SAMPLE. Weingart Foundation Grantee Survey INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
Common Recommendations to Improve Nonprofits and Their Order of Implementation

Demonstrates strong alignment of vision, mission, strategic plan, programs and partnerships. Demonstrates moderate reach of

How it works: Questions from the OCAT 2.0

The Philadelphia Foundation

Executive Director Evaluation

UWGA IMPACT FUND ASSESSMENT TOOL

Nonprofit Organizational Assessment Tool

Advisory Board Members: Sample Board Evaluation Best Buddies Board Evaluation

Resource Library Banque de ressources

ADVANCING PARTNERS & COMMUNITIES. Organizational Capacity Assessment Tool

Chair Job Description

Incentives in Not-for-Profits: A Review of Basic Principles. JER HR Group, LLC

Millennial Employee Engagement in the Workplace. May 24, 2017 American Fraternal Alliance Spring Symposium

Seven Core Competencies of a Sustainable Fundraising Program

BOARD SELF-EVALUATION TOOL

Nonprofit Board Evaluation Form

NONPROFIT SURVEY WINTER 2017/2018

Reporting to the Board of Directors, the Executive Director is responsible for the overall successful leadership and management of the agency..

Overview of the Internship Program for Mentors/Site Supervisors Lindenwood University NPA Majors

PROMPT OAS Assessment Process

Program Review Self-Study Guidance Administrative Units

Central East LHIN Organizational Health Self Assessment Tool

Center for Work Education and Employment CEO Position Guide

AmeriCorps Volunteer Programs Volunteer Program Needs & Purpose Worksheet

West Virginia Nonprofit Association

Standards for Excellence Program Organizational Self-Assessment Checklist

2018 ASSOCIATION SALARIES and STAFFING TRENDS REPORT

The School District of Lee County Division of Operations

Principles of Effectiveness Worksheet Instructions:

STRATEGIC PLAN

NASW-PA Board of Directors Job Descriptions

GARNER POLICE ATHLETIC/ ACTIVITIES LEAGUE STRATEGIC PLAN

Executive Director: Annual Evaluation

Advocacy Capacity Tool for organizational assessment

Risk assessment checklist - Not-for-Profit governance

PROMPT OAS Assessment Process

FY19-21 Core Investment Cycle Application Questions

SUSTAINABILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL

STRATEGIC PLANNING. High Divide Workshops Dillon, Montana February 5, Don Elder, TREC

TCC Group s. Foundation Core Capacity Assessment Tool (FCCAT) Report for. 123 Foundation

Job Fact Sheet 1) POSITION IDENTIFICATION. President & Chief Executive Officer. Job Number ADM 01. Date JFS Created April 2011

Nonprofit Sustainability Survey: Final Report. Nonprofit Sustainability Survey: Final Report. Section 1 of 3

JB+A Board Evaluation Tool

POSITION DESCRIPTION MEMBER BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Society of Animal Welfare Administrators 2018 Management Conference

The Mentoring Collaborative of Montgomery County AmeriCorps Program Host Site Application

CORE RESOURCE: REPLICATION APPLICATION ADDENDUM

Special thanks to the Gulf Coast Community Foundation for making their board self-assessment tool available to the Greater Waco Community.

Sample questions for a development audit

Competency Model. Level B. Level C Applies to: Manager Coordinator. Applies to: Assistant Vice President Assistant Dean Director

United Way of Kankakee & Iroquois Counties Job Description Executive Director

NONPROFIT BOARD GOVERNANCE WORKSHOPS

Texas Standards for High Quality Afterschool, Summer and Expanded Learning Programs Assessment Tool

Selecting the most appropriate review scales in 360 degree assessments. part of our series of Tools

Education Liaison: The Performance Evaluation Process (PEP)

THE STATE OF INTERMEDIARY-LED PRO BONO A 2014 REPORT

Evaluation of the Kansas City Regional Health Care Initiative: Executive Summary

Minnesota Literacy Council AmeriCorps VISTA. New Project Application

PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS, INC. (PVI) PENINSULA VOLUNTEER PROPERTIES, INC. (PVP) Executive Director

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & STAFF EVALUATION

Elected Official and Governing Board Self-Evaluation Tool

Action Planning Workbook

Request for Proposal Strategic Planning Process and Facilitation

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR POSITION ANNOUNCEMENT THE OPPORTUNITY. Council on Islamic Relations (CAIR), Washington

NATIONAL INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ASSOCIATION YOUTH BOARD MEMBER JOB DESCRIPTION

Tools and Techniques for Effective CAA Board Leadership. Today s Agenda

CalSERVES AmeriCorps VIP Partner Site Volunteer Capacity Assessment Submission

CalSERVES AmeriCorps VIP Partner Site Volunteer Capacity Assessment Submission

Board to Death. Cafe TAC

OPPORTUNITY PROFILE Chief Executive Officer

Governance Models: What s Right for Your Board By Nathan Garber, Nathan Garber & Associates

YAVAPAI BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS (YBBBS) CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

2019 BOARD OF DIRECTORS INFORMATION & NOMINATION FORM

Ten top tips for winning tenders

Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service

Planning for Sustainability. Toolkit

Achieving Organizational Readiness to Maximize the Impact of Skills-Based Volunteering. June 12, 2017

Q1 The Board intentionally recruits new Board members with skills/expertise

North Okanagan Youth and Family Services Society (NOYFSS) Strategic Plan

Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT)

ICANN Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC) Review Work Party. RSSAC2 Review Feasibility Assessment & Initial Implementation Plan

Concept of Operations. Disaster Cycle Services Program Essentials DCS WC OPS PE

Organizational Capacity for Engagement Survey

MADFA JOB ADVERTISEMENT

Board Governance Road Map. CBO Sustainability Project - Governance Task Team

STRATEGIC PLAN Our Mission

Strategic Planning in Nonprofits (SPiN)

IPMA-CANADA INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM IPMA-CP (IN TRAINING) IPMA-CP IPMA-ACP IPMA-EX IPMA-CE

Lethbridge Destination Management Organization. Position Profile

Scavenger Hunt Sheet A

SUMMARY. Organizational Self-Assessment Tool SUMMARY. Agreement Priority. Dimensions. Funder: Number of Respondents: 9

Effective Governance in the Fraternal Community: A Report to Fraternity Executives Association

Finance Division Strategic Plan

The superintendent routinely considers school or corporation goals when making personnel decisions.

PSBA Standards Effective School Governance

Document 3: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Draft FY19 Key Projects and Activities. ICANN 19 January 2018

GRANT PROPOSAL: Part Two

7 Tips for Reviewing Your Volunteers and Volunteer Programs

GUIDE TO GIVING Civil Legal Assistance

IT MANAGER - BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS (12235) ( )

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION The grantee survey is an opportunity for the Foundation s nonprofit partners to reflect on their accomplishments, challenges and lessons learned. The Foundation will use this information to deepen its understanding about organizational effectiveness in the nonprofit organizations it supports and, when applicable, to inform the future application process for repeat grantees. - The survey will be administered online at the end of every unrestricted operating support grant, and should be completed by the Executive Director, Chief Operating Officer, or equivalent. It should be possible to complete in a single sitting without having to reference other documents, although some of the finance-related items may require consultation with finance staff and/or financial documents. - The online survey incorporates the existing final report narrative questions along with additional items about key functional areas (listed below) and core programs. Together, the functional areas represent what the Weingart Foundation believes are key components of overall organizational effectiveness. While some of these topics may not be directly related to an organization s original grant objectives, the Foundation is interested in learning about all of these areas for all organizations. This survey is also an opportunity for grantees to reflect on a range of topics related to organizational effectiveness, whether those areas are directly related to their Weingart grant objectives or not. - The survey will be complemented by an in-depth conversation between the grantee and the program officer that will allow them to engage more fully in the process of organizational learning and to explore any outstanding issues raised in the survey. The grantee survey consists of the following sections: I. Organization information II. Organizational goals III. Functional areas: 1) Board Governance and Engagement 5) Client/Constituent Engagement 2) Financial Operations and Management 6) Diversity 3) Fund Development 7) Cultural Competence 4) Staff and Infrastructure 8) Organizational Strategy and Adaptability. IV. Core Programs 1

Organization Information * Please complete the following information Contact Name: Organization Name: Contact Email Address: Contact Phone Number: ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS Please answer the following questions about the organizational goals that you set out to accomplish at the beginning of this grant. The Foundation recognizes that some grants, despite being well conceived and executed, will not achieve the desired results. Information about approaches that have not succeeded is also important and valuable to the Foundation. * a. Please describe any ways that your organizational goals have changed since the beginning of this grant. b. In the sections provided below, please list each goal you set to accomplish at the beginning of this grant as articulated in your original grant application. You must enter at least one goal. * Enter goal #1: 2

* How much progress did your organization make on this goal? Fully accomplished Mostly accomplished Somewhat accomplished Not at all accomplished Please explain: Enter goal #2: How much progress did your organization make on this goal? Fully accomplished Mostly accomplished Please explain: Somewhat accomplished Not at all accomplished Enter goal #3: How much progress did your organization make on this goal? Fully accomplished Somewhat accomplished Mostly accomplished Please explain: Not at all accomplished Enter goal #4: 3

How much progress did your organization make on this goal? Fully accomplished Mostly accomplished Somewhat accomplished Not at all accomplished Please explain: Enter goal #5: How much progress did your organization make on this goal? Fully accomplished Mostly accomplished Please explain: Somewhat accomplished Not at all accomplished * c. Please describe any challenges and/or anything unexpected that you encountered in trying to accomplish these organizational goals. d. What did you do to address those challenges? FUNCTIONAL AREAS 4

The following sets of questions are about key functional areas for nonprofit organizations. Within each functional area, please indicate: 1. the frequency with which you engage in the activities listed, or how often each statement is true for your organization 2. your assessment of your organization s overall capacity in that area 3. the extent to which your grant from the Weingart Foundation impacted your organization's capacity in that area. 1) FUNCTIONAL AREA - BOARD GOVERNANCE AND ENGAGEMENT * Board Governance and Engagement a. Board members attend and actively participate in regular board meetings. b. Our board has active and relevant committees. c. Board members participate in fundraising activities and make personally meaningful contributions to our organization. d. We have a clear strategy for recruiting new board members with relevant skills and backgrounds. e. Our board understands, reviews, and approves budgets and financial statements. f. Our board formally reviews and evaluates our Executive Director at least annually. g. The roles of the board and Executive Director are clearly defined and respected. h. New board members are oriented to the organization, including our mission, bylaws, policies, programs, key stakeholders. Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never N/A i. Board members participate in ongoing training (e.g., fund development, roles and responsibilities, financial analysis). If N/A selected please explain 5

* j. Overall, how would you rate your organization s capacity in the area of BOARD GOVERNANCE AND ENGAGEMENT? 1 We have a clear need for increased capacity in this area 2 We are getting by in this area, and there is some room for improvement 3 We are functioning well in this area 4 We go above and beyond the items listed here * k. Overall, to what extent did your grant from the Weingart Foundation impact your organization s capacity in the area of BOARD GOVERNANCE AND ENGAGEMENT? N/A (not a focus during grant period) l. Comments: 2) FUNCTIONAL AREA - FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT * Financial Operations and Management Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never N/A a. We track and report financial activities to board and staff management. b. Key staff and board members review regular updates on our organization's financial health. c. We have access to loans, reserves, and/or working capital to manage cash flow (e.g., to make payroll). d. Financial operations are carried out in alignment with budgeting, decision-making, and organizational goals. e. We have written systems and controls that govern financial operations. If N/A selected please explain 6

* f. Overall, how would you rate your organization s capacity in the area of FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT 1 We have a clear need for increased capacity in this area 2 We are getting by in this area, and there is some room for improvement 3 We are functioning well in this area 4 We go above and beyond the items listed here * g. Overall, to what extent did your grant from the Weingart Foundation impact your organization s capacity in the area of FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT? N/A (not a key focus during grant period) h. Comments: 3) FUNCTIONAL AREA - FUND DEVELOPMENT * Fund Development a. We have an appropriate funding model or structure in place that supports core infrastructure and programs and is integrated into our organization s long-term budget projections. b. Has sufficient capacity from staff and/or volunteers to implement fund development activities. Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never N/A c. We have a staff person (other than the ED/CEO) whose primary responsibility is fund development. d. We use up-to-date results from fundraising efforts to inform planning and implementation. If N/A please explain 7

* e. Overall, how would you rate your organization s capacity in the area of FUND DEVELOPMENT? 1 We have a clear need for increased capacity in this area 2 We are getting by in this area, and there is some room for improvement 3 We are functioning well in this area 4 We go above and beyond the items listed here * f. Overall, to what extent did your grant from the Weingart Foundation impact your organization s capacity in the area of FUND DEVELOPMENT? N/A (not a focus during grant period) g. Comments: 4) FUNCTIONAL AREA - STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE * Staff and Infrastructure a. Our current staffing structure allows us to effectively do our administrative work. Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never N/A b. Our staffing structure allows us to effectively do our programming work. c. Our staffing size allows us to effectively do our administrative work. d. Our staffing size allows us to effectively do our programming work. e. We provide and/or support ongoing staff development opportunities, including for our Executive Director. f. Staff turnover is a problem for our organization. g. We have the technology and information systems in place that are necessary to operate efficiently and effectively. If N/A please explain 8

* h. Overall, how would you rate your organization s capacity in the area of STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE? 1 We have a clear need for increased capacity in this area 2 We are getting by in this area, and there is some room for improvement 3 We are functioning well in this area 4 We go above and beyond the items listed here * i. Overall, to what extent did your grant from the Weingart Foundation impact your organization s capacity in the area of STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE? N/A (not a focus during grant period) j. Comments: 5) FUNCTIONAL AREA - CLIENT/CONSTITUENT ENGAGEMENT * Client/Constituent Engagement Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never N/A a. We solicit feedback from clients /constituents. b. We have mechanisms in place to seek and incorporate client/constituent input on key decisions (e.g., advisory groups, needs assessments). c. We have staff position(s) that include client/constituent engagement activities. If N/A please explain 9

* d. Overall, how would you rate your organization s capacity in the area of CLIENT/CONSTITUENT ENGAGEMENT? 1 We have a clear need for increased capacity in this area 2 We are getting by in this area, and there is some room for improvement 3 We are functioning well in this area 4 We go above and beyond the items listed here * e. Overall, to what extent did your grant from the Weingart Foundation impact your organization s capacity in the area of CLIENT/CONSTITUENT ENGAGEMENT? N/A (not a focus during grant period) f. Comments: 6) FUNCTIONAL AREA - DIVERSITY * Diversity Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never N/A a. We have staff who reflect the diversity of people and key interests the organization serves. b. We have recruiting processes that encourage diverse candidates to apply for staff positions. c. We have board members who reflect the diversity of people and key interests the organization serves. If N/A please explain 10

* d. Overall, how would you rate your organization s capacity in the area of DIVERSITY? 1 We have a clear need for increased capacity in this area 2 We are getting by in this area, and there is some room for improvement 3 We are functioning well in this area 4 We go above and beyond the items listed here * e. Overall, to what extent did your grant from the Weingart Foundation impact your organization s capacity in the area of DIVERSITY? N/A (not a focus during grant period) f. Comments: 7) FUNCTIONAL AREA - CULTURAL COMPETENCE * Cultural Competence a. Our services are responsive to the cultural needs of clients/consumers/constituents. Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never N/A b. We make outreach and communication materials available in the primary language(s) spoken by stakeholders. c. We provide training in cultural competence to our staff. If N/A please explain 11

* d. Overall, how would you rate your organization s capacity in the area of CULTURAL COMPETENCE? 1 - We have a clear need for increased capacity in this area 2 - We are getting by in this area, and there is some room for improvement 3 - We are functioning well in this area 4 - We go above and beyond the items listed here * e. Overall, to what extent did your grant from the Weingart Foundation impact your organization s capacity in the area of CULTURAL COMPETENCE? N/A (not a key focus during grant period) f. Comments: 8) FUNCTIONAL AREA - ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY AND ADAPTABILITY 12

* Organizational Strategy and Adaptability Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never N/A a. We have an organizational strategy for achieving our goals and objectives that is developed and actively used by staff and board. b. We periodically review our vision, mission, and major programs to analyze opportunities and challenges, strengths and weaknesses. c. We anticipate challenges in advance and consider different scenarios for responding to them. d. Board members participate in strategic/organizational planning on a regular basis. e. Our budget allocations are realistic and based on mission, strategies and goals. f. Evaluation processes are integrated into program activities and used to inform our work. g. We engage with others (e.g., partnerships, advocacy activities) when necessary in order to advance our mission. If N/A please explain * h. Overall, how would you rate your organization s capacity in the area of ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY AND ADAPTABILITY? 1 We have a clear need for increased capacity in this area 2 We are getting by in this area, and there is some room for improvement 3 We are functioning well in this area 4 We go above and beyond the items listed here * i. Overall, to what extent did your grant from the Weingart Foundation impact your organization s capacity in the area of ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY AND ADAPTABILITY? N/A (not a key focus during grant period) j. Comments: 13

CORE PROGRAMS The Weingart Foundation is also interested in learning about your organization s approach to its core programming. Please select the most appropriate response to the questions below. * Core Programs a. To what extent has the demand (or need) for your organization s services or programs changed during the grant term? b. To what extent has your organization s level of activity or service (number of clients served, enhanced program capacity, etc.) changed in the past two years? c. To what extent has the effectiveness of your organization s services or programs changed over the past two years? Decreased significantly Decreased moderately Stayed about the same Increased moderately * d. To what extent have the types of work your organization engages in changed in the past two years? Stayed more or less the same Changed moderately Changed significantly Please briefly explain your responses: Increased significantly 14

Please indicate to what extent you agree with the following statement: As a result of our most recent unrestricted operating support grant from the Weingart Foundation, we are better equipped to address the needs of low-income and underserved individuals. Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Please briefly explain your response: Optional: Is there anything else you want the Foundation to know about your organization? Financial Statements We will need to access financial statements from your most recently completed fiscal year. Please upload this document to your organization's GuideStar nonprofit profile. 15