMENTAL RESEARCH

Prestressed Member Fabrication Plants (Multi-Project) Material Producer List Construction Division Materials & Pavements Section

TTI s Capabilities in Connected Transportation

2015 Ozone Standard. David Brymer. Air Quality Division. Presented to the 2016 Texas Transportation Planning Conference June 16, 2016

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

FREIGHT PLAN UPDATE/CRITICAL FREIGHT CORRIDORS. Association of Texas MPOs 2017 Summer Meeting

OPEN DATA & PROJECT TRACKER. Michael Chamberlain TPP, Data Management

PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT

determine their mutual responsibilities in carrying out the metropolitan transportation planning process;

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

Revised Statewide Asphalt Binder Selection Catalog

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government 3. Recipient s Catalog No.

9 Summary of Findings

Eagle Ford and Barnett Shale Activities. Impacts to the Transportation System

PEPS DIVISION. October 2018 Where are we now where are we headed

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

Accommodating Truck Traffic on Texas Highways: Survey Results

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LAREDO DISTRICT EAGLE FORD SHALE: IMPACTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Accelerated Construction: A Path Forward by Texas Department of Transportation 512/ All Rights Reserved

PEPS DIVISION SEPTEMBER 2018

20. Security Classif.(of this page) Unclassified

TEXAS-OKLAHOMA PASSENGER RAIL STUDY

Transportation 101: Orientation for Legislators and Staff. Brandi Bird, Dallas Regional Mobility Coalition

Retaining Walls. and Going Beyond the Standards

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS

REVIEW OF RURAL TRANSPORTATION AND CONNECTIVITY INITIATIVES

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL SERVICES DIVISION

summary report West Texas Rail Feasibility Study Texas Department of Transportation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. HNTB August 2011

2017 Educational Series RAIL

Internal Audit Report

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Future Trends. Asphalt Rubber. Gregory S. Cleveland, P.E. TxDOT Construction Division. f HMA. f 1

DECEMBER P R O G R E S S R E P O R T

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report. Compass TxDOT Office of Internal Audit

Internal Audit Report. Contract Administration TxDOT Office of Internal Audit

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN UPDATE. Regional Freight Advisory Committee NCTCOG

Internal Audit Report. Rail Project Management TxDOT Office of Internal Audit

Telling the Freight (trucking/goods movement) story:

Table of Contents PERMIAN BASIN MPO TIP 2

RTC Position on Pavement Condition Targets

Texas Department of Transportation Section 1309, TEA-21 Comprehensive Streamlining Efforts

PEPS QUARTERLY CONSULTANT WEBCAST. Martin L. Rodin, P.E. PEPS Division Director March 22, 2016

Internal Audit Report. Contract Administration - Closeout Phase TxDOT Internal Audit Division

20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified

Jan R. Prusinski, P.E. Executive Director

Energy Solutions with Real Results

PERMIAN ROAD SAFETY COALITION SAFETY FORUM. September 21, 2017 Permian Road Safety Coalition Safety Forum September 21, 2017

INTEGRATING FREIGHT IN CORRIDOR PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Steve Linhart, AICP Caroline Mays, AICP

Research Initiatives at TxDOT Related to Utilities and Right of Way

Table of Contents Local Agency Guidelines Section B August 2011

PEPS DIVISION PEPS Conference Martin Rodin, P.E.

Current Prediabetes Prevalence Among Adults by Demographic Characteristics, Risk Factors, Other Conditions, and Place of Residence, Texas, 2013

Executive Summary. March 24, Prepared by: Copyright 2005 by Texas Department of Transportation. All rights reserved.

CHAPTER 2B - PHASE I, INITIAL ROADWAY INVESTIGATION & PRELIMINARY FIELD INSPECTION

TTI is pleased to respond to any questions or comments from Committee members regarding this information.

STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014 Janie Temple

Responses to Questions from the Texas House of Representatives Select Committee on Transportation Funding

Internal Audit Report. Bulk Fuel Management and Reporting TxDOT Internal Audit Division

The Impact of Indirect Reuse on Water Supply Planning

Introduction to the Proposed Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Planning and Programming

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BENT CAPS

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

TxDOT s NEW ACCESS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Bill Frawley Texas Transportation Institute Access Management Conference August 31, 2004

Cody Cockroft, P.E. (713) mobile: (832)

WATER for TEXAS Water CONSERVATION for the Future. Kathleen Jackson, P.E. Gulf Coast Water Conservation Symposium March 22, 2018

Transcription:

VALUE ENGINEERING FOR TxDOT PROJECT MANAGERS DOs and DON Ts October 13, 2015

What is Value Engineering? From the FHWA website (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/) Value Engineering (VE) is defined as a systematic process of review and analysis of a project, during the concept and design phases, by a multidiscipline team of persons not involved in the project, that is conducted to provide recommendations for: 1. providing the needed functions safely, reliably, efficiently, and at the lowest overall cost; 2. improving the value and quality of the project; and 3. reducing the time to complete the project. Value = Function / Cost 2

What is Value Engineering? It shall include following seven phases: Information Phase Function Analysis Phase Creative Phase Evaluation Phase Development Phase Presentation Phase Resolution Phase 3

What Value Engineering is NOT? Value Engineering does not (necessarily): Cut cost, but it rather adds value. Provide a complete set of design recommendations with detailed or a 100% accurate estimate and/or full design analysis, but rather the best estimate and design analysis a multidisciplinary team can provide in such short period of time. (i.e., a 10 15 people team split into several groups, with 3 4 people working on hydraulics, can t provide a full hydraulic analysis as a result of the study but rather a set recommendations to the District.) 4

What Value Engineering is NOT? Value Engineering does not (necessarily): Have to be 100% implemented. It is up to the District to decide what ideas will move forward. Do not freak out if you see an idea that, based on your expertise, makes no sense, or you already know won t work (for whatever reason). Some examples: Use slopes instead of retaining walls on approaches ($989,000; implemented) Replace median barrier with cable barrier ($690,000; implemented) Replace flexible pavement with concrete pavement section ($7,840,000; implemented) 5

What Value Engineering is NOT? Other Examples: Replace as many MSE walls with riprap as possible without adding ROW ($4,300,000; not implemented) Relocate railroad line and put roadway on grade in lieu of elevated section ($23,020,000; not implemented) Use double tear drop roundabouts at all interchanges ($389,000; not implemented) Note: Please do not ask for ideas to be removed from the report. 6

Intermission: Double Teardrop Roundabouts 7

Intermission: Double Teardrop Roundabouts 8

Intermission: Double Teardrop Roundabouts 9

When is it required? 23 CFR Part 627 Highway projects on the NHS Receiving federal assistance Total cost of: $50M or more for highway projects $40M or more for bridge projects VE analysis not required for design/build projects You can request a VE analysis on any project you deem necessary Note: The FHWA may require additional VE analysis beyond the federally required minimum thresholds if determine the project may benefit from it. 10

TxDOT s Value Engineering Procedure Described on the TxDOT s Project Development Process Manual, Chapter 2 Section 6 Value Engineering. Responsible parties. Project manager Contact the Design Division VE Coordinator for current VE requirements and processes. Conduct pre-study conference call with VE facilitator and Design Division. Executive Decision Summary Form (form 2502) should be completed by district and sent to Design Division along with the final report. Invite the FHWA Area Engineer * Follow these steps regardless of origin of VE study (District s or via DES). 11

Design Division Value Engineering Contracts 2 Value Engineering Contracts for FY 2015-2016 with AMEC and HDR, Inc. Memo sent to the Districts on September 25, 2014. Each contract is for $375,000 (approx. 15 17 Value Engineering Studies). No cost to the District. District only provides participants and facilities. All paperwork and billing goes through DES. Preliminary report is provided to the District 2 weeks after presentation day. 1 week to review. Final report is provided to the District 4 weeks after presentation day along with the Executive Decision Summary form 2502. District provides completed form 2502 to DES. 12

Design Division Value Engineering Contracts Contact the Design Division VE Coordinator with the following information: Highway, CSJ(s), Limits Existing Section, Proposed Section Status of design (30% preferred) In house design or consultant (name of consultant) District s Study Contact Person Number of days (3, 4, or 5 day study) and your preferred dates Please make the request at least 3 weeks before your estimated VE study date. This time frame will also give you enough time to invite the FHWA. 13

FHWA Engineering Operations Albert Hinojosa 512-536-5967 Area Engineer: Corpus Christi, Laredo, Pharr I-69 Program Coordinator Anita Wilson 512-536-5951 Urban Engineer: Dallas, Fort Worth Bindu Johnson 512-536-5968 Engineering Coordinator Construction Program Contract Administration, Emergency Relief Brett Jackson 513-536-5946 Major Projects Coordinator Major Projects Management Clarence Rumancik 512-536-5947 Area Engineer: San Angelo, Yoakum LPA Program Coordinator Value Engineering Design Exceptions Dan Mott 512-536-5964 Major Project Engineer/Team Leader Major Projects Management Justin Ham 512-536-5954 Urban Engineer: Austin, San Antonio Kevin Spohrer 512-536-5958 Area Engineer: Brownwood, Waco, Tyler, Atlanta Lisa Larsen 512-536-5962 Area Engineer: Amarillo, Austin, Childress Randy Paulk 512-536-5961 Area Engineer: El Paso, Odessa, Lubbock, Consultant Services Houston TIGER IV Projects Semme Yilma 512-536-5975 Area Engineer: Abilene, Fort Worth, Wichita Falls Ujval Patel 512-536-5955 Area Engineer: Dallas, Paris e-construction Design Program Lisell Guerra 512-536-5957 Area Engineer: Bryan, San Antonio Joe Krejci 512-536-5957 Area Engineer Beaumont, Houston, Lufkin Federal Lands Programs 14

FHWA Engineering Operations Clarence Rumancik, P.E. Area Engineer / LPA Program Coordinator / Design Exceptions Statewide Value Engineering Coordinator Federal Highway Administration Texas Division 15

I leave you with this If you only remember 4 things from this presentation: VE Studies FREE of charge to the District available Invite the FHWA area engineer to the VE study Send the final report along with the form 2502 to the Design Division for coordination with the FHWA Contact me for anything Value Engineering related 16

Jorge A. Millán, P.E., CFM Design Division Roadway Design Section 512-416-2344 Jorge.Millan@txdot.gov 17