Responsible Wool Standard

Similar documents
CORPORATE PRODUCT POLICY

Responsible Down Standard International Working Group. September 13, 2017

Responsible Wool Standard. International Working Group Update Meeting June 20, 2017

IOAS Operating Manual

TE Standard Setting and Revision Procedures

ULVANG AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. Updated 28th of October 2015 RESPONSIBLE PRODUCTION

Responsible Wool Standard

Textile Exchange Responsible Down Standard 2.0 Brand Toolkit

International Position Statement on Animal Welfare

Sustainable commodity traceability systems

Wetherspoon: food sourcing policies, practices and guidelines

The Good On You Ethical Brand Rating System

Agriculture in Australia Our role

Responsible Leather Initiative Meeting Tuesday, February 6 th, 2017

Supporting transparency and quality in the products we sell

Responsible Leather Initiative Meeting Washington, D.C. Thursday, October 12 th, 2017

1Source and sell with integrity

Sustainable Food Policy

Responsible Wool Standard

FINAL FOR PUBLICATION 1 JUNE FSA 2.1 Third Party Verification Audit Guide for Stand-Alone Farms FINAL for publication 1 June 2018 (1)

Global Recycled Standard Summary of Changes from 3.0 to 4.0

Agenda. Responsible Leather

True Source Certified TM. Galveston Texas January 6, 2011

Sustainable Food Policy

Sustainable Food Policy

Contents The Bonsucro Certification System How to become a Bonsucro approved Certification Body? How to become Bonsucro certified?

RESPONSIBLE LEATHER ROUNDTABLE. Stakeholder Meeting Monday April 9 th, 2018

Countering counterintuitive ratings and embracing regeneration, wool sets a course for long-term credibility

This document describes the level of sampling, data management, and verification audits required to support claims against FSA performance levels.

Chapter 5 - Additional rules for the certification programs: Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) and TE Standards (CCS, OCS, GRS and RCS)

PEFC contribution to the review. of the EU Timber Regulation

S U S T A I N A B L E A G R I C U L T U R E I N I T I A T I V E

Addressing Perceived Barriers to the Acceptance of Third Party Certification

INTEGRITY SCHEME. Manual Version 5 June The New England Wool. SustainaWOOL Integrity Scheme. Manual

PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT AROUND THE WORLD

Sustainable Sourcing Policy Dairy Products

Animal welfare guideline

GLOBALG.A.P. The Global Partnership for Safe and Sustainable Agriculture. UNESCWA (Feb. 2017; Jordan/Lebanon) Manal Saleh GLOBALG.A.P.

TEXTILE EXCHANGE. Policy and Template for issuing Transaction Certificates (TCs) Objective. Original Document. Multiple Shipments on a TC

RESPONSIBLE LEATHER. STAKEHOLDER MEETING #4 SEPTEMBER 21 st

National Farm Animal Care Conference October 5-6, Responding to Consumer and Market Realities

Modern Slavery Statement 2016 / 17

FSA 2.1 Third Party Verification Audit Guide for Farm Management Groups FINAL for publication 1 June 2018 (1)

Table of Contents. CCS - Implementation Manual 2013 Textile Exchange. Introduction CCS Standard Interpretations... 4

Responsible Wool Standard. Roundtable Meeting February 7 th 2018

Roadmap Mandatory targets. Hugo Boss AG has set a total of 75 targets for the year 2018.

Agriculture Industry s Role in Developing Metrics for Improving Soil Health

Sustainable Agricultural Development for Food Security and Nutrition: What Roles for Livestock?

FOREST CERTIFICATION: WHAT S IT ALL ABOUT?

Quick Guide: Independent Verification in TCO Certified

Cotton 2040: Proposals for cross-industry workstreams to mainstream sustainable cotton

Further excellence. transparency

Safety, Plus. Dr. Neal H. Hooker

MSC - Marine Stewardship Council Consultation Document:

Introduction to GLOBALG.A.P.

MAKING MATERIALITY WORK FOR YOU

OUR product RUles June 2015

The Status of Revisions to Forest Certification Standards

Welfare assessment of dairy cows

The Global Food Safety Initiative

INTEGRITY SCHEME. The New England Wool. SustainaWOOL. Integrity Scheme. Version 1 January

Principles and Criteria for Defining Global Sustainable Beef

INNOVATION IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

U.S. Cotton Sustainability

Recycled Claim Standard Summary of Changes from 1.0 to 2.0

TRUSTED QUALITY NEW ZEALAND WOOL A JOURNEY OF GENUINE INTEGRITY

The Responsible Fishing Ports Scheme

Berlin Declaration Fourth World Cocoa Conference

What is FSC and how does it work - James Sandom

Nestlé General Responsible Sourcing Guidelines for Materials of Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery and Aquaculture Origin

District Roles in Field to Market Projects. NACD Annual Meeting February 4, 2019

Pure Life. Welfare Assured

Driving change in aquaculture. Michiel Fransen ASC Standards & Certification Coordinator 24 May 2016

ISCC PLUS SAI Gold. SAI Gold ISCC PLUS V 1.0

Environment. Environmental management is a global concern.

I m going to cover briefly -who is World Wildlife Fund and our Global Forest & Trade Network -what are some of today s biggest global forestry

Policy Mandatory February The Nestlé Policy on Environmental Sustainability

Any idea what s happening down there?

Responsible Down Standard International Working Group. Training and Education. March 1, 2018

Common Swine Industry Audit. Sherrie Webb Director, Swine Welfare National Pork Board

Mark Grave. Australian Wool Exchange Limited

ISCC 204 AUDIT REQUIREMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT. Version 3.0

U.S. ROUNDTABLE FOR SUSTAINABLE BEEF INDICATOR AND METRIC SUMMARY

A Guide to Chain of Custody

EcoVadis CSR Rating Methodology: Scoring Principles

EQUASS 2018 Principles, criteria and Indicators for EQUASS Excellence recognition

Field to Market. Maree Deventer Archer Daniels Midland March 3 rd, 2015

DUE DILIGENCE GUIDANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY CHAINS IN THE GARMENT AND FOOTWEAR SECTOR

globalg.a.p. aquaculture

Keywords HACCP, quality assurance, wool, residues, pesticide. Introduction. Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)

Environmental & Social QualityScore

Product Compliance for Discrete Manufacturers

Together we make textiles perform. Testing. Certification. Research. Development.

FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL

Corporate Governance Statement Australian Men s Shed Association

Major Economies Business Forum: Intended Nationally Determined Contributions: From Good Intentions to Implementation

EMAS KEY BENEFITS FOR ORGANISATIONS AND AUTHORITIES

Proposed Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines (Poultry) Submission to the Regulatory Impact Statement

SUSTAINABILITY SOLUTIONS FROM NSF INTERNATIONAL

Building Integrity. Textile Exchange. a case study

Transcription:

Textile Exchange Responsible Wool Standard Introduction The Responsible Wool Standard (RWS) is an industry- led, voluntary standard that provides an opportunity for farmers to demonstrate their best practices to the public, and a means for brands and consumers to have certainty that the wool products they buy and sell are in line with their values. The RWS is a tool to ensure that wool comes from sheep that have been raised with respect to their Five Freedoms, that the land has been managed responsibly, and to provide a robust chain of custody system to validate the source of the material for all product claims. The Five Freedoms 1. Freedom from Hunger and Thirst 2. Freedom from Discomfort 3. Freedom from Pain, Injury or Disease 4. Freedom to Express Normal Behavior 5. Freedom from Fear and Distress The Responsible Wool Standard is a voluntary global standard that addresses the welfare of sheep and the land they graze on. The standard was developed through an open and transparent, multi- stakeholder process. Our International Working Group (IWG) included representation from all potential stakeholders and worked together to create a tool that balances effective requirements with realistic and auditable criteria. The standard combines expertise and perspectives from all of the major wool- growing regions of the globe. The Strengths of a Global Standard Do we really need a global standard? Some argue that we do not. However, Textile Exchange received a clear message from a large number of brands that one is needed. In almost every industry in the world, customers have begun to ask questions about where their products come from. Customers want the companies they buy from to hold high ethical standards in every aspect of their business; they are not just asking, but demanding that their supply of wool be free of questionable practices. Animal welfare organizations have challenged many industries to examine the efficacy and goals of routine farming practices around the world, causing wool production to come into focus for brands and consumers. The RWS provides independent verification of the practices that are happening at the farm level, giving

brands a clear solution that will allow them to make claims about their wool sourcing with confidence. Standards are a way of reducing the risk to the farmer, the supply chain and their brand partners. Many individual and regional efforts have been made on animal welfare and land management, and several initiatives and standards exist in varying countries. The RWS does not intend to replace this work, but to provide a global benchmark to align regional practices into the context of a global industry. A global standard for the wool supply chain meets the needs of today s farmers, supply chain, brands, and consumers: Simplicity of sourcing Up to now, there has been no single third- party global tool for brands to efficiently source to meet their Corporate Social Responsibility goals and the expectations of the consumers. Each region could offer them different things: non- mulesed, progressive land- management, fully verified and traceable wool, self- declarations on animal welfare, etc. The RWS pulls together animal welfare and land management criteria to provide a coherent fiber supply. Variations in legislations and enforcement Government legislations have different focus areas, regional application, and levels of enforcement. It is costly and difficult for brands to rely on these regulations to meet their demand across multiple regions. For example, in Australia animal health and welfare is the responsibility of the six state and two territory governments. Each of these jurisdictions has specific, but separate legislation governing animal health, welfare and cruelty. Risk management Even if most farmers are doing the right thing, the fact remains that some are not. The last thing that a brand wants is graphic footage showing abuse of sheep in their supply chain. A standard cannot guarantee that animal welfare will be completely protected, but the RWS provides third- party audits and a transparent system to address any violations of the standard. Self- declarations are not enough The quality of information from self- declarations relies on the commitment and training of the individual. They carry this risk of subjective and variable interpretations and even conflicts of interest. Regular third- party audits ensure that requirements are being consistently met. A global standard creates opportunities for all stakeholders Connection to the consumer The RWS will help bring the story of sheep farming to consumers. It presents an excellent opportunity for people to learn about the farmers, the incredible work that they do, and the care that they take of their land and their animals. Efficiency The RWS also provides a means for brands to communicate their fiber and traceability expectations clearly and consistently to any and all points in their supply networks. Multiple brands working with a single standard means economies of scale can be more quickly reached.

Flexibility The IWG was always concerned about the practicability of the standard for the farmers around the globe, and had to balance that out against the expectations of the brands and the animal welfare groups. For this reason we ve built in flexibility wherever possible, setting out the desired outcomes of the standard and leaving it to the farmers to find the most efficient ways to meet them. We also created a large range of templates and tools to help farmers, particularly with the less popular actions like record keeping. Benchmarking Data Part of the farm audit process includes the collection of data, ranging from the types of fiber and number of sheep to performance indicators on animal welfare and land health. By aggregating this data, brands can report on the impacts of their programs, governments can assess the effectiveness of their programs, and farmers can compare themselves against global and regional benchmarks and identity opportunities for improvement. The data will also help to revise the standard to make it more and more effective over time. The Development of the RWS How can an NGO like Textile Exchange develop a technical standard for sheep farming? TE s expertise is in standard development: we have created global standards for organic content (OCS), recycled inputs (RCS and GRS) and animal welfare related to down and feathers (RDS). Our standards are used throughout the textile supply chain, and are recognized for the strong chain of custody they offer for preferred materials. (Read more at http://textileexchange.org/integrity). The greatest strength of the RWS is the process by which it was developed: Multi- stakeholder, Transparent The greatest strength of the RWS is the process by which it was developed. An International Working Group (IWG) was formed, representing the interests of the wide range of stakeholders with an interest in wool. The IWG included global brands from apparel and home, industry organizations (including RESP, European Outdoor Group, the Outdoor Industry Association and the IWTO in observer status), animal welfare groups (Humane Society International, Four Paws), and established producer groups with their own standards (Ovis 21, New Zealand Merino, and New Merino). See http://responsiblewool/org/iwg/ for a full list of IWG members. Throughout the two years of development, as many as 50 IWG members attended our calls. Meeting notes and updates were made publicly available on the website, and all decisions were reached through consensus or majority vote. We made every effort to have all sides be heard and understood. Experts The RWS has been developed with the input of experts from across the industry and around the globe, including: Stuart Adams (Continuum Textiles) is a farmer with over 25 years of experience in sheep farming in Western Australia, as well as 10 years of supply chain experience Sara Shields (Humane Society International) has a PHD in animal behavior as well as many years of practical experience, and is currently a U.S. Delegate to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) TC34 Working Group on Animal Welfare. William Burnidge (The Nature Conservancy)is an expert in conservation with years of experience as the Grasslands Program Director at TNC; he is also involved in the Roundtable for Sustainable Beef.

Gyorgyi Acs (Control Union Certifications) has years of experience in developing standards and overseeing their application at both the farm and manufacturing levels. Gyorgyi played a key role in the Responsible Down Standard. Collaboration From the beginning we tried to integrate the excellent work that had already been done at different levels of the industry. Private organizations like New Zealand Merino were active contributors; Ovis 21, The Nature Conservancy and Predator Friendly gave us strong input into land management issues; and we ensured that the requirements of the standard addressed the Five Freedoms and covered all of the OIE and IWTO Animal Welfare Guidelines. We also reached out to groups such as AWI, and the IWTO participated in almost all of our calls in observer status. Piloting The standard was piloted in Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, China, South Africa, United States and the UK, over multiple audits. We made multiple adjustments along the way based on feedback from farmers and auditors, and were pleased to see immediate impacts in some cases: as the result of the pilot, one farm immediately changed their method of tail docking: he changed from using a knife to thermo- cauterization. We have now introduced the RWS to farmers in every major wool- producing country in the world, and the feedback we have received so far is that it is very achievable. And this does not surprise us: we ve always believed that most farmers are already doing the right thing. Flexibility The IWG was always concerned about the practicability of the standard for the farmers around the globe, and had to balance that out against the expectations of the brands and the animal welfare groups. For this reason we ve built in flexibility wherever possible, setting out the desired outcomes of the standard and leaving it to the farmers to find the most efficient ways to meet them. We also created a large range of templates and tools to help farmers, particularly with the less popular actions like record keeping. We have now introduced the RWS to farmers in every major wool- producing country in the world, and the feedback we have received so far is that it is very achievable. And this does not surprise us: we ve always believed that most farmers are already doing the right thing, and a key role of the standard is to simply capture their information in a uniform way, and create a clearer link from farms to brands to consumers. The final result of the two years of work put into the development of the RWS is a strong, industry- driven, voluntary standard that ensures the animal welfare of sheep and the land they graze. You can find more information about the standard online: http://responsiblewool.org/. Key Points in the RWS Reduced risk The RWS reduces the risk to brands, the supply chain and wool growers. Protecting animal welfare The Five Freedoms of sheep are protected at all times: freedom from hunger and thirst, freedom from discomfort, freedom from pain, injury or disease, freedom to express normal behavior, and freedom from fear and distress.

Preserving land health Progressive methods of land management are practiced on RWS farms, protecting soil health, biodiversity and native species. Supply chain traceability The identity of the RWS wool is maintained at all times: from the farm to the final product. Consumers can have full confidence that the wool in a product carrying the RWS logo comes from responsibly managed farms. Credible certification A professional, third party certification body audits each stage in the supply chain. Confident communication Only products with 100% certified wool may carry the RWS logo. The certification of the fully supply chain ensures that the chain of custody of the RWS fiber is protected from farm to retailer. Stakeholder engagement Our process of standard development is open and inclusive. The RWS was developed with the input of farmers, animal welfare experts, land conservation experts, brands and retailers from all parts of the globe. Creating a link between brands and farmers The RWS provides an opportunity for brands and farmers to better understand each other s realities and to meet each other s needs. About Textile Exchange Textile Exchange (www.textileexchange.org) is a non- profit organization that accelerates sustainability practices in the textile industry. We develop and own standards that provide traceability for materials such as organic cotton, recycled polyester, and responsibly sourced down. There has been increasing interest from brands and industry groups in creating a tool to identify the best practices to respect animal welfare and land protection for wool production. Responsiblewool.org Responsiblewool@responsiblewool.org