Genome wide association and genomic selection to speed up genetic improvement for meat quality in Hanwoo

Similar documents
The what, why and how of Genomics for the beef cattle breeder

Genomic selection applies to synthetic breeds

Strategy for Applying Genome-Wide Selection in Dairy Cattle

Practical integration of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes

Genomic selection in the Australian sheep industry

National Genetic Evaluation (System) of Hanwoo (Korean Native Cattle)

BLUP and Genomic Selection

Genomic Postcard from Dairy Cattle Breeding GUDP Project. Søren Borchersen, Head R&D VikingGenetics

Breeding Objectives Indicate Value of Genomics for Beef Cattle M. D. MacNeil, Delta G

Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle

Genetics Effective Use of New and Existing Methods

Fundamentals of Genomic Selection

Traditional Genetic Improvement. Genetic variation is due to differences in DNA sequence. Adding DNA sequence data to traditional breeding.

QTL Mapping, MAS, and Genomic Selection

Application of MAS in French dairy cattle. Guillaume F., Fritz S., Boichard D., Druet T.

The economics of using DNA markers for bull selection in the beef seedstock sector A.L. Van Eenennaam 1, J.H. van der Werf 2, M.E.

New Limousin Genomic Breeding Values (GEBVS) Delivering s value for commercial producers

Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.

Genomic selection in cattle industry: achievements and impact

Value of DNA information for beef bull selection

TSB Collaborative Research: Utilising i sequence data and genomics to improve novel carcass traits in beef cattle

How might DNA-based information generate value in the beef cattle sector?

Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist

The promise of genomics for animal improvement. Daniela Lourenco

Developments in the Genetic Improvement of a Large Commercial Population in the New Zealand Sheep Industry

João Dürr Interbull Centre Director. Animal identification and traceability Interbull s s and Interbeef s perspectives

Genomic Selection in Beef Ireland Francis Kearney ICBF

Use of New Breeding Techniques applied to cattle

Collecting Abattoir Carcase Information

Strategic Research Center. Genomic Selection in Animals and Plants

WAGYU BREEDOBJECT $INDEXES TECHNICAL UPDATE

Genomic selection and its potential to change cattle breeding

Bull Selection Strategies Using Genomic Estimated Breeding Values

Using Genomics to Improve the Genetic Potential and Management of Your Herd

11/30/2018. Introduction to Genomic Selection OUTLINE. 1. What is different between pedigree based and genomic selection? 2.

2010 Annual Research Report

Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle

The role and power of ultrasound in predicting marbling

The use of multi-breed reference populations and multi-omic data to maximize accuracy of genomic prediction

REDUCED SNP PANELS creation, realistic expectations, and use in different livestock industries

Implementation of Genomic Selection in Pig Breeding Programs

Genetic Evaluations. Stephen Scott Canadian Hereford Association

Angus BREEDPLAN GETTING STARTED

Introduction to Animal Breeding & Genomics

Addressing the Phenomic Gap: Next generation genomic tools in beef

Multi-breed Genomic Evaluations for 1 million Beef Cattle in Ireland. A.R. Cromie, R.D. Evans, J F Kearney, M. McClure, J. McCarthy and D.P.

Developing a Large Scale Data Platform. Dr Rod Polkinghorne, OAM

The potential of genotyping pooled DNA to leverage commercial phenotypes for genetic improvement of beef cattle

Current situation and future prospects for beef production in South Korea A review

Goal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction

The benefits of genotyping at farm level & the impact across the wider dairy herd in Ireland. Kevin Downing 27 th October, 2016

Where is Dairy Cattle Breeding Going? A Vision of the Future

Application of Carcass Ultrasound in Beef Production. T. Dean Pringle Animal and Dairy Science University of Georgia

Development and implementation of genomic methods in beef cattle genetic improvement in Australia. Rob Banks (AGBU) Alex McDonald (ABRI)

Implementation of dairy cattle breeding policy in Ethiopia some reflections on complementary strategies

What could the pig sector learn from the cattle sector. Nordic breeding evaluation in dairy cattle

Canadian Hereford Association

Genetics to meet pastoral farming requirements in the 2020 s a dairy perspective. Phil Beatson, R&D Manager CRV Ambreed

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXII Nov. 29, 30 and Dec. 1, 2011, Mitchell, NE. IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKER ASSISTED EPDs

Beef genetics for accelerated economic growth

2018 ICBF and Sheep Ireland Genetics Conference 20 th Anniversary. Dorian Garrick

Marker Assisted Selection Where, When, and How. Lecture 18

Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.

LowInputBreeds & Genomic breeding

The use of multi-breed reference populations and multi-omic data to maximize accuracy of genomic prediction

PG Technicians Tully Visit 24 th /25 th Oct 2017

GENOTYPING OF COWS TO SPEED UP THE AVAILABILITY OF GEBVS

Subproject 1: Dairy cattle

The Irish Experience; DQI, breeding programs and genetic evaluations.

Genomic Selection in Sheep Breeding Programs

Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.

Obiettivi e recenti acquisizioni del progetto di ricerca SelMol

Application of Modern Genetic Technologies to Improve Efficiency of Pig Production and Pork Quality

2/22/2012. Impact of Genomics on Dairy Cattle Breeding. Basics of the DNA molecule. Genomic data revolutionize dairy cattle breeding

ECONOMICS OF USING DNA MARKERS FOR SORTING FEEDLOT CATTLE Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs using genomic selection

Breeding for Profit from Beef Production ( )

15. Breeding Program Design Principles

Overview. 50,000 Markers on a Chip. Definitions. Problem: Whole Genome Selection Project Involving 2,000 Industry A.I. Sires

Genomic selection for sheep and beef systems, dispelling the myths for farmers. Dewi Jones January 2016

Dr. Gatot Ciptadi. Fac. Of Animal Husbandry, UB. gatotciptadi.lecture.ub.ac.id. Dr.Gatot Ciptadi,Fac.Of Anim.

The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs

B+LNZ GENETICS BEEF BREEDER UPDATE

SNP production markers and how genomic technologies will influence breeding decisions. Elisa Marques, PhD GeneSeek, a Neogen Company

Profiting from Information Management and Genomics

Dr. Gatot Ciptadi. Fac. Of Animal Husbandry, UB. gatotciptadi.lecture.ub.ac.id.

The new infrastructure for cattle and sheep breeding in Ireland.

New Zealand Hereford Selection Indexes

Breeding your cows for genetic gain. Max Tweedie, B+LNZ Genetics

Applications of Genomics Introduction of genomics selection procedures in existing genetic improvement programmes

WHETHER dealing with a commercial

Longhorn Cattle Performance Recording

ABACUSBIO LIMITED BRIDGING SCIENCE & BUSINESS

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL SCIENCE

Genomics selection in livestock ILRI ICARDA Perspectives

EPD Info 1/5. Guide to the American Gelbvieh Association Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Single-step genomic BLUP for national beef cattle evaluation in US: from initial developments to final implementation

The Data Which Breeders May Collect For BREEDPLAN Analysis Includes: Flight time (from bail head to light beam)

(530) Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology and Genomics. animalscience.ucdavis.edu/animalbiotech

Transcription:

Genome wide association and genomic selection to speed up genetic improvement for meat quality in Hanwoo Seung Hwan Lee, PhD Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA 1

National Institute of Animal Science, RDA Department of Animal Biotechnology & Environment Seoul Pyungchang Hanwoo Exp. Station Animal Genetic Resources Station Suwon Seongwhan Namwon Department of Animal Resources Development Jeju Subtropical Anim Exp Station 2

Genomic Networking in NIAS, RDA Genetic Improvement National Breeding Program Planning, strategy of breeding program Development of Breeding tools Optimization of Breeding program Delivery Genomics into Breeding Animal Genome & Bioinformatics Genome project for Livestock Bioinformatics Development of Genomic tools QTL, GWAS, GS model Hanwoo Experiment Station Evaluation of GS model Validation of QTL, GWAS etc Line breeding 3

Statistics for Hanwoo Industry Location farm % Head % Whole country 165,420 3,034,812 Seoul 5 0 108 0 Busan 111 0.07 2,203 0.1 Daegu 1,106 0.67 19,728 0.7 Incheon 423 0.26 15,771 0.5 GwangJu 313 0.19 7,167 0.2 Daejeon 240 0.15 5,902 0.2 Ulsan 1,901 1.15 28,927 1 Gyeonggi 6,940 4.2 212,000 7.3 Gangwon 12,996 7.86 225,899 7.8 Chungbuk 10,114 6.11 184,387 6.3 Chungnam 21,376 12.92 391,808 13.5 Jeonbuk 15,099 9.13 357,163 12.3 Jeonnam 33,607 20.32 521,716 18 Gyeongbuk 35,405 21.4 580,394 20 Gyeongnam 25,180 15.22 322,142 11.1 Jeju 604 0.37 29,497 1 3 million head (total) 1.3 million head (Cow) 165,420 farm Incheon Gyeonggi Chungnam Seoul Daejeon Jeonbuk Gwangju Jeonnam Jeju-do Chungbuk Gangwon Gyeongbuk Daegu Ulsan Gyeongnam Busan 4

Hanwoo Supply Chain Government Funding Seed Stock MIFAFF -> NIAS + NACF (1,000 cows) Breeding farms (Registered 75 farms with 100 cows, total 8,000 cows) Performance and Progeny testing Selection of bulls, selling a semen straw by NACF Multipliers Feedlot sector Production of calves Feedlot farms (average 16.5 heads) some of them are large scale but most of all are very small scale Beef supply chain Beef Grading system Beef Palatability system MIFAFF: Ministry for food, agriculture, Forestry and Fishery NACF: National Agricultural Cooperative Federation NIAS: National Institute of Animal Science KAPE : Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation AIAK : Korea Animal Improvement Association 5

Bull selection in Seed Stock Sector Elite Bull Elite Cows NACF (1,000 cows) Breeding farms (8,000 cows) Young Bulls (700 heads) Purchasing from breeding farms 28 Months Candidate Bulls(55 heads) Performance Testing at 6 and 12Months Growth trait Progeny testing Hanwoo farms (2,500 head) Breeding farms (800 heads) 750 heads 38 Months Total 5.5 years NACF (400 heads) Breeding farms (100 heads) KPN Bulls (20 heads) Carcass measurement at 24 months and Genetic Evaluation 2.2 million straw 6

Trends in Korean Hanwoo Carcass traits It is very successful!!! ~10kg/10yr ~3cm 2 /10yr ~0.5/10yr 7

What is advantages of genomics in Hanwoo breeding? More genetic gain in a short time Reduce generation interval, Increased EBV Effective breeding program Open nucleus system Benefit for New traits to breeding program Low heritability traits Traits that are hard to measure(eg, feed efficient etc) Benefit for reducing inbreeding Own information rather than family information 8

Benefits of SNPs in Animal Breeding Phenotypes GEBVs Pedigree Imputation Check/reconstruct pedigree SNPs 9

This talk Genetic architecture of carcass traits in Hanwoo Accuracy of Genomic breeding value Requirement of accurate GEBV Effective pop size Num of SNPs Num of ref. pop size 10

Distribution of gene effects vs Models 11

Genome wide association study to understand the Genetic Architecture of carcass traits Reference population (n=1,012) consisting of steers from progeny testing: Reference pop for GWAS (n=1,012) Sire =118, dam = 995 Steers genotyped with 50K MS, CWT, EMA and BF 12

Genome wide association for Carcass weight 13

SNP effect (Vg) SNP effect (Vp) 16kg 38kg 356kg 14

Back Fat Thickness 15

Eye muscle area 16

Marbling score 17

This talk Genetic architecture of carcass traits in Hanwoo Accuracy of Genomic breeding value Requirement of accurate GEBV Effective pop size Num of SNPs Num of ref. pop size 18

19 육종가표현형혈통통계모델 (BLUP) 유전자형 G -1 GBLUP = = = = ) (1 2 ' ) (1 2 ) ( ' ) ( 2 2 2 2 i i a i i u u a p p zz G p p G g Var zz g Var σ σ σ σ

Genomic Selection_Prediction of GEBVs Reference pop vs Validation set Reference population (n=1,011) consisting of steers from progeny testing Val set 1 (n=106) consisting of KPN bulls of steers in ref pop Val set 2 (n=178) consisting of progeny without obs Val set 3 (n=236) consisting of Line breeding in Hanwoo station Sire =118, dam = 995 Reference pop (n=1,011) Steers genotyped by 50K IMF, MS, CWT, EMA and BF KPN1 KPN2 KPN3 Progeny tested pop Genomic Prediction GBLUP Val set 1(n=106) Candidate bull for progeny Val set 2(n=178) Progeny without obs Val set 3(n=236) Bull and female for line breeding in Hanwoo station 20

Accuracy of GEBV Traits BLUP GBLUP Diff. Sire without obs. (n = 106) EMA 0.71(0.12) 0.72(0.11) 0.01 BF 0.75(0.13) 0.76(0.12) 0.01 MS 0.75(0.13) 0.76(0.12) 0.01 Progeny without obs.(n=178) EMA 0.30(0.03) 0.35(0.04) 0.04 BF 0.32(0.03) 0.37(0.04) 0.06 MS 0.32(0.03) 0.38(0.04) 0.06 Hanwoo station females without obs. (n=236) EMA 0.11(0.08) 0.29(0.07) 0.18 BF 0.11(0.08) 0.30(0.11) 0.19 MS 0.11(0.08) 0.27(0.12) 0.16 21

This talk Genetic architecture of carcass traits in Hanwoo Accuracy of Genomic breeding value Requirement of accurate GEBV Effective pop size Num of SNPs Num of ref. pop size 22

Linkage disequilibrium vs Effective pop size 23

Num of SNPs Num of SNPs that is required to get accurate GEBV 10NeL *Ne : Num of Effective pop. Size, *L : Length of the genome in Morgan 200000 Num of SNPs 150000 100000 50000 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 Ne 24

Ref. Pop vs Accuracy of GEBV Mike Goddard Equation r = 1 λ /(2N 1+ a + 2 a)*ln( 1+ a 2 a ) a Accuracy 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 100 Ne h2 0.3 100 Ne h2 0.4 100 Ne h2 0.5 200 Ne h2 0.3 200 Ne h2 0.4 200 Ne h2 0.5 0.1 0 1 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 Number of Reference Population 25

Summary Technically Genomic selection for complex traits w ork well in Dairy cattle and can be used in Hanwoo Very similar breeding scheme Reference population Large reference population (Bulls or Steers) Phenotypes involved in Breeding goal Genotypes (50K or 700K) 26

Research Collaboration with EMBRAPA Imputation of whole genome sequence for individual using Key sire group with WGS Development of Bioinformatics system Development of statistical model for GS Pipeline for GS model Optimization of GS model to Breeding program Controlling Inbreeding More genetic Gains Maintain genetic diversity etc. 27