NISP Communities Water Conservation Efforts. A Key Component to Meeting Future Water Needs

Similar documents
CONSERVATION PLAN April 2009

3. Water Conservation Program

KENT COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY

DROUGHT MANAGEMENT AND WATER CONSERVATION IN CHARLOTTESVILLE AND ALBEMARLE COUNTY

Water Conservation Workshop

Potential. Capital Cost

Marion County Office of the County Engineer Water Resources. Water Use Efficiency Plan FY 2016/17

APPENDIX B Mammoth Community Water District Water Conservation Measures

Water Conservation Plan

APPENDIX K ESTIMATION OF SAVINGS AND COSTS FOR WATER CONSERVATION STRATEGIES

Declining Residential Water Usage

City of Dallas Water Conservation Initiatives

Drought Response and Drought Rates. Castro Valley, CA November 19, 2014

Water Conservation Workshop. February 24, 2009

LCRA Water Conservation Incentives Program

EXISTING WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM

SILVER LAKE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT

Drought Response and Drought Rates. October 23, 2014

Executive Directive #5 Issue Date: October 14, 2014 Subject: Emergency Drought Response Creating a Water Wise City Introduction Los Angeles and

Prepare60 s Guide to Securing Utah s Water Future

CITY OF MANTECA WATER CONSERVATION APRIL 7, 2015 TO JANUARY 19, 2016

Summary of KPUD s Water Use Efficiency Program and Proposed Future Water Efficiency Goals December, 2013

TWDB Statewide Municipal Water Conservation Quantification Project Report to the Plateau Regional Water Planning Group Region J 2017

City of Portsmouth Water Efficiency Efforts. updated: March 2017

City of Ceres Water Conservation Program

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARLAND, TEXAS: SECTION 1

EMERGENCY. Water Conservation Plan

Castle Pines North Metropolitan District

Water Supply FAQ August 11, 2015

Conservation Success & Challenges

Before the Wells Run Dry

Recycled Water for Los Angeles

WATER CONSERVATION PLAN CITY OF FORT MORGAN

Water Conservation Plan

NTMWD The North Texas Municipal Water District provides water for a number of cities and utility districts in and around the Metroplex, including Sach

LEAK DETECTION GUIDE. Your Guide to Home Water Conservation

California Drought Discussion Water Conservation Action

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

WaterSense: Every Drop Counts

Water Supply & Demand Management Policy Report

C. Residential Water Efficiency Standards for New Structures. 1. High Efficiency or Ultra High Efficiency Toilets shall be installed;

PREPARING FOR AN UNCERTAIN WATER FUTURE: CONSERVATION, DEMAND

4.2 Step 2 Profile of Water Demands and Historical Demand Management

CITY OF GUELPH WATER EFFICIENCY STRATEGY UPDATE Summary

The Drought Affects Everyone Fontana Water Company s Drought Response Plan

Every Drop Counts. Drought Response and Water Self- Sufficiency : Business

Every Drop Counts. Use Less. Diversify. Manage Wisely.

ARTICLE 10 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLAN 90

Tempering the Thirst Of America s Driest City

Water Supply and Conservation

Comprehensive Water Conservation Plan Las Virgenes Municipal Water District Fiscal Years

WATER USE EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

SUCCESSFUL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT

DROUGHT RESPONSE PLAN DEVELOPED APRIL 2003 UPDATED MARCH 2018

A Look at Water Conditions in the Second-Driest State

NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 2009 WATER CONSERVATION PLAN

Exhibit 1 City of Lake Oswego WMCP Progress Report Progress Report for Benchmarks Listed in the 2007 WMCP (Appendix E: Matrix 1 and 2)

Boise City Climate Protection Program Advisory Committee Recommendations August 2007

City of Manhattan Beach. May 12, Public Works Department, (310)

Water Use, Conservation, and Efficiency Rome, Georgia A Report by the Coosa River Basin Initiative July 2014

M A R K H A M S WAT E R

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

Water Conservation. Program Report FY09 FY10

Contents 8/31/2017 DRAFT REGIONAL IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN & ANALYSIS

Conn. Agencies Regs d-2 Preparation of plans and schedule for submission

Water Conservation Case Studies

Table of Contents. Table of Contents. Introduction. Water Efficiency Plan and Purpose

Texas Water Resources Institute

Santa Fe County Sustainable Land Development Code ORDINANCE NO , December 8, 2015

California Drought Update: Staged Mandatory Water Conservation and Rationing. Claremont System May 28, 2015

ANNUAL REPORT

CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA UTILITY DEPARTMENT WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLANS

National Water Demand Management Policy

Conservation is a Culture: The Monterey Peninsula Story

July 31, 2014 Get Ahead or Get Parched: Six Ways to Survive the Drought. Joe Berg Water Use Efficiency Programs Manager

UWMP Standardized Tables. Los Altos Suburban District Urban Water Management Plan Appendix H

UWMP Standardized Tables. Livermore District Urban Water Management Plan Appendix H

UWMP Standardized Tables. King City District Urban Water Management Plan Appendix H

5-1. WATER SUPPLY AND WATER CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN MAY 2009 Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District

ACRONYMS and ABBREVIATIONS

Inventory of municipal CEP plans

IVINS CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2018 NOTICE DRAFT

SECTION 7: DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES

Irvine Ranch Water District Local Supply and Drought Response. Orange County Coastal Coalition September 25, 2014

UWMP Standardized Tables. Salinas District Urban Water Management Plan Appendix H

EMERGENCY DROUGHT REGULATIONS

A Review of the City of Santa Fe Water Conservation Rebate Program. Executive Summary and Recommendations:

The PUD Supply-Side conservation program consists of the two (2) measures listed below.

Water for Tucson s Future

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

Western has $600 waiting for you! See page 3. Spring Western water news, info and tips

Agua Special Utility District (Agua SUD) Water Conservation Plan

UWMP Standardized Tables. Dominguez District Urban Water Management Plan Appendix H

2015 MUNICIPAL WATER EFFICIENCY PLAN UPDATE

How much water do you use at home on a daily

PENNGROVE SANITATION ZONE NEWS SPRING 2016 Vol. 4, Issue #1

UWMP Standardized Tables. City of Hawthorne District Urban Water Management Plan Appendix H

OC Coastal Coalition Meeting July 24, Joe Berg Water Use Efficiency Programs Manager

Green California Schools Summit Metropolitan Water District of Southern California

Transcription:

NISP Communities Water Conservation Efforts A Key Component to Meeting Future Water Needs

Water Conservation is Part of the Mix Water is a precious resource to the people who live, work and play in Northern Colorado. Conservation is common sense to the 15 participating water providers in the Northern Integrated Supply Project, who all have active water conservation programs. And these programs are working. Since 1988, they have reduced water use by more than 22 percent. 1

Today, NISP partners water use, at 177 gallons per person per day, compares favorably to cities throughout the western U.S. But new water demand far outstrips the ability to conserve. The 15 partners together face a doubled population within 20 years and nearly triple by 2060. NISP partners know conservation savings alone cannot meet the expected demands. Ed Harvey, author of the Water Supplies and Demands for Participants in the Northern Integrated Supply Project Report, said, Conservation plays an important role, but it is not going to meet the future demand for water in Colorado. NISP will provide an additional 40,000 acre feet of reliable water annually. (One acre foot equals about 326,000 gallons, enough for two families of four annually.) Even with NISP, the participants will continue to intensify conservation efforts as part of their overall water management strategy. Both conservation and new supplies are essential to meeting the communities needs. This brochure outlines some of the programs NISP participants have in place to save water. Average gallons per person per day for selected cities 400 370 350 Gallons per person per day 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 154 Lewiston 177 NISP Participant Average 182 182 185 Casper Great Falls Cheyenne 192 Boise City-Nampa Area 224 227 Utah Study Average Fort Collins-Loveland Area 246 Pueblo 282 Pocatello Logan Source: Water Use and Residential Rate Structures in the Intermountain West, Utah Economic and Business Review. Volume 65, March/April 2005. 2

NISP Participants Conservation Programs All of the NISP participants use meters to keep track of water use patterns and to charge customers for the water they consume. Education and Outreach Education and outreach are the foundation for NISP partners water conservation programs. Information appears in websites, ads, videos, bill inserts, newsletters, and school programs. Following are some examples of NISP participants programs: Erie sponsored a six-part local television series on water conservation. Fort Lupton monitors houses and is able to report concerns about leaks or overwatering to homeowners. The Central Weld County Water District is developing a library of water conservation materials for citizens to use. Lafayette hosts free classes on Xeric principles, planning and implementation, soil enhancement and efficient turf irrigation. The Fort Collins-Loveland Water District promotes voluntary upgrades to water-efficient fixtures, low water use landscaping and efficient irrigation in its newsletters and bill inserts. 3

COST Conservation-friendly Rates WATER USAGE It s a matter of economics: Customers use less water when it costs more. Nearly all NISP partners communicate the importance of conservation through tiered billing, which sets an affordable rate for essential indoor use, a moderate rate for practical outdoor use and an aggressive rate for high use. Watering and Landscaping Restrictions Most NISP participants mandate or discourage residents from watering outside in the hottest summer hours between 10 a.m. and 6 p.m. The Town of Severance, for example, allows homeowners to water lawns, wash cars and use water for recreation on either even or odd days, outside of 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Some participants have ordinances that limit the amount of turf and call for Xeriscaping, a practice of landscaping that reduces or eliminates the need for supplemental water. Advanced Leak Detection Leaks from old, corroded pipes can waste thousands of gallons a year. More than half of the NISP partners have invested in leak detection systems that measure flow and pressure, which indicate leak locations and potential repairs. They also regularly conduct flushing, testing and other maintenance activities that extend system lives. And they regularly upgrade their water distribution systems through leak protection and pipe repair. The Left Hand Water District s leak detection program has resulted in a 50 percent reduction in distribution system losses. (See the case study on pages 11-12). The Central Weld County Water District s advanced computer leak detection system monitors inflows and outflows every 2 ½ minutes, allowing engineers to rapidly detect and repair leaks. Electronic Metering What gets measured gets managed. Electronic metering is essential for accurate, real-time measurement of water consumption. Most NISP participants use the latest technology in meter testing and replacement. 4

5

Non-potable Water for Irrigation NISP partners are finding the right water for the right use. The highest standards of green building call for using non-potable water for parks, golf courses and backyards. Several partners are advancing the use of non-potable water for outdoor irrigation: Eaton requires new residential developments to install dual-use irrigation systems, which bring treated water into houses, but use non-potable water for outdoor irrigation. Evans water conservation plan calls for the use of non-potable water for irrigation in new developments. Frederick encourages developers to conserve by incorporating Xeriscape techniques and non-potable irrigation systems. In Windsor, dual water systems require the use of non-potable water for landscaping in new residential developments. Water-efficient showerheads can save a household up to 750 gallons a month. Rebates, Incentives and Codes Financial incentives encourage customers to upgrade to water-efficient appliances. Among NISP communities, rebates are available for highefficiency toilets, showerheads and clothes washers; rainfall and wind sensors; and irrigation efficiency devices. A number of towns and cities have changed codes to require the installation of low-flow water appliances. Others require wind or rain sensors for business and open space irrigation. 6

Conservation in Action FORT MORGAN: Water Conservation in Partnership with Industry With a comprehensive and aggressive water conservation program in place, Fort Morgan counts industry partnership as a key success. Water conservation is so important to the 11,000-person city of Fort Morgan that it s written into the city code. Since 1996, this participant has embraced a range of conservation activities, such as aggressive leak detection and repair, Xeric park gardens, water-efficient landscaping on city property and widespread public education. It s even a violation of city code to waste water one that can merit a ticket. But with more than half of Fort Morgan s water going to industrial users, the city also wanted to ensure wise water use at dairy food processing and meat processing plants. The city found these businesses were doing their part to obtain the highest level of operation using the least amount of water. 7

Fort Morgan s largest industrial user, meat processor Cargill Meat Solutions, promotes water conservation awareness for all employees. The company recycles water for hide and pen washing, uses meters to monitor daily water use, and watches for leaks or unusual water use activity. Another large industrial user, Dairy Farmers of America, conserves by reusing water extracted from milk processing for cleaning purposes. And at Leprino Foods, one of the world s largest producers of mozzarella cheese, employee bonuses and profit sharing are tied into reducing overall water use at the plant. Between 2004 and 2006, water use dropped from 120 million gallons to 100 million gallons, and efforts are ongoing. Each year, the company strives to reduce water use by 1 to 2 percent. Fort Morgan is proof that saving water is good business. Since implementing conservation measures, Fort Morgan has saved more than 500 acre-feet of water enough for 1,250 families for a year. Leprino Foods Company, a Colorado Corporation, a world leader in premium-quality cheese manufacturing and the largest U.S. exporter of whey products, has a long history of continuous improvement in the consumption of water. 8

Xeriscape can reduce landscape water use by 60 percent or more. Schoolhouse Garden as a Laboratory and Northern Water offers a free state-of-the-art conservation garden to visitors to demonstrate the latest water conservation techniques and the best technology. One of every two gallons of municipal water is used to water landscapes. Yet grass, plant and shrubs can thrive on limited water, not gallons of it. Although users with automatic sprinklers often think they are conserving, the average homeowner with this type of system overwaters by 25 percent. So in 2004, Northern Water opened a formal conservation garden to teach lawn care and to study the best way to plant, irrigate and maintain landscapes. Located behind Northern Water s headquarters in Berthoud, the Conservation Gardens contain more than 700 plants and 60 turf grasses, as well as eight Xeriscaped plots. At any time, researchers run 10 to 12 studies, from measuring what types of soil amendments work best to which soil moisture sensors are most effective, to improving the efficiency of sprinkler heads and nozzles. This laboratory displays landscapes designed to thrive on a minimum amounts of water. And the garden s scientists know exactly what that minimum is, because they ve measured every drop of water applied. Some 5,000 people have visited the Conservation Gardens since 2006, learning how to water carefully and raising awareness of conservation throughout NISP communities. 9

WINDSOR: Country Neighborhoods Use Native Water Rights Windsor requires new housing developments to retain longstanding agricultural water rights, saving energy and reducing future demand from new water projects. Along the Northern Front Range, new houses sit atop former farmland. In Windsor, those houses keep something of the farms with them. By law, developments must set up dual water systems, using non-potable, agricultural water for irrigation and landscaping. Ditch water is diverted from the Poudre River using 100-year-old structures below Fort Collins. According to town data, during the hot summer months in 2010, houses that have dual systems used almost two-thirds less municipal treated water than their in-town counterparts. In the summer of 2011, water use in dual-system households was down by more than half. Ditches transport and supply the non-potable, agricultural water to new communities. But even this water supply is limited. In heavy snowmelt years, ditches and irrigation ponds are full. But during light snowmelt years, these neighborhoods have far less water to use. Not only does this 10-year-old policy keep native water rights on the land, but it also limits the amount of finished drinking water pumped through town, saving energy and chemicals. In the future, retaining native water rights will lower Windsor s demand for new water. Water Valley housing development and golf course is one of the areas using dual systems to allow non-potable, agricultural water to be used for irrigation. 10

LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT: Cracking Down on Water Loss Left Hand Water District invested $9.3 million to hunt down and repair water losses, saving thousands of gallons of water a year. Water system losses have many causes. Following the adoption of its 1996 Water Conservation Plan, the Left Hand Water District discovered that 16.4 percent of its treated water was unaccounted for. This discrepancy was due to underground leaks, worn meters, and an underestimation in the amount of water used in the treatment process and system maintenance. For some water-rich parts of the U.S., water providers consider it normal to have 10 percent to 20 percent of water go unaccounted for. But in the arid mountain West, such losses are more concerning and should be unacceptable. The district, which provides treated water to about 6,500 homes and businesses in Boulder and Weld counties, set up programs to find and fix the losses. The district began by building a replacement fund for repairs. Next, engineers tracked reported leaks locations to determine whether problems were neighborhood-wide or due to faulty transmission lines. Left Hand s 2008 Water Conservation Plan goal was to reduce overall water use by 10.6 percent or by 714 acre-feet per year. 11

Fixing a leaky faucet can save 140 gallons a week. The district put meters within the distribution system to pinpoint leaks. Because worn meters can underreport usage, the district set up a regularly scheduled meter replacement program. All of these changes added up. The system water losses were reduced on average from the 16.4 percent identified during the development of the 1996 Water Conservation Plan to a 5-year average of 8.3 percent in its updated plan, approved by the Colorado Water Conservation Board in 2008. And the district s efforts are not finished officials are planning additional measures, including electronic leak detection to better target areas for pipeline replacement in an effort to reduce losses to closer to 5 percent. Best of all, because of planning ahead, the district has been able to fund these replacements nearly $10 million worth by using base revenue, not increased assessments. The district is also now offering free indoor residential audits to 550 households located in older subdivisions built prior to the use of water-wise fixtures. This, coupled with a commercial water audit program and no-cost replacement fixtures and continued leak detection and repairs, will support the district s goal of continued reduction of unaccounted water. 12

The Need for NISP Conservation is an essential part of any water provider s portfolio. But it is not a silver bullet. The 2010 Statewide Water Supply Initiative determined that the state will need an additional 600,000 to 1 million acre feet of water by 2050 and that the gap between supply and demand will be between 190,000 to 630,000 acre feet depending on how many proposed projects get built. To meet future demands, Colorado must continue to conserve, allow continued ag transfers, complete as many of the already-planned storage projects as possible, and develop additional new water supplies. 13

In the last few years, hundreds of thousands of acre feet of water escaped the state over and above legal requirements. That s surplus water we could have legally stored, but had no place to save it. Our future is coming quickly. Looking back 30 years, few would have predicted that the 15 NISP communities would grow from 76,000 people to 200,000 people, with an anticipated population of 400,000 by 2030. More people need more water, even when they use it carefully. Conservation is in the best interest of our communities and the environment. But it s not enough. NISP is necessary because water conservation, through an assortment of best management practices, policies and educational efforts, must be supplemented with new storage. 14

NISP Participants Dacono Eaton Erie Evans Firestone Fort Lupton Fort Morgan Frederick Lafayette Severance Windsor Central Weld County Water District Fort Collins-Loveland Water District Left Hand Water District Morgan County Quality Water District For More Information: Northern Integrated Supply Project Northern Water 220 Water Ave. Berthoud, CO 80513 Phone: 970-622-2229 Email: bwerner@ncwcd.org Website: gladereservoir.org