Applications Overview of IHDIV NSWC s Reactive Materials

Similar documents
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

DESCRIPTIONS OF HYDROGEN-OXYGEN CHEMICAL KINETICS FOR CHEMICAL PROPULSION

FEASIBILITY OF USING NON PROPAGATION WALLS IN AN EXISTING OPERATING FACILITY. And

Modeling Challenges on Reactive Structural Materials: Congressional Plus-Up HECE Phase II Kibong Kim

309th Commodities Group

From Environmental Science to BMP The Canadian Experience

Army Quality Assurance & Administration of Strategically Sourced Services

A New Small-Scale DDT Test for Flash Compositions

Laser-induced plasma chemistry of the explosive RDX with various metals

Improvements to Hazardous Materials Audit Program Prove Effective

Robustness of Communication Networks in Complex Environments - A simulations using agent-based modelling

ROCK STRIKE TESTING OF TRANSPARENT ARMOR NLE-01

ITEA LVC Special Session on W&A

RFID and Hazardous Waste Implementation Highlights

James F. Miller and Chase A. Wortman Dynetics, Inc Explorer Boulevard Huntsville, AL 35806

DETONATION TRAP STUDIES

CORROSION CONTROL Anniston Army Depot

BULLET AND FRAGMENT HAZARD TESTING

DoD Solid Waste Diversion

Charting the Way Forward to Cadmium and Hexavalent Chromium Free Connectors: NAVSEA Usage and Testing

Trends in Acquisition Workforce. Mr. Jeffrey P. Parsons Executive Director Army Contracting Command

Water Sustainability & Conservation in an Exhaust Cooling Discharge System Case Study

Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective

Report Documentation Page

AF Future Logistics Concepts

An Open Strategy for the Acquisition of Models and Simulations. Rudolph P. Darken Director, MOVES Institute

AND Ti-Si-(Al) EUTECTIC ALLOYS Introduction. temperatur-dependent

DDESB TP13 Software Update 2010 DDESB Seminar 15 July, 2010

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

NOGAPS/NAVGEM Platform Support

Diminishing Returns and Policy Options in a Rentier State: Economic Reform and Regime Legitimacy in Saudi Arabia

FINAL REPORT. Joint Army/Navy Program for Environmentally Acceptable Propellant Charges for Medium Caliber Guns. ESTCP Project WP

SENSITIVITY TESTING OF CONTAMINATED SURFACES TO ESTABLISH NON-REACTIVITY LEVELS OF HMX, TATB, HBNQ, NC, AND TETRYL ON WOOD, CONCRETE, AND METAL

USMC Environmental and Corrosion Control Issues. Andrew Sheetz USMC CPAC Engineering Manager

Army Ground Vehicle Use of CFD and Challenges

Processing of Hybrid Structures Consisting of Al-Based Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) With Metallic Reinforcement of Steel or Titanium

Panel 5 - Open Architecture, Open Business Models and Collaboration for Acquisition

Bio-Response Operational Testing & Evaluation (BOTE) Project

Biased Cramer-Rao lower bound calculations for inequality-constrained estimators (Preprint)

STORAGE OF LIMITED QUANTITIES OF EXPLOSIVES AT REDUCED Q-D

Issues for Future Systems Costing

Navy s Approach to Green and Sustainable Remediation

Measurement and simulation of volatile particle emissions from military aircraft

Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facilities (TEMF) Update To The Industry Workshop

Nonlinear Optics at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory s Weapons and Materials Research Directorate

Implication of Atmospheric Wetness Levels on Corrosion at a Coating Defect during Accelerated Testing

Alex G. Manganaris Director, Workforce Plans and Resources

Safe Disposal of Secondary Waste

PL and Payment of CWA Stormwater Fees

JUDGING THE EFFICACY OF ANTHRAX FUMIGATIONS

DEVELOPMENT OF HPM NON-PROPAGATION WALLS: TEST RESULTS & AUTODYN 2D PREDICTIONS OF WALL EFFECTIVENESS

DISTRIBUTION A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED

Propane as a Surrogate for Kerosene in Fuel Fire Tests

Future Capabilities of GenCade Ashley Frey

Performance-Based Acquisitions (PBA) E2S2 Conference April 2011

Characterizing Munitions Constituents from Artillery and Small Arms Ranges

Defense Business Board

GUIDE FOR EVALUATING BLAST RESISTANCE OF EXISTING UNDEFINED ARCH-TYPE EARTH-COVERED MAGAZINES

HVOF Hard Chrome Alternatives: Developments, Implementation, Performance and Lessons Learned

Exploring DDESB Acceptance Criteria for Containment of Small Charge Weights

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Contractor Past Performance Information: An Analysis of Assessment Narratives and Objective Ratings. Rene G. Rendon Uday Apte Michael Dixon

COMPUTER ENHANCEMENTS FOR DETERMINING EXPLOSIVE FRAGMENTATION Q-D

AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY RESEARCH ON AUTONOMOUS AND NON- DESTRUCTIVE PAVEMENT SURFACE ASSESSMENT

Grinding & Superfinishing. Methods & Specifications

ortable Hybrid Ultrasound-Eddy Current NDI System for Metal Matrix Composite Track Shoes

Fort Belvoir Compliance-Focused EMS. E2S2 Symposium Session June 16, 2010

SEDD Our Vision. Anand Mudambi. Joseph Solsky USACE USEPA 3/31/2011 1

Kelly Black Neptune & Company, Inc.

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Field Demonstration of Alternative Coatings for High Strength Steel (HSS)

Surfactant-Based Chemical and Biological Agent Decontaminating Solution Development

NDCEE. Landscape Modeling Technologies for Sustainable Forests. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment. Ms. Donna S.

The Nuts and Bolts of Zinc-Nickel

11. KEYNOTE 2 : Rebuilding the Tower of Babel Better Communication with Standards

LASER-INDUCED SPALL IN SILICON CARBIDE

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

INDIAN HEAD DIVISION NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER INDIAN HEAD, MD. Erratum to IHTR 2375

Evaluation and Selection of Technologies for the Removal of RDX from an Industrial Wastewater Stream

Microstructural effects and kinetics of high temperature oxidation in Nb-Si base alloys

AN OVERVIEW OF THE BLAST DESIGN FOR THE EXPLOSIVES DEVELOPMENT FACILITY ABSTRACT

Mitigating Potential Single-Point-Failure in the Chain of Materials Supply of Densified Basic Magnesium

US Naval Open Systems Architecture Strategy

UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION and MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND. The Evolution of Protective Covers for Army Aviation and Missile Systems

1 ISM Document and Training Roadmap. Challenges/ Opportunities. Principles. Systematic Planning. Statistical Design. Field.

FIVE-SECOND EXPLOSION TEMPERATURE (U.S. ARMY ARDEC METHOD) USERS MANUAL

Ultraviolet Curable Powder Coatings With Robotic Curing for Aerospace Applications

(10) Patent No.: US 7,691,731 B / A1 * 5/2005 Sato et al / / A1 * 6/2006 Fujii eta! /499 (57) ABSTRACT

Cirrus Dopant Nano-Composite Coatings

Aerodynamic Aerosol Concentrators

A BRIEF DISCUSSION OF A RECENT EXPLOSIVE ACCIDENT AT THE NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER

Decision Framework for Incorporation of Sustainability into Army Environmental Remediation Projects

Emission Guide Update for Mobile and Stationary Sources at Air Force Installations

Characterizing PCB contamination in Painted Concrete and Substrates: The Painted History at Army Industrial Sites

Energy Security: A Global Challenge

Title: Nano shape memory alloy composite development and applications

Atmospheric Plasma Depainting. Peter Yancey Atmospheric Plasma Solutions, Inc.

Operational Effectiveness Modeling of Intelligent Systems

Sediment and Terrestrial Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Nano Aluminum Oxide. Click to edit Master subtitle style

Transcription:

Applications Overview of IHDIV NSWC s Reactive Materials Brian Amato 301-744-1414 Brian.Amato@navy.mil Carl Gotzmer 301-653-1000 carl.gotzmer@navy.mil Steve Kim 301-744-1275 steven.s.kim@navy.mil 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE APR 2009 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2009 to 00-00-2009 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Applications Overview of IHDIV NSWC s Reactive Materials 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA),Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division,Indian Head,MD,20640 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presented at National Capital Region Energetics Symposium, La Plata, MD, April 27-28, 2009. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 14 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

What are Reactive Materials? Reactive Materials refers to materials that either react with themselves (thermites, intermetallics) or combust violently with air (Al, Ti, Hf) upon impact releasing energy. An energetic material consisting of two or more solid-state reactants that together form a thermo-chemical mixture Typically metal-metal and/or metal-metal oxide mixtures with and without binders Materials with higher predicted energy per unit volume than conventional energetics Energy release management is critical to obtain useful energy from RMs RM formulation (particle size, density, structural properties etc..) System engineering ENERGY COMPARISON Composition (-ΔH) [cal/g] (-ΔH) [cal/cm3] TNT 1,040 1,530 HMX 1,280 2,510 Ti+2B 1,115 3,992 2 Al + 3 H2O --- 10,154 C+O2 2,800 17,600 4Al+3O2 7,420 20,040 2

Classes of Reactive Materials Self-Propagating High-temperature Synthesis (SHS) - more energy Thermitic - metal/metal oxide reactions Thermite and MIC reactions Intermetallic reactions Aluminides Borides Carbides Metal/fluorine systems Ultra-fine powders - energy management ALEX (exploded wire) MIC ingredients Nano-laminates Mechanochemical Synthesis (MCS) Energy Saturated Media (ESM) Hf and Ti powders 3

Potential Applications Biological agent defeat Material destruction Target damage using structural reactives Reactive fragments Enhanced blast effects High Explosive Target Countermeasure Improved underwater explosives Manufacturing Metal cutting/concrete cutting Propellant/Explosive additives 4

Advantages of an RM Additional energy by replacing inert components with an RM Adaptable to a variety of applications Offers kill mechanisms that resulting in lower collateral damage Many RMs are 4.1 Flammable solid versus 1.1 detonable explosives Improved Insensitive Munitions (IM) sensitivity Minimal gas evolved during combustion Warhead fill would survive high impacts from penetration 5

Biological Agent Defeat Application HIGH EXPLOSIVE BOMB ATTACK ON BIOLOGICAL TARGET HE overpressure and target damage will result in large release of live agents and massive collateral damage downwind. Anthrax Spores 1 GRAM 10 BILLION SPORES 8,000 Spores 50 % Lethal 6

Biological Agent Defeat Application RMs that produce a long thermal pulse, low overpressure and biocides will be effective against biological agents. In FY2005, IHDIV NSWC demonstrated the Vulcan Fire intermetallic / oxidizer payload against Anthrax simulant during the Agent Defeat ACTD Program FY2005 Military Utility Assessment (MUA) of RM payload for USECENTCOM Effective Kill Environment Sustained target temperature >500F Biocides created Cl 2, and Titanium Dioxide Very low overpressure 7

High Explosive Target Countermeasure Application RMs may be effective countermeasure to HE targets. The goal is to identify RM candidates that can destroy these targets with minimal collateral damage Maximize target break-up and combustion Prevent target detonation response 8

High Explosive/RM Characterization Test chamber simulates HE target impacted by RM projectile. It incorporates an HE bulk and rubble zone to simulate impact damage. Data Collection Temperature vs Time Pressure vs Time Chamber damage serves as a witness to HE response HE consumption Scalable Chamber was sized to hold ~380g but can be scaled HE/RM Test Chamber Bulk & Rubble HE Loading 9

Material Destruct Application Sustained high temperature is required to destroy materials. An RM producing high overpressure is not desired. Vulcan Fire Thermal Radiator Cave Test The Vulcan Fire (VF) intermetallic RM with and without oxidizer was demonstrated for material destruct application. Manportable VFThermal Radiator Vulcan Fire Burn Barrel Test 10

Underwater Warhead Application Increase underwater warhead performance by reacting water with an RM. The challenge is to react and mix RM with external water fast enough to support shock impulse and bubble. Small scale tests conducted in FY09 indicate that the aluminum-water reaction was fast enough to increase shock impulse and bubble energy. UNDEX Tank 11

Structural RM Applications Reactives augment Kinetic Energy Effects with Chemical Energy to Enhance Lethality and Battle Damage Indication. IHDNSWC has developed the highest performing RMs with densities >5.5 g/cc. Goal is to increase density to steel (7.8 g/cc) REACTIVE FRAGMENTS For a reactive fragment impacting a target, the break-up and react as a FAE inside the target For enhanced blast, an RM case will immediately breakup during HE event and react as a FAE ENHANCED BLAST WARHEAD CASING HE detonation disperses Structural RM and initiates fuel/air combustion with heated/dispersed RM particles resulting in increased blast. 12

Reactive Materials Energy Release Characterization PI Jason Jouet, PhD, Code R11JJ, 301-744-4212, Jason.Jouet@Navy.mIl PI Dr. Richard Lee, PhD, Code R12RL, 301-744-2380, Richard.j.lee@Navy.mil RMs are fired from 1K to 8K ft/sec. They penetrate thin steel plate and break up finally impacting on anvil in test chamber. We can collect peak and quasistatic pressure data, spectroscopy data, pyrometry data, flash x-ray images, high speed optical photography, reaction gas sampling, and RM debris collection in a single shot. Quasistatic pressure generally accepted as performance metric. 42mm Powder Gun Octapig Flash X-Ray/High Speed Imagery 0.0 Spectroscopy Data Pyrometric Data Fragment Size Data Streak Time (ms) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 440 460 480 500 520 540 Wavelength (nm) 13

Points of Contact (POC) Carl Gotzmer, Code TM3, Carl.Gotzmer@Navy.Mil, (301) 653-1000 Brian Amato, Code E123A, Brian.Amato@Navy.Mil, (301) 744-1414 Steven Kim, Code E123B, Steven.S.Kim@Navy.Mil, (301) 744-1275 Acknowledgements Jason Jouet, PhD, Code R11JJ, Jason.Jouet@Navy.Mil, (301) 744-4212 Richard Lee, PhD, Code R12RL, Richard.J.Lee@Navy.Mil, (301) 744-2380 14