STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF POULTRY.

Similar documents
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF CARCASSES BY EXCISION DESTRUCTIVE METHOD

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF CARCASSES BY THE ABRASIVE SPONGE SWABBING METHOD

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF CARCASSES BY WET/DRY SWABBING

Microbiological criteria and shelf-life. ...Current legal situation

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

EU Regulation on Microbiological Criteria for Foodstuffs. Mary Howell Hygiene and Microbiology UK Food Standards Agency

THE EFFECTS OF LACTIC AND ACETIC ACID TREATMENT ON THE PSYCHROTROPHIC GERM GROWTH FROM THE SURFACE OF BEEF AND PORK

I EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

DETERMINING THE POINTS OF CONTAMINATION IN PROCESSING FRESH PORK SAUSAGE

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements

Raad voor Accreditatie (Dutch Accreditation Council RvA) Explanatory document on microbiology

How to Handle Excursions in Environmental Monitoring (EM) and Personnel Monitoring (PM) in an Aseptic Processing Plant

Guidance document Regulation (EC) 882/2004 Microbiological sampling and testing of foodstuffs. Enne de Boer. II. Analysis

3M Food. with 3M. TB Effective Date: Number: April 2, 2013 Supersedes: New Technology Products Originating.

Cercetări privind microbiologia cărnii proaspete, refrigerate şi congelate de pasăre ABSTRACT

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

ComparisonoftwoSamplingMethodsforSalmonellaIsolationfromImportedVealMeatSamplesofUnknownInfectionStatus

The Flame Sanitizer A Poultry House Sanitation Tool

TECHNICAL REPORT submitted to EFSA. Fate of Salmonella spp. on broiler carcasses before and after cutting and/or deboning 1

INTRODUCTION Contaminated serial dilution countable plates

Microbiology of food and animal feed Preparation of test samples, initial suspension and decimal dilutions for microbiological examination.

Microbiological specifications

Microbiological Standards for Reusable Plastic Containers within Produce Grower Facilities within Ontario and Quebec

EC-type approval protocol No. 2 Microbiological safety of toys containing aqueous media REV 2

Simulation-based assessment of Microbiological Criteria on Salmonella in poultry meat 1

SANCO/4198/2001 Rev. 15 (PLSPV/2001/4198/4198R15-EN.doc)

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Guide on measurement uncertainty for the enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes

Annex A2. Guidance on Process Validation Scheme for Aseptically Processed Products

Validation of Hot Water and Lactic Acid Sprays for the Reduction of Enteric Pathogens on the Surface of Beef Carcasses

Microbiological Standards for Reusable Plastic Containers within Produce Grower Facilities within Ontario and Quebec

Report #3 Short-term temperature abuse of cooked but not shelf-stable meat and poultry products

Microbiological Standards for Reusable Plastic Containers within Produce Grower Facilities

EC-type approval protocol No. 2 Microbiological safety of toys containing aqueous media REV 3

Critical control points (CCPs), monitoring and critical limits Maurizio Ferri

Nationwide Microbiological Baseline Data Collected by Sponge Sampling during 1997 and 1998 for Cattle, Swine, Turkeys, and Geese

MICROBIOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR FOODSTUFFS IN COMMUNITY LEGISLATION IN FORCE

COUNT METHOD 5.0 OBJECTIVES 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.2 PRINCIPLE. Structure

Microbial Risk Factors Associated With Condensation In Ready-To-Eat Processing Facilities

Best Practices for Using Microbiological Sampling

TECHNICAL LEAFLET. MEDI-MEDIA-FILL KIT SUPPLY PACKAGE (Code: MR-25/S)

BacTrac 4300 Microbiological Multi Monitoring System. Fast Automated Documented

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Draft for comments only - Not to be cited as East African Standard

Opinion from the Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards on the evaluation of the efficacy of L (+) Lactic acid for carcass decontamination 1

AUDIT REPORT. Audit of Offi cial Controls carried out by the Local Authority Veterinary Service Leitrim County Council

M I C R O B I O L O G I C A L T O O L S F O R Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E I N H A T C H E R Y : Sampling Procedures

3M Microbiology. Food safety. maximized. Safety. Processing

The Prerequisites Program includes:

DESTRUCTION OF SELECT HUMAN PATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN MUSHROOM COMPOST DURING PHASE II PASTEURIZATION

EVALUATION OF THE HYGIENE STATUS IN SEVERAL MEAT AND DAIRY PROCESSING ESTABLISHMENTS IN R.MACEDONIA

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WATER COOLER DISPENSERS AND TAP WATER

Annals. Food Science and Technology 2010 USING OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS (ESSENTIAL OIL) FOR MICROBIOLOGY POULTRY AND ITS PRODUCTS

Discussion Topics. Some process engineering considerations

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Box 42141, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA

Culturing microorganisms may be hazardous

Cork County Council. Veterinary Food Safety Laboratory, Inniscarra, Co. Cork. Testing Laboratory Registration number: 261T

Pathogen Reduction: a food safety priority

SANIDATE 5.0 -BLUEBERRY STUDY

PURE CULTURE TECHNIQUES

MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF FOOD & FOOD PRODUCTS

RapidChek SELECT Salmonella Test Kit

Annex I Comments on the draft report, French version The comments are shown in blue, and the changes highlighted in grey

Microbiology Testing: USP requirements for Sterile and Nonsterile Preparations Webinar Q&A

OPERATOR S MANUAL FOR DETECTION AND ENUMERATION OF ENTEROBACTERIACEAE BACTERIA IN FOOD, SERIAL DILUTIONS OF FOOD, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SPONGE SAMPLES

Core practical 12: Investigate the rate of growth of microorganisms in liquid culture

Improved methods for supervision and official controls in pig slaughterhouses

Pr oject Summar y. Efficacy of cetylpyridinium chloride to reduce E. coli O157:H7 in commercial beef processing plants

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAMS MICROBIOLOGY

FINAL REPORT LOW LEVEL DISINFECTION EVALUATION VIOGUARD KEYBOARD

MICROBIOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HATCHERY: Laboratory Methods

Eduarda M. Zandamela Mungói, PhD Food Science

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL GENERAL AUDIT REPORT OF A SPECIFIC AUDIT CARRIED OUT IN LATVIA

The UK s experience developing Campylobacter controls

EURL Lm European Union Reference Laboratory for Listeria monocytogenes

Animal Products (Raw Milk Products Specifications) Notice 2009

D08-FSQ(2005)D/ Name of Additive: Calsporin. Active Agent(s): Bacillus subtilis C Renata Leuschner (CRL-FAA)

OPTIMIZATION AND CV ESTIMATION OF A PLATE COUNT ASSAY USING JMP

STUDY OF MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION OF BROILERS IN MODERN ABATTOIRS IN KHARTOUM STATE

Adapted from Biology 15 Laboratory Manual Supplement: Wrightsman, Ininns and Cannon-Moloznic, Saddleback College, CA 92692

Safepork 2015 Conference

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES

REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Negotiating Group 12 - Food Safety, Veterinary and Phytosanitary Policy. Bilateral Screening. Hygiene Rules

Thermal Disinfection of Poultry Grow-Out Facilities in Central-Northern Italy

PathoSEEK Analysis Quick Reference Tables:... 2 FLOWER... 2 NON FLOWER Matrices... 2 GUMMY... 3

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE (HACCP-PREERQUISITES LETTER) December 2016

Opportunities for Improved Offal Recovery and their Validation. (Burst Cattle Paunches)

Spoilage of Seafood. Measuring Spoilage

GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES FOR GOOSE FARM

Microbiological Evaluation of Raw Meat Products Available in Local Markets of Karachi, Pakistan

AUDIT REPORT. Audit of Offi cial Controls carried out by the Local Authority Veterinary Service Louth County Council

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

Rapid Microbiological Methods: Why and what!

Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2012, 3, Published Online May 2012 (

EURL-Salmonella. interlaboratory comparison study on the detection of Salmonella in samples from the primary production XVI (2013)

Section III Research Articles and Short Communications

Lab Exercise 13: Growth Curve

BIO & PHARMA ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES

Microbiological Methods

Transcription:

Page 1 of 9 1. PURPOSE To ensure that the microbiological examination of poultry, carried out as part of a plant own check programme for the control the general hygiene of food processing operations is carried out in accordance with Commission Regulation No. 2073/2005 on the microbiological criteria of foodstuffs. 2. SCOPE This standard operating procedure (SOP) is applicable to the bacteriological examination of poultry for Salmonella spp, ACC and Enterobacteriaceae in slaughterhouses using the neck skin excision method. Plant management are responsible for ensuring that with designated responsibility for carrying out this procedure have received formal training. Plant management are obliged to provide the necessary resources to facilitate and ensure the health and safety of carrying out this procedure. 3. DEFINITIONS Mean Log = the arithmetic average of the logarithm (base 10) of individual carcass test results (in colony forming units per gram: cfu/g) for all carcasses sampled on a given day, see worked examples 4.3.4, 4.3.5 and 4.3.6. Note: When computing the mean log value where the average bacterial counts may be less than 1, the logarithm of counts of less than 1 should be designated as 0 for the purpose of constructing the process control charts.

Page 2 of 9 4. PROCEDURE 4.1 Sampling method 4.1.1 A minimum of 15 carcasses should be sampled on each sampling session and a piece of approximately 10g of neck skin (Diagram A) removed aseptically from each carcass. The neck skin from 3 carcasses should be pooled before examination so that in total five composite samples are obtained per session. In total 50 sample results (n = 50) derived 10 consecutive sampling sessions should be examined. Diagram A: Aseptic removal of poultry neck skin sample. Note 1: An alternative sample site to the above may be used in consultation with the official veterinarian where it can be demonstrated that because of the production processes involved, other sites are likely to carry higher levels of contamination. Note 2: It is imperative that the sample is taken under aseptic conditions and that the equipment used is sterile. Note 3: The composite samples obtained may also be used as a source of sample material for pathogen testing (for example Salmonella), subject to the approval of the official veterinarian in charge. Sterility can be achieved by: 1) Flaming the cutting equipment using 70% ethanol and a portable gas blow torch or cigarette lighter.

Page 3 of 9 2) Using disposable alcohol wipes. 3) Placing samples in sterile, peristaltic type, homogeniser bags or sterile sample containers. Other methods, which will achieve the same results, may be used. 4.1.2 Sampling should be carried out after carcass chilling. 4.1.3 The carcasses are sampled on one day of each working week and to ensure that they are representative of the factory throughput, the day on which sampling is carried out should be altered each week. 4.2 Sample maintenance, storage and transport 4.2.1 Using aseptic techniques, a composite sample from each carcass is placed in a sterile container or bag prior to transfer to the laboratory. 4.2.2 Each sample container should be identified with the flock number or batch identification, time and date of sampling and the identity of the person who took the sample. 4.2.3 The sample container is stored between 0-4 C (e.g. using a coolbox) and then transported to the laboratory under chilled conditions (0-4 C). N.B, The time between sampling and laboratory examination should not exceed 24 hours.

Page 4 of 9 4.3. Laboratory examination: 4.3.1 The analyses for aerobic colony count (ACC), Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella spp. are carried out using the following ISO procedures: (a) ISO 4833:2003, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs. Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms. Colony-count technique at 30 C. (b) ISO 21528-2:2004 Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs Horizontal methods for the detection and enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae part 2: Colony-count method (c) ISO 6579 Horizontal method for detection of Salmonella spp. Note 1: Methods other than the ISO methods described above may be used where they have been validated against the reference method or validated according to internationally accepted protocols and authorised by the Competent Authority. E. coli counts may be used instead of Enterobacteriaceae counts following approval by the Department of Agriculture and Food, and establishment of appropriate criteria. If methods other than the standard ISO methods given above are used, details must be provided for the incubation temperature and times, types of agar and inoculation volumes and reference to method used. Note 2: Testing for Salmonella is a compulsory requirement in Commission Regulation No 2073/2005. Testing for Enterobacteriaceae counts and aerobic colony counts (ACC) is a voluntary requirement only but seen as indicator of good process hygiene. 4.3.2 Laboratory results are recorded as colony forming units per gram (cfu/g) for each composite (three carcass) sample using the following formula: Cfu/g = Average cfu/plate x dilution factor

Page 5 of 9 Example: Average cfu/plate = 110 on 10-1 dilution cfu/g = 110 x 10 = 1100 = 1100 cfu/g 4.3.3 The logarithm of each result is obtained by taking the logarithm to base 10 (log 10) of cfu/g for each composite sample result. 4.3.4 The mean log is calculated by taking the logarithm to base 10 (log 10 ) of each individual composite test result and then calculating the arithmetic mean of these log values. An example of a calculation using data from five composite samples is as follows: Composite no Colony count (cfu/g) logarithm to base 10 (log 10 ) 1 20000 4.3 2 1485 3.2 3 300 2.5 4 450000 5.7 5 2500 3.4 Mean Log (arithmetic mean of log values) 3.8 4.3.5 The laboratory records should show the name and address of the laboratory carrying out the examination, the date of the examination, reference to the method

Page 6 of 9 used, the signature of the laboratory supervisor, identification of the sample (including date and hour of sampling) and the results. These should be reported as the cfu per plate used to calculate the number of cfu/g computed as in 4.3.4, 4.3.5 and 4.3.6 above. The Salmonella spp. results should be reported as presence/absence. 4.3.6 Laboratory records must be maintained for a period of not less than 18 months after the date of sampling and must be available on request by the veterinary officer in charge. 4.4 Presentation/evaluation of results and process control 4.4.1 Daily mean log values for ACC, Enterobacteriaceae and presence/absence of Salmonella spp. are presented in the form of the following Process Control Charts A, B and C. These provide ready identification where there is the need to take corrective action on the process. Charts A and B presents data for daily mean log values and shows the acceptable (m) and the unsatisfactory (M) limiting criteria for the microbiological counts. Chart C presents data for 10 consecutive weeks where c is the maximum number of positive Salmonella samples allowed from total of 50 samples (5 pooled samples per week)

Page 7 of 9 Process Control Chart A: Aerobic colony count - daily mean log values of colony forming units (cfu/g): Daily mean log: 6.0 ( M ) Corrective Action required (2 acceptable results) Corrective Action required (1 unsatisfactory result) 5.0 ( m ) Comments: Action taken: No of weeks Process Control Chart B: Enterobacteriaceae - daily mean log values of colony forming units (cfu/g) Corrective Action Corrective Action required Daily mean log: required (1 unsatisfactory (2 acceptable results) result) 4.0 ( M ) 3.5 ( m ) Comments: Action taken: No of weeks Note: above plots are for illustrative purposes only

Page 8 of 9 Process Control Chart C: Salmonella c Number of positive Salmonella samples detected 7 2 Corrective action required x x x x 1 0 x x x No of weeks 10 4.4.2 Corrective actions: Where one mean log result on either chart exceeds the unsatisfactory Range, or two consecutive results exceed the satisfactory Range, immediate corrective action is required to address the root cause of the problem (see Process Control Chart above). Where there is greater than 7 positive Salmonella results from 10 consecutive sampling sessions (50 samples in total) then correction action should be taken to address the problem. This action is documented after consultation with the responsible staff by the appropriate plant. Note 1: Corrective actions should include: Review of flock hygiene, animal welfare and controls at producer level, review of transportation procedures, evaluation of operation cleanliness, improving working procedures/instructions, retraining, review of cleaning/effectiveness of disinfection materials and maintenance/cleaning equipment, improved supervision and review of controls at relevant critical control points, review of biosecurity measures on farms. Note 2: In the case of Salmonella, the frequency of sampling may be reduced to forthnightly if satisfactory results are obtained for 30 consecutive weeks, subject to the agreement of the veterinary officer in charge. Note 3: Sampling frequency may be increased where the results of sampling are unsatisfactory

Page 9 of 9 Note 4: when justified on the basis of risk analysis and consequently authorised by the competent authority, small slaughterhouses and establishments producing minced meat and meat preparations in small quantities may be exempted from these sampling frequencies. A sampling frequency of one day in every five days of slaughtering may be used for such premises. The specific microbial limiting criteria for poultry to be used in the Process Control Chart (Criteria are based on historical baseline data submitted by poultry processing companies and research carried out by the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin.) Daily mean log values (cfu/g) for the neck sampling method Satisfactory range Acceptable range (m) Unsatisfactory range (M) ACC 5.0 log (100,000 cfu/g) >5.0 6.0 log (100,000-1,000,000 cfu/g) > 6.0 log (1,000,000 cfu/g) Enterobacteriaceae 3.5 log (3162 cfu/g) >3.5 4.0 log (3162 10,000 cfu/g) > 4.0 log (10,000 cfu/g) Salmonella sampling plan: Food category Sampling plan Limits n c Carcasses of broilers and turkeys 50 7 Absence in 25g of pooled neck sample Where: n number of carcasses tested c number of carcasses above which corrective action as outlined in section 4.4.2 above must be applied.

Page 10 of 9 5 REFERENCES ISO 4833:2003, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs. Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms. Colony-count technique at 30 C. ISO 21528-2:2004 Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs Horizontal methods for the detection and enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae part 2: Colony-count method Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005, on Microbiological Criteria for foodstuffs, 15 th November 2005. ISO 6579 Horizontal method for detection of Salmonella Sp. Whyte, P., Bolton, D., O Mahony, M., Collins, D., (2002). Development and application of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) systems in commercial broiler production and slaughter, ISBN 1 90227 7627.