Overview of PADEP 2014 Integrated List of All Waters (from Draft 2014 Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report )

Similar documents
303d Ag Impaired Delisting Process. Agricultural Advisory Board December 16, 2015

Pennsylvania s TMDL Program

Impaired Watersheds and Stream Designations in Adams County

EXISTING AND READILY AVAILABLE DATA

The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois. Watershed Management Section Bureau of Water

TMDL 101. Andrea M. Fredenburg Kentucky Division of Water TMDL Section November 15, 2011

Supplemental Information for Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Final Rule. Comparison of Final Rule Language and Proposed Rule Language

Chapter 11 North Carolina s Impaired Waters List

Water Quality Standards Variances OVERVIEW OCTOBER 2017 OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OF WATER U.S. EPA

AMENDED DECISION DOCUMENT REGARDING FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION S SECTION 303(d) LIST AMENDMENTS FOR BASIN GROUPS 1, 2, AND 5

Summary of Presentation

TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL)

EPA Numeric Criteria Where do we stand now? Mark W. Clark

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER OUTSIDE AGENCY DATA AND QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Chapter 4 Watershed Goals and Objectives

Recasting Aquatic Designated Uses as Ecosystem Services in Clean Water Act Programs

Decentralized Wastewater Treatment in Texas Watersheds

Numeric Nutrient Criteria Development

Appendix B Stream Database

Numeric Nutrient Criteria Update

Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program

Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy 26 East Exchange Street Suite 206 Saint Paul, MN

2010, 2012, 2016, and 2018 Integrated Reports Classified Use Support Evaluation. Compiled, Evaluated, and Written by R. W.

South Carolina Water Quality Standards. Heather Preston DHEC Bureau of Water October 14, 2008

Yes, all were objectionable in my opinion.

ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information

Triennial Review of Surface Water Quality Standards. Public Meeting June 21, 2017

Selena Medrano Water Quality Management Planning

Overview of the Clean Water Act and Water Quality Standards

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Surface Water Quality Antidegradation Policies, with Emphasis on Application to Wetlands

(3) Location, type, significance and interaction of pollutant sources;

New Mexico s Surface Water Quality Standards

Chapter 5 Goals and Objectives of the Watershed

(including Slides from Dick Schwer & Michelle Thompson)

Final Total Maximum Daily Load for the Monongahela River, Greene County PCBs and Chlordane

Second Draft. WQCC Policy 98-1 Narrative Sediment Policy

Summary of Water Quality Assessments for Each Waterbody Type. National Summary Water Quality Attainment in Assessed Rivers and Streams

Colorado's Section 303(d) Listing Methodology

2013 MINERAL TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR RUSH CREEK WATERSHED, OKLAHOMA (OK310810)

Nitrogen Management through Land Use. Holly Greening, Tampa Bay Estuary Program July 2010

Utah s (d) List of Impaired Waters

Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Stephen Foster Lake Bradford County, Pennsylvania

Fact Sheet. Pennsylvania s Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy Goals for Nutrient and Sediment Reduction and Habitat Restoration

Little Cypress Bayou. Recreational Use Attainability Analysis Summary of Findings & Public Comment

Watershed Planning in Blackberry Creek We Save Land. We Save Rivers.

A Review of the Water Quality in Beaver Lake Watershed

Some Context behind the Implementation of Numeric Nutrient Criteria or Why do we have these Water Quality Regulations?

Florida Nutrient Criteria Update

BEAVERDAM BRANCH WATERSHED TMDL Blair and Cambria Counties

Clean Water Act Basics: An Overview of Core Programs. Merritt Frey Habitat Program Director River Network

FINAL 2012 BACTERIA AND TURBIDITY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR THE RED RIVER, OKLAHOMA (OK311100, OK311200, OK311210, OK311510, OK311600, OK311800)

Shifting Tides: Florida's Changing Water Quality Regulations

Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan

FINAL BACTERIA TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR STREAMS IN THE UPPER CIMARRON RIVER AREA, OKLAHOMA. Prepared By:

Overview of Tiered Aquatic Life Uses (TALU)

It has been over two years since numeric nutrient

Final Total Maximum Daily Load Allegheny River, Allegheny County PCBs

A Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern Challenge - Assessing the Eutrophication or Undesirable Algae Beneficial Use Impairment Michelle Selzer Lake

Final Total Maximum Daily Load for the Susquehanna River, PCBs

SANDY CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Clearfield County

INFORMATION SHEET. Proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Bens Creek, located in Portage and Washington Townships, Cambria County, Pennsylvania

Setting Water Quality Standards. Jason Childress Water Quality Standards, Section Head April 2, 2014

August 24, Via electronic mail )

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

PROPOSED DECEMBER 2013

Lower Prairie Dog Town Fork Red River

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Numeric Nutrient Criteria: Current Status

Water Quality in Kansas: The Backstory & the Basics

MIDDLE GRAND RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN

Medicine Lake Excess Nutrients TMDL project: Water Quality Standards

BACTERIA TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR STREAMS IN SALT CREEK AREA, OKLAHOMA

Standards and Assessment

Decision Rationale. Total Maximum Daily Load for Phosphorus for the Sassafras River, Cecil and Kent Counties, Maryland 4/1/2002

2413 (6) Authorize random audits by the director of documentation developed or submitted by certified water quality professionals to ensure

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER RECREATIONAL USE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLING PROTOCOL

CHANGES TO THE REGIONAL HAZE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISION: BART LIMITS FOR THE CHESWICK POWER PLANT, ALLEGHENY COUNTY

Linda Cooper, Eno River State Park, Durham, NC

FINAL 2014 BACTERIAL AND TURBIDITY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR OKLAHOMA STREAMS IN THE LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER AREA (OK220100, OK220200, OK220600)

EnviroScience FE Evce//ence In Any Environment 2/16/2018. Environmental Quality Board. Rachel Carson State Office Building

Water Quality Control Commission Policy 98-1

BEAVERDAM BRANCH WATERSHED TMDL Blair and Cambria Counties

Section 303(d) Listing Methodology Listing Cycle

Paxton Creek Watershed TMDL Strategy

Understanding Agriculture And Clean Water

Water quality standards and criteria are the foundation for a wide range of programs

Developing Numeric Nutrient Criteria: The Florida Story

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF RULES OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Rules Governing. Water Pollution Control Loan Fund

INFORMATION SHEET. What is being proposed? A TMDL plan to improve the quality of water in the Redbank Creek Watershed.

FACT SHEET. Owners/Operators of Potable Water Treatment Plants located in the State of Oklahoma

The 2018 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report. 10 October 2017 FINAL DRAFT. For the Preparation of:

A quick draw on two approaches to water quality restoration

Illinois EPA update to DuPage County Watershed Management Section Bureau of Water

Lake Tohopekaliga Nutrient Reduction Plan and Best Management Practice Pollutant Load Analysis

Water Quality Criteria Update

Finding Data Gaps: Compiling and Interpreting Existing Data

FINAL TURBIDTY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR THE LOWER CIMARRON RIVER-SKELETON CREEK AREA (OK620910)

Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Criteria and their Assessment:

5.0 NUTRIENT TMDL COMPONENTS

Total Maximum Daily Load

Transcription:

Overview of PADEP 2014 Integrated List of All Waters (from Draft 2014 Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report ) Background PADEP uses an integrated format for Clean Water Act Section 305(b) reporting and Section 303(d) listing. The 2014 Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (Integrated Report) satisfies the requirements of both Sections 305(b) and 303(d). Section 305(b) Section 305(b) of the federal Clean Water Act that requires states to provide an assessment of water quality. Section 303(d) The term, "303(d) list," is short for the list of impaired waters (stream segments, lakes) that the Clean Water Act requires all states to submit for EPA approval every two years (even-numbered years). Section 303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act and 40 CFR Part 130 require states to identify waters which would still be impaired, even after the appropriate technology has been applied to point sources and requires best management practices are in place for nonpoint sources. Waterbodies that do not meet water quality standards after this evaluation are placed on 5 of the Integrated Waterbody List. Assessed Uses Each waterbody must be assessed for four different uses as defined in PADEP 's rules and regulations at 25 Pennsylvania Code Chapter 93 (Water Quality Standards) in Section 93.3 Protected Water Uses. The four include Aquatic Life - maintaining flora and fauna indigenous to aquatic habitats; Water Supply - protection of ambient water quality for possible use as a potable water supply; Fish Consumption - protects the public from consuming tainted fish, and Recreation - relates to water contact and boating Each use may have different water quality criteria for individual chemical constituents and each use requires a different type of stream or lake assessment. Organization of PADEP s Listing for the entire Commonwealth In addition to the 305(b) narrative, the water quality status of Pennsylvania s waters is presented using a five-part characterization of use attainment status. The listing categories are: 1: Waters attaining all designated uses. 2: Waters where some, but not all, designated uses are met. Attainment status of the remaining designated uses is may be unknown because data are insufficient to categorize the water or it may be impaired. 3: Waters for which there are insufficient or no data and information to determine if designated uses are met. 4: Waters impaired for one or more designated uses but not needing a total maximum daily load (TMDL). These waters are placed in one of the following three subcategories: o 4A: TMDL has been completed. o 4B: Expected to meet all designated uses within a reasonable timeframe. o 4C: Not impaired by a pollutant and not requiring a TMDL. 5: Waters impaired for one or more designated uses by any pollutant. 5 includes waters shown to be impaired as the result of biological assessments used to evaluate aquatic life use. 5 constitutes the Section 303(d) list EPA will approve or disapprove under the Clean Water Act. (Emphasis added) 1

Chester County Streams On the 2014 Integrated Report, streams in Chester County are listed in the following Categories: 1 (waters attaining all designated uses) 2 (waters attaining at least one use) 4A (TMDL has been completed) 4C (not impaired by a pollutant and not requiring a TMDL) 5 (impaired waters requiring a TMDL) Attached: Excerpts of Listings for Chester County streams as they appear by in the 2014 Integrated List. References: 1. Draft Integrated Water Quality Report 2014, web page, PADEP, http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/water_quality_standards/10556/draft_integ rated_water_quality_report_-_2014/1702856 7/8/2014) 2

1 Waterbodies, Attaining Some Uses (Excerpt Only) 2014 DRAFT Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report - Streams Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report; List 1: All Uses Attained, 3

2 Waterbodies, Attaining Some Uses (Excerpt Only) 2014 DRAFT Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report - Streams Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report; List 2: At least One Use Attained, 4

4a Waterbodies, Approved TMDLs (Excerpt Only) 2014 Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report - Streams Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report; List 4a: Approved TMDLs, 5

4c Waterbodies, Pollution not Requiring a TMDL (Excerpt Only) 2014 Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report - Streams Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report; List 4c: Pollution not Requiring a TMDL 6

5 Waterbodies, Pollutants Requiring a TMDL (Excerpt Only) 2014 Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report - Streams Source: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, 2014 Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report; List 5:Pollutants Requiring a TMDL, 7