Submission of a Project idea Note

Similar documents
Sustainable Development Verified Impact Standard

BURKINA FASO FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAMME. GENERAL PRESENTATION FIP/REDD+ Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development of Burkina Faso

the challenge we face

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AGRICULTURAL TRANSFORMATION INITIATIVE

Determining the Additionality of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Projects The Climate Trust

Delivering Sustainable Change: TREE AID s Approach

LIVELIHOODS FUNDS: INVESTING IN THE RESILIENCE OF FAMILY FARMERS DECEMBER 6 TH 2017 SÃO PAULO

Mainstreaming Environment for Poverty Reduction (RETA6422) Subproject Proposal

Forest Land Use and Climate Change in North Sulawesi (FLUCC) in the Poigar Forest

An Economic Framework for Analyzing Forest Landscape Restoration Decisions

Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) in Developing Countries

Joint Framework for Action Ghana

Forest- and Climate-Smart Cocoa in Côte d Ivoire and Ghana

Alliances for Action

A Framework for Analyzing Forest Landscape Restoration Decisions. CBD Training

UNDP-Spain MDG Achievement Fund. Terms of Reference for Thematic Window on Environment and Climate Change

REDD+ Safeguards and Safeguard Information Systems

Forestry and Climate Change Fund

Terms of Reference. Pilot Program for Climate Resilience and Forest Investment Program in Rwanda. Scoping Mission

Financing Landscape Programs Integrating Different Financing Sources

Undertaking Restoration: Building-in Resilience

AFRICAN FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION

Coffee Sustainability Catalogue 2016

World Economic and Social Survey (WESS) 2011: The Great Green Technological Transformation

Sustainable Cocoa Economy

GEF SECRETARIAT REVIEW FOR FULL/MEDIUM-SIZED PROJECTS* THE GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF TRUST FUNDS

BURKINA FASO FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAMME. PRESENTATION OF THE INVESTMENT PLAN Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development of Burkina Faso

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility

1.0 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Project Activities Legal Status Additionality Timescale... 3

PROCOSTA SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL AND MANGROVE ECOSYSTEMS PROGRAM

FAO STRATEGY FOR FORESTS AND FORESTRY

Potentialities for CDM in Africa Sudan case Abdalla Gaafar Mohammed Forests National Corporation Sudan

Annual General Meeting 2001 October Washington DC, USA STAKEHOLDER MEETING

7 th FOREST EUROPE Ministerial Conference. Madrid 2015

Afforestation and creation of woodland

THE LIVELIHOODS FUND FOR FAMILY FARMING.

APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMES

Sustainable Cacao-based Agroforestry Development to Support Green Growth in Gorontalo

REQUIRED DOCUMENT FROM HIRING UNIT

African Forest Landscape Restoration Initiative

GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE (GACSA) FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT. Version 01 :: 1 September 2014

Carbon Finance for Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land-Use Sectors

The Opportunity for Agriculture: Becoming Climate-Smart and Sequestering Carbon

Innovative Financing Methods for Lake Basin Management

FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM DESIGN DOCUMENT. (Prepared by the Forest Investment Program Working Group)

Restoration Opportunities Assessment Methodology (ROAM)

How Carbon Trading Can Help Preserve Coastal Ecosystems

Global Forest Alliance (GFA) and the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF)

SUSTAINABILITY MATERIAL TOPICS

CAMEROON S FOREST INVESTMENT PLAN

Economic and Social Council

Measuring Under-delivery Risk

forests strengthened support Sustainable Strategy

Trees for carbon sequestration with small landholders The Case of Trees for Global Benefits Program Bushenyi District South Western Uganda By

AFRICAN RESILIENT LANDSCAPES INITIATIVE Concept Note

PROJECT PREPARATION GRANT (PPG) PROJECT TYPE: Full-sized Project TYPE OF TRUST FUND: GEF Trust Fund

OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Reforestation and Improved Forest Management in Uganda

Droughts and floods, crop failures, degradation of natural resources are increasingly linked to, or exacerbated by climate

PROMESA. Economic Improvement and Food Security in Coffee, Cocoa and other Crop

THE CHARCOAL TRANSITION

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) in developing countries

Regione Marche. Development Programme Non techincal summary. Roma, June 2015

Fauna & Flora International. Reducing Carbon Emissions from Deforestation in the Ulu Masen Ecosystem, Aceh, Indonesia

Social & Environmental Consideration of REDD+

Comparing results of Carbon balance appraisal using on-going Bio-Carbon fund projects

2.1 FAO s Forest and Landscape Restoration Mechanism

Insights from projects and initiatives

SCALING SUCCESS Lessons from Adaptation Pilots in the Rainfed Regions of India

Private Sector Investment in REDD: Minimum Conditions and Risks

Brazilian Natural Capital Initiative The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity - EEB Brazil

Plantations for People:

African Green Growth Strategy Towards Low-Carbon Growth and Climate Resilient Development (Draft Elements)

FIP Investment Plan for Rwanda

The importance of ecosystems

Integrated landscape approach

Sustainable Bioenergy Development Opportunities and Challenges in Research & Policy for Africa

Questions & Answers. Q1: What is the BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes?

Call for concept notes

Brief description, overall objective and project objectives with indicators

USE OF SYNERGIES IN THE REVIEW, UPDATING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN : THE CASE OF UGANDA

Technical Cooperation Programme TCP. Providing FAO technical expertise to Member Countries through targeted, catalytic, short-term projects

Climate Smart Territories; what are they and how do we evaluate progress towards this goal?

Next-generation enterprise risk management

Resolution XI.14. Climate change and wetlands: implications for the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

PRINCIPLES FOR GUIDING RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURE

Living in harmony with nature

NAS Workshop on Terrestrial Carbon TERRESTRIAL. Colorado State University CARBON SEQUESTRATION. September 19, Debbie Reed, C-AGG

Madagascar: Assessing the impacts of climate change on Madagascar's biodiversity and livelihoods2

Conquering the Valley of Death: overcoming pitfalls in financing sustainable agriculture. The case of improving cocoa yields in San Martin, Peru

Forest Landscape Restoration Mechanism and Integrated land-use in Africa

CRITERIA FOR SELECTING COUNTRY AND REGIONAL PILOTS UNDER THE FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM

Carbon Credits for Managing The Laguna De Bay Basin

The Mountain Institute SUBMISSION IN THE AREA OF ECOSYSTEMS, INTERRELATED AREAS SUCH AS WATER RESOURCES, AND ADAPTATION

MANUAL FOR REDD PROGRAM

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS ELEVENTH MEETING

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK CLIMATE CHANGE AND GREEN GROWTH DEPARTMENT (PECG)

TARGET ZERO NET CARBON

Integration of PES in policy design and the role of government in scaling up: the case of Southern Africa

05/05/2015 European Investment Bank Group 1

Transcription:

Submission of a Project idea Note Version 2.0(March 2014) 1. Introduction 2. Project investment phases 3. General conditions of eligibility 4. Livelihoods selection processus 5. Submission of a PIN

1. Introduction Livelihoods Fund consists of 9 European investors from the private sector (Danone, Crédit Agricole, Schneider Electric, Hermès International, SAP, La Poste, Firmenich, Caisse des Dépôts Climat, Voyageurs du Monde) with a total size of 34m. To date, the Fund has invested in 6 large-scale carbone projects in reforestation, agroforestry and rural energy in Senegal, India, Indonesia, Kenya and Guatemala. The investments have resulted in the plantation of 150 million trees spanning 30,000 hectares with a positive impact on the revenues of more than 1,000,000 farmers and their families. The projects will result in the generation of nearly 8m carbon offsets that will be distributed among the investors. The Livelihoods Fund aims to invest new projects to preserve and restore ecosystems that are crucial to the carbon cycle and food securities for the communities, in various locations. Livelihoods projects are also intended to benefit local community farmers. Restoration and/or conservation will not only generate carbon benefits for the Livelihoods Fund, but will also secure ecosystem goods and services, which are essential for the livelihoods of the communities who live in these areas. The local communities will be offered the opportunity to become involved with conservation, sustainable agriculture management and ecosystem rebuilding operations. In this respect, the Livelihoods Fund finances upfront a range of different activities including programs and activities developed by the Fund itself and programs and activities during 20years which are in line with the partnership's stated mission and objectives. Initial capital is entrusted to a local project developer who runs projects with small-holder farmers. Importantly, the restoration and conservation programs financed by Livelihoods Fund must, once up and running, be ready to withstand scrutiny from one of the standards recognized by the international carbon offsetting community. Livelihoods Venture as Livelihoods Fund advisor will select projects that are able to deliver carbon offsets and positive social and environmental impact while simultaneously providing revenue-generating goods and services. All projects aim at creating a symbiotic coalition among off-takers, local farmer communities and local authorities. The contribution of each of them under aligned targets (funding, labor, land, expertise, payments) is the key lever for project success. Finally, Livelihoods-eligible projects should be financially sustainable. In other words, they must demonstrate that they are likely to provide an adequate flow of funds for project implementation and to achieve the anticipated climate, community and wetland impacts over the long-term. 2.Project investment phases Project investment is divided into three main phases and endorsed by Livelihoods investment decision body: i) Origination / preparation: this phase is completed when (i) the project is selected, (ii) the community recognizes the role of the project developer and understands its duties and benefits under the project, (iii) the project scenario is understood and agreed by all parties and (iv) the project realization budget is fully secured. ii) Investment decision: the Livelihoods Investment Committee may either: approve the project proposal, request modifications, or refuse it. Furthermore, the committee has the prerogative to call a meeting at any point in time to examine a particular aspect of an ongoing project. iii) Investment phase: the investment phase is staircase-shaped. The first investment round is limited as a means to confirm the investment strategy while maintaining risks at a minimum level. The subsequent

rounds are larger, once the process is proven under control by the project manager and local communities. All investment rounds are split into several portions that correspond to specific milestones. The money is only released once each milestone has been reached. iv) Monitoring and results-measurement phase: at this point, the project starts a new phase in which its results and outcomes are carefully monitored and measured. The measurements are then compared to the baseline and other targets and serve as the basis for payments by the off-takers. 3. General conditions of eligibility of a project Livelihoods is calling for investments in large scale ecosystem restoration or conservation projects which deliver tangible socio-economic benefits for poor farmers, and generate a significant amount of certified carbon credits for Livelihoods investors 3.1 The following main criteria are essential regarding the impact of the project Sustainability on soil and agroforestry practices Well-managed land-use and implementation of sustainable agroforestry practices will be set to create opportunities for local communities on -training, capacity and institutional building, transfer of techniques and tools to upgrade human capital and resilience. -production models to improve yields of both food and cash crops with positive effects on food security and economic activity. The restored ecosystem is recognized by water users as necessary to maintain, to develop local activities in favor of water availability and/or quality of water Environmental impact on a watershed i) The restored ecosystem brings a positive impact on the environment and on the biodiversity taking into consideration standard of the UICN and the Convention of RAMSAR, and main international standards (see references sources) ii) The projects will always have a net positive environmental impact (biodiversity, forest cover protection, fight against desertification, soil erosion etc ) that will be purchased by local or international agencies, nature trusts or foundations; Improvement of the life of the farmers The project has to be driven as broad impacted community-based farming project. The specific challenges to investing in small-holder agriculture: aggregating communities of thousands of farmers, properly assessing and mitigating local specific risks, structuring and implementing large scale projects, carrying out results-based program measurement, securing long-term management of the projects and aligning the objectives of all stakeholders and off-takers. Generating added value The project create jobs and value in rural area as well as conditions for improved nutrition, gender equality and overall poverty reduction. Marketable externalities can be generated by the project primarily focus on producing food and agricultural goods capable of attracting off-taker payments Result driven project This projects is guided by a cost and results-driven management approach Partnership Cofinancing The project will provide credible and affordable operational solutions for private and public off-takers interested in cofinancing or purchasing the externalities, goods and services generated by the projects or improving their operations and fulfilling their core objectives. Geography The project has to be driven in poor farmers areas and priority will be given to African countries

3.2 The Carbone criteria below are essential regarding the choice of the project: Additionality The recourse to the Livelihoods financing is accessible if,and only if,this financing makes the project possible, despite this financing the project could not be carried out. That it is in financial term: Livelihoods cannot finance actions a posteriori That it either ecological term: Livelihoods cannot engage a restoration which would take place in any case by natural regeneration. The restored ecosystem is recognized by the local communities as necessary to maintain, to develop their local activities in favor of food security. Biodiversity The restored ecosystem brings a positive impact on the environment and on the biodiversity taking into consideration standard of the UICN and the Convention of RAMSAR, and main international standards (see references sources) Methodologies The eligible activities to the Livelihoods financing correspond ing mainly to replantation of forest and land ecosystems on soil previously degraded either with an overexploitation of surfaces (pastoralism, crops ) and natural erosions natural or of the rural energy activities. All these activities being covered by approved methodologies CDM and/or VCS.. Anteriority The case of restoration of a forest or a forest ecosystem, this one had to be realized on deforested plots before 2000 Sizing Because of the fixed costs related to the carbon registration and the validation, the agro-forests projects require in 3 years period a minimum surface of 3000-5000ha (according to the biomass generated by the protocol of restoration) and of 100.000units installed for rural energy Land usage It s needed to identify the owner of carbon credits, and if the owner can reassign these credits as a counterpart of the upfront financing of Livelihoods taking in an account that the whole benefits coming from the activities of restoration of the ecosystems belong to the communities. 3.3 The following criteria are required concerning the choice of the project developer: Processability A pilot project is already implemented and makes it possible to qualify the capacity of mobilization and intervention of the project developer close to the communities. The pilot project made it possible to establish a process (technical and organizational sequences) potentially scalable. Background The project developer has already experiences, competences and networks of intervention supporting to the development of its activity either in the field of the Nature conservation, or in the economic development of the rural activities. Temporality Project actors commit themselves over the duration fixed by methodologies (10 years for the energy projects 20 years for the other projects) bringing means for maintaining and monitoring of the ecosystems National Size The project developer is well recognized at the national level of its activities and benefits of an effective network for intervention (political, administrative, scientific)

Commitment The quality of the leaders of the organization (mobilization, structuring ) is well recognized and they can share a medium-term vision of their project Potentiality The project developer and its organization have the capacity to grow in a period of 2 3 years to be autonomous to implement by themselves high scale projects of the dimension required by Livelihood. Financial Viability Because of financial governance of the majority of the eligible organizations (not-profit organizations), the organization must be solvable and provide the 3 years proof of financial balanced assessment. 4. The Livelihoods selection process The project selection process includes the following steps. Step 1: Submission of project idea notes The Livelihoods Fund will accept a carbon Project Idea Notes (PIN) either in response to a call for proposals or by invitation. Step 2: Review of project ideas Each project idea note will be reviewed with respect to the eligibility criteria described in chapter 2 and submit recommendations by Livelihoods Venture. Step 3: Approval of project ideas : detailed project plan Based on this review, Livelihoods Venture will propose to the Livelihoods Investment Committee on whether to approve a project idea and to support, as appropriate, a set of actions required to develop a detailed project plan. Step 4: Due diligence Approved project ideas will then be subject to a rigorous due diligence review organized by livelihoods Venture including a site visit, consultations with relevant stakeholders and risk assessment (see procedure 25. Livelihood risk assessment tool ),and a detailed project plan will be set. Step 5: Submission of a detailed project plan The detailed project plan will be submitted to the livelihoods investment committee for its approval, including: -an executive summary -the detailed business plan (provisional profit and loss account, projected treasury flows, risk analysis) - Status and financial accounts of the project developer -A technical and environmental expertise report -Permits and/our licenses needed for the project development (land property, carbon credits cession..)

Step 6: Project implementation contract Based on the detailed project plan, a project implementation contract will then be agreed between the project proponent and the Livelihoods Fund. This plan will include monitoring and evaluation of the project as required by the carbon markets. 5. Submission of a PIN Please submit a PIN in confidence to: JP Rennaud Livelihoods Venture jprennaud@livelihoods-venture.com +33 646315869 This section provides general guidance for the preparation of a Livelihoods carbon Project Idea Note (PIN) for consideration by the Livelihoods Fund. On the basis of the PIN, project proponents may be invited, and receive financial or technical support, to develop a detailed project plan. The PIN should be no longer than 3pages in length and include the following sections: 1) WHO - Details of the project proponent(s) a) Contact details b) Summary information on the organization and organization structure c) Overview of relevant expertise and experience d) Short description of other project partners, if any 2) WHERE Location and description of the ecosystem a) Type of ecosystem/watershed b) Location and size c) Current legal status of lands and ownership d) Current management and use of lands e) Ecosystem stakeholders

3) WHY Status of the ecosystem a) Historical status as a functioning medium (at least for the last 10 years, and in case of VCS since 2000) b) Current degraded or threatened status of the ecosystem c) Direct and underlying, current and possible future threats, and causes of degradation d) Overview of any previous or on-going restoration initiatives, in addition to the planned project 4) WHAT - Expected project outcomes a) Goals, objectives and projected outcomes of the project in the following areas: Carbon impacts: e.g. expected emission profiles in the baseline and the project case, quantities of carbon credits over the lifetime of the project and choice of standard (how will marketable carbon be delivered) Community impacts, creation and /or capacity on farmers communities,including the distribution of benefits between stakeholders and project proponents Added value projected : creation pf jobs, improved nutrition, gender equality, marketable externalities generated by the project,added value on supplychain and potential off-taker Environmental impacts: e.g. how will the project address ecosystem threats and what are the expected impacts on the provision of ecosystem good and services b) Major assumptions, risks and threats to achieving outcomes 5) HOW - Project description a) Project summary matrix b) Technical description of project activities c) Methods and technologies to be used d) Project schedule and milestones e) Project team f) Community participation and benefits 6) HOW MUCH Project finance a) Description of total project value b) Estimate of total project cost c) Total Livelihoods investment sought d) Sources of co-financing, if any (both secured and under application) e) Financial analysis