Land Use and Transportation Scenario Analysis and Microsimulation. 14 th TRB National Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH 2013

Similar documents
LINKING LAND FORM AND DEVELOPMENT LOCATION TO MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND: CASE STUDIES OF TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDIES IN DELAWARE

APPENDIX TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING OVERVIEW MAJOR FEATURES OF THE MODEL

APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS

Des Moines Area MPO. MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization

Porter, D.R., Performance Standards for Growth Management. PAS Report 461. APA Planning Press: Chicago, IL. ed

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

SCENARIO PLANNING 12

Database and Travel Demand Model

Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG

VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) TRAFFIC IMPACT METRIC

Metropolitan sustainability and the Interstate System: A new professional paradigm. Eric Sundquist Future of the Interstate Study March 27, 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

Urban Transport Modeling (based on these two sources)

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT

Transportation Model Report

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Travel Demand Modeling Applications How Modeling is Being Used to Address the Big Issues of Transportation Planning

4: Transportation and Land Use

1003 K Street NW, Suite 209 Washington, DC MEMORANDUM. Matthew Ridgway, Nat Bottigheimer, and Alex Rixey, Fehr & Peers

CHAPTER 2: MODELING METHODOLOGY

Chris Gray (WRCOG), Chris Tzeng (WRCOG), Sarah Dominguez (SCAG), Mike Gainor (SCAG)

Appendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements

Smart Growth Impact Fees

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

New Mexico Statewide Model

Chapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

Moving the first state forward! Delaware s Statewide Long- Range Transportation Plan November 17, 2010 WILMAPCO Our Town

The Consultant (team) will be required to have knowledge and expertise in the following areas:

Lesson 2. Principles of. Transportation. Land Use 2-1

Long Range Transportation Plan Project Status Update

Land Use Assumptions and the Plan Development Process

Overcoming Barriers to Mixed-Use Infill Development: Let s Get Trip Generation Right

Utilizing GIS to Assess Win-Win Built Environment Investments: Transportation Modeling Methodologies and Economic Analysis Applications

Project Summary. Project Objectives

Transportation and Utilities

Land Use and Traffic Congestion

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

Regional Evaluation Decision tool for Smart Growth

2016 Subdivision Staging Policy TISTWG 6/7/16. Draft Review of Worksession #1 on 6/9/16

Appendix E Technical Description of the Modeling Framework

CHAPTER 7. TRAVEL PATTERNS AND TRAVEL FORECASTING

Maryland Statewide Transportation Model (MSTM)

Subdivision Staging Transportation Recommendations. Subdivision Staging Policy Community Meeting II April 12, 2016

- FACT SHEET - THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Buffalo Niagara Integrated Corridor Management Project. ENTERPRISE Webinar Keir Opie, Cambridge Systematics September 26, 2016

Transportation and Smart Growth ITE Traffic Engineering Workshop, March, 2004 Edward Beimborn, UWM

Table II.B.3.1: Regional Trends, Concord-Kannapolis UA. Year Pct Ch Pct Ch

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

Transportation Concurrency

Transportation Concurrency

Performance Based Transportation Project Assessment. Utilizing Travel Demand Model Data and Dynamic Economic Modeling

Chapter 4: Transportation and Land Use

Standardization of Travel Demand Models

USING TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES TO FUND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS AND IMPACT MODAL CHOICE IN URBAN AREAS. Mark J. Magalotti P.E.

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 3 Existing Facilities & System Performance

Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

Sustainable Transportation Performance Measures

To Market, To Market. Discussion Contents. Part 1: Land Use & Infrastructure

INTEGRATED MOBILITY PLAN

Appendix C: Scenarios and Future Drivers Impacting Transportation

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

Regional Transit Framework Study

Context. Case Study: Albany, New York. Overview

Market-to-Market Market influences on Transportation and Development. Dawn Cartier & Tom Hester January 2015

State of the Practice - How Public Transportation is addressed in Traffic Impact Studies ITE Transit and Traffic Impact Studies Committee

Executive Summary. Reimagining a Legacy Transit System: Lessons from Wilmington, Delaware

City of Tacoma TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN DRAFT

Kentucky Statewide Travel Model (KYSTM) Rob Bostrom Wilbur Smith Associates Combined Kentucky-Tennessee Model Users Group Meeting Bowling Green, KY

MTP VISIONS, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Congestion Management Strategy

SHIFT Model Training: Scenario 3A

Chapter 2 Transportation Element Goals, Objectives and Policies

Memorandum. FROM: Jim Ortbal Rosalynn Hughey Barry Ng TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. DATE: June 16, 2017

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

Scope of Work. Land Use, Transportation, and Resilience: Scenario Planning Study East Tangipahoa Area State Project No. H RPC Task: ETangi

THAT Council adopt the Congestion Management Strategy as outlined in this report

TRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES

REGIONAL PLANNING AND POLICY FRAMEWORK A Preferred Approach for our Regional Growth

Nashville Southeast Corridor High-Performance Transit Alternatives Study. Final Report

CALIFORNIA URBAN INFILL TRIP GENERATION STUDY. Luke Schwartz Kimley-Horn and Associates

A Shift from LOS to VMT in the California Environmental Quality Act

Improved Software Tools for Regional & Local Integrated Land Use/Transportation Planning in California (funded by Caltrans)

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE

Multi-Resolution Traffic Modeling for Transform 66 Inside the Beltway Projects. Prepared by George Lu, Shankar Natarajan

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION. Section 2.0 MODEL ARCHITECTURE RECOMMENDATIONS, PHASE I, TIER I - PASSENGER CAR AND TRUCK..

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND FORECASTING INFORMATION SESSION

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

6.1 Integrated Land Use and Transportation Planning Approach

Measuring Success: Using data wisely for a healthier, wealthier, more equitable city. NACTO Conference, October 2013.

Final Regional 2035 Transportation Plan Adopted: January 21, 2010

Transcription:

Land Use and Transportation Scenario Analysis and Microsimulation 14 th TRB National Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH 2013

SMART TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Project Need: How to quantify the benefits of Smart Transportation and Land Use Investments? Need a transferable process that will produce reasonable results statewide in a streamlined manner.

GOAL: EVALUATING MULTIPLE, DETAILED LAND USE AND INFRASTRUCTURE SCENARIOS Rural Traditional Suburban Neo-traditional Smart Growth Density 1 Unit/Acre 4 Units/Acre 8 Units/Acre 15 Units/Acre Net Units 10 Units 50 Units 75 Units 75 Units Transit None None Yes Yes Sidewalks None Partial Complete Complete Trails & Bikepaths Interconnected None None Partial Complete None 30% Cul-de-Sac Partial Grid Highly Connected

BACKGROUND: PENINSULA MODEL OVERVIEW Model Maintenance (Network, TAZ, & Count Update Utilities) Core Model (5 Step Travel Demand Model Equations) Single Network Processor GIS TAZ Land Use Layer Feature Models Air Quality Conformity EZPass Toll/Mode Split Model Build/No Build Model Statewide Evacuation Model Seasonal Tourist Model Junction Model TIS Model (Extra P s & A s) Subarea Model (GIS Network, Fratar Trip Table) Micro Model (GIS Network, Tax Parcel TAZ ) Outputs (Reports, GIS Files, Loaded Networks, etc) 4

BACKGROUND: DELDOT S PENINSULA MODEL Two Levels of Resolution Standard Resolution: 13,491 Links 2108 TAZs Enhanced Resolution: 177,211 Links 19,640 TAZs Can be applied using windowing process in GIS for a hybrid setup 5

LUTSAM (Land Use and Transportation Scenario Analysis and Microsimulation) 6 6

WHAT IS LUTSAM? LUTSAM is a modeling tool and process resulting from a collaboration between the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT) and the State Smart Transportation Initiative (SSTI) at the University of Wisconsin Madison. LUTSAM tests land use alternatives along with multi-modal investments, by integrating GIS, land use, travel demand and microsimulation. 7

SSTI - MODELING PROCESS FLOW Land Use Scenario Development (LUTSAM) Travel Demand Modeling Sub Area Model Sub Area Microsimulation 8

9 LUTSAM USER INTERFACE

10

REGIONAL MODEL FLOW MTDM Demographic Data Processor Peninsula Model TAZ Demographic Data Parcel (Micro TAZ) Database from LUTSAM Define Macro TAZs to be Micromodeled Run Demographic Data Processor Randomly Assigns Household Type to each New Household Re-allocates remaining people, vehicles, and workers to parent TAZ households Refined Trip Generation Refined Trip Distribution Refined Mode Split Refined Traffic Assignment Master Input Network Link and Node Database from LUTSAM Run Network Processor Combines Micro Model and Peninsula Model Links and Nodes into Single Model Network Extract AM/PM peak hour subnetwork and trip tables for microsimulation MTDM Network Processor 11

HOUSEHOLD SYNTHESIZER

LUTSAM - Test Scenario 13 13

SCENARIO LOCATIONS 1. Suburban Traditional 2. Urban 14

SCENARIO DESCRIPTIONS Suburban Traditional 200 single/multi family homes with a big box store Traditional design Four entrances to adjacent roadways Poor connections and pedestrian facilities Urban 200 single/multi family homes with one big box store Compact, dense design Two entrances to adjacent roadways Well connected and completely walkable/bikeable community 15

16 SUBURBAN TRADITIONAL

17 URBAN GRID

WALK/BIKE TRIPS (DAILY) 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 Traditional Urban 600 500 400 300 Walk Bike 18

VMT & VMT/TRIP 35,000 12 30,000 10 25,000 8 20,000 15,000 Traditional Urban 6 Traditional Urban 10,000 4 5,000 2 VMT VMT/Trip 19

VHT & DELAY 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 Traditional Urban 300 200 100 0 Congested VHT Free VHT Delay 20

SMYRNA TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY

SMYRNA TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY Regional Model TAZ = 2,136 Census Block TAZ = 22,500 Tax Parcel TAZ = 7,700

SMYRNA TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY Sheridan s Pub Christiana Hospital Downtown Smyrna William Henry Middle School Southern Elementary School

SMYRNA TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY Townhomes Retail Single Family Units Can the Design Form of Potential Development Locations AND Improved Bike & Pedestrian Connections Contribute to Travel Patterns Shifts? US 13 Bike & Pedestrian Improvements

SMYRNA TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY Results: Significant Increase in Bike/Walk Trips 10% Decrease in Auto Trips to Shopping Pedestrian Trips to Adjacent Shopping Center 10% Less VMT / Unit Vehicle Trips Less Travel on Arterials & Key Intersections 11% Less Emissions / Unit 25

26 SMYRNA SAMPLE VIDEO

Conclusions Useful for a variety of applications Regional studies Small area studies Corridor studies Transit evaluations Multimodal Studies Allows Standard MPO and Statewide Travel Demand Models to operate at the tax parcel level, taking advantage of the benefits of both regional and parcel based models.

Contacts Scott Thompson Graves 724 779 7940 sthompson graves@wrallp.com Mike DuRoss 302 760 2110 michael.duross@state.de.us Rafey Subhani 410 246 3434 rsubhani@wrallp.com Eric Sundquist 608 265 6155 erics@cows.org Bill Holloway 608 265 5899 holloway@ssti.us