HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING

Similar documents
HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING

Why Plan? Sean Rausch Disaster Response and Recovery Planner Mitigation Ozaukee County Hazard Mitigation Kickoff Meeting February 13, 2018

Joseph E. Boxhorn, Ph.D., Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission

Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) SEWRPC: Hazard Mitigation Planning

RACINE COUNTY HAZARD

Clay Macon. Kickoff Meeting. January 6, Peeks Creek Landslide, Macon County, NC Photo Source: Wikipedia

3.1 Problem Statements, Goals, Objectives and Action Items

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary

OVERVIEW... 1 PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS... 2

Mitigation for Emergency Managers. Mitigation for Emergency Managers

MECKLENBURG COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CLINTON COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

University of Kentucky Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

Climate Smart Resiliency Plans, Policies, and Projects Improvement Plan for: The Town of Caroline

Table G - 7. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Eyota ( ) (From Olmsted County Master Mitigation Action Chart)

Houston-Galveston Area Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Initial Planning Workshop

Baldwin County, Alabama

Village of Gurnee, Illinois Flood Mitigation Plan. Executive Summary. November 15, Flood Mitigation Planning Committee

State Mitigation Planning Key Topics Bulletins: Mitigation Strategy

KAMM: Planning Project Application Development, Basics, Implementation Wednesday, August 26, 2015 W. Nick Grinstead, University of Kentucky Hazard

REGIONAL PUBLIC MEETING February 22, 2018, East Haven, CT. South Central Regional Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

Urban Flooding: How can planners help?

CHAPTER 3. PLANNING BASIC: LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING

Overview of the Local Planning Process and Future Enhancements Dave Coats, The Polis Center

Humboldt Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Volume 1: Planning-Area-Wide Elements PART 3 MITIGATION STRATEGY

TWIN PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT

Appendix C MITIGATION STRATEGY

CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Land Use, Governance, Funding & Implementation

The Iowa Watershed Approach

Thinking Outside the Box Culvert Eco Systems Marketing Workshop

Proactive Planning for Resilient Coasts Lessons for North Texas

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON ADOPTED HAZARD MUTIGATION PLAN COMMUNITY #

Sarah White, MEMA.

Tuscaloosa County, Alabama

Coastal and River Flooding Events

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

FEMA s Mitigation Support for Resiliency: Innovative Drought and Flood Mitigation Projects

Commonwealth of Kentucky Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan 2018

COMMUNITY PROFILE PLATTE VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT. Twin Platte Natural Resources District Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

Natural Hazards, Climate Change & DCR. DCR s 2018 vulnerability assessment survey for the State Hazard Mitigation & Climate Adaptation Plan

Door County Hazard Mitigation Plan Chapter 3: Mitigation Strategies DRAFT September 24, 2015

Community Assistance Planning Report No. 330 A RESTORATION PLAN FOR THE OAK CREEK WATERSHED. Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION

Alamance, Durham and Orange

Summer Flooding 2018 Community Impacts AUGUST 20 TH, 2018-PRESENT

WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HAZARDS IN YOUR COMMUNITY

Coastal and River Flooding Events

Handout #1 Draft Action Plan City of Los Angeles Floodplain Management Plan 2015 Update

State of Utah Mitigation Success Story 2012

S o u t h o l d

4. Present Activities and Roles

Hackensack River Flood Reduction Study Update

Climate Impacts and Action

HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE

MITIGATION IDEAS MITIGATION MEASURES BY HAZARD TYPE

Breaking Down Hazard Mitigation Plans

Welcome and Introductions Project Overview Draft Plan Review

Lessons [being] learnt 2016 Flood in Cedar Rapids. Sandy Pumphrey Project Engineer II Flood Mitigation

ANCR INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES SUMMARY: 2/11/04 WATER RESOURCES GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Kane County Natural Hazards Mitigation Committee

Goal 1: Inform and educate to all residents of the county concerning hazards and mitigation efforts

INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DANE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5-YEAR UPDATE. Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee 10/10/2013 Chapter 8: Land Use

Table 31. Faribault County Master Mitigation Action Chart ( )

COMMUNITY PROFILE WHEELER COUNTY. Lower Loup Natural Resources District Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

Advisory Committee Meeting November 16, South Central Regional Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

15 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ANNEX

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY MITIGATION STRATEGIES

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - REVISED

Hazard Mitigation: Integrating Best Practices into Planning

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 3E

Flood Mitigation Plan

Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Resiliency Efforts: Using PRI Data

Work Group Discussion Guidance

DEKALB COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PHASE 2

Managing Water Where It Falls: Green Infrastructure in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Plan Rollout Presentation July 31, Michael G. Hahn, P.E., P.H. Chief Environmental Engineer. Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission

Worksheet Task Capability Assessment Worksheet. Planning and Regulatory. Jurisdiction:

APPENDIX D: MITIGATION CATALOG

CHAPTER 5 MITIGATION STRATEGY

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGY

Great Lakes Community Resilience Index:

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY MITIGATION STRATEGIES

Hazard Mitigation as an Economic Development Strategy

Hampton Roads Hazard Mitigation Plan

a vision for a more resilient Iowa Larry J Weber Director, IIHR Hydroscience & Engineering

Appendix IV Village of Bald Head Island Hazard Mitigation Plan. Mitigation Strategy

Chapter 2.0. Mitigation Strategy: Goals, Objectives, and Initiatives. Introduction. Vision: Chapter 2.0 Mitigation Strategy

Mason County 2018 Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Volume 1: Planning-Area-Wide Elements

Tools for Building and Implementing Your Resilience Program. July 28, 2017 Hampton Roads

Table D-1. Montour County Hazard Mitigation Projects - Municipalities Affected. Structural Projects

Problem Assessment: The Bee Branch Watershed, where over 50% of Dubuque s

FEMA funding sources for Open Space and Green Infrastructure

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

City of Toronto s Climate Change Adaptation Strategy to Address Urban Flooding

The success of Gwinnett County s Floodplain Management Program can be directly attributed to Dewberry s innovation and quality.

New Flood Risk Products for Flood Forecasting and Warning Systems in Colorado

SECTION VIII PLAN MAINTENANCE AND EVALUATION

COMMUNITY PROFILE PAXTON-HERSHEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT. Twin Platte Natural Resources District Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update

Transcription:

HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING October 5, 2016 Joseph Boxhorn, Ph.D., Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission DOCS #232977

What is Mitigation? Mitigation is any sustained action taken to eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to human life and property from natural and technological hazards FEMA definition Photo from Kenosha County Constructive actions to reduce damages prior to the next disaster Photo from Soldiers Grove, WI

Mitigation is not What is Mitigation? Emergency response Crisis management Disaster preparation and recovery Mitigation focuses on reducing the impacts of disasters when the occur

Mitigation Breaks the Disaster Cycle Disaster

Why Do We Mitigate? Disasters cost society too much State and federal aid insufficient Can prevent future damages Less impact and speed response and recovery process Mitigation happens at the local level

Why Do We Mitigate? Nationwide Trends $80 Billion 2004-2011 (GAO) responding to disasters $6 Billion per year in flood damages Costs continue to rise People continue to build and live in high-risk areas

Why Do We Mitigate? In Wisconsin $3 billion in disaster-related damages last 3 decades 12 Federal Disaster Declarations in the 90 s compared to 6 in the 80 s 2000, 2001, two in 2002, 2004, 2007, 2008, two in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2016 2 snow emergencies (2000 and 2008)

Value of Mitigation In 2005, the National Institute of Building Sciences found that for every $1 spent on mitigation, $4 are saved in avoided future damages

Examples of Mitigation Measures (mostly related to flooding)

Acquisition/Demolition Communities acquire land, demolish structures, and keep the land in open space. Images from Darlington, WI

Elevation Elevation raises a structure out of the floodplain. Wisconsin has specific regulations to follow with elevation projects. See DNR for more information. Images from Soldiers Grove, WI

Floodwall Floodwalls can prevent water from inundating structures that cannot be elevated, relocated, or demolished. Image from Darlington, WI

Community Safe Room Community safe rooms built to FEMA-361 standards can withstand winds up to 250 MPH. Image from Town of Dunn, WI

Stormwater Detention Detention ponds can store stormwater runoff, decreasing flash flooding in urban areas. Image from MMSD Stormwater Detention Project (Wauwatosa, WI)

Stormwater Management Stream restoration allows watersheds to better manage flooding. Image from Thiensville, WI

River Warning Systems River warning systems installed on conservation dams to warn county officials about expected dam breaching. Images from Vernon County

Other Projects NOAA Weather Radios Mobile Home Tie-Downs Proper Landscaping Raise appliances and utilities Install back-flow valves Retrofit for wind resistance Education and public awareness Insurance (flood and sewer backup) Land use planning

Benefits of Mitigation Enhance recreation and tourism Parks Trails Increase community pride and quality of live Darlington, WI Save tax dollars Chaseburg, WI

Hazard Mitigation Planning

Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 Established a national disaster mitigation program Communities must have an approved hazard mitigation plan to be eligible to receive Federal funds through: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Pre-disaster Mitigation Program (PDM) Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA) Plans must be reviewed and updated every five years

Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 Vision of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 Communities will have all hazards mitigation plans that identify and prioritize costeffective mitigation measures that can be implemented prior to a disaster or quickly after a disaster Having a plan would speed up the recovery process

Plan Components 1. Documentation of the planning process 2. Description of study area 3. Analysis of hazard conditions 4. Hazard mitigation goals and objectives 5. Hazard mitigation strategies 6. Plan adoption, implementation, and maintenance

Plan Components 1. Documentation of the Planning Process Chapter 1 and Appendix A The City must adopt the plan in order to be covered Public and adjacent communities must be given an opportunity to comment during the drafting stage

Plan Components 2. Description of Study Area Chapter 2 Demographic Surface waters Transportation Public facilities Police facilities Fire facilities EMS facilities Related regulations and programs Land Use Lake Michigan Shoreline Flood hazard areas Utility systems Critical community facilities Hazardous material use and storage Emergency operation planning

Plan Components 3. Analysis of Hazard Conditions-Chapter 3 Vulnerability and risk analysis for each covered hazard Historical and recent incidents Vulnerabilities and community impacts Human lives and property damages Potential for future changes in hazard condition

Plan Components 4. Hazard Mitigation Goals-Chapter 4 Express what the plan is trying to achieve Ties the plan to other active plans City comprehensive plan Watershed plans Park and open space plans Fairly general

Plan Components 5. Hazard Mitigation Strategies-Chapter 5 Develop a range of actions and projects to reduce the impacts of each hazard Structural, nonstructural, educational Prioritize actions for implementation Identify responsible parties Examine costs and benefits Consider multi-jurisdictional aspects

Plan Components 6. Plan Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance-Chapter 6 The City must formally adopt the plan Detail available funding and technical assistance Monitoring of plan implementation Incorporation of the plan into existing planning mechanisms

Background on 2nd Plan Update

City of Milwaukee All Hazards Mitigation Plan Initial study conducted 2003-2005 Report published 2005 First update conducted 2011-2012 Report published 2012

Reviewed and revised First Plan Update Inventories Goals Vulnerability and risk analysis Mitigation strategies Report published 2012

Natural Hazards Profiled in the Plan (Required by FEMA) Earthquake Extreme Temperatures Flooding and Stormwater Drainage Problems Lake Michigan Coastal Hazards Thunderstorms High Wind/Hail/Lightning Tornado

Natural Hazards Profiled in the Plan (Required by FEMA) Winter Storms

Technological Hazards Profiled in the Plan (Optional under FEMA rules) Contamination/Loss of Water Supply Public Health Emergencies Major Fire or Emergency Medical Incident Hazardous Material Incidents Terrorism

Plan Components to Review and Revise Review implementation activities Update inventories of natural and built features Review and reevaluate identification of hazards Update and reevaluate risk analysis Review and revise mitigation goals Review and revise mitigation strategies Update plan implementation and maintenance Update potential funding sources

Local Planning Team Role Weigh in on hazard identification Review the plan chapters Help us get needed information Recent and historical problems with hazards Location, occurrence, damages Recent projects, planned and contemplated projects, recent hazard-related outreach Inventory data

Project Web Site http://www.sewrpc.org/hmp Agendas and other meeting materials Summary notes from meetings Presentations Draft chapters as they are completed Comment screen Other ways to send a comment Email to jboxhorn@sewrpc.org