Chapter 1. General Design Information. Section 1.02 Structure Selection and Geometry. Introduction

Similar documents
Conceptual Design Report

EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT (ERCAR) SAMPLE OUTLINE

STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

CHAPTER 3 SCOPE SUMMARY

Chapter 1. General Design Information. Section 1.03 Loads and Load Factors. Introduction. Load Modifying Factors

Review of Plans and Specs from a Constructability Perspective

January 2015 v 2.0. (Revised April 2016)

CHAPTER 18 TEMPORARY ROADS AND BRIDGES

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

DECEMBER 2017 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 2-1

Chapter 11 Culverts and Bridges

5.0 Plan Development. 5.1 Introduction. 5.2 Design References

CHAPTER 11: WALLS.

SCOPE OF WORK AND DELIVERABLES

Grade-Separated Trail Crossings How Do We Get Over There?

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR LOCAL 3R PROJECTS

Chapter 11 PRELIMINARY DESIGN NDOT STRUCTURES MANUAL

Chapter 4 Bridge Program Drawings

APPENDIX C INLETS. The application and types of storm drainage inlets are presented in detail in this Appendix.

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION UNDERPASS GRADE SEPARATION DESIGN CRITERIA

Construction Cost Estimation Preparation Manual for Preliminary Design (English Units)

JULY 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 11-1

Constructability Guidelines

Section 13. Guidelines for the Design of Ground Mounted Sign Supports

LRFD Bridge Manual - Part I 2-1 CHAPTER 2 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING GUIDELINES

STRUCTURE SELECTION REPORT

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS NON-NHS BRIDGE R&R POLICY

Traffic Technical Memorandum: Hickman Road over Tuolumne River Bridge Replacement Project, Stanislaus County (BRLO-5938(199))

UPRR criteria for sizing waterway openings under bridges and through culverts are as follows:

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE, 1980 W. BROAD ST., COLUMBUS, OHIO

Rapid City, SD HDR Project No RE: Replacement of Existing I-190 Twin Bridges at I-190/Silver Street Interchange, Rapid City, SD

CHAPTER 12 BRIDGE DECK DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Construction Cost Estimation Preparation Manual (Metric Units)

SINGLE STEEL BOX GIRDER BRIDGES FOR THE TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT TORONTO PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. Srdjan Brasic, M.Sc., P.Eng.

ARGENTINE CONNECTION BRIDGE TRIPLE TRACK CROSSING. Kansas City Terminal Railway Company

STANDARDIZED CONCRETE BRIDGES IN TEXAS. John Holt, PE, Texas Department of Transportation Ronald Medlock, PE, Texas Department of Transportation

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT (ERCAR) SAMPLE OUTLINE

Bridge and Culvert Design Standards

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section / Article Page

CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Winooski/Burlington, US RTs 2 & 7 Bridge Scoping Study ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NO.

I-35W Retaining Wall Design Exhibit A - Draft Scope of Work

MIDAS Training Series

Barriers and highway accessory supports

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE, 1980 W. BROAD ST., COLUMBUS, OHIO

B R I D G E O F F I C E

CHAPTER 12 INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES AND OTHER SYSTEMS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents 5.1 GENERAL Overview Investigation and Engineering Information

Chapter 7. Street Drainage. 7.0 Introduction. 7.1 Function of Streets in the Drainage System. 7.2 Street Classification

REHABILITATION PACKAGE 4-a

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE, 1980 W. BROAD ST., COLUMBUS, OHIO

DESIGN OF CAMPBELL ROAD OVERPASS IN KELOWNA. Yulin Gao, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., SNC-Lavalin Inc. Samson Chan, M.Eng., P. Eng., SNC-Lavalin Inc.

CHEF MENTEUR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

Dave Ward Drive Pedestrian Overpass

Grade Separation Inspection and Rating

Maclay Bridge Preservation Alternatives Analysis

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Manual Section. Introduction 1. Using This Manual 2-3. Administrative Actions 4-6. Road and Bridge Project Types 7

PIER PROTECTION (VEHICLE COLLISION) September 13, 2018

2.0 Purpose. 3.0 Work Plan. Page 1 of 7

CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECKLIST

B760 - NOISE BARRIER SYSTEMS OPSS 760

October BC MoTI

B R I D G E O F F I C E

Grade Separation Inspection and Rating

Chapter 11 Culverts and Bridges

Chapter 11 Culverts and Bridges

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Workshop Meeting: Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Bridge Planning Updates. Bridge Planning Practitioners Workshop April 2012

ATTACHMENT 50-1: PERFORMANCE AND MEASUREMENT TABLE

STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PLANNING AND DESIGN PARAMETERS BRIDGE STRUCTURES. Engr. Ericson Mammag Feasibility Study Preparation CHARM2 Project

Canadian Consulting Engineering Awards 2016 CANADIAN NIAGARA POWER FOREBAY BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION

The Main Street Bridge - Supporting Transportation Systems

49-2A Clear-Zone Width for New Construction or Reconstruction B Clear-Zone Adjustment Factor, K cz, for Horizontal Curve...

Appendix C: Port Jervis Line Capacity Improvements Analysis. Technical Memorandum 2: Passing Siding Alternative

FRST 557 Lecture 7b Cross Drainage Structures: Culverts and Bridges

6 th STREET VIADUCT SIESMIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Section 1 - Introduction Introduction Policy on Use of AASHTO Standards Reference Publications... 2

Red Wing Bridge Alternates

500 Interchange Design

Guidelines for Checking Final Design Bridge Plans

Baseline Document Change Announcement

PROJECT SCOPING PHASE ~ SCOPE OF SERVICES MAIN STREET BRIDGE OVER WINOOSKI RIVER CITIES OF BURLINGTON & WINOOSKI VERMONT

Bridge Concept Report

Roadway Surfaces and Traffic Control Elements

PHASING CONSIDERATIONS FOR BRIDGES

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY FILES: BR & BR

Chapter URBAN & RURAL FREEWAY DESIGN

ACHD Bridge and Culvert Policy DRAFT

SECTION 6. ROAD CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

RED FLAG SUMMARY. Red Flag Summary Completed: January 2006

CHAPTER 13 MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN RAILROAD CROSSINGS RAILROAD CROSSINGS IDENTIFICATION OF GRADE SEPARATIONS

POLICY & PROCEDURE MANUAL

Road M3 Chisinau Giurgiulesti/ Romanian Border Extension and Rehabilitation Project Draft Feasibility Study (December 2008)

Bridge Construction. Nick Haltvick North Region Bridge Construction Engineer May 17, Bridge Office mndot.gov/bridge/construction.

SOUTH MEDFORD INTERCHANGE BRIDGES

500 Interchange Design

Transcription:

Chapter 1 Bridge Design Manual General Design Information Section 1.02 Selection and Geometry Introduction Selection or Rehabilitation Report This section of the design manual provides guidance on the procedure for selection of the most cost-effective and appropriate structure for a particular bridge site. Information is also provided to help determine structure geometrics such as skew, clearances, lengths, etc. The purpose of the Selection or Rehabilitation Report (SSR / SRR) is to provide enough background information so that reviewers can effectively evaluate the proposed final design and the concepts it is based on. The report should describe the project, the proposed structure, and give reasons why the bridge type, size, and location were selected. The report should concisely summarize the information. A single report is recommended if multiple structures are included in a project. The intent of these reports is the collection of pertinent data required for the design of the structure, in addition to documentation of design decisions. Pertinent data shall be extracted from other discipline reports and summarized in this report for use by the structure designers. The SSR / SRR will include the following sections, where applicable. Not all sections will apply to all structures. Report Outline General Background Project description Right-of-way restrictions Permits and restrictions Utility conflicts or restrictions 1.02-1

Railroad clearances or restrictions Design Specifications Existing Conditions location (may include roadway plan & profile and aerial photography) Condition of existing structure Reason for replacement or rehabilitation Environmental Wetlands Length of Detour Historical sites Contaminated areas Recreation areas Threatened species areas Environmental commitments listed in the environmental documentation Design Concepts Rationale for: Building new bridge versus widening existing one Use of bridge versus culvert Foundation support assumptions Seismic load assumptions Geometry and Layout Roadway width Traffic volumes Profile grade Horizontal alignment Design exceptions Sidewalks Railing Hydraulics Waterway opening High water elevation Clearance Bank protection Floodway information Deck Drains Foundations Piling, spread footings, or drilled shafts. 1.02-2

Fills and surcharges Settlement Lateral earth loads Seismic loads Bridge Design Manual Selection / Recommendations Span length, skew, and span arrangement Type of superstructure o Girder type and spacing o Fixity at abutment & piers o Location and type of expansion joints o Deck thickness and corrosion protection system Type of substructures and location Alternate structure types considered and estimated costs Stage construction and detour requirements Aesthetics Maintenance considerations Feasibility of construction Rehabilitation recommendations Cost estimate of the proposed work The following additional items should be considered and addressed as practical in the report: Alignment and span configurations of the new bridge in relation to the existing bridge Proposed treatment of the runoff and comparison of the number of drains on the existing bridge to the number of drains on the new bridge. Discuss the sizes, numbers, and removal methods of the existing bents, footings and piles within the ordinary high water mark. Discuss the sizes, numbers, and construction methods of the new bents, footings and piles within the ordinary high water mark. Possibility of lead based paint and mitigation options Amount or extent of fill and/or riprap Amount of wetland impacted Geometry Bridge lengths shall be in 5'-0" increments unless space constraints require otherwise. Refer to the tables in the Bridge Applications Manual (BAM) Chapter 4.1 - Preliminary for general and structural characteristics of the most common bridge types. 1.02-3

Span lengths and substructure locations should typically avoid existing substructures and be aligned with the channel or crossroad. It is recommended to minimize cuts and fills by best fitting the structure to the site geometry. Selection of final structure geometry shall depend on structural requirements, hydraulics, alignment, geology, land use, affect on adjacent property, personal and vehicle safety, and economics. Other factors, such as environment and aesthetics, may need to be considered. Experience and good engineering judgment are the key factors. Piers (solid shaft columns) or bents (multi-column) shall be placed parallel with the feature intersected and located to minimize interference. The use of bents in streams where heavy scour and large quantities of debris are possible is discouraged. Piers and bents for bridges crossing highways should be located out of the clear zone. Desired freeboard from design high water elevation to bottom of lowest girder is 7'-0" where drift, as listed in the Hydraulic Report, includes trees and logs and 3'-0" elsewhere. Desired freeboard for major irrigation ditches is 2'-0". If the above noted freeboard values require a large grade raise or additional girders, the design freeboard will need to be discussed with Bridge Program Staff. The US Corp of Engineers (USCOE) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may require different freeboard values than those described above. The Hydraulics Section and the agencies should be consulted when dealing with structures under their jurisdiction. Grades & Slopes Bridge grades, including vertical curvature, typically follow the road grades set by the Project Development Section. Consideration should be given to restrictions on grades required by vertical clearances and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for sidewalks and bicycle paths. An example of a structure requiring one or more of these restrictions is an urban railroad overpass. Culvert slopes are based on matching the stream (or approach roadway grades) and should be kept at a minimum of 0.3% to 1.02-4

ensure drainage. When culverts are used as pedestrian underpasses, consideration should be given to allowing pedestrians continuous vision through the underpass from one approach to the other. Widths The following clear widths are based on A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and the Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, both by AASHTO, with all revisions to date, and the ADA. The clear bridge roadway width should be as wide as the approach pavement and paved shoulders and is usually taken from the Road Plans. The minimum clear bridge roadway width is 26'-0". The minimum clear roadway width for 2-lane Interstate structures is 40-0. The width of curbs for new structures shall be 1'-8". Curb widths for rehabilitations should match the existing width, but have a minimum width of 1'-4". The curb width for bridges crossing over railroad tracks is 2-2 to accommodate future installations of splashboard and safety fence. If texturing on the outside edge of the deck and curb is going to be used, an additional 2 of width will be required for clearance of the rebar to the form liners. The current standard clear sidewalk width is 5'-0". This is usually measured from the front face of the pedestrian rail to the rear face of the bridge rail base plate or the rear face of the barrier rail. Consideration of the rubrail connection at the end of the bridge should also be considered when determining clear sidewalk widths. The recommended minimum clear two-way bicycle path width is 10'-0", while the minimum clear one-way bicycle path width is 5'- 0". A bicycle path should be considered to have two-way traffic unless effective measures are taken to ensure one-way traffic. The total width for the 5-0 and 10-0 clear sidewalks are 7-0 and 12-0 respectively to accommodate the bridge and pedestrian railing. For bridges on a horizontal curve, the following guidelines should be used when determining the structure layout: 1.02-5

A straight deck and girders should be considered when the throw of the curve is less than 15. When the throw is between 6 and 15, the working line should be placed to split the throw. When the throw is greater than 15, a curved deck should be used. Straight girders can be used with a curved deck if the cantilever lengths stay within the design standards. When using a straight deck and girders, the bridge clear roadway width should not be increased to encompass the entire curved roadway section. The length of the bridge, curvature, or skew may not allow the above noted guidelines to be used. In these cases, the bridge layout should be discussed with Bridge Program Staff. Skews Bridge skews shall be in 5 degree increments and limited to 45 degrees maximum, unless required by site or right-of-way constraints, required roadway alignment, and/or required geometry of the feature spanned. Skews greater than 45 degrees need to be approved by the Bridge Program Staff. Skews for hydraulic culverts shall match stream geometry and be shown in 1 degree increments. Non-hydraulic culvert skews may match the existing terrain or approach roadway, but will usually be normal to the intersected road. Clearances The following clearances establish the minimum standards. Additional clearances shall be provided where necessary to meet sight distances, through drainage, and railroad or traveled way requirements at specific locations. Sign structures and pedestrian overpasses have a higher minimum vertical clearance because of their lower vehicle impact resistance. To ensure adequate horizontal clearance, substructures of bridges, overhead sign structure columns, retaining walls, and other obstructions shall be located outside of the clear zone where possible. Protection of these substructures and obstructions shall be provided when roadway alignment(s), right-of-way, span ratios, 1.02-6

or fiscal constraints prevent them from being outside the clear zone. Clear zones and guardrail requirements are determined by the Project Development Program. Clearance behind the guardrail shall be provided along the face of obstructions and supports located within the clear zone and shall be in accordance with the Standard Plans. Overhead sign structures at locations with curbs and no shoulders shall be located a minimum of 1'-6" beyond the face of the curb where possible. Where a continuous parking lane is provided, no clearance is required but a minimum 2'-0" setback to obstructions is desirable to avoid interference with opening vehicle doors. The minimum vertical clearances for bridges are as shown in the following details. Pedestrian bridges shall have a minimum clearance 2'-0" greater than the clearance established for major overcrossing structures within the vicinity, but not less than 18'-0". All new or relocated sign structures shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 19-0 to the lowest protruding feature (i.e., signs, signals, luminaires, etc.). Existing sign structures may maintain a minimum clearance of 18'-0" to the lowest protruding feature. The specific railroad company should be contacted before starting final design computations as required clearances may vary from site to site based on geometry and track requirements. The Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation Projects should be followed when working on structures crossing the BNSF Railway and Union Pacific Railroad. For pedestrian and bicycle path underpass clearances, refer to the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, with all revisions to date. The clearance from retaining walls to the guardrail shall be at least the minimum noted in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification. The following details show minimum horizontal and vertical clearances for various bridge structures. The vertical clearance for bridges over a road should be measured from the highest roadway point, including the travel lanes and shoulders. The dimension 1.02-7

shown for the minimum clearance from guardrail to face of the column is based on the use of corrugated beam rail and is measured from the back of the guardrail post. Box beam guardrail will require a larger clear distance. See Standard Plans for more information on required clearance to rail posts. 1.02-8

1.02-9

1.02-10