Nutrient Management of Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton

Similar documents
Fertigation. Dr. Juan Enciso Associate Professor BAEN Department Texas Agrilife Research and Extension Texas A&M University System

IRRIGATION TECHNOLOGY DECISIONS: MICROIRRIGATION

Maintaining Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems

Fertilizing Young Almond Orchards. David Doll UCCE Merced 1/16/2015

Maintaining Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems

Blueberry I. Wednesday morning 9:00 am

Subsurface Drip Irrigation Systems (SDI) Water Quality Assessment Guidelines

Principles Of Fertigation In Micro Irrigation

Nutrient Management. Things to Know. Chapter 16. Fertilizer Use Concerns. Goals of Fertilizer Usage. Nutrient Balance in Soil. p.

MAINTAINING DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

Impact of Management on the Life Expectancy of Drip Systems. Juan Enciso-Medina, Ph D., P.E. Warren L. Multer. Freddie Lamm, Ph D., P.E.

Pop-up and/or Starter Fertilizers for Corn

Soil Testing for P and K in Annual Crops

Fertility and Crop Nutrition. B. Linquist, R. Mutters, J. Hill and C. vankessel Rice Production Workshop, March 21, 2011

Getting the Most out of Your Nitrogen Fertilization in Corn Brent Bean 1 and Mark McFarland 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

Calcium Thiosulfate LIQUID FERTILIZER APPLICATION GUIDE. CaTs 100% SOLUBLE CALCIUM S-6Ca. Soluble Calcium (Ca) 6% Combined Sulfur (S) 10%

Pepper Production Guide for Florida: Fertilization 1

Evaluating the Reuse of Swine Lagoon Effluent and Reclaimed Municipal Water for Agricultural Production Progress Report April 20, 2017

Clain Jones

Nutrient Management of Conservation- Till Cotton in Terminated-Wheat

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Watermelon Response to Soluble and Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizers

Maintenance of Drip Drip Irrigation Systems. Patrick Byers Regional Horticulture Specialist University of Missouri Extension

ADVANCING NITROGEN AND IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT FOR ROW CROPS AND BIOFUEL CROPS IN THE WESTERN US

Taking the Confusion Out of Soil Testing. Bill Kreuser University of Nebraska-Lincoln

CHAPTER 16: Fertigation

NITROGEN FERTILIZATION FOR DRIP-IRRIGATED ONIONS

Annual Report for Potash & Phosphate Institute (PPI)/Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada (PPIC) and Foundation for Agronomic Research (FAR)

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations

Wilbur-Ellis Company. Carl Bruice - National Nutrition Technical Manager

Reflectance-based Nitrogen Fertilizer Management for Irrigated Cotton

Development of Cotton N Fertilization Algorithms, Southern USA

Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Big Horn Basin Crops

Do not oven-dry the soil

Recommendations in this nutrient management

Irrigation water management for subsurface drip

Nutrient Management in Vegetable Crops

Title: Case Study: Subsurface Drip Irrigation in Southeastern Colorado

Irrigated Spring Wheat

Water quality can have a huge impact on plant

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Sugar Beet. Jay Norton Soil Fertility Specialist University of Wyoming

5. NITROGEN (N)-The Big Guy

Soil fertility management for pepper production

The Fluid Journal Offi cial Journal of the Fluid Fertilizer Foundation Early Spring 2013 Vol. 21, No. 2, Issue # 80

Antonio P. Mallarino Iowa State University, John E. Sawyer Iowa State University,

2011 Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia, January 4-7, 2011

Improving Cotton Production Efficiency With Phosphorus and Potassium Placement At Multiple Depths in Strip Tillage Systems

By-Step Nutrient Management Plan May 23, Jim Crownover, Conservation Agronomist USDA-NRCS Lubbock, Texas

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

Effects of Potassium Fertilizer Sources, Timing, and Rates On Tuber Specific Gravity

Understanding Salt Index of Fertilizers. Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Fertigation management for tomato production in saline soils

Nitrogen Management in Cotton: West Texas, Irrigated

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Water Management in Pecan Orchards. Dr. Jim Walworth Dept. of Soil, Water & Environmental Sci. University of Arizona

Chemicals for Fertigation

Improving Cotton Production Efficiency With Phosphorus and Potassium Placement At Multiple Depths in Strip Tillage Systems

Grain Sorghum Fertility Management Lucas Haag Ph.D., Asst. Professor/Northwest Area Agronomist K-State Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby

Plants need. Drip Irrigation: The Silver Bullet?

Potassium Thiosulfate Fertilizer

Evaluation of fertigation. Wetting pattern of a drip system on different soil types. Design of a fertigation system

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

5.7 Fertigation. Key points. Scott Wallace. Ian Rochester. Section 5: Irrigation systems 441

General Recommendations for Fertilization of Turfgrasses on Florida Soils 1

Drip Irrigation Maintenance

Subsurface Drip Irrigation in the Southeast

Low biomass cover crops for tomato production

NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW POTATO VARIETIES UNDER FURROW IRRIGATION

Lecture 18. Soil Acidity, Alkalinity, and Socidity

Getting the Most from Your Irrigation System Maintenance of Microirrigation Systems. Larry Schwankl

Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations. Kent Martin SW Agronomy Agent Update 12/1/2009

Evaluation of a Drip Vs. Furrow Irrigated Cotton Production System

CENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST

Nutrient Removal by Crops

Soil Test Advanced. Southwest Agricultural Conference Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada 3-4 January 2013

Irrigation Systems Evaluations

Todd P. Trooien South Dakota State University Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Brookings, South Dakota

With High Fertilizer Prices. Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO

Soil Fertility and Fertilizers - Timing and Management Crop Opportunity Update North Battleford, SK March 6, 2014

How to use Artificial Fertilizers. AT UGANDA LIMITED SOILS BROCHURE SERIES No. 02

Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay

UNDERSTANDING A TURF FERTILIZER LABEL

Water Testing and Interpretation. by Bob Schultheis Natural Resource Engineering Specialist

BAND PLACEMENT FOR POTATOES IN CALCAREOUS SOIL ABSTRACT

How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Irrigation Analytical Package

Edible Hemp Foliar Sampling Project 2018 Judson Reid and Lindsey Pashow; Harvest NY Cornell Cooperative Extension

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

Unit F: Soil Fertility and Moisture Management. Lesson 3: Applying Fertilizers to Field Crops

Irrigation Water Quality for B.C. Greenhouses

Biofilm Management. Paul Fisher, California 2017

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIELD MONITORING 1. Bradford D. Brown ABSTRACT

CRITERIA FOR SUCCESSFUL ADOPTION OF SDI SYSTEMS

Managing Nitrogen in Almond Orchards. Gurreet Brar UCCE Farm Advisor Fresno & Madera

Subsection 3D: Nutrient Recommendations Forage Crops

Evaluation of Several Controlled Release Fertilizers for Irrigated Potato Production

Transcription:

Nutrient Management of Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton Installation of subsurface drip irrigated (SDI) in cotton fields in the Southern High Plains is expanding at a rapid rate. Information is lacking on nutrient management in these systems where 3 and 4 bale/ac lint yields are possible. This publication provides best management practices based on current knowledge of SDI cotton production in the High Plains. Acidification and chlorination The ph in our hard (high calcium salt) irrigation waters of the Texas High Plains should be reduced to ph 6.5 using acidification. Pumping high ph water into SDI systems without acidifying it can result in serious consequences. Problems could include scale formation and related blockage of emitters from calcium carbonate, iron oxides or manganese oxides. Additionally, precipitation of the fertilizer salts such as 10-34-0 will occur if un-acidified irrigation water is used. Sulfuric acid or phosphoric acid is often used for acidifying irrigation water, but these products are dangerous to handle, and will damage flesh and eyes very easily. Urea/sulfuric acid mixtures such as N-pHURIC are superior from the standpoint of being less hazardous to handle, but they are more expensive that sulfuric acid alone. Injecting phosphoric acid has greater potential than sulfuric acid injections to produce the salts (calcium phosphates) that can plug emitters.

The salt formed as bicarbonate ions in our irrigation waters are neutralized with sulfuric acid is calcium sulfate, which is soluble and stays in solution. Addition of chlorine (Cl) into SDI systems with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (bleach) disinfects the water and prevents algae growth. Chlorine also kills some bacteria, many of which can form slimes that clog emitters. The target concentration of free residual Cl in high ph irrigation water is 2 ppm. Free residual Cl test kits are available at SDI dealers. Nitrogen Fluid nitrogen (N) fertilizers based on urea-ammonium nitrate (32-0-0 or 28-0-0) can be injected into SDI systems, in a similar manner as they are used in center pivot systems. In center pivots, however, 25 to 30 lb N/ac is the usual rate that is possible, which means that N fertigation is performed only a few times during the season. For SDI, daily injections of small amounts of N fertilizer are possible with the daily irrigation, which is very efficient. Annual soil testing is recommended for determination of N fertilizer requirements of cotton (Dryland fields can be sampled every 2-3 years for N). We recommend soil sampling to 24 inch depth for nitrate-n analysis. For more details on soil sampling go to: http://lubbock.tamu.edu/soilfertility/pdfs/improvesoilsamp.pdf Multiplying the nitrate-n content of your 24-inch soil sample by 8 gives lb nitrate-n/ac. For a 2.5 bale yield goal we recommend you subtract your soil test result of lb nitrate- N/ac from 150 lb N/ac to arrive at your seasonal N requirement. We have developed a N fertilizer requirements calculator that is available at: http://lubbock.tamu.edu/cotton/calcinstructions.html This calculator can be used for any yield goal, soil test data, etc. for SDI (and center pivot and dryland) cotton. Testing irrigation water for nitrate-n content is highly recommended as well, and the N calculator will adjust recommendations based on this input. We recommend pre-plant N applications of 30 lb N/ac be applied with a ground rig in sandy soils, or loamy, clayey soils with high amounts of residue, or if soil test nitrate-n is less than 4 ppm in a 0-6 inch soil sample. The pre-plant N application should be knifed in the bed on the wet furrow side of the seed row. The balance of the N fertilizer can be injected through the fertilizer system. In most situations, we encourage avoiding N fertilizer pre-plant or at planting, as it is far less efficient than in-season fertigation. Since most irrigation systems start up in June close to first square, N fertilization should start at this time. Cotton plants in the High Plains are small at first square and the amount of

plant N at that time is only about 15 lb N/ac. After first square, however, biomass growth and N accumulation increase rapidly, making this the best time for N fertilization Petiole-nitrate analysis programs have been commonly practiced in cotton growing areas such the High Plains for many years. This analysis can be an effective way to determine the need for in-season N fertigations for center pivot irrigations. In SDI, they are probably less useful, since small increments of N are being added daily already. A major change, like doubling the N injection rate, based on a low petiole nitrate reading, starts doubling your N fertilizer bills. Minor changes in injection rates won t affect petiole nitrate in the short run. One feature of petiole nitrate analysis we are not comfortable with is the strong rate of seasonal decline in the readings, even in over-fertilized cotton. Analysis shows that leaf N concentration does not decline that rapidly. Phosphorus Phosphorus (P) management, like N management, starts with soil testing. A 6-inch sample will suffice for P analysis. Phosphorus soil testing is only needed every 2-3 years, and the same P fertilization program should be followed between soil tests. Since P fertilizer is often band applied, it is important to take the soil subsamples for P in all positions of the field, i.e. bottom of furrow, side of bed, top of bed, and composite them before analysis. The critical soil test value for Mehlich-3 or Bray P is 33 ppm, or 15 ppm for Olsen P. This means that if your soil test P level is greater than this, then you do not need to apply any P fertilizer, i.e. you will not get a yield response. Phosphorus soil tests can be confusing because of the various extracts. Mehlich-3 P works on all soils. Bray should not be used on calcareous soils (ph > 7.6 and when soils fizz if weak acid is added). Olsen works well on alkaline (ph > 7.0) and calcareous soils. Soil test labs should use Olsen instead of Bray on calcareous soils if they do not provide Mehlich 3. The following table provides our recommendations for P fertilizer applications at different soil test P levels (all yield goals). Mehlich 3 or Bray 1 Olsen P fertilizer rate ------------- ppm ----------- lb P 2 O 5 /ac 0 5 0 2.5 90 5 10 2.5 5.0 75 10 20 5.0 10 60 20 25 10 12.5 45 25 33 12.5 15 30 33+ 15+ 0

For maintenance of adequate soil test P levels, 30 lb P 2 O 5 /ac can be applied for Mehlich 3 and Bray 1 tests of 33-38 ppm (15-20 ppm Olsen P). There is a lot of interest in injecting P fertilizer through SDI (and center pivot) systems. This can be done, but several points need to be made. First of all, banding P fertilizer (either dry or liquid) close to planting 2 to 4 inches off the seed row and 2 to 4 inches deep is the best management. Broadcasting P is not effective as the P fertilizer rapidly becomes insoluble calcium phosphates and or P fertilizer gets fixed on calcium carbonate surfaces, so the added P is not plant available. The P band in the bed will take care of early season growth and encourage rooting. We are not sure at this time (research still to be done) if the large mass of young, active roots that are present near the emitters in the wet furrow after first bloom have trouble accessing a P band in the bed. Producers with SDI systems may want to consider a second band in the bottom of the wet furrow (applied at the same time as the bed band). This would be highly effective, and definitely take care of the concern of some that the P near the emitter will run-out. This is impossible if a P band (several hundred ppm P) is only a few inches away in the same wet zone, as mass flow and diffusion will rapidly replenish soil solution P as the roots take it up. Injecting P fertilizer through the SDI system could be done during the season, but a several warnings are in order. First, 10-34-0-0 is the fertilizer source with the strongest tendency to precipitate (salt) out in hard irrigation water. You will need to increase your acidification program to adjust the ph of the irrigation water to ph 6.0 to prevent this precipitation and emitted clogging. Another factor with 10-34-0 use is that this source is out of balance with plant needs, i.e. the cotton plants need more N than P. Therefore, additional N from 32-0-0 is needed to be pumped and injected into the system as well. Phosphoric acid (0-54-0) injection is another possibility to supply in-season P to SDI cotton. Some disadvantages of phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ) include: 1) it is hazardous to handle, 2) it is more costly per unit of P than 10-34-0, 3), calcium phosphate precipitates can form and clog the system 4), it does not supply as much plant available P in alkaline and calcareous soils as 10-34-0 does. At this time, if soil test P recommends P fertilizer, we believe that it is simplest and safest to band apply 10-34-0 at planting, if possible in both the bed and in the furrow. However, we do not discourage injection of phosphoric acid, which has the big advantages of continuous acidification and supply of P. Zinc The critical soil test value for Zn for cotton is 0.28 ppm. Soil testing for Zn is needed every 2-3 years. We recommend 4, 2, and 0 lb Zn/ac for soil test Zn in the range of 0-0.19 ppm, 0.19 0.28 ppm, and > 0.28 ppm, respectively. A good liquid Zn fertilizer source for SDI (or center pivot) is Zn-EDTA. This product can be injected directly or mixed with 32-0-0 or 10-34-0 without a problem. ZnSO4. H 2 O is a dry source that is cheaper, and can easily be added and dissolved into acidified water. This source however has a much greater tendency to get fixed/immobilized by calcium carbonates in High Plains soils, and Zn-EDTA does not.

Multiple product injections A final point. Many producers will find it desirable to inject multiple products at once into a SDI system, for e.g. N-pHURIC and 32-0-0. It is important that the same injection pump not be used for more than one product, unless it is a dual head pump (separate inlets and outlets). This is because precipitation will occur with many products. Even with a dual head pump, the two products should go into the irrigation line at least three feet apart. A cheaper alternative to injecting multiple products besides buying additional pumps is a Venturi system, which relies on creating a pressure differential. See your local SDI supplier for parts and more details on setting up a Venturi system for injecting fertilizers and acids. Questions? Contact Kevin Bronson at 806-746-4013 (email: k-bronson@tamu.edu) or Randy Boman at 806-746-4049, or Jim Bordovsky at 806-889-3315, or Dana Porter at 806-746-4022 Revised 07/28/2004