COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) GUIDELINE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR VACCINE ANTIGEN MASTER FILE (VAMF) CERTIFICATION

Similar documents
Guideline on. Plasma Master File (PMF) And. Vaccine Antigen Master File (VAMF) Second Step

Explanatory note on fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

Revision of the Variations Regulation. Key Principles and Guidelines Development CONTENT

Guideline on the processing of renewals in the centralised procedure

Guideline on the processing of renewals in the centralised procedure

Phasing-in EU procedures: MRP and referrals September 23, 2003

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE PAEDIATRIC REGULATION (REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL (EC) No 1901/2006, AS AMENDED)

Explanatory note on fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) POSITION PAPER ON COMPLIANCE WITH PHARMACOVIGILANCE REGULATORY OBLIGATIONS

Official Journal C 223. of the European Union. Information and Notices. Information. Volume 56 2 August English edition

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)

Guidelines. of

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

CMDh Best Practice Guide on the processing of renewals in the Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures

VICH Topic GL29. at Step 7 GUIDELINE ON PHARMACOVIGILANCE OF VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS. MANAGEMENT OF PERIODIC SUMMARY UPDATE REPORTS (PSUs)

CMD(h) GUIDANCE FOR MAHs ON THE PHARMACOVIGILANCE SYSTEM AND RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN IN THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION & DECENTRALISED PROCEDURES

Marketing Authorisation Routes in the EU

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON MRP & DCP AND EU ENLARGEMENT

Preparing for the withdrawal is therefore not just a matter for EU and national authorities, but also for private parties.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL QUESTIONS. and ANSWERS

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CVMP)

GxP Inspections within the Centralised Procedure. Brendan Cuddy Inspections Sector

European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use

Performance indicators for the EMEA in 2003

INTRODUCTION OF FEES TO BE CHARGED BY THE EMA FOR PHARMACOVIGILANCE

PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING PHARMACOVIGILANCE INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE CVMP. Ad Hoc PhV Inspectors Working Group

An analysis of quality product defects in the centralised procedure

COMMITTEE FOR THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Adoption by CHMP for release for 3-month public consultation 18 November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 28 February 2011

Pre-accession product information linguistic review process (PALC III)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) DRAFT GUIDELINE ON THE NON-CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF FIXED COMBINATIONS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Chapter 28 Pharmaceutical acquis (human and veterinary medicinal products)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) PAEDIATRIC COMMITTEE (PDCO) COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC)

Report from EMA industry survey on Brexit preparedness

Medicinal Products for Human Use. May 2008

Q/A-LIST FOR THE SUBMISSION OF VARIATIONS ACCORDING TO COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) 1234/2008

Variation Regulations (EU)

CMDh STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE ON THE PROCESSING OF PSUR SINGLE ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR NATIONALLY AUTHORISED PRODUCTS

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS ON SUBMISSIONS of PSURs UNDER THE EU PSUR WORK SHARING SCHEME. Version 10 November 2009

GxP Inspections within the Centralised Procedure

European Medicines Agency policy on changes in scope of paediatric investigation plan (PIP) decisions

European Medicines Agency Inspections

Marketing Authorisation Procedures in Europe: A Regulatory Perspective

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIVE SUBSTANCES IN PART II OF THE DOSSIER

Adoption by CHMP for release for 3-month public consultation 18 November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 28 February 2011

Title: Processing pharmacovigilance data in renewal procedures for centrally authorised medicinal products for veterinary use

Applying for EU marketing authorisation. For medicinal products for human use. An agency of the European Union

Guidance on preparing for Brexit in the centralised procedure

Regulatory Considerations and Trends Europe and the U.S.

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)

Implementation strategy of ICH Q3D guideline

URGENT SAFETY RESTRICTION MEMBER STATE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Guidelines on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products

Advanced Therapies Regulation Introduction & Implementation

VOLUME 2A Procedures for marketing authorisation CHAPTER 2 Mutual Recognition. February 2007

EMA/CMDh EXPLANATORY NOTES ON VARIATION APPLICATION FORM (Human medicinal products only)

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS. VOLUME 6B Presentation and content of the dossier-part 1 Summary of the dossier Part 1A Application form OCTOBER 2008

Brexit Guidance for Stakeholders Human and veterinary medicines

Standard operating procedure

How are medicines evaluated at the EMA

Re : EC Consultation Paper Revision of the variations regulations

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

APPLICATION FOR VARIATION TO A MARKETING AUTHORISATION

Roles and responsibilities of members and alternates, rapporteur and peer reviewers, experts and observers of the Paediatric Committee (PDCO)

European Medicines Agency Inspections

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE NON-CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF FIXED COMBINATIONS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

PRESS RELEASE. The Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) held its 61 st 27 June 2000 to 29 June 2000.

Module 1: Administrative information Application form

Guidelines on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Guide to Fees for Veterinary Products

Monthly statistics report: December 2017

The procedure of Certification of Suitability to the Monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia (CEP) and the EDQM Inspection Programme

Monthly statistics report: November 2016

Medicinal Products for Human Use. September 2015

The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Work Programme 2003

Medicinal Products for Human Use. VOLUME 2B Module 1.2: Administrative information Application form. February 2018

VOLUME 9 - PHARMACOVIGILANCE. Medicinal Products for Human and Veterinary Use

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS. VOLUME 6B Presentation and content of the dossier-part 1 Summary of the dossier Part 1A Application form.

European Medicines Agency practical guidance on the application form for centralised type IA and IB variations

European Medicines Agency post-authorisation procedural advice for users of the centralised procedure

Work plan for the CHMP Biologics Working Party (BWP) 2011

Introductory cover note to the List of European Union reference dates and frequency of submission of Periodic Safety Update Reports

Report from the Paediatric Committee on its first anniversary

Clinical Development and enabling Regulatory Steps: How to obtain ODD and Scientific Advice at EMA

EMA Comments on Implementing Measures for Pharmacovigilance (PCIM/11/01)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) POSITION PAPER ON NON-CLINICAL SAFETY STUDIES TO SUPPORT CLINICAL TRIALS WITH A SINGLE MICRODOSE

EMEA POST-AUTHORISATION GUIDANCE ON PARALLEL DISTRIBUTION

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Brexit info meeting. 5 February 2018

Guidance on the classification of veterinary medicinal products indicated for minor use minor species (MUMS) / limited market

Issues identified by stakeholders: follow-up from EMA s ATMP workshop

The European Medicines Agency Inspections ANNEX IV TO PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA:

GUIDELINE ON DOSSIER REQUIREMENTS FOR TYPE IA AND TYPE IB NOTIFICATIONS July 2003

DJ Cockburn Head of Manufacturing and Quality Compliance European Medicines Agency

Implementation strategy of ICH Q3D guideline

Transcription:

The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Pre-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 17 March 2005 EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final/Rev 1 COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) GUIDELINE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR VACCINE ANTIGEN MASTER FILE (VAMF) CERTIFICATION TRANSMISSION TO CPMP July 2003 RELEASE FOR CONSULTATION of WORKING DOCUMENT July 2003 DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS End August 2003 DISCUSSION AT BWP September 2003 February 2004 ADOPTION BY CPMP February 2004 DATE FOR COMING INTO OPERATION 1 March 2004 UPDATED GUIDELINE February 2005 ADOPTION BY CHMP March 2005 DATE FOR COMING INTO OPERATION 1 April 2005 Minor updates to this guideline have been made in section 4.4 and 4.5 to reflect the new SOP (Procedure for Co-ordinating pre-approval inspections in the context of Vaccines Antigen Master File certification SOP/INSP/2012) 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK Tel. (44-20) 74 18 84 00 Fax (44-20) 74 18 85 45 E-mail: mail@emea.eu.int http://www.emea.eu.int EMEA 2005 Reproduction and/or distribution of this document is authorised for non commercial purposes only provided the EMEA is acknowledged

GUIDELINE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR VACCINE ANTIGEN MASTER FILE (VAMF) CERTIFICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 4 2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK... 4 3. PRINCIPLES OF THE VAMF CERTIFICATION... 4 4. INITIAL CERTIFICATION OF A VAMF... 6 4.1 Trigger for submission of a VAMF application... 6 4.2 Pre-submission activities... 6 4.2.1 Letter of intent to EMEA... 7 4.2.2 Appointment of co-ordinator(s)... 7 4.3 Submission and validation... 7 4.4 Evaluation... 7 4.5 Inspections... 8 4.6. Certification... 8 5. DOSSIER REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION.. 8 5.1 Administrative information... 8 5.2 Expert statement... 8 5.3. Scientific data... 8 5.4. Specific dossier requirements... 9 6. CHANGES TO THE CONTENT OF A VAMF (VARIATIONS)... 9 6.1 Legal framework... 9 6.2 Procedure for Variations to the terms of a VAMF certificate... 9 7. USE OF VAMF CERTIFICATES WHEN SUBMITTING NEW MAAS... 9 ANNEX 1 - TRIGGERS FOR A VAMF CERTIFICATION... 10 ANNEX 2 - PRESUBMISSION ACTIVITIES FOR INITIAL CERTIFICATION OF A VAMF11 ANNEX 3 TIMETABLE FOR INITIAL CERTIFICATION OF VAMF... 12 EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final/Rev 1 EMEA 2005 Page 2/12

Note: This document contains a number of abbreviations, a list of which is provided here below: BWP Biotech Working Party CP Centralised procedure CPMP Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products MAA Marketing Authorisation Application MA Marketing Authorisation MAH(s) Marketing Authorisation Holder(s) MRFG Mutual Recognition Facilitation Group MR Mutual Recognition MS Member State VAMF Vaccine Antigen Master File EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final/Rev 1 EMEA 2005 Page 3/12

1. INTRODUCTION This document is intended to provide guidance to Marketing Authorisation (MA) Applicants and Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs) on issues associated with the submission, evaluation and certification of the VAMF by the EMEA. This guidance may be reviewed after experience. The detailed scientific requirements for an application for VAMF certification are described in the Guideline on the Scientific Data Requirements for a Vaccine Antigen Master File 1. 2. LEGAL FRAMEWORK Commission Directive 2003/63/EC of 25 June 2003 amending Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use introduces the concept of the Vaccine Antigen Master File. Part III, section 1.2 of Annex I lays down specific requirements related to VAMF 2. 3. PRINCIPLES OF THE VAMF CERTIFICATION The use of the VAMF certification system is optional. The VAMF is a stand-alone part of the marketing authorisation application dossier (MAA) for a vaccine. One given VAMF contains all relevant information of biological, pharmaceutical and chemical nature for one given vaccine antigen, which is common to several vaccines from the same MA applicant or MAH. The VAMF system is aimed at simplifying the tasks of both applicants and competent authorities by: - Reducing the number of dossier submissions and data evaluations carried out for the same vaccine antigen. - Harmonising the data for a given antigen present in several vaccines. - Ensuring consistency throughout the European Community. The VAMF certification consists of a centralised assessment of the VAMF application dossier submitted by the MA Applicant/MAH, which results in a certificate of compliance to Community legislation, issued by the EMEA. This certificate shall be valid throughout the European Community. As a second step, the competent authority that will grant or has granted the MA shall take into account the certification, re-certification or variation of the VAMF on the concerned medicinal product(s) (Figure 1). This document only deals with the first step; details on the second step procedure will be given in a separate guidance document. 1 EMEA/CPMP/BWP/3734/03 2 Commission Directive 2003/63/EC, O.J. L159/82, vol.46, 27.6.2003 EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final/Rev 1 EMEA 2005 Page 4/12

VAMF application 1 VAMF per vaccine antigen 1st Step VAMF certification (EMEA, centralised) Certificate of Compliance (valid throughout the European Community) Vaccine A Antigen Y Centralised MA Vaccine B Antigen Z Mutual Recogn. MA Vaccine C Antigen Y Antigen T National MA... 2nd Step impact on the concerned medicinal products (Competent Authority) Concerned medicinal products (linked MAs) in which the is present as an active substance Figure 1: General principles of a VAMF. A Marketing Authorisation (MA) or a Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) may contain one or more VAMF certificates and respective VAMF data. If, when submitting a new MAA, the MA Applicant decides to opt for vaccine antigen master files, the VAMFs must be submitted for all vaccine antigens in the respective MAA. As a rule, one VAMF should be submitted per vaccine antigen (see figure 2). In the case of a group of antigens aimed at preventing a single infectious disease (e.g. Inactivated poliovirus Serotypes 1, 2 and 3), a VAMF should be submitted for each antigen in the group. New MAA Vaccine A New Marketing Author. Application VAMF X VAMF Y VAMF T Antigen Y Antigen T Existing MAs Vaccine B Antigen Y Antigen Z Vaccine C Antigen Y Antigen Z Vaccine D Antigen Z... Vaccine E Antigen Z Antigen T Figure 2: Example of a new MAA for a Vaccine (Vaccine A), which has 3 antigens as active substances (, Y and T). For existing vaccines (Vaccines B, C, D, E), VAMF certificates will not be available for all antigens (e.g. Vaccine B has VAMF certificates for antigens X and Y, but not for antigen Z). EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final/Rev 1 EMEA 2005 Page 5/12

A VAMF application can only be submitted to the EMEA for antigens that form part of at least one MA or MAA, which has been, or will be evaluated via a Community procedure (Mutual Recognition (MR) or Centralised Procedure (CP)). If this not the case, the evaluation shall be carried out by the national competent authority that has granted the marketing authorisation. This guidance document does not cover a purely national VAMF certification process. The decision as to whether a particular VAMF is to be used for an existing MA rests with the MAH, who may decide that even though the same antigen is contained in several MAs, the MAH only wishes to link the certificate to some, not all such MAs. Once the Applicant chooses to use the Community VAMF certification system, all variations to the corresponding MAs will have to be submitted through the same certification system. Either the same change is made to all linked MAs or the particular MA in question is removed from the system. 4. INITIAL CERTIFICATION OF A VAMF 4.1 Trigger for submission of a VAMF application. An application for a VAMF may be submitted as follows (see also the diagram in Annex 1): Trigger 1: In the framework of a new MAA assessment via the centralised procedure. In this case, the certification of the VAMF is an intrinsic part of the assessment of the MAA dossier submitted to the EMEA. Trigger 2: In the framework of a new MAA via the Mutual Recognition (MR) procedure. Trigger 3: In the framework of a new MAA via a purely national procedure, provided at least one of the antigens has already been evaluated through a Community procedure. Trigger 4: In the case of existing MAs, MAHs may initiate the VAMF certification at any time, e.g.: (i) The data submitted for certification are identical to the corresponding data approved in all proposed linked MAs, and no changes are proposed during the certification. (ii) A change to the data approved in all linked MAs is proposed by the Applicant. (iii) The Applicant may intend to harmonise differences between the data package as currently approved for a given antigen in all proposed linked MAs, e.g. differences in approved storage times of intermediates. Note for Applicants: It is not possible to certify a VAMF that might change during the procedure. Therefore, it is strongly advised not to initiate a VAMF certification when there are ongoing variations related to the content of the VAMF in the individual MA(s). Additionally, the Applicants should not submit variations related to the content of the VAMF until the VAMF is certified. 4.2 Pre-submission activities Prior the submission of the VAMF application (see section 4.1), the MA Applicant/MAH should inform the relevant Competent Authority(ies) that they intend to use the Community VAMF certification system (see also Annex 2). EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final/Rev 1 EMEA 2005 Page 6/12

4.2.1 Letter of intent to EMEA MA Applicants and MAHs should ideally inform the EMEA of their intention to submit VAMF applications approximately 2-3 months before submission, specifying the intended submission date and the appropriate trigger for submission (see section 4.1). A list of MAs, to which the respective VAMF will apply, with the corresponding Member States (MS) of authorisation should also be provided at this time. In addition, the name(s) and address(es) of the manufacturing site(s) of the vaccine antigen, with the corresponding inspection information and supportive information, should be provided. For any application, other than that made in the framework of a new centralised MAA, the MA Applicant/MAH should also propose co-ordinators in their letter of intent. The co-ordinator(s) will be responsible for the evaluation of the VAMF certification application on behalf of the EMEA. 4.2.2 Appointment of co-ordinator(s) Two co-ordinators will be appointed by the CPMP in consultation with the BWP and the appointment will be notified to the MA Applicant/MAH, and where appropriate to the Mutual Recognition Facilitation Group (MRFG) and the National Authority. The EMEA will publish a list of VAMF co-ordinators. 4.3 Submission and validation The monthly deadlines for submission of applications for VAMF certification will be published on the EMEA website. The MA Applicant/MAH shall submit the application and accompanying documentation to the EMEA, to the co-ordinator(s), and to all Member States (MS). All documentation requirements for the EMEA, co-ordinators and MS will be published on the EMEA website. The validation of the submission will be performed by the EMEA and the outcome communicated to the MA Applicant/MAH, the co-ordinators and the MS with the evaluation timetable. 4.4 Evaluation In all cases, an evaluation report will be prepared by the appointed co-ordinator(s) and circulated for review by the BWP. The BWP will then make appropriate recommendations on the outcome of the evaluation, to the CPMP. In the case a VAMF certification application is submitted within a new centralised MAA (trigger 1, section 4.1), the assessment will by definition be embedded in the centralised evaluation procedure. The timetable will follow that of the respective MAA. Certification may occur at any stage prior to or at the stage of the CPMP opinion on the MAA. The timetable for all VAMF certification applications following triggers 2, 3 and 4 (see section 4.1) will be as follows (see also Annex 3): Day -10 EMEA validation of the VAMF application Day 0 Clock start (at official CPMP start date) Day 45 Circulation of co-ordinators evaluation report to the BWP. Subsequent transmission of this report, by the EMEA, to the Applicant. Day 60 CPMP adoption of inspection request(s) for the vaccine antigen manufacturing site(s), if necessary. (see section 4.5) Day 75 Comments BWP members Day 83 BWP discussion/recommendation Day 90 CPMP adoption of the evaluation report & certification/list of Questions (clock stop)(*) (*)A response timetable may be arranged as necessary. EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final/Rev 1 EMEA 2005 Page 7/12

In the case a VAMF certification application submitted within a national MAA, which may be going for MR (trigger 2 and 3, section 4.1), the assessment should be instigated before or at the beginning of the national authorisation process, so that the Certificate is available before the end of the initial 210 day review process. In some circumstances (e.g. in the case of initial VAMF certification for already existing MAs when VAMF data have been previously assessed and authorised via a centralised MA), there may be no need for scientific re-evaluation of the data and the timetable will be shortened. 4.5 Inspections When considered necessary to complete the assessment of the submitted VAMF, (an) inspection(s) of vaccine antigen manufacturing site(s) may be requested by the CPMP. See SOP/INSP/2012 Procedure for co-ordinating pre-approval inspections in the context of Vaccine Antigen Master File Certification. 4.6. Certification Within 5 working days of the adoption of a positive evaluation report by the CPMP, the EMEA will issue a VAMF certificate. The evaluation report will accompany the certificate. Within 5 working days of the adoption of a negative evaluation report by the CPMP, the EMEA will issue a letter refusing the grant of a certificate for a VAMF to the Applicant. The evaluation report will be attached to the refusal letter. In both cases, MA applicant/mah and MS will be notified by the EMEA. 5. DOSSIER REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION 5.1 Administrative information The following documentation should be provided in the initial application for certification: An application form for each EMEA VAMF certification submission, which will contain: - A list of medicinal products to which the VAMF will apply, with corresponding MAs/reference numbers if relevant, countries of authorisation if relevant (MS) and approval dates. Information on pending approvals should also be given. For information, third country approvals of MAs containing the same data should also be listed. - For VAMF linked MAs, if a particular MAH name and address are not identical to the name and address of the proposed VAMF certificate holder, a relevant declaration should be provided attached to the application form, stating that the MA Applicant and the MAH belong to the same mother group of companies, which share the same data package. 5.2 Expert statement The Applicant should provide an Expert statement on the data submitted for certification. This should also include an overview/summary of the Applicant s view of the possible impact of the VAMF to each linked MA. In case of submission under trigger 4(i) (see section 4.1), the submission of an expert statement is not required. 5.3. Scientific data Refer to the Guideline on the Scientific Data Requirements for a Vaccine Antigen Master File (EMEA/CPMP/BWP/3734/03). EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final/Rev 1 EMEA 2005 Page 8/12

5.4. Specific dossier requirements In the case of trigger 4 (ii) and (iii), the change(s) and/or harmonisation introduced should be clearly highlighted in the VAMF dossier. Where a harmonisation of any differences between respective MAs is proposed (trigger 4 (iii), see section 4.1), it should be indicated in the submission what is exactly approved in the various dossiers (specify country of authorisation and MA number). Where there is already a VAMF data package approved via a centralised MA, then the content of this VAMF data package should normally be the reference file. If there is no centralised MA, then the most recent MR MA should normally be the reference file. 6. CHANGES TO THE CONTENT OF A VAMF (VARIATIONS) 6.1 Legal framework A variation to the terms of a VAMF certificate must be submitted in accordance with Article 1 (2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1085/2003 of 3 June 2003 concerning the examination of variations to the terms of a marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products falling within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93 3. 6.2 Procedure for Variations to the terms of a VAMF certificate The variation submission, data requirements and evaluation will follow the current established procedure for variations to centralised MAs. The Certificate Holder shall submit the VAMF variation application and accompanying documentation to the EMEA, to the co-ordinator(s), and to Member States (MS). All documentation requirements for the EMEA, co-ordinators and MS will be published on the EMEA website. By analogy to the original submission for certification, for type II variations, an expert statement including the Certificate Holder s view of the possible impact of the VAMF to each linked MA should be provided. Once approved, the EMEA will deliver a certificate of compliance to Community legislation with the variation evaluation report attached, if applicable. 7. USE OF VAMF CERTIFICATES WHEN SUBMITTING NEW MAAS When submitting an application for a new MA, the MA Applicant should notify the EMEA or the National Competent Authority, if appropriate, of the use of VAMF certificates in the application. The Applicant will be required to provide, to the relevant competent authority, all valid VAMF certificates of compliance to Community legislation and accompanying evaluation reports together with the respective VAMF data. The list of relevant medicinal products to which the VAMF applies forms part of the VAMF application form. This list should be updated by the MAH after the new MA has been granted. In addition, a signed declaration stating that the VAMF certificates are fully applicable to the attached updated list of all linked MAs, highlighting the new MA additions should be provided. The updated list and declaration should be sent to the EMEA, all coordinators and MS. 3 O.J. L159, vol. 46, 27.6.2003 EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final/Rev 1 EMEA 2005 Page 9/12

ANNEX 1 - TRIGGERS FOR A VAMF CERTIFICATION New MAA Vaccine A Antigen Y Antigen Z 1 VAMF for each antigen No new MAA Only existing MAs sharing the same antigen X (linked MAs) Centralised Procedure Mutual Recognition Procedure Purely National None of the linked MAs have been evaluated through a Community procedure At least one of the linked MAs has been evaluated through a Community procedure Trigger 1 Trigger 2 At least one of the antigens None of the antigens is common to another product, are common to other products evaluated through already evaluated a Community procedure through a Community procedure (MRP or CP) (MRP or CP) data are identical in all proposed linked MAs Harmonised situation data are not identical in all proposed linked MAs Non-Harmonised situation Trigger 3 Purely National procedure VAMF evaluation carried out by the national competent authority (This case is not covered by this guidance document) data submitted for VAMF certification are identical to the corresponding data approved in all proposed linked MAs A change (variation) to the VAMF data approved in all linked MAs is proposed by the Applicant The Applicant may intend to harmonise differences between the VAMF data package in all proposed linked MAs Trigger 4 (i) Trigger 4 (ii) Trigger 4 (iii) EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final EMEA 2004 Page 10/12

ANNEX 2 PRESUBMISSION ACTIVITIES FOR INITIAL CERTIFICATION OF A VAMF -90 days -60 days -10 days Day 0 Applicant may request EMEA pre-submission meeting Applicant submits letter of intent Submission of application Procedure start EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final EMEA 2004 Page 11/12

ANNEX 3 TIMETABLE FOR INITIAL CERTIFICATION OF VAMF -10 days Day 0 45 days 75 days 83 days 90 days EMEA validation Clock start (CPMP) Circulation of Co-ordinator s report *The response timetable will be 90 days. The milestones will follow the initial evaluation Comments from BWP BWP discussion recommendation CPMP adoption of positive evaluation report + 5 working days EMEA certificate sent to Applicant CPMP LOQ clock stop 91 days Response to LOQ- CPMP clock start 91+x days * CPMP adoption of evaluation report + 5 working days EMEA certificate/ refusal letter sent to Applicant EMEA/CPMP/4548/03/Final EMEA 2004 Page 12/12