Safe Water for Europe: issues and options

Similar documents
CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

Eurostat current work on resource-efficient circular economy Renato Marra Campanale

ESF Ex-Post evaluation

High-Level Public Administration Conference For a Business-Friendly Public Administration Brussels, 29 October 2013

EUROPEAN COUNCIL Brussels, 31 May 2013 (OR. en)

Cutting Red Tape The Member State point of view. Presentation by Hilde Van de Velde Bruges March 2010

Emissions Trading System (ETS): The UK needs to deliver its share of the total EU ETS emissions reduction of 21% by 2020, compared to 2005;

RFID Systems Radio Country Approvals

3. Future wood demand for energy

ODYSSEE-MURE, a decision support tool for energy efficiency policy evaluation. Recent energy efficiency trends in the EU

Energy demand dynamics and infrastructure development plans in the EU. October 10 th, 2012 Jonas Akelis, Managing Partner - Baltics

How to secure Europe s competitiveness in terms of energy and raw materials? The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind

Session 13: Prequalification Within the Context of Global Fund Procurements

EUROPE S ENERGY PORTAL

FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE - Secretariat CONVENTION - CADRE SUR LES CHANGEMENTS CLIMATIQUES - Secrétariat KEY GHG DATA

ENERGY PRIORITIES FOR EUROPE

Waste prevention in Europe. European Environment Agency

Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 November 2016 (OR. en)

AMBITION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY TARGETS FOR THE EU IN 2030

Stakeholder consultation on the mid-term review of the 2011 White Paper on transport

EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol Bucharest 17 October 2017

Wind energy in Europe markets

Even implementation of the EU Timber Regulation Harmonizing and improving the implementation of the EUTR in the EUTR countries

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

PPI Training. MODULE 2 The need to innovate in municipal waste management. PPI training Location of the training Date of the training.

EU Climate and Energy Policy Framework: EU Renewable Energy Policies

Background Document. Study supporting the revision of the EU Drinking Water Directive. Second stakeholder s consultation workshop

EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol Dublin, 22 June 2017

Munkaanyag

Presentation 2. The Common Assessment Framework CAF 2013

to ensure that the public is properly informed about the state of the environment.

Photo: Karpov. Wind in power 2009 European statistics. February 2010 THE EUROPEAN WIND ENERGY ASSOCIATION

The Common Assessment Framework CAF Principles, background, headlines

Over the whole year 2011, GDP increased by 1.4% in the euro area and by 1.5% in the EU27, compared with +1.9% and +2.0% respectively in 2010.

Environmental statistics in Europe Facts and figures on the environment: from environmental taxes to water resources

Public Consultation On the Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive

Environmental impact assessment of CAP greening measures using CAPRI model

ANALYSIS OF E-GOVERNMENT IN THE MEMBER STATES EUROPEAN UNION AND CANDIDATE

The need for better statistics for climate change policies

Environmental Best Practices, It Begins with Us: Business, Local Governments and International Community Should Work Together

Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP)

The Energy Efficiency Watch Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU28

Relating to the transnational hiring-out of workers in the framework of the provision of services

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

The Fourth Community Innovation Survey (CIS IV)

Performance of Rural Development Programmes of the period - Your Voice

Circular Economy and Energy Union

This document is a preview generated by EVS

The FMD Pack Coding, Sharing and Transition

.eu brand awareness. Domain names have a high awareness. About 81% of the European Internet population has heard of domain names.

Crop production - Coarse grains

Example of using detailed statistics: The case of poplar markets in EU

Implementation of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive; contribution to the Water Framework Directive.

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

Options for structural measures in the EU ETS

Public consultation on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES)

Making the Parcel Regulation work. 17th Königswinter Postal Seminar 5-7 February

Water Exploitation Index WEI+ Current state of play

ANNEXES. to the. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

RENEWABLE H&C: BREAK-THROUGH NEEDS?

Energy Efficiency Perspectives and Priorities Vleva EUSEW, 24 June 2014

European information on climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation

Photo: Thinkstock. Wind in power 2010 European statistics. February The European Wind energy association

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Munkaanyag

This document is a preview generated by EVS

State of play of energy efficiency investment and financing scheme Czech Republic

A body of industry and contact center expertise Ipsos. to drive performance

Training course on Animal Welfare concerning the farming of laying hens and broiler chickens kept for meat production

Outlook on WtE bottom ash recycling and EU policy

From Tradition to Innovation. Skill Needs in the Agri-Food Sector Skillsnet conference February 21-22, 2008 Cedefop, Thessaloniki, Greece

ANNEXES. to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Min Shu Waseda University. 2013/10/15 European Public Policy-Week 3 1

The aim of this paper is to outline how PRO EUROPE and its members participate to these efforts through:

Drought policy: key challenges of the Xerochore project Thierry Davy

Joint owner of the research company Profu Research leader of the waste management group at Chalmers University of Technology , Ph.D

PRICE SETTING IN THE ELECTRICITY MARKETS WITHIN THE EU SINGLE MARKET

Approximated greenhouse gas emissions in 2016

(c) The terms of the agreement are set out in the Annex to this Note Verbale.

Price Statistics Working Group. Item 3.3 of the agenda. Methodological Development in the HICP

Energy Mapping in Heat Roadmap Europe

Antitrust: Car price report shows price differentials for new cars in EU narrowing in 2010

Publishing date: 07/02/2018. We appreciate your feedback. Share this document

Potential Sustainable Wood Supply in Europe

The EU Directive on the management of waste from extractive industries. J Rizo European Commission DG ENVIRONMENT Brussels, June 2014

Pesticide residues in food - Monitoring programs in Europe

CROATIA. Risk Assessment Exercise

European Commission. Communication on Support Schemes for electricity from renewable energy sources

International Indexes of Consumer Prices,

Update on EFSA s scientific cooperation activities with EU Member States and Third Countries

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Trends in waste generation and management in Europe. Özgür Saki European Environment Agency

ECC-Net statistics 1 regarding e-commerce

Resource efficiency and waste

Latest state-of-play EU Timber Regulation. Harmonizing and improving the implementation of the EUTR in the EUTR countries

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Annex to the

Grundfos Solutions for Sustainable Water Supply Rasoul Mikkelsen Global Partnership Director Grundfos. Budapest Water Summit October 8-11, 2013

Fuel cells & hydrogen research and innovation in Horizon 2020

Transcription:

Study supporting the revision of the EU Drinking Water Directive www.safe2drink.eu Safe Water for Europe: issues and options Results of Second Stakeholder s consultation workshop and proposed policy options for Impact Assessment Olga Mashkina (ACTeon) Brussels, 22 th of January 2015

Study supporting the revision of the EU Drinking Water Directive To support the review of the implementation of the Drinking Water Directive (DWD), the EC has launched a study that focuses on the ex-post evaluation of the current DWD implementation and the assessment of options that would enhance the effectiveness of current EU drinking water policy (ex-ante). A first stakeholder workshop in May 2015 in Brussels to discuss the issues to be addressed in the ex-post evaluation phase of the study A second stakeholder workshop in December 2015 to ascertain the main underlying causes of the current DWD shortcomings, to validate and refine the policy storylines/options

Identifying areas for improvement in the DWD The process Different areas for improvements in the Drinking Water Directive identified, based on... Assessments carried out under the ex-post evaluation study (EC) Consultation, including two stakeholder workshops (last: December 2015) These have helped prioritizing key areas for improvement for ex-ante investigation

The thematic areas for which improvements could be proposed

1. Risk based assessment beyond compliance at the tap Policy Option 1.1. Water Safety Plan Risk Based Approach Policy Option 1.2. Fully-fledged Water Safety Plan Risk Based Approach 2. Selection of parameters and threshold values Policy option 2.1: A core list of parameters with threshold values Policy option 2.2 A longer list of parameters with strict threshold parameters and accounting for the precautionary principle Policy option 2.3: A wider list of parameters including emerging substances 3. Controlling the risk of pollution from material in contact with drinking water Policy option 3.1 Regulation for products in contact with drinking water 4. SMART information for consumers Policy option 4.1. Access to information for reporting threshold values using IT tools Policy option 4.2. The Safe Drinking Water Label of water service suppliers Policy option 4.3. Smart water information systems 5. Ensuring resource efficiency and the efficient management of water services Policy option 5.1 High performance to deliver safe drinking water Policy option 5.2 Responsible drinking water service operators Policy option 5.3 Efficient management of the water (service) cycle Policy option 5.4. Governance: Responsible consumers 6. Safe drinking water for all EU citizens Policy option 6.1. Access to safe drinking water for all

Stakeholders workshop and revision of policy options 1. Workshop had 60 participants, representing a diversity of sectors and countries 2. Group work (4 groups) to work with different focus areas (2 group with thematic areas 1, 2,3, and 2 group with thematic areas 4,5,6) reviewing and clarifying the options, proposing new options (and justifying their relevance), identifying the priority/most appropriate option(s) 3. Evaluation forms

Analysis fo resutls of Stakeholders workshop and evaluation forms From the focus areas 1 and 2 Risk based assessment and Parameters and threshold values options were combined together with a new proposed options, and the following were derived: Policy option 1. Core list of parameters based on WHO: Common regulation of quality standards values for a limited number of core parameters posing high risks for human health (following WHO). Policy Option 2. RBA holistic approach based on WHO principles: The risk-based policy holistic approach covering catchment to tap with a regulatory framework based on proven principles of the WHO. All parameters are selected using risk based approach, including parameters for emerging contaminants after examination for their potential effect on human health.

Analysis fo resutls of Stakeholders workshop and evaluation forms Controlling the risk of pollution from materials in contact with drinking water : a separate study by DG ENV to be carried out by November 2016, thus not included in the IA. In the focus area 4 SMART information for consumers, and 5. Ensuring resource efficiency and the efficient management of water services it is proposed to combine options into the following: Policy option 3. SMART Drinking Water information to all EU citizens The establishment of smart water information to provide a wide range of up-to-date information to ALL consumers linked to water quality, reliability and continuity (via water label (or excellence label), which can be accesses from smart phone). Policy option 4. Responsible Drinking water consumers (governance, information) for decision making - establishment and delivery of smart water information to ALL consumers which can enhance their role in water management and governance. This will include establishment of consumer boards, different types of information that consumers need to make more responsible decisions (i.e. information on leakages, investments, water tariffs and pricing).

Analysis fo resutls of Stakeholders workshop and evaluation forms In the focus area 5, Ensuring resource efficiency and the efficient management of water service, it is proposed to combine options 5.1 and 5.2 combined: Policy option 5. Responsible drinking water service operators. This option proposes to develop a wider performance system for monitoring the performance of water service operators as key to enhance efficiency In the focus area 6 Policy option 6. Access to safe drinking water for all: this option extends the current obligation to provide human right to safe drinking water and sanitation to all citizens, expanding the drinking water quality standards of the current Drinking Water Directive to all small communities and any person living in Europe (including Roman populations, migrants.).

The priority areas for improvement considered today 6. Access to safe drinking water and sanitation to all 2. Hollistic Risk-Based Assessment (includes emerging contaminants) 1. Core WHO list of parameters with common (strict) threshold values 3. SMART Drinking Water information to all EU citizens 4. Responsible Drinking water consumers (governance, information) for decision 5. Enhancing performance & resource efficiency of drinking water services Controlling the risk of pollution from materials in contact with drinking water To be investigated at later stage, as EC study under way

Revised policy options 1. Core WHO list of parameters with common (strict) threshold values Common regulation of quality standard limit values for core parameters posing high risks for human health (from WHO). 2. Holistic Risk-Based Assessment (includes emerging contaminants The risk-based policy holistic approach covering catchment to tap with a regulatory framework based on proven principles of the WHO. All parameters are selected using risk based approach (including parameters for emerging contaminants after examination for their potential effect on human health. 3. SMART Drinking Water information to all EU citizens The establishment of smart water information to provide a wide range of up-to-date information to ALL consumers linked to water quality, reliability and continuity (including water label or excellence label, which can be accessed from smart phone). (to develop in more detail the level of aggregation of information) 4. Responsible Drinking water consumers (governance, information) for decision making The establishment and delivery of smart water information to ALL consumers which can enhance their role in water management (include establishment of consumer boards, and types of information that consumers need to make more responsible decisions, i.e. leakages, investments, water tariffs and pricing). 5. Enhancing performance & resource efficiency of drinking water services This option proposes to develop a wider performance system for monitoring the performance of water service operators as key to enhance efficiency and the performance of drinking water service operators, including regular national benchmarking between water service providers. Performance will address a range of management and efficiency issues: delivery of safe drinking water quality, water resource management (in terms of quality and quantity) and its efficiency, conveyance efficiency, water savings, energy efficiency and emissions of CO2/GHG, satisfaction of final consumers, timeliness and adequacy of responses to problems, etc. Drinking water operators will be responsible for implementing actions that will enhance their overall performance and footprint including in terms of application of measures such as water reuse, water saving, rain-water harvesting, etc. 6. Access to safe drinking water and sanitation to all This option extends the current obligation to provide human right to safe drinking water and sanitation to all citizens, expanding the drinking water quality standards of the current Drinking Water Directive to all small communities and any person living in Europe (including Roman populations, migrants.).

Questions for participants 1. SH workshop identified focus areas, any additional thematic areas to be considered in the DWD revision process? 2. What are key issues that need to be spelt out when describing the "Risk-based assessment" policy option? 3. In the 6 policy options to focus in the IA, are there options that already implemented or you think will be implemented anyway (already on the way)? 4. What are specific sources of information (studies, databases...) that can be mobilised for the (social, economic, environmental) impact assessment?

1. SH workshop identified focus areas, any additional thematic areas to be considered in the DWD revision process?

2. What are key issues that need to be spelt out when describing the "Risk-based assessment" policy option?

3. Implementation of DWD in MS: are any of these options already implemented (partially) or will be implemented)? Belgium France Netherlands Germany Denmark Spain Italy Portugal Slovakia Romania Hungary Croatia Slovenia Iceland Poland Latvia Lithuania Estonia Ireland Czech Austria Finland Sweden Malta UK Norway Cyprus Greece 1. Core WHO list of parameters with common (strict) threshold values 2. Holistic Risk- Based Assessment (includes emerging contaminants X X 3. SMART Drinking Water information to all EU citizens 4. Responsible Drinking water consumers (governance, information) for decision making smart app and label 5. Enhancing performance & resource efficiency of drinking water services 6. Access to safe drinking water and sanitation to all

4. What are the sources of information for the (health, social, economic, environmental) impact assessment? (study, contact person/link) Belgium France Netherlands Germany Denmark Spain Italy Portugal Slovakia Romania Hungary Croatia Slovenia Island Poland Latvia Lithuania Estonia Ireland Czech Austria Finland Sweden Malta UK Norway Cyprus Greece Health Economic Environmental Social

Thank you! Forms (implementation of policy options in MS and sources of information) will be also available to complete via CIRCA, and email to Olga Contact: Olga Mashkina o.mashkina@acteon-environment.eu