B-1 Preliminary Steps WP Reference

Similar documents
Master Document Audit Program. Statement. Version 4.9, dated December 2017 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document. Version 2.6, dated November 2017 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program. Activity Code Compliance Audit CAS 420 Version 5.21, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program. Activity Code Compliance Audit CAS 408 Version 5.21, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

Operations Audit Materials and Other Cost

Master Document Audit Program. Activity Code Compliance Audit CAS 407 Version 5.19, dated December 2017 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program. Version 2.15, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

B-1 Preliminary Steps WP Reference

Master Document Audit Program. Version No. 2.16, dated October 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program

Master Document Audit Program

Master Document Audit Program. Version 1.6, November 2017 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Master Document. Version 8.13, dated December 2017 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program. Version 9.6, dated November 2017 B-1 Planning Considerations. Purpose and Scope

Master Document Audit Program. Version 1.7, dated April 2016 B-01 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program. Version 4.28, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Master Document. Version 4.28, dated December 2017 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program. Interviews. Version 4.25, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program. Interviews. Version 4.27, dated November 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

July 30, (1) CHAPTER 5. Table of Contents

Master Document Audit Program. Version 4.14, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

PSP A/ and September 27, PSP-024(R)

Master Document Audit Program. University Indirect Cost Allocation (F&A rate) Proposal. Version 1.0, dated February 2019 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program. Version 5.23, dated April 2017 B-1 Planning Considerations

Master Document Audit Program. Version 5.28, dated March 2018 B-1 Planning Considerations

PAS B.2.4 August 8, PAS-020(R)

GARMIN LTD. Audit Committee Charter. (Amended and Restated as of July 25, 2014)

Chapter 3. Audit Planning

PAS B.2.4 July 30, PAS-014(R)

DCAA MEMORANDUM FOR REGIONAL DIRECTORS COVER SHEET AUDIT GUIDANCE/AUDIT MANAGEMENT GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM NO. 13-PPS-016(R)

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED. the audits of the Company s financial statements;

Chapter 4. General Audit Requirements

RAVEN RUSSIA LIMITED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Terms of reference of the Audit Committee

Subcontractor and Vendor Kickbacks. Next Slide

IAASB Main Agenda (March 2005) Page Agenda Item 12-C

IAASB Main Agenda (December 2004) Page Agenda Item

PCAOB Auditing Standard 15 addresses audit evidence. What is audit evidence?

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 260 COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE CONTENTS

Standard on Auditing (SA) 701, Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor s Report Contents Paragraph(s) Introduction Scope of this SA

Internal Audit. Lecture # 09 By: Kanchan Damithendra

irobot Corporation Audit Committee Charter I. General Statement of Purpose

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER DATED AS OF AUGUST 5, 2010

ISA 701, Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor s Report

Agenda Item 1B (marked) Proposed SAS, Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor s Report (AU-C 701)

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

DCAA Contract Audit Manual

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT, FINANCE AND RISK COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ACE AVIATION HOLDINGS INC.

BioAmber Inc. Audit Committee Charter

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 701 COMMUNICATING KEY AUDIT MATTERS IN THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT

Repetitive Bidding of Duplicative Material Costs. Next Slide

PPS August 15, PPS-016(R)

Minneapolis Public Schools Special School District No. 1 Minneapolis, Minnesota. Communications Letter of the Student Activity Accounts.

Tab No. F-2 TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Informa PLC TERMS OF REFERENCE AUDIT COMMITTEE. Adopted by the Board on

Informa PLC TERMS OF REFERENCE AUDIT COMMITTEE. Effective 1 st January

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

International Standard on Auditing (UK) 701

2017 Archaeology Audit Program Procedure Manual. April 2017

WATCH WORDS FROM THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS

PSP A/ March 28, PSP-003(R)

BOARD AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

2.2. Attendance: Others may be invited by the Chair to attend all or part of any meeting (but they will not be entitled to vote).

WATCH WORDS FROM THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Quality Control Review Checklist

SRI LANKA AUDITING STANDARD 260 COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE CONTENTS

F5 NETWORKS, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER AS AMENDED AND RESTATED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF F5 NETWORKS, INC. APRIL 21, 2017

Government Auditing Standards

The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. Practice Note 21

FAMILY ASSURANCE FRIENDLY SOCIETY LIMITED THE AUDIT SUB-COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE. (as adopted by the Society s Board of Directors on 15/11/2018)

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES

DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, SUITE 2135 FORT BELVOIR, VA

Sample Audit Committee. of Auditors and Management

Chapter 6 Field Work Standards for Performance Audits

Auditing Standards and Practices Council

AN AUDIT OF INTERNAL CONTROL THAT IS INTEGRATED WITH AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: GUIDANCE FOR AUDITORS OF SMALLER PUBLIC COMPANIES

STUDENT GUIDE. CON 170 Fundamentals of Cost & Price Analysis. Unit 5, Lesson 1 Cost Analysis Process, Players, and Business Systems

Audit Committee Charter for XL Group Ltd

Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment

I. Mission. II. Scope of the Work

SA 402(REVISED) AUDIT CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO AN ENTITY USING

Compilation Engagements

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 315 UNDERSTANDING THE ENTITY AND ITS ENVIRONMENT AND ASSESSING THE RISKS OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT CONTENTS

Contractor Estimating Systems: System Adequacy Standards and Key Compliance Issues

Mapping of Original ISA 315 to New ISA 315 s Standards and Application Material (AM) Agenda Item 2-C

ADES International Holding Ltd (the Company )

DAVITA INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

CHAPTER 2: AUDIT STRATEGY, AUDIT PLANNING AND AUDIT PROGRAMME. By CA Kanika Khetan

How to Pass an ALGA Yellow Book Peer Review Training by the Association of Local Government Auditors (ALGA) Tampa, Florida September 20, 2013

FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES N.V. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

ContourGlobal PLC (the Company and, together with its subsidiaries, the Group ) AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

STATEMENT OF AUDITING STANDARDS 402 EXTERNAL CONFIRMATIONS

Effects of Changes in Attest Standards on SOC 1 Examinations

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 402 AUDIT CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO ENTITIES USING SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS CONTENTS

Make or Buy Decisions in a Proposal Audit. Next Slide

Understanding the DCAA Audit Process and How to Prepare for Success

REGISTERED CANDIDATE AUDITOR (RCA) TECHNICAL COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS

Compilation Engagements

AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER

Real-Time Labor Evaluations

Transcription:

Concurrent Adequacy and Compliance Revised Disclosure Activity Code 19100 Statement B-1 Planning Considerations Purpose and Scope To provide general objectives to be considered in auditing a revised D/S for adequacy and compliance. Normal ongoing compliance audits, not directly associated with a change in D/S, should be performed in accordance with the routine audit planning cycle and are not covered by this program. NOTE: This program does not replace individual auditor judgment and therefore, should be tailored to the audit scope of the particular assignment. The revised audit program must reflect a mutual understanding between the auditor and supervisor as to the scope required to meet auditing standards and DCAA objectives for the current assignment. References 1. CAM, Chapter 10, Section 8 2. CAM, Chapter 8 3. CAS Board Rules, Regulations, and Standards 4. DoD CAS Working Group Guidance Papers 76-6, and 77-20 5. 48 CFR 9903.202 B-1 Preliminary Steps WP Reference 1. Review the open MRD s for guidance which may impact the audit and adjust the scope and procedures appropriately. Open MRDs can be identified using the link provided on the DCAA Intranet home page for MRDs, AGMs, & AMGMs 2. Upon receipt of a revised D/S, coordinate the audit report due date with the cognizant Federal agency official (CFAO). Advise the CFAO of any delays encountered during the audit. 3. Contact the contracting officer to ascertain any known concerns (including risk related to the contractor s financial condition) that will 1 of 8

impact the audit and adjust the audit scope and procedures accordingly. If information regarding the contractor s financial condition is not available from the contracting officer, the auditor should perform the procedures addressed in CAM 2-302.1h. If during the course of the audit the auditor becomes aware of unfavorable or adverse financial conditions, they should immediately communicate their concerns to the contracting officer, and appropriately adjust the scope of audit. 4. Electronically transmit an acknowledgement/notification to the ACO/Buying Command notifying them of the commencement of the risk assessment and that the expected completion date will be provided in the formal acknowledgement/notification once the risk assessment is complete. (CAM 2-303). The acknowledgement/notification process should be within the timeframe and in accordance with the procedures in CAM 4-104. 5. If the organization being examined is a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or contractor wholly-owned subsidiary or division, read CAM 7-1800. a. Determine the need for a CAS Disclosure Statement in accordance with CAM 7-1810.2. b. Determine the actual relationship between the contracting organizations using the criteria in CAM 7-1807. c. Determine if the contractor is proposing to and/or is accumulating and allocating costs consistent with the actual relationship, e.g., if the actual relationship more closely resembles that of a prime contractor/subcontractor then costs should be allocated consistent with this type of relationship. 6. Review permanent files and prior audit assignments (e.g., forward pricing, incurred cost and financial capability audits) to determine whether the contractor is involved in any off-balance sheet financing activities. If the contractor has off-balance sheet activity, determine the impact of the activity on the allocation bases (see CAM 9-703.4d). If the contractor is publicly held, off-balance sheet financing activities will be identified in the Management s Discussion and Analysis (MDA) section of the contractor s quarterly and annual SEC filings (see CAM 14-305a(1)). If a review of the SEC filings has not been performed for the period(s) covered by the CAS audit, review the SEC filing. Quarterly and annual SEC filings can be accessed via the Securities and Exchange Commission website at http://www.sec.gov. If the contractor is not publicly held, review the contractor s last financial capability audit to determine if the contractor has provided written confirmation that its financial statements include disclosure of all off-balance sheet arrangements and related party transactions. 2 of 8

If the contractor has not provided the written confirmation, request the contractor to provide this documentation. (See CAM 14-305a(2).) Note: A proforma letter requesting contractor confirmation of the financial statements is included in the APPS of Financial Capability Audits (17600), Other Audit Guidance section, entitled ConfirmLtr Financial Statements. 7. Briefly evaluate the D/S to determine if it appears to be complete. If it is obviously incomplete, report it to the CFAO. Coordinate with the contractor to determine if any modifications are being contemplated which would affect the current audit. 8. Determine the reason for the submission (e.g., response to a noncompliance determination, proposed accounting change, etc.) The auditor should identify the contractor s cost accounting change(s) (see 48 CFR 9903.302) and each item of the DS-1 that is affected by the change(s) to ensure that all revisions to the DS-1 are included in the scope of the audit. This listing should also be included in the audit report as required by CAM 10-806.5, Statement of Changes. Ascertain whether the revision(s) will affect any outstanding noncompliance issues or any other current audit assignments, such as a price proposal. 9. Request assist audits, if needed. 10. Materiality is a prime consideration in determining the extent of disclosure and degree of audit effort needed to assure compliance. Considering materiality includes identifying accounting practices which have a material impact on Government contracts. If an area is not being audited in depth because of materiality considerations, the working papers should document the restricted scope. 11. Hold a planning meeting with the audit team (e.g., RAM, Manager, Supervisor, Auditors) to discuss the risk of fraud and other noncompliances with applicable laws and regulations that could have a material effect on the assertion. The discussion should include relevant prior audit experience (e.g., questioned cost, relevant reported estimating or accounting system deficiencies), relevant aspects of the contractor s environment (e.g., the extent of incentives, pressures and opportunities to commit fraud and the propensity to rationalize misstatements), other known risk factors, and the audit team s understanding of relevant internal controls (see W/P B-2). The team should also review and discuss the general and other relevant sections of the IG Handbook on Fraud Indicators for Contractors as well as the relevant fraud indicators in CAM Figure 4-7-3. See Principal Sources of Fraud Indicators below. Based on the team discussion and other risk assessment procedures the team should document on W/P B, Section 4 the risk factors/indicators identified and design audit procedures to meet the audit objectives and 3 of 8

provide reasonable assurance of detecting fraud and other noncompliances with applicable laws and regulations that could have a material effect on the proposal (i.e., tailor (add/delete/modify) the audit steps). GAGAS 6.13(a) Communication among audit team members about the risk of material misstatement due to fraud should continue as needed throughout the audit. Principle Sources of Fraud Indicators: Handbook on Fraud Indicators for Contract Auditors, Sections I and III, (IGDH 7600.3, APO March 31, 1993) located at: http://www.dodig.mil/fraud-resources/contractaudit/. CAM Figure 4-7-3. (To access the fraud handbook, copy and paste the web address shown above into the address block in Internet Explorer.) 12. Examine the ICQ or relevant ICAPS (whichever is applicable) to obtain information regarding accounting system adequacy, identify any known outstanding system deficiencies, and perform preliminary assessment of risk. Document results. 13. Using the framework and the guidelines in WP B-2, obtain and document an understanding of the contractor's internal controls that are relevant to the audit. With the proper planning auditors should be able to obtain and document a major portion of this understanding during a walk-through of the contractor's assertion. 14. Issue a notification letter to the contractor regarding the audit in accordance with CAM 4-302.3. C-1 Evaluation of Adequacy WP Reference 1. Emphasis of the audit should be on accounting practices which have a material impact on Government contracts, as identified during the risk assessment. 2. Audit D/S interrelationships are listed below to assure internal consistency: a. If item 1.4.0 is marked A or B, item 2.2.1 or 2.2.2 should be marked A, and/or item 2.5.0 should be coded D in at least one column. 4 of 8

b. Section 2.4.0 should be completed, only if line A of item 2.2.1 or 2.2.2 is marked. c. Section 2.6.0 should be completed, only if one or more columns in item 2.5.0 were marked D. d. If item 2.2.2 is marked A, B, C, D, or Y, item 3.2.1(f) must be marked with a code other than Z. e. If item 2.7.1 is marked with a code other than Z, item 3.2.3(v) should be marked D or E. f. If item 3.2.1(b) is marked other than Z, item 5.5.0(a) must be completed. g. If item 4.5.0(b) is marked A, B, C or D then item 3.2.3(l) or (m), or both (l) and (m) must be marked other than F or Z. h. If item 3.2.3(w) is marked with a code other than Z, item 6.3.0 cannot be marked Z. i. If item 4.3.0, column (3), is marked with a rate code A, item 4.4.0 cannot be marked Z. j. If item 4.6.0 is marked A, the G&A pool described in item 4.2.0 must include IR&D/B&P functions and activities. k. If item 4.6.0 is marked B, one of the pools listed in item 4.1.0 must include the IR&D/B&P pool. l. If item 3.2.2(f) is marked other than Z, item 7.1.0 cannot be marked Z. m. If item 3.2.2(g) is marked other than Z, item 7.2.0 cannot be marked Z unless the plan is reportable under item 7.3.0. n. If item 3.2.2(h) and/or (i) are marked other than Z, item 7.3.0 must be marked A. o. If item 3.2.2(j) is marked other than Z, item 7.4.0 and/or 7.5.0 must be marked A. p. If one of the lines in 7.1.0.A is marked, item 7.1.2 cannot be marked Z. q. If one of the lines in 7.1.0.B is marked except 7.1.0.B.2.b or 7.1.0.B.2.c, item 7.1.3 cannot be marked Z. r. If item 7.1.0.B.2.b or 7.1.0.B.2.c is marked, item 7.1.2 cannot be marked Z s. If item 7.2.0 is marked other than Z, items 7.2.1 and 7.2.2 must be completed. t. If item 7.3.0 is marked A, item 7.3.1 must be completed. 5 of 8

u. If item 7.4.0 is marked A, items 7.4.1 and 7.4.2 must be completed. v. If item 7.5.0 is marked A, item 7.5.1. must be completed. w. If item 7.6.0 is marked A, item 7.6.1 must be completed. x. If the submission includes Part VIII (which is only completed by a home office in accordance with Part VIII instructions), at least one of the items, 8.3.1, 8.3.2, or 8.3.3 must be completed by the home office. y. If item 8.2.0 is marked other than Z, the corresponding part(s) (ie Parts V, VI or VII) of the disclosure statement must be completed 3. Determine if the particular D/S item is adequately described (i.e., current, accurate, and complete) and document your workingpapers accordingly. This determination should first be attempted using data existing in your current files. If insufficient information exists in the files to determine the adequacy of a D/S item, then perform any additional audit steps necessary to verify the adequacy of the D/S item. a. A disclosure statement item is "current" if it describes the current accounting practices which the contractor intends to follow for estimating, accumulating and reporting costs associated with covered contracts. b. An item is "accurate" if it correctly, clearly and distinctly describes the actual method of accounting the contractor uses or intends to use on covered contracts. c. An item is "complete" if it clearly describes the cost accounting practices the contractor intends to use and gives you sufficient information to fully understand the accounting system being described. d. When a particular item is adequately described (i.e., current, accurate, and complete) mark it accordingly and cross-reference it to related audit files. 4. If the description is inadequate, document the reasons for the inadequacy. 5. If insufficient information is available to form an opinion, mark the item(s) for additional follow-up. Evaluate additional contractor records to verify the adequacy and accuracy of the accounting practice(s). 6. Examine closely for any disclosed practices which are different from established practices. The contractor may intend to make an accounting practice change. 7. Coordinate significant or unusual issues with the Supervisor or the FAO technical specialist. 6 of 8

8. Discuss with the contractor those items that you intend to recommend to the CFAO as inadequate or that may constitute an accounting practice change. 9. If part of a CAC/CHOA network, coordinate exceptions with the CAC/CHOA to assure consistent audit positions. In addition, furnish a copy of the D/S to the CAC/CHOA for consistency considerations. D-1 Evaluation of Compliance WP Reference 1. Prepare a list detailing CAS applicability dates for each standard included in the audit. 2. Survey the D/S to identify practices, which appear to be obviously noncompliant with an applicable standard or FAR including agency supplements. 3. Prepare a schedule listing each apparent noncompliance. Also, list sensitive or critical areas requiring in-depth audit, including those accounting practices which have a material impact on Government contracts, as identified during the risk assessment. Perform risk analysis and assign audit priorities. 4. Audit those described accounting practices involving significant costs or sensitive issues to determine compliance with applicable standards. Document findings, conclusions, and observations. 5. Coordinate significant or unusual issues with the supervisor and the FAO technical specialist 6. If a noncompliance issue is identified and supported, a separate assignment should be established to report and resolve the noncompliance (activity code 19200 and CAM 8-208) A-1 Concluding Steps WP Reference 1. Summarize the result of audit. 2. Discuss results with the supervisor and the FAO technical specialist. 3. Prepare draft audit report in accordance with CAM 10-806. Noncompliance issues should be reported separately in accordance with CAM 10-808. 7 of 8

4. Hold an exit conference with the contractor and provide a draft report to the contractor for comments in accordance with CAM 4-304. 5. Finalize audit report incorporating the contractor s reaction and auditor s response, if applicable. 6. Update the permanent files, e.g., ICAPS or SHORTICQ, and Mandatory Annual Audit Requirements (MAARs) schedules, as appropriate. 8 of 8