Use of WARSSS in Stream Restoration and Watershed Planning. Michigan Aquatic Restoration Conference 2015

Similar documents
Watershed Hydrology: Go with the flow. Greg Jennings, PhD, PE

Stream Restoration Raccoon Creek A Case Study

IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR STREAM ALTERATION PROJECTS

Old Mill School Stream Restoration

Mill Creek Restoration in Lower Merion Township. PH (610) ; FAX (610) ;

Stream Assessment Form (Form 1) Unified Stream Methodology for use in Virginia

Introduction to stream assessment

LITTLE SHADES CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT CWA Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant Project Workplan #17 ADEM Contract #C

South St. Vrain / Hall Meadows Restoration Planning August 20, 2015

PROJECT SCREENING MATRIX: A User s Guide

Ten Principles of River Restoration and Four River Project of Korea

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

Stream Restoration in the Urban Environment Concepts and Considerations

Stream Condition Assessment 2013

Stream Restoration at Road Crossings in Northern Wisconsin. Dale Higgins, USDA Forest Service

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management. Glossary

* For applicants utilizing bank for compensatory mitigation requirements, information below is not applicable.

3.0 Stream Assessment

FORM B: DAMMING AND DIVERSION OF WATER

In re: Town of Norwich Pool Dam Reconstruction, Stream Alteration Permit Application

4.1 Traditional Approach versus Geomorphic Approach

Application for resource consent Form B Damming and diversion of water

NCS Design Approach. Biology/Ecology Primer. Presented by: Jack Imhof, National Biologist Trout Unlimited Canada

Stream Simulation in Very Low Gradient Channels

MONITORING RECOMMENDATIONS

Assessing physical habitat condition using River MImAS

May 15, Lower Squaw Creek Restoration Public Workshop. for The Friends of Squaw Creek Truckee River Watershed Council Sierra Nevada Conservancy

WHY ARE STREAM IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED IN TENNESSEE? TENNESSEE STREAMS

Bluff Creek One Water

Table D1: WC-R1 to WC-R3 (Wilket Creek Park)

UNIFIED STREAM METHODOLOGY

FINAL REPORT. Dry Gulch Stream Restoration

Western Strait Drainages. Watershed Summaries DRAINAGES EST WRIA 19 EST

Habitat Grant Projects Clinton River Watershed

Beaver Creek Hydrology, LLC. Franklin, Tennessee

Treatment Strategies based on Stream Stratification Methodology by W. Barry Southerland Fluvial Geomorphologist, WNTSC, USDA, NRCS

Hydrologic Regime; Past and Present and Water Quality Implications

Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan

Griswold Creek Subwatershed

7.0 WATER-BASED CONTROL MEASURES

Site Selection and Design for Stream Mitigation

Fish Passage and Abundance around Grade Control Structures on Incised Streams in Western Iowa

Town of Aurora Stream Management Master Plan PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE May 1 st, 2018

DEVELOPING A WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT PLAN TO MEET MULTIPLE COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES IN GAINESVILLE AND HALL COUNTY, GEORGIA

County-wide Stream Inventory Data Analysis. Executive Summary August 2011

Chapter Three: Discussion and Conclusion. 3.1 Introduction/Overview. 3.2 Countywide Stream Assessment

Logan River at Rendezvous Park, Channel and Floodplain Restoration: Crack Willow (Salix fragilis) Issues and Management Strategies

Restoration of Riparian Forests and Riparian Ecosystem Processes and Implications for Salmon Restoration. Katie Ross-Smith Jennifer Hammond

Understanding and Restoring Natural Floodplain Function. Gary James CTUIR Fisheries Program Manager

FIGURE 12-1 FUNCTIONS AND BENEFITS OF HEALTHY STREAMS

Natural Channel Design and Dead River Case Study Stream Restoration in the Great Lakes Basin: Using In-stream Structures & Natural Channel Design

Stream Watch Visual Survey Instructions

Massachusetts River and Stream Crossing Standards: Technical Guidelines

Gwinnett County Dept. of Water Resources Watershed Improvement Program. Russell Manley, CFM, Gwinnett County DWR Kevin Middlebrooks, CH2M

Jason R. Vogel, Ph.D., P.E. Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University

Low Head Stone Weirs By: Jon Fripp 1, Dr. Craig Fischenich 2, and Dr. David Biedenharn 2

STREAMBANK RESTORATION DESIGN

Restoring Ecological & Geomorphic Function on the Heartrock Ranch

Hydrology Attribute 1/15/2016. California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands. Hydrology. Precipitation Increases the Extent of Wetlands

STREAM DISSOLVED OXYGEN IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY

2012 Mill Creek Watershed Habitat Assessment Level 3 Project Study Plan Results

Floodplain Restoration with Large Wood

CROSBY BROOK RESTORATION STUDY BRATTLEBORO, VT

Urban and Suburban Stream Restoration Structures

Galveston District Stream Condition Assessment June 2013

FAIRFIELD COUNTY STREAM MANAGEMENT GUIDE

INTERMEDIATE BMI ASSESSMENT TIER 2 FIELD SHEET

Glossary of Terms. Aquifer A permeable body of rock capable of yielding quantities of groundwater to wells and springs.

River Restoration in Iowa is there anything fishy going on here? or Fish Habitat in Iowa

Department of the Army Corps of Engineers. State of Missouri Stream Mitigation Method

Restoration of Abandoned Channels. Prepared for KICT, South Korea. Pierre Y. Julien, Ph.D. Seema C. Shah-Fairbank Jaehoon Kim

Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution

Ongoing and Completed Studies

Natural flood management guidance:

Developing Tools for Hydromodification Management and Assessment

Bridge Planning Updates. Bridge Planning Practitioners Workshop April 2012

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ithaca Creek Habitat Monitoring

Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport in the Napa River watershed: now and a possible future

Voluntary Water Quality Conservation Plan

Case Study 19. Mill Creek Embedded Box Culvert Vented Ford

Boulder Elkhorn TMDL Project. TMDL Document Public Comment Meeting June 27, 2013

Monitoring Report #3 Kenston Lake Stream Restoration Bainbridge, Ohio

Water and Watersheds. Data Maps Action

RED LAKE WATERSHED DISTRICT MONTHLY WATER QUALITY REPORT May 2014

TEMPORARY STREAM DIVERSION

Temporary Watercourse Crossing: Fords

U.S. EPA Presentation Stormwater Program Update

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. Stream processes are strongly related to the physical conditions of the

1/30/2014. SR-BOK Outcomes. Sue Niezgoda, Gonzaga University January 28, Depth. Breadth

WATERSHED AND STREAM MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES for Lands and Waters Managed by Missouri Department of Conservation

Today s Webinar: Types of Monitoring and Assessment Data and What They Mean

Temporary Watercourse Crossing: Culverts

TRCA Natural Channel Design Monitoring Program. SOSMART Group Meeting December 7, 2010

The Streamkeepers Handbook

Crooked Creek Storm Water Master Plan

Stormwater Management Tools: Real-Life Solutions for a Resilient Community Riparian Corridor Protection

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

Created by Simpo PDF Creator Pro (unregistered version) Asst.Prof.Dr. Jaafar S. Maatooq

Prepared for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District

Transcription:

Use of WARSSS in Stream Restoration and Watershed Planning Michigan Aquatic Restoration Conference 2015 October 22, 2015

Use of WARSSS in Stream Restoration and Watershed Planning 1. Watershed Management Planning 2. Catchment-Scale Restoration Management Plans 3. Clean Sediment, Biota, and D.O. TMDLs 4. Reach-Scale Stream Restoration Design 5. Habitat and Biological Monitoring

Watershed Assessment of River Stability and Sediment Supply Geomorphology-based framework for evaluating river stability Disproportionate sediment/tp supply Assess instability causes Prioritize restoration efforts Developed with the USEPA http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/tools/warsss

1. 2. 3. Rosgen, 2014

Sediment Supply Clean sediments (i.e., non-toxic) Sediment-starved reaches Sources of disproportionately high sediment loads

Departure Analysis

Watershed Scale Source: Center for Watershed Protection

Belle River Watershed Plan

Belle River Longitudinal Profile Adapted from Knutilla, 1969

Streambank Erosion Screening Stream Types Bank Height Ratio (>1.5 = High/VH) Radius of Curvature-to-Width (<2.25) Altered Riparian Vegetation (mowed turf grass, bare soil, or tilled areas)

Watershed Planning: In-Stream Pollutants, Sources, and Causes Source: MDEQ, 2000

Impervious Cover Model Belle R. Source: Center for Watershed Protection

River Instability Processes Over-widening Accelerated downstream meander migration Chute cutoffs Aggradation (excessive deposition) Degradation (downcutting or incision)

Signs of Excess Deposition Pool filling Most of bed exposed during low flow Slope reversals Coarse over-bank deposition Transverse bars; mid-channel bars; side bars

Signs of Degradation Exposed till river bed Nickpoints caused by headcutting Stream tributary rejuvenation Steep bars Leaning trees, vertical banks

Geomorphic Thresholds Bank height exceeds1.3 x bankfull depth Width-to-Depth Ratio exceeds 1.4 x reference W:d Shift in stream type >25% of banks or vegetation impacted >30% riffle embeddedness >20% pool filling with fine sediment

Historic Aerials Time Trend

Look for man-made impacts Channelization, dredging, relocation Bed lowering at road crossings Dams, weirs, rock dams, in-line ponds Altered riparian vegetation; cattle Floodplain encroachment; riprap Wood removal; clearing and snagging Excess sediment supply, construction Gravel mining

(Rosgen, 2007)

Belle River ICD

Belle R. IC Drain Departure Analysis Parameter Measure Reference (Richmond Twp) Impaired (ICD) Lateral Stability Width-to - Depth Ratio 18.8 Stable 12.0 Stable Vertical Stability D84 (or Di bar) 2 in. Gravel Stable Silt/clay Aggrading Vegetation Class Tree/Shrub/ Grass Stable Turf Grass Not Functioning Floodplain Connectivity Bank Ht Ratio 1.0 Functioning 2.3 Channelized Entrenchment Ratio 7.9 Functioning 1.5 No Floodplain Hydraulics Gradient 0.112% Functioning 0.0335% Not Functioning Shear Stress 0.22 lb/ft 2 Sediment Competence 0.08 lb/ft 2 Depositional

Deposition, Excessive Wood Removal

Natural 2-Stage Ditch Analog

Hillslope Failures

Natural Toe Wood Analog

Subwatershed Restoration Master Plans

Subwatershed Master Planning Communicate with multiple landowners Cost savings Leverage infrastructure expenses Various restoration approaches which vary by site constraints

Level of Action Required 1. Protection and conservation 2. Riparian management 3. Empirical (adaptive) management approach 4. Active restoration (or combined approach)

Phasing by Focus Area Infiltration, tile control structures Water on the landscape Fish passage: culvert replacement, weirs Sediment regime: gravel augmentation, excessive fines Cattle or human access points Floodplain excavation Tree planting Instream habitat: wood

TMDLs

Dissolved Oxygen TMDLs SOD; algae decomposition >>> anoxic Sulfide and ammonia toxicity Source: G Fred Lee

Reach-Scale Restoration

Typical Channelized Stream

Floodplain Connectivity Restored

Microhabitat-Scale Assessments Limiting Factor Analysis Assess specific facets (ex. pools) Interpret biomonitoring results

Assessing Stream Functions Parameter Simple Measure Intensive Measure Floodplain connectivity Bank Height Ratio Entrenchment Ratio Stage vs. discharge Bedform diversity % Riffles and pools Max. pool depth Variable depth, velocity, Froude number Lateral stability Streambank erosion Replicate cross-sections Riparian vegetation Buffer density, width Vegetation plots Adapted from Harman, et al. 2012

Qualitative Habitat Assessment (ex. pools)

Ex. Quantitative Pool Assessment Pool type, pool dimensions, pool slope, point bar slope Pool Length to Riffle Width Dimensionless Ratios Pool Max. Depth to Riffle Mean Depth Pool Slope to Avg. Slope Lateral Scour Pool Mean Min. Max.

Interpreting Biomonitoring Results by Stream Type (Source: Friends of the Rouge, 2015)

Rob.Myllyoja@stantec.com Questions?