United Nations Economic and Social Council. Report of the Second Asian and Pacific Energy Forum

Similar documents
Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Energy Sustainability Challenges in Asia-Pacific Opportunities for Regional Cooperation. Sergey Tulinov December 2013

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

ESCAP/APEF/2018/INF/1

Summary of delegations assessments of the outcome of the 72 nd session of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific * Contents

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Integrated Transport Network and Development of Transport Corridors to Emerging Markets

Cultural Diversity Ministerial Forum of the Asia-Pacific Region May 9-11, 2012 Dhaka, Bangladesh

Sharing Knowledge & Experiences, Developing Capacity Asia-Pacific Initiatives on SE4ALL

Report of the Working Group on the Trans-Asian Railway Network on its 5th meeting

UNESCAP regional transport activities with focus on SPECA countries

Reports of the sixth and seventh meetings of the Steering Group for the Regional Programme on Economic Statistics **

Note of the Director-General Region in Focus Asia

Economic and Social Council

Energy trade and connectivity in Asia and the Pacific. Vladimir Krasnogorskiy

Sanitation Coverage: Progress and Prospects

Economic and Social Council

Provisional annotated agenda and organization of work

Statistical Yearbook for Asia and the Pacific 2013 F. Environment

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Global and Regional Perspectives of Sustainable Transport Development

ST/SG/AC.10/46. Secretariat. United Nations

ANNUAL REPORT

A/AC.289/2. General Assembly. United Nations

Developing a Regional Roadmap on Energy Connectivity. China Electric Power Planning & Engineering Institute Bangkok

Economic and Social Council

Ministerial Perspectives on Energy Transition and Regional Cooperation Country/ Organization Statement and Discussion

EXAMPLES OF GOOD PRACTICES RELATING TO THE PARTICIPATION OF ASIA AND PACIFIC PARLIAMENTS IN THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW PROCESS

Water Hotspots and Household Water Security in Asia and the Pacific

Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 2 October 2015

6.4.1 Water Intensity (litres per US dollar)

National Stakeholders Workshop on Accessible and Affordable Sustainable Energy. Brief Report

6.4.1 Water Intensity (litres per US dollar)

ASEAN-Japan Forum Towards 4th IR"

Travel support available to Parties to the WHO FCTC

Lao PDR. Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs. Lao PDR Asia-Pacific Developing. SDG Goal Water Intensity (litres per US dollar)

Philippines. Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs. Philippines Asia-Pacific Developing. SDG Goal. 6.4 Increase water-use efficiency

Global Tracking Framework 2017 Asia-Pacific Progress in Sustainable Energy ACCESS TO ENERGY

Charter for the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate

JOINT MINISTERIAL STATEMENT OF THE 36 th ASEAN MINISTERS ON ENERGY MEETING 29 October 2018, Singapore

CIO Conference for Strengthening Regional Cooperation to Advance E-Government Development in Asia and the Pacific AIDE-MEMOIRE

6.4.1 Water Intensity (litres per US dollar)

Economic and Social Council

Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs

Economic and Social Council

Bangladesh. Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs. Bangladesh Asia-Pacific Developing. SDG Goal. 6.4 Increase water-use efficiency

Energy connectivity is a platform which is being explored at subregional levels in

Preliminary draft ministerial declaration to Get every one in the picture

Nepal. Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs. Nepal Asia-Pacific Developing. SDG Goal Water Intensity (litres per US dollar)

Strengthening Institutional Capacity to Support Energy Efficiency in Asian Countries: UN ESCAP Project

ADB s Initiatives in the Climate Change Area. Sujata Gupta Asian Development Bank July 2002

The Regional Support Office (RSO) of The Bali Process

Independent Evaluation Department Work Program,

Economic and Social Council

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [on the report of the Second Committee (A/64/420/Add.6)] 64/203. Convention on Biological Diversity

Joint Ministerial Statement of the Sixth East Asian Summit Energy Ministers Meeting (6 th EAS EMM)

Scope, modalities, format and organization of the high-level meeting on universal health coverage

Asian Water Development Outlook 2013

Preparations for the first meeting of the Open-ended Legal and Technical Working Group of the International Conference on Chemicals Management

Report of the Working Party on the Strategic Framework and the Programme Budget on its sixty-fourth session

Primer. Energy Statistics. in Asia and the Pacific ( ) and. Energy Outlook. for Asia and the Pacific

Concept note. Background

Joint Ministerial Statement The14 th ASEAN+3 (China, Japan and Korea) Ministers on Energy Meeting 28 September 2017, Pasay City, Philippines

WOMEN S EMPOWERMENT AND ITS LINK TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Additional priority areas for capacity-building relating to the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol

Information and communications technologies for development

Session 3: Regional Perspectives and Requirements on Using STI to Promote Renewable Energy

Review of Development of Transport and Logistics Network in North-East Asia

International Training Course on. Molecular biological techniques for research in agriculture and biomedical sciences

Meeting Conclusions and Recommendations

Further to my letter dated 12 June 2018,1 have the honour to enclose

Economic and Social Council

Preamble. Page 1 of 11. Jakarta Declaration is a good-will, voluntary and legally non-binding.

51/177. Implementation of the outcome of the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II)

ASEAN SAFE SCHOOLS INITIATIVE (ASSI) OUTCOME REPORT. Road to the Asian Ministerial Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction 2018:

Regional Advocacy & External Engagement Director, Asia Pacific

I. Exploring Various Training Modes Over a long time, HRC has been innovating the training modes and seeking for

SAARC:- Energy Security

THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL MECHANISM OF ESCWA AND ITS SUBSIDIARY BODIES

Ministerial Summit on the Environment - Tentative Programme

Economic and Social Council

Perspectives and challenges in operationalizing the

Japan s International Cooperation for Resource Efficiency and the 3Rs

GLOBAL STRATEGY. to improve agricultural and rural statistics in ASIA PACIFIC

October 2018 C 2019/22. Forty-first Session. Rome, June 2019

ANNOTATED PROVISIONAL AGENDA

16 th Summit of Heads of State or Government of the Non-Aligned Movement

Sustainability Options

JOINT STATEMENT BY THE G8 ENERGY MINISTERS AND THE EUROPEAN ENERGY COMMISSIONER

UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

Statement By H.E Mr. Eshag Alehabib Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative Islamic Republic of Iran

OECD Eurasia Competitiveness Roundtable

Transcription:

United Nations Economic and Social Council ESCAP/74/27 Distr.: General 12 April 2018 Original: English Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Seventy-fourth session Bangkok, 11 16 May 2018 Item 3 (i) of the provisional agenda * Review of issues pertinent to the subsidiary structure of the Commission, including the work of the regional institutions: energy Report of the Second Asian and Pacific Energy Forum Note by the secretariat Summary The Second Asian and Pacific Energy Forum was held in Bangkok from 3 to 5 April 2018. The senior officials reviewed the draft ministerial declaration on regional cooperation for energy transition towards sustainable and resilient societies, for consideration by the ministers. During the ministerial segment, deliberations were held on the challenges and opportunities associated with the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 7, including the important role of energy connectivity in attaining Goal 7. The Forum adopted the report and the Ministerial Declaration, and requested the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific to endorse the Ministerial Declaration and support its implementation. The Commission may wish to consider the matters calling for action or brought to its attention, as contained in the present report, and provide the secretariat with further guidance. I. Matters calling for action by the Commission or brought to its attention A. Matters calling for action 1. The Second Asian and Pacific Energy Forum requests that the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), at its seventy-fourth session, endorse the Ministerial Declaration on Regional Cooperation for Energy Transition towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies in Asia and the Pacific and support its implementation. * ESCAP/74/L.1/Rev.1. B18-00488 (E) TP180418

B. Matters brought to the attention of the Commission 2. The following decision adopted by the Forum is brought to the attention of the Commission: Decision 1 The Forum adopts the Ministerial Declaration on Regional Cooperation for Energy Transition towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies in Asia and the Pacific. II. Proceedings A. Review of the draft ministerial declaration on regional cooperation for energy transition towards sustainable and resilient societies in Asia and the Pacific (Agenda item 2) 3. The Forum had before it the note by the secretariat on the review of the implementation of the Plan of Action on Regional Cooperation for Enhanced Energy Security and the Sustainable Use of Energy in Asia and the Pacific, 2014 2018 (ESCAP/APEF/2018/1 and ESCAP/APEF/2018/1/Corr.1); the note by the secretariat entitled Energy transition in Asia and the Pacific: pathways to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all (ESCAP/APEF/2018/2 and ESCAP/APEF/2018/2/Corr.1); the report of the Regional Preparatory Meeting for the Second Asian and Pacific Energy Forum (ESCAP/APEF/2018/INF/1); and the draft ministerial declaration (ESCAP/APEF/2018/L.3/Rev.2). 4. Representatives of the following members and associate members of the Commission made statements: Azerbaijan; Bangladesh; Bhutan; China; Fiji; India; Indonesia; Japan; Lao People s Democratic Republic; Mongolia; Nepal; Pakistan; Russian Federation; Timor-Leste; Turkey; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; and United States of America. 5. The Forum agreed to the text of the draft ministerial declaration of the Second Asian and Pacific Energy Forum as contained in document ESCAP/APEF/2018/L.3/Rev.2 with amendments, and requested the Chair of the senior officials segment to report on the outcome of the deliberations to the ministerial segment. B. Other matters (Agenda item 3) 6. No other matters were raised. C. Policy perspectives on the role of regional cooperation for energy transition towards sustainable and resilient societies in Asia and the Pacific (Agenda item 5) 7. The Forum had before it the note by the secretariat on the review of the implementation of the Plan of Action on Regional Cooperation for Enhanced Energy Security and the Sustainable Use of Energy in Asia and the Pacific, 2014 2018 (ESCAP/APEF/2018/1 and ESCAP/APEF/2018/1/Corr.1), and the note by the secretariat entitled Energy transition in Asia and the Pacific: 2 B18-00488

pathways to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all (ESCAP/APEF/2018/2 and ESCAP/APEF/2018/2/Corr.1). 8. Keynote addresses were delivered by Mr. Twarath Sutabutr, Director General, Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Thailand; Mr. Sun Xiansheng, Secretary-General, International Energy Forum; Ms. Joyashree Roy, Jadavpur University; and Mr. Edward Lock, McKinsey and Company. The speakers focused on the challenges, potential and outlook of the energy transition in the Asia-Pacific region and the pathways to it. 9. Representatives of the following members and associate members made statements: Afghanistan; Armenia; Australia; Azerbaijan; Bangladesh; Bhutan; China; Fiji; Georgia; India; Indonesia; Kiribati; Lao People s Democratic Republic; Mongolia; Myanmar; Nepal; Pakistan; Republic of Korea; Russian Federation; and Viet Nam. 10. A representative of the International Atomic Energy Agency made a statement. 11. Representatives of the following intergovernmental organizations made statements: Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Centre for Energy; Asian Development Bank; Eurasian Development Bank; Global Energy Interconnection Development and Cooperation Organization; International Renewable Energy Agency; International Solar Alliance; and Islamic Development Bank. 12. Speakers thanked the Government of Thailand and ESCAP for hosting the meeting and highlighted the importance of energy for the world economy. Energy demand had continued to rise, particularly in the fast-growing economies in the region. The aim of the energy transition was to ensure the wise and sustainable use of resources, and national transition road maps could help guide that process if aligned with other national policies and Sustainable Development Goal 7. That type of strategy could also provide the investment perspectives necessary to attract funds, together with the support of international financial institutions. The importance of development partners in this process for least developed countries was mentioned. As the national institutional arrangements were crucial, establishing national coordination councils or similar bodies should be considered. 13. The Forum noted the impressive progress made in many countries in expanding access to electricity, but also highlighted that over 420 million people still had no access to electricity. One of the challenges noted in that regard was the matching of the demand mix with the right type of energy supply, since different types of users required different types of energy. Facing limited resources, countries had difficult choices to make regarding the question of whether to invest in expanding access, in upgrading transmission lines or in expanding the share of renewables. It was difficult to pass on the cost of new infrastructure when the majority of the customers were poor, especially since electricity access alone did not ensure economic development and additional interventions were required. The provision of access to clean cooking fuels and technology remained a challenge in the region, requiring much higher levels of investment, technology dissemination and international cooperation. In addition, some of the progress made on clean cooking was now being threatened by rising energy prices. 14. Political commitment and a clear strategy were the key to the expansion of electricity access. Off-grid technologies, such as solar home systems and small hydropower, could make a significant difference in achieving access in B18-00488 3

both remote and densely populated areas. The private sector had a key role to play in providing access to electricity, and adequate regulation and tariffs would be required. Clean cooking programmes could help to raise the share of the population with access to clean cooking fuels and technology, and the construction of terminals for liquefied petroleum gas was highlighted as a measure to make it more available for clean cooking purposes. 15. The challenges in addressing energy efficiency in the context of Goal 7 included evolving energy markets and the associated changes in the price and cost of energy efficiency measures that it might not be possible to pass on to consumers. Energy efficiency was at the core of the energy transition, and awareness-raising could help to change people s mindset on energy use. In the power sector, losses continued to be a major issue and grid upgrades to minimize such losses were needed. 16. However, energy efficiency was a source of savings for low-income households, with energy labelling an important first step in that direction. Two important elements identified for consideration were the combined use of energy efficiency and renewable energy to achieve the optimal solution, in terms of technology as well as in terms of policy, and cogeneration in the power sector as an energy-efficient approach. 17. Regarding renewable energy in the context of Goal 7, the Forum noted the continued high share of fossil fuels in the energy mix, and pointed out the importance of the role of natural gas where the expansion of renewable energy resources was slow, to enable countries to move towards fuels with lower carbon emissions. Resources were crucial for finding the right energy mix in that respect. One representative of one country pointed out that with decreasing domestic gas resources, it had been forced to move towards greater coal consumption. Nevertheless, there was agreement among country representatives, including those from countries endowed with hydrocarbon reserves, that strategies for trade and diversification were needed, including the attraction of foreign investment in the energy sector. Representatives of small island States noted that remoteness was a challenge in terms of providing access to renewable energy to the whole population through the grid, and densely populated countries might face limitations resulting from lack of surface area to deploy large-scale renewable energy. Expanding the grid, however, was essential, at the national level as well as at the cross-border level. Overall, the Forum pointed to the ability of renewable energy to increase energy security and energy access, with a view to achieving resilient societies. 18. Member States emphasized that overcoming the challenges required a pragmatic, step-by-step approach that took into account the local context. National strategies and road maps were the point of departure for that and should be aligned with Goal 7 and other national strategies. A review of existing policies could form the initial action. It was noted that, over time, more countries in the region had adopted targets for renewable energy. One policy instrument that seemed to work well included mechanisms that allowed the consumer to feed energy back into the grid through feed-in tariffs and net metering. The creation of industry associations might facilitate the development of national renewable energy industries. Also, innovative technological approaches such as wind-solar hybrid installations could be an option. Sharply declining costs of renewable energy would contribute to drive that uptake further. 19. The role of energy connectivity in achieving national energy policy targets was underscored, notably electricity and its contribution to achieving a low-carbon future. Landlocked countries would be able to benefit from 4 B18-00488

connectivity in particular. A robust legal framework and adequate transmission systems were essential in addition to adequate financing. Ongoing bilateral and subregional connectivity and initiatives to further connectivity were mentioned as examples, and the holistic nature of energy connectivity, including coal trade, gas pipelines and cross-border electricity connections, was stressed. The role of connectivity in breaking down the resource constraints of each country, with its focus on mutual benefits and building a community of shared interests, was highlighted. In that way, the hydropower resources of the region could serve as a sustainable battery. That would entail the construction of the necessary infrastructure to move from dependency to interdependency. Building on existing protocols that ensured sound development and the continued support of neighbours were needed. The Forum emphasized that regional connectivity had a key role to play in enabling the achievement of Goal 7. The first multilateral Energy Purchase and Wheeling Agreement signed by the Lao People s Democratic Republic, Malaysia and Thailand was seen to be a promising breakthrough for broader regional connectivity. It was noted that ESCAP could help to reduce non-physical barriers to connectivity. The newly established Expert Working Group on Energy Connectivity was identified as a promising platform for the promotion of regional interconnection, including the development of a regional road map on electricity interconnection. Furthermore, it was suggested that ESCAP convene a conference on technology innovation in the energy sector. 20. Regional cooperation was pointed out as a mechanism to support addressing the issues discussed. As data was the first step to enable decision makers, a regional data bank for off-grid energy solutions could be considered. Likewise, energy models available from international organizations could benefit countries. The United Nations in general and ESCAP in particular were highlighted as platforms for exchange and coordination, and participants expressed their commitment to them in order to overcome challenges while also stressing the importance of subregional initiatives. The Commission s Committee on Energy as well as its expert working groups contributed to advancing regional connectivity. It was suggested that ESCAP, or a similar regional entity, could organize a meeting on frontier technologies for knowledge-sharing. The representative of one country said that his Government would submit its policy revisions to ESCAP for review and encouraged other countries to do the same. The establishment of a regional renewable energy institute as well as of a regional carbon market managed by a regional body were proposed. D. Other matters (Agenda item 6) 21. The representative of Japan informed the Forum that the negotiations on the draft ministerial declaration would continue on 5 April 2018 at 10 a.m. E. Adoption of the ministerial declaration on regional cooperation for energy transition towards sustainable and resilient societies in Asia and the Pacific and the report of the Forum (Agenda item 7) 22. The Forum adopted the present report on 5 April 2018. 23. The Forum adopted the Ministerial Declaration on Regional Cooperation for Energy Transition Towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies in Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP/APEF/2018/L.3/Rev.2, with amendments). B18-00488 5

24. The representative of the United States of America announced, with regret, that her delegation disassociated itself from the declaration. She explained that her delegation could not accept the language in the declaration, in particular the language on regional energy connectivity contained in paragraph 12 of the declaration. She stated that her delegation did not support the references to technology transfer in the declaration and opposed language that her delegation believed undermined intellectual property rights. She further shared her delegation s view that the proposed measures in paragraph 5 on appliances, lighting and machinery were problematic as they did not specify that such measures needed to be World Trade Organization-consistent and based on international standards. She reiterated her delegation s view that the secretariat should take actions that reflected the consensus of its members rather than a majority or plurality. 25. The representative of Pakistan noted with appreciation the efforts of the Forum to reach consensus on the declaration. However, he noted his delegation s concern that a member State had chosen to disassociate itself from the declaration after efforts had been exerted to offer concessions in the text of the declaration. He noted the unity and unanimity of views on the declaration from within the Asia-Pacific region itself and thanked all member States for their support. 26. The representative of China congratulated the Forum in reaching the declaration by consensus, which she noted was a major milestone that would continue the momentum since the Asian and Pacific Energy Forum held in 2013. Taking note of the doubts, specific comments and advice expressed by the delegation of the United States of America, she expressed her delegation s regret that those issues had not been raised during the negotiation of the document. She noted that in its resolution 73/8, the Commission had established two working groups that focused on the energy sector, and reaffirmed China s commitment to participate in those working groups as agreed by member States, including with respect to the development of a regional road map for electricity connectivity. She highlighted the abundant intellectual property and capacity of countries represented in the Forum to advance their innovation and that China would implement a concrete policy of innovation including the strengthening, protection and application of intellectual property. She noted China s deep involvement in energy discussions under the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation and the G-20, but stressed that the ESCAP membership included developing and least developed countries that were not members of those forums. She underscored that for these countries, work undertaken under the mandate of ESCAP was of particular importance and for that purpose, China would continue its solid efforts for cooperation to achieve inclusive development for all. III. Organization A. Opening, duration and organization of the Forum 27. The Second Asian and Pacific Energy Forum was held in Bangkok from 3 to 5 April 2018. The Forum was opened by Mr. Virasakdi Futrakul, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Thailand. The Executive Secretary of ESCAP and Mr. Kirill Molodtsov, Deputy Minister of Energy, Russian Federation, made statements. B. Attendance 28. The Forum was attended by representatives of the following members and associate members: Afghanistan; Armenia; Australia; Azerbaijan; 6 B18-00488

Bangladesh; Bhutan; China; Democratic People s Republic of Korea; Fiji; Georgia; India; Indonesia; Japan; Kazakhstan; Kiribati; Lao People s Democratic Republic; Mongolia; Myanmar; Nepal; Pakistan; Papua New Guinea; Philippines; Republic of Korea; Russian Federation; Sri Lanka; Thailand; Timor-Leste; Turkey; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; United States of America; Uzbekistan; and Viet Nam. 29. Representatives of the following United Nations bodies, specialized agencies and funds attended: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; International Atomic Energy Agency; International Labour Organization; secretariat of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa; United Nations Development Programme; United Nations Environment Programme; United Nations Industrial Development Organization; and World Health Organization. 30. Representatives of the following intergovernmental organizations attended: ASEAN Centre for Energy; Asian Development Bank; Eurasian Development Bank; International Renewable Energy Agency; International Solar Alliance; and Islamic Development Bank. 31. Representatives of the following non-governmental organizations, civil society organizations and other entities attended: China Electricity Council; China General Nuclear Power Corporation; Global Energy Interconnection Development and Cooperation Organization; Jadavpur University; McKinsey and Company; and ME SOLshare Ltd. C. Election of officers 32. The Forum elected the following officers: Chair: Vice-Chairs: Mr. Awais Ahmad Leghari (Pakistan) Mr. Ali Ahmad Osmani (Afghanistan) Mr. Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury (Bangladesh) Mr. Fanrong Li (China) Mr. Vijay Nath (Fiji) Mr. Romeo Mikautadze (Georgia) Mr. Ruateki Tekaiara (Kiribati) Mr. Sinava Souphanouvong (Lao People s Democratic Republic) Mr. Davaasuren Tserenpil (Mongolia) Mr. Win Khaing (Myanmar) Mr. Barsha Man Pun (Nepal) Mr. Kang-hyeon Yun (Republic of Korea) Mr. Kirill Molodtsov (Russian Federation) Mr. Siri Jirapongphan (Thailand) 33. The senior officials segment of the Forum elected the following officers: Chair: Vice-Chairs: Mr. Vijay Nath (Fiji) Mr. Hitoshi Kozaki (Japan) Mr. Talyat Aliev (Russian Federation) B18-00488 7

D. Agenda 34. The Forum adopted the following agenda: Senior officials segment 1. Opening of the senior officials segment: (a) (b) (c) Opening addresses; Election of officers; Adoption of the agenda. 2. Review of the draft ministerial declaration on regional cooperation for energy transition towards sustainable and resilient societies in Asia and the Pacific. 3. Other matters. Ministerial segment 4. Opening of the ministerial segment: (a) (b) (c) Opening addresses; Election of officers; Adoption of the agenda. E. Other events 5. Policy perspectives on the role of regional cooperation for energy transition towards sustainable and resilient societies in Asia and the Pacific. 6. Other matters. 7. Adoption of the ministerial declaration on regional cooperation for energy transition towards sustainable and resilient societies in Asia and the Pacific and the report of the Forum. 8. Closing of the Forum. 35. On 5 April 2018, a seminar on government-business dialogue in achieving Sustainable Development Goal 7 was held. 8 B18-00488

Annex General series List of documents Symbol Title Agenda item ESCAP/APEF/2018/1 and ESCAP/APEF/2018/1/Corr.1 ESCAP/APEF/2018/2 and ESCAP/APEF/2018/2/Corr.1 ESCAP/APEF/2018/3 Limited series Review of the implementation of the Plan of Action on Regional Cooperation for Enhanced Energy Security and the Sustainable Use of Energy in Asia and the Pacific, 2014 2018 Energy transition in Asia and the Pacific: pathways to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all Report of the Second Asian and Pacific Energy Forum 2 and 5 2 and 5 ESCAP/APEF/2018/L.1 Annotated provisional agenda 1 (c) ESCAP/APEF/2018/L.2 Draft report 7 ESCAP/APEF/2018/L.3 and ESCAP/APEF/2018/L.3/Rev.1 Draft outcome document 2 and 7 ESCAP/APEF/2018/L.3/Rev.2 ESCAP/APEF/2018/L.3/Rev.3 Draft ministerial declaration on regional cooperation for energy transition towards sustainable and resilient societies in Asia and the Pacific Draft ministerial declaration on regional cooperation for energy transition towards sustainable and resilient societies in Asia and the Pacific 2 and 7 7 Information series ESCAP/APEF/2018/INF/1 Information available online www.unescap.org/events/apef2 www.unescap.org/events/apef2 www.unescap.org/events/apef2 Report of the Regional Preparatory Meeting for the Second Asian and Pacific Energy Forum Information for participants List of participants Tentative programme 2 B18-00488 9