Status of the Niagara River (New York) RAP

Similar documents
Chapter 4 Watershed Goals and Objectives


Prioritizing Habitat Projects in Areas of Concern Throughout the Great Lakes

GREAT LAKES CONSIDERATIONS

Four Agency Managers Report June 26, 2013

St. Louis River Area of Concern A Great Lakes Restoration Initiative - MN Legacy Fund Partnership

A Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern Challenge - Assessing the Eutrophication or Undesirable Algae Beneficial Use Impairment Michelle Selzer Lake

Buffalo River Area of Concern Cleanup Public Meeting

Binational Action to Restore the Great Lakes

Buffalo River, New York Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) Dredging

Detroit River. Area of Concern Canadian Section. Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) Dredging

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

Integration of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, Superfund Remediation, and Natural Resources Damages Restoration at an Area of Concern

Jackfish Bay. Area in Recovery Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

LAKE ONTARIO WATERS: NEW CONCERNS REQUIRE A NEW PLAN. Presented by NYSDEC on behalf of The Lake Ontario Partnership February 13, 2019

Nelson T. French Upper Midwest Stream Restoration Symposium March 6, 2012 Minneapolis, MN

Muskegon Lake Area of Concern Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration

Great Lakes Economic and Environmental Review

INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION NIPIGON BAY STAGE 2 REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN REVIEW

Habitat Grant Projects Clinton River Watershed

Great Lakes Biodiversity Conservation Strategies

Hamilton Harbour. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Role in the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI)

Prepared by: Rouge River Advisory Council

FACT PATTERN THE RESERVATION

ROCHESTER EMBAYMENT AREA OF CONCERN

Status and Needs of Michigan s Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan. Roger Eberhardt Office of the Great Lakes

We re In this Together Ohio AOC Panel

Green Bulkheads in the Cuyahoga River. Christopher Streb, PE And Elaine Price Cuyahoga Planning Commission. July 29, 2014

Based on a Canada-United States Workshop Held at the University of Windsor s Great Lakes Institute June 18-19, 2002

GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY BOARD

Ohio Bioassessments - Applicatio

LAKE HURON LAKEWIDE ACTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

SECTION V - STATE AND FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION

Buffalo s rebirth as the Queen City of the Great Lakes The Buffalo River: from a severely degraded waterway to one of Buffalo s greatest assets

RAPs and LaMPs. Chapter 2. Concerns. 2.1 Annex 2 - Remedial Action Plans and Lakewide Management Plans (RAPs and LaMPs)

DRAFT THE ROUGE RIVER AREA OF CONCERN BENEFICIAL USE IMPAIRMENTS DELISTING STRATEGY

2016 Call for Proposals

Industry Perspective on the Great Lakes Legacy Act Sediment Remediation Program

Canada-Ontario Agreement Respecting the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem

How is Water Quality Affected by Land Use?

Peninsula Harbour. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

The International Joint Commission

Maumee Area of Concern Water Quality Database Development

CASE STUDY 5. Economic Benefits of Remediating Contaminated Sediments at Hamilton Harbour s Randle Reef

THE ROUGE RIVER AREA OF CONCERN BENEFICIAL USE IMPAIRMENTS DELISTING STRATEGY

OVERVIEW. What is the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement?

Engineering with Nature In Action: SLR AOC Living Shoreline Design Basis

Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern Restoration Plan for the Habitat and Populations BUIs

Great Lakes Legacy Act. Marc Tuchman U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office

A Guide to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Background for the 2006 Governmental Review

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

Delisting Guidance and Restoration Targets for Ohio Areas of Concern

Chapter 4 Introduction Challenges in the Rouge River Watershed Challenges is an overarching term encompassing the

Lessons Learned, Innovations, and Successes from U.S. Great Lakes Areas of Concern Sediment Cleanups

TAMARACK CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION

Findings of the IJC Nearshore Workshops

A Citizen s Guide to the International Joint Commission Draft Detroit River Area of Concern Status Assessment

Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration

Working under the Updated Agreement: The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. National Conference on Ecosystem Restoration July 31, 2013

Grand Calumet. River Revitalized

PRESENTATION OUTLINE. Stormwater Program Update Stormwater Overview. Education Program Discussion. Sources and consequences of pollutants

STATE OF THE BAY IN 2012

Bear Creek/Bear Lake Upper Watershed Information and Education Plan

New York- New Jersey Harbor Estuary. Lower Passaic River

U. S. Steel Duluth Works - Spirit Lake Cleanup Plan FAQs

HECI GLRI. Fish Habitat Enhancement Strategies for the Huron- Erie Corridor

EVALUATION - SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENTS FROM OR THROUGH A DAM

CASE STUDY. Cleanup of Toronto Harbour Leads to Waterfront Revitalization

Cayuga Creek. Watershed Restoration Road Map

Indiana Harbor and Canal (IHC) Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) and Navigational Dredging

Approach to Los Angeles/Long gbeach Harbor Toxics TMDL. Kathryn Curtis, Port of Los Angeles January 23, 2014 CMANC Meeting

NET ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS

PROPOSED PLAN FOR CLEANING UP THE LOWER 8 MILES OF THE LOWER PASSAIC RIVER

Proposed Addition to ATTACHMENT E, LIST OF TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDLs) APPLICABLE TO INDUSTRIAL STORM WATER DISCHARGERS

OH-13. Honorable Tim Ryan. Ohio 114th Congress. 13th Congressional District. Miles. 1, CG-CAP 205, Tinkers Creek

Summary Report What is a Healthy Lake Ontario for You? Wednesday, October 5, 2016 Toronto City Hall

Great Lakes Sediment Testing Manual Evaluating the Suitability of Dredged Material for Beneficial Use

In This Issue. FOSCR Participates at the Go Wild Grow Wild Expo in London, Ontario

Cat Island Chain Restoration, Green Bay

ASSESSING THE REPRESENTATIVENESS OF STREAM GEOMORPHOLOGY PARAMETERS IN BASINS

Biscayne Bay Regional Restoration Coordination Team

FISH HATCHERY PARK JOHNSON CREEK HABITAT RESTORATION

The Ottawa River Great Lakes Legacy Act Cleanup Project. March 12, 2009

EAST WATERWAY HARBOR ISLAND SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP CLEANING UP THE ENVIRONMENT, WHILE IMPROVING COMMERCE FOR THE PORT OF SEATTLE

Development of Delisting Targets for Presque Isle Bay Area of Concern

St. Clair River Canadian Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Implementation Committee (CRIC) Meeting Minutes - FINAL

APPLICATION FOR 2013 WEDA ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE AWARD ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING CATEGORY RIVER RAISIN AREA OF CONCERN PROJECT, MONROE, MICHIGAN

Focusing the Right Regulatory Approaches on Surface Water Source Control at Sediment Sites using Portland Harbor as case study

Stage 2 Remedial Action Plan Implementation Annex

Grand Traverse Bay Watershed Protection Plan:

Pierce County Islands and the Head of Lake Pepin

APPENDIX G. Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) Revised EE/CA. Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site: T-117 Early Action Area

Natural Resources of Chatham

Renewal of the Canada-United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

Portland Harbor in the Post-ROD World Integrating In-Water & Upland Remedies and Permitted Discharges --Legal Structure and Tools

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR THE GREAT LAKES SYSTEM. SUMMARY Of THE FINAL REPORT TO THE INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION

Cleveland Harbor Open Lake Placement

November 2009 Volume 1, Number 3

Transcription:

Status of the Niagara River (New York) RAP Niagara River Remedial Action Plan Implementation Committee Session February 15, 2012

Overview Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Strategic Planning Reassessing sources of contamination

Niagara River Area of Concern (U.S. Section)

Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Funding: 2010 - $475 million 2011 - $300 million 2012 - $300 million? Current priorities: Restoring AOCs Reducing phosphorus loadings Preventing introductions of invasive species

Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Benefits for the Niagara River: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Assessments Fish tumor study Lake Sturgeon and Lake Trout populations and reproduction Additional NYSDEC staff Accelerated Buffalo River dredging

Strategic Planning EPA requested specific plans from all U.S. AOCs Support measurement of progress Basis for distributing future funding New York AOC managers produced Stage 2 RAP Addenda

Strategic Planning Impairment Status Changes Likely Impaired to Impaired Degradation of Fish and Wildlife Populations RAP: insufficient evidence of AOC-related cause Bird or Animal Deformities or Reproductive Problems RAP: no direct evidence; likely due to contaminant levels in fish

Strategic Planning Beneficial Use Impairments: Restrictions on Fish and Wildlife Consumption Degradation of Fish and Wildlife Populations Fish Tumors and Other Deformities Bird or Animal Deformities or Reproductive Problems Degradation of Benthos Restrictions on Dredging Activities Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat

Strategic Planning Sources of contamination: Contaminated sediments Hazardous waste sites Other nonpoint sources Wastewater discharges Sewer overflows Groundwater Inflow from Lake Erie

Hazardous Waste Sites 31 sites identified in the 1994 RAP Additional 13 sites identified later 36 of 44 sites have all actions completed, remainder under way

Contaminated Sediment Projects completed at 14 locations Pursuing federal funding for new assessments

Strategic Planning Examples of actions to address loss of habitat: Protect existing habitat areas Promote softening of shoreline Create/restore habitat Priorities to be based on a Niagara Habitat Conservation Strategy

Niagara River Watershed and Greenway Communities

Reassessment of Sources of Contamination NYSDEC initiative with EPA support Assess waste sites, point sources, and primary tributaries Update previous studies GLRI funding through 2011 EPA grant Primary goal advance the removal of BUIs

Reassessment of Sources of Contamination 1984 Report of The Niagara River Toxics Committee 1985 Preliminary Evaluation of Chemical Migration to Groundwater and the Niagara River from Selected Waste-Disposal Sites 1988 Potential Contaminant Loadings to the Niagara River from U.S. Hazardous Waste Sites 1989 1987-88 Toxic Substance Discharges From Point Sources to the Niagara River 1990 The Niagara River Toxics Management Plan 1991 1989-90 Toxic Substance Discharges From Point Sources to the Niagara River 1994 Niagara River Remedial Action Plan 1995 1993-94 Toxic Substance Discharges From Point Sources to the Niagara River

Reassessment of Sources of Contamination Need for Reassessment Slowing rate of decline in contaminant levels Some levels still exceed NY standards Removing some BUIs may require further reductions Need to address additional sources?

Reassessment of Sources of Contamination Goals Confirm that point sources are no longer significant Determine whether waste sites are still a source of contaminants Estimate contaminant loadings from primary tributaries

Reassessment of Sources of Contamination Combine existing and new data Incorporate advances in groundwater modeling Analyses include all priority pollutants

Reassessment of Sources of Contamination Focus on priority toxics that still exceed standards: PCBs Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene Hexachlorobenzene Benzo(a)pyrene ppddt/ppdde Dieldrin Mirex Chrysene/Triphenylene Dioxins/Furans

Reassessment of Sources of Contamination Final report will: Evaluate long-term trends Explain the impact of findings on status of BUIs Recommend additional analyses if necessary Recommend adjustments to strategic plans

Contact Information Mark Filipski Niagara River AOC Coordinator NYSDEC 270 Michigan Avenue Buffalo, New York 14203 716-851-7130 mdfilips@gw.dec.state.ny.us