The Development of Agricultural Mechanization in Jordan. Taha A. Al-Issa 1

Similar documents
2017 Alfalfa Enterprise Budget

2000 ESTIMATED MACHINERY COSTS FOR SOUTH CAROLINA FARMS

TABLE 1. Acreage Summary, San Juan County, TABLE 2. Basic cost information for San Juan County, Projected 2017 Projected 2017.

VERSION 1.0. COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS

Item 35 ACRES FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 4. Labor Wage Rate: Equipment operators $/hour $7.20 WATER USE. General & Irrigators $/hour $7.

$1,600 $1,143 $565 $953 $6,541 $1,181 $768 $0 $6,010 $591 $292 $191

Item. NUMBER OF CROPS... 2 Labor Wage Rate: LAND USE Equipment operators $/hour $7.75 ACREAGE SUMMARY: (ACRES) General & Irrigators $/hour $7.

WATER USE. Employee Liability Insurance $/$1,000 wages $ Employee Benefits percent/wages 18.00% Labor Downtime percent 25.

Custom Rates Survey, 2013

Custom Rates Survey, 2013

Mr. Surya Prasad Paudel. Director General Department of Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development Nepal

LESSION - 17 TRACTOR AND IMPLEMENT SELECTION FOR DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS

BUDGET AREA... FARM SIZE IRRIGATION TYPE NUMBER OF CROPS.. Item

VERSION 1.0. COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS

BUDGET AREA FARM SIZE... IRRIGATION TYPE NUMBER OF CROPS. Item

COUNTRY REPORT (Islamic Republic of Pakistan)

Equipment & Tools for Small Farmers

Rwanda. Technical Track _ Progress Chart

BUDGET AREA... ROGERS-DORA AREA, ROOSEVELT COUN FARM SIZE... 1, ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE. DRYLAND NUMBER OF CROPS 2 VERSION 1.0

Item. Labor Wage Rate: Equipment operators $/hour $8.55 WATER USE

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR

Status of Custom Hiring System of farm Machinery in Sri Lanka. Eng. M. H. M. A. Bandara Chief Engineer Department of Agriculture Sri Lanka

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS

Mechanizing Small and Marginal Farmers

Mongolia. Mongolian Agricultural Mechanization Development. Mr. Davaasuren Yesun Erdene

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR

BUDGET AREA.. DRY CIMARRON AREA, UNION COUNTProjected 2018 FARM SIZE ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 2 VERSION 1.

4 Labor Wage Rate: Equipment operators $/hour $8.55 WATER USE

3 Labor Wage Rate: Equipment operators $/hour $8.55 WATER USE

Kansas Custom Rates 2016

A NEW APPROACH. to mechanized farming for rural communities in Africa

Custom Hiring Services for Sustainable Agricultural Mechanization. Gajendra Singh

Tillage Practices and Sugar Beet Yields 1

Ohio State University Extension Agriculture & Natural Resources

Mechanization in the United States of America

Country Presentation Paper

$3,048 $1,524 $1,873 $2,800 $12,700 $2,502 $2,007 $0 $0 $1,657 $457 $191. Total $28,759

2013 RATES PAID BY KANSAS FARMERS FOR CUSTOM WORK

Custom Rates and Machine Rental Rates Used on Illinois Farms, 1968

ITEM PRICE YIELD TOTAL GROSS RETURNS OAT HAY TONS (IN FIELD) TOTAL PURCHASED PURCHASED INPUTS PRICE QUANTITY INPUTS TOTAL

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Source of data. (amount) Four-wheel Tractor Under 18 hp 59, hp 130, hp and over 97,360 Hand Tractor ( 2-Wheel) 2,644,982 32,239 4,450

Technical and Policy Track on Agricultural Mechanization in Uganda

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR VERSION 1.0. COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS

Country Report. Nepal. The 1 st Annual Meeting on the Asian Pacific Network for Testing of Agricultural Machinery (ANTAM)

Table 7A. Income and Cash Operating Summary; Grain Sorghum, 1998 Page 30

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR

English for Agriculture

Many Iowa farmers hire some custom machine work

Department of Agriculture. Eng. M.H.M.A. Bandara Chief Engineer. Country Report. Sri Lanka

FACTSheet. Custom Work Charges in Maryland 2015

2009 RATES PAID BY KANSAS FARMERS FOR CUSTOM WORK

By Chang Xiongbo China Agricultural Machinery Testing Centre

Dryland Wheat Production and Marketing Costs in Oregon's Columbia Plateau

Custom Farm Work Rates

NEPAL COUNTRY PAPER. Nepal Agricultural Research Council Khumaltar, Lalitpur,Nepal

1 st Member Meeting of the Regional Council of Agricultural Machinery Associations in Asia and the Pacific (ReCAMA)

COUNTRY PRESENTATION PAPER (PHILIPPINES)

Table 8A. Income and Cash Operating Summary; Watermelons, 2001

Asian and Pacific Workshop on Whole-Process Mechanization of Potato Production June 2016, Kunming, China

2017 Alfalfa Baleage Enterprise Budget

Many Iowa farmers hire some custom machine

OPERATING INPUTS Units Price Quantity $/Acre Wheat Seed Bu./acre $ $ Custom Harvest Acre $ -

TABLE 1. Basic cost information for Socorro County Projected 2017 BUDGET AREA... SOCORRO COUNTY Projected 2017

Table 10A. Income and Cash Operating Summary; Grain Sorghum (Late), 1998 Page 45

Table 7A. Income and Cash Operating Summary; Grain Sorghum (Dbl. Crop), 1998 Page 30

Wheat production using direct seeding, reduced tillage and conventional tillage in Middle Anatolia. Abstract. Introduction

COUNTRY REPORT. ESCAP/APCAEM 2nd. Session of The Technical Advisory Committee. at Beijing, China 24~25 November 2003

2016 Iowa Farm. Custom Rate Survey File A3-10 Many Iowa farmers hire custom machine work. Ag Decision Maker. Average Charge. Median Charge Range

Table 3A. Income and Cash Operating Summary; Alfalfa Stand Establish, 1998 Page 10

A Study on Paddy Growers Awarness on Farm Mechanization in Uttarkannada, Karnataka

Ohio Farm Custom Rates 2014 Barry Ward, Leader, Production Business Management Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics

Total 2, ,519

Ohio Farm Custom Rates 2014 Barry Ward, Leader, Production Business Management Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics

Table 8A. Income and Cash Operating Cost Summary, Grain Sorghum, 1996 Page 29

Progress of agricultural mechanization in Cameroon

Custom Machinery Rates Applicable to Kentucky (2018)

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): AGRICULTURE, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 1

Irrigated Cropping Region, Reduced Tillage

The Developing and Testing of Rotary Puddler for Secondary Tillage in Rice Production of Thailand

Enterprise Budget. Sweet Corn, Willamette Valley Region. EM 8376, Revised August 1995

Cost of Producing, Harvesting and Marketing Field Grown Tomatoes in the Southeastern United States May 2012

HAS IRRIGATION CAUSED THE MAIZE SURPLUS? DR PHILIP THEUNISSEN COMPUTUS BESTUURSBURO

Machinery Pete: Used Equipment Trends. Webinar Co-Hosted With EDA

Table 13A. Income and Cash Operating Summary; Upland Cotton, 1998 Page 61

CHAPTER 4 : AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Development and Mechanization in A Comparative Survey at a Global Level

Effect Of Forward Speed On Tractor Performance Under Clay Loam Soil

2018 Equipment and Machinery Study

COUNTRY REPORT BANGLADESH

Promoting Agricultural Mechanization in SSA Seminar on Private sector development and roles of the public sector

both above responses. deviation AEDE-RP- Ohio Farm t Economics to be completed by others. This is often of operating in the course encounter

Performance Evaluation of Tractor Operated Ridge Plastering Machine

THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE. BACKGROUND IN AGRICULTURE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IN JORDAN Agr. Eng.

Page 1 of 36 ( Shreemat Shrestha. Agricultural Engineering Division Nepal Agricultural Research Council

CONTENT SECTOR OVERVIEW P 4 TRADE STATISTICS P 6 INVESTMENTS IN THE SECTOR P 7 MAIN STAKEHOLDERS P 8 MAIN CONTACT DETAILS P 9 CONTACT US P 10

Special Crop Production Costs

Progress of Agricultural Mechanization Process in Rwanda

Special Indonesian Issue

Transcription:

Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences December 2015, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 71-76 ISSN: 2334-2404 (Print), 2334-2412 (Online) Copyright The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/jaes.v4n2a8 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/jaes.v4n2a8 The Development of Agricultural Mechanization in Jordan Taha A. Al-Issa 1 Abstract The agricultural sector in Jordan plays an important role in the development of the country. Machinery is one of the major production inputs in agriculture. This study discuses the development and use of agricultural mechanization, the types and numbers of different farm machines used in the country, farm machinery manufacturing, and the major constrains to agricultural mechanization in Jordan. The mechanization of agricultural activities is limited to tillage and other operations. The results of the study showed that agricultural mechanization is increasing in Jordan, whether it is through ownership or through services. There was an increase in the number of tractors, sprayers, seed drills and other machines and equipment. The study showed that local manufacturing of farm machinery is limited to the assembly of imported components and mold implements. The lack of research and extension services in farm machinery, the presence of a wide range of types of farm machines, low yield and the high cost of farm machines are major constraints to the adoption of more agricultural mechanization in Jordan. Keywords:Farm machinery, tractors, combines, seed drills and sprayers. 1. Introduction Jordan is located in the Middle East (east of the Mediterranean Sea) between latitudes 29 o 32 N to 32 o 42 N and longitudes 35 o 00 E to 38 o 15 E. The total area of Jordan is 88,777 km 2 of which 88,237 km 2 land constituting 99.4% of the total area of the Kingdom and 539.5 km 2 surface water (0.6%) of the total area, with a total population of 5,480,000 people and a growth rate of 2.8 (D.O.S 2003). The usage of land on a percentage basis is as follows: 4% arable land, 1% permanent crops, 9% permanent pastures, 1% forests and woodland and the rest (85%) are arid desert with annual rainfall rate less than 200 mm (Khdair 2002).The total planted area in the year 2003 was about 0.34 million hectares (ha) distributed as follows: 44,301 ha, or about 13% of the planted land is planted with vegetables; 124,145 ha (37%) field crops; 27,140 ha (8%) fruit trees; 6,697 ha (2%) citrus; 14,235 ha (4%) grapes; and 123,018 ha (36%) olives. The irrigated area was 45,583 hectares making about 13% of the total planted area, was mainly for irrigating fruit trees and olives (M.O.A, 2003). The agricultural sector in Jordan plays an important role in the development of the country. Due to its scarce resources, Jordan gives more attention to the development of agriculture in its economic, social, and environmental aspects, and it deals with the agricultural sector on this multifaceted structure. This structure does not only consider economic returns, but the social and environmental benefits important for national security, environmental safety and public health. The agricultural sector contributes to the creation of job opportunities. The number of employed agricultural labor increased from 41,000 in 1991 to about 68,000 in 1996 (31 percent Jordanians) and to about 114,000 in 2000 (55 percent Jordanians) (M.O.A, 2003). 1Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid P. O. Box (3030), 22110, Jordan. E-mail: taha@just.edu.jo

72 Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 4(2), December 2015 In Jordan, the nature of the socio-economic development, led to rapid development of other sectors of the economy, especially services and industry, and has resulted in a continued decline in the contribution of agriculture to the gross domestic product (GDP). The contribution of agriculture to the GDP, at current prices, has declined steadily from 14.4 percent in 1971, to 8.3 percent in 1975, to 7.1 percent in 1980, to 6 percent in 1995 and finally to 3.8 percent in 2000 (M.O.A, 2003). The objectives of this study are to discuss the development and use of agricultural mechanization in Jordan, the types and numbers of different farm machines used in the country, farm machinery manufacturing, and the major constraints to agricultural mechanization in Jordan. Agricultural Mechanization in Jordan Machinery is one of the major production inputs in agriculture. Agricultural mechanization is increasing in Jordan, whether it is through ownership or through services. Organizations providing custom services have played an important role in recent years. Agricultural mechanization in Jordan occurred on a purely private base without public interference. The mechanization of agricultural activities is limited mainly to tillage and partly other operations (Snobar and Arabiat, 1984). Land operation was, and still is, the most important field of agricultural mechanization. The first tractors were imported to Jordan in the 1930s; the very first could have been an International Harvester with about 20 h.p. bought in 1933. Prior to 1948, tractors had steel wheels or tracks. They were operated with kerosene and pulled 4- moldboard plows and 15-disk-harrows (Lanzendorfer 1985). Further introduction of the tractor was rather slow. According to the records of the Department of Agriculture there were nine tractors in Jordan in 1939 and about 74 tractors in 1948. According to the data on tractor assets from the Agricultural Censuses 1965 and 1975, the biggest advance in Jordan s tractorization must have been from the mid 1950s to the end of the 1960s. Moreover, in 1971/72 a sample of 112 farmers in the three pilot areas of the Dryland Farming Project Jordan/Karak revealed that tractor use had become very common, when 84 percent of the farmers plowed their land with their own or hired tractors (Lanzendorfer, 1985). During the 1970s, and especially after 1973, there was only a slight increase in the total tractor population. Purchases were mainly made to replace unserviceable machines. The increase that did occur was to a large extent, due to area extension and intensification of agricultural practices in the JordanValley. The articulated tractor was introduced to Jordan during the 1970s when 14 articulated tractors were bought between 1973 and 1979. Whereas the market for conventional tractors has become saturated, sales of articulated tractors indicated a cautious trend towards the need for more specialized machinery. Not only were old items substituted, but total assets were also increased. At the end of 1973, there were 3,260 tractors in the country. Of these, 1,905 tractors were used in agriculture. Table 1 gives the numbers for tractors and other equipment and the number of tractors sold annually during the period of 1968 to 1973 in Jordan (Aresvik, 1976). In his study about the mechanization of agriculture in Jordan, Lanzendorfer estimated the assets of farm tractors and combine harvesters in the country in the year 1985 as follows: Tractors a. Based on Dealers Sales Statistics: Allowing for an average life span of 12 years for a tractor in Jordan and leaving imports other than those of dealers out of consideration, the minimum sales for all dealers from 1967 to 1978 were 2055 tractors (from 1978 to 1985 there had been no significant change). a. Based on Vehicles Registration Statistics: In 1977, 2782 tractors were registered. In addition, 20% of non-registered tractors must be allowed. This means that there was a maximum population of 3500 tractors (from 1977 to 1985). The overall tractor population ranges between 2000 and 3500 tractors. If the registration figure of 2782 tractors is considered to be rather accurate, about 2900 seems realistic for the total number of tractors in Jordan in 1979 (Lanzendorfer, 1985).

Taha A. Al-Issa et al. 73 Combines The next major step in the mechanization of field operations was the introduction of the combine. It closely followed the increase in Jordan s tractor population. Until 1960, a total of 15 combines had been sold, but until the beginning of the 1970s, combine assets rose considerably (inventory 1973: 144). Afterwards, there was a sharp drop, because combine owners abstained from replacing unserviceable combines and because there were heavy sales of old ones (up to 1968 models) to Syria (Lanzendorfer, 1985). Comparison between the two Agricultural Machinery Inventories of 1973 and 1978, and between the two Agricultural Censuses of 1965 and 1975, showed a decreasing number of combines. The Agricultural Census 1975 lists 36 combines owned by agricultural holders. The 1978 inventory counts 77 self-propelled combines and 43 pulled combines. During the 1980s there were no accurate statistics about the number and types of farm tractors and other farm equipment in Jordan. The Directorate of Farm Machinery in the Ministry of Agriculture conducted a survey in 1992. The results of this survey indicated that the number of tractors increased from 2900 in 1979 to 3442 in 1992. In the same survey the tractors in Jordan were found in 34 types of which 51.6% were Massy Ferguson, 17% Volvo, 7.7% Ford, 4.2% Kubota, 2.1% John Deere and 17.4% others (Shadid, 1993). In general, tractors and other implements in Jordan are imported by dealers. During the period of 1988 to 1991 about (1134) tractors, (18) combines and (5416) other implements were imported (Shadid, 1993). In the year 1997 the Ministry of Agriculture conducted another survey, the result of which showed that there was an increase in the numbers and types of farm machines used in the country. For example, the number of tractors increased by about 1000 from the year 1992 to 1997, it was 3442 in 1992 and 4445 in 1997. While there was no change in the number of combine harvesters (69) in 1992 and (63) in 1997, there was a clear increase in the number of boom sprayers and seed drills from (83) and (69) in 1992 to (328) and (92) in 1997, respectively. The numbers and types of different farm machines available in Jordan for the years 1992 to 1997 are given in Table 2. The statistics of the Ministry of Agriculture and the Department of Statistics showed that there was a major increase in almost all farm machines used in the country from the year 1998 to 2010. There was an increase in the number of tractors, sprayers, seed drills and other machines and equipment as shown in Table 3 and Table 4. Farm Machinery Manufacturing Most farm machineries in Jordan are imported. Local manufacturing is limited to the assembly of imported components and mold implements. Some specialized small workshops and blacksmiths manufacture some farm implements in Jordan. They can manufacture moldboard plows; chisel plows, cultivators, harrows, field sprayers, threshers, trailers and water tanks. According to Khdair (2002), these machines and implements are produced mainly by three different enterprises: small scale, medium scale, and artisan shops. a- Small-scale enterprises can repair all kinds of implements by using new technology for cutting, shaping and finishing. Their main products are assembling cultivators, moldboard plows, disc plows, P.T.O driven threshers, trailers, water tanks, and potato diggers. b- The medium-scale enterprises produce traditional equipment like 7-9 tine cultivators, 500-L mounted type boom sprayers and 2-3 furrows moldboard plows (Hamam, 1996). Recently, these enterprises started manufacturing seed drills, potato planters, potato diggers, chisel plows and post hole diggers. They have supplied 40-50% of the country s need of the above tools. c- Artisan workshops repair farm machineries and build traditional machines like 1.5-3 ton trailers and water tanks. These workshops do other basic work like welding, metal hardening, grinding, cutting and drilling. The distribution of farm implements manufactured by these enterprises is shown in Table 5.

74 Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 4(2), December 2015 Constraints The major constraints to the adoption of more agricultural mechanization technology were: (1) lack of relevant technology at the proper time, lack of farmer s awareness, small holdings, low yields and high cost of farm machines, especially harvesting technology (Salem and Snobar, 1995); (2) lack of enough specialized workshops for repairing and maintenance of farm machineries; (3) lack of research in farm machineries; (4) lack of extension services or training programs and (5) the presence of wide range of types of farm machines, most of which did not have spare parts in the imported companies. Table 1: Tractors and other equipment available and tractors sold during 1968 to 1973 in Jordan. YearsTractors 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 Tractors at end of year 2507 2662 2758 2856 3060 3344 Tractors sold during year 179 155 96 98 204 284 Combines 11 15 3 22 24 N/A Cultivators 190 232 466 94 241 90 Source: Kingdom of Jordan, Department of Statistics, Statistical Year Book, 1972 and 1973. Table 2: Number of farm machines available in Jordan for the years 1992 to 1997. YearMachine 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Tractors (Total) 3442 3404 3834 4089 4157 4445 Big tractor 3046 2986 3324 3436 3474 3663 Small & medium wheel tractor 394 413 506 650 680 779 Chain tractor 2 5 4 3 3 3 Boom sprayer 83 167 202 186 257 328 Combine harvesters 66 77 69 58 43 63 Big seed drills 65 71 75 61 56 65 Small seed drills 15 14 12 13 21 27 Seed drills (Total) 80 85 87 74 77 92 Harvesters pulled by a tractor 14 22 12 17 36 30 Mobile grain & hay thresher 502 500 559 564 539 620 Binder (Harvester) 44 47 29 31 15 72 Source: Jordan Ministry of Agriculture. Annual Report, 1997. Table 3: Number of farm machines in Jordan for the years 1998 to 2004. YearMachine 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Tractors (Total) 5212 5114 5378 5579 5769 5744 5583 Big tractor 4347 4272 4488 4608 4767 4774 4475 Small & medium wheel tractor 862 837 877 958 989 956 1092 Chain tractor 3 5 13 13 13 14 16 Boom sprayer 362 331 367 380 378 405 417 Combine harvesters 54 72 78 80 77 78 61 Big seed drills 66 72 68 71 75 81 81 Small seed drills 32 28 35 35 28 32 30 Seed drills (Total) 98 100 103 106 103 113 111 Harvesters pulled by a tractor 37 39 39 39 50 57 58 Mobile grain & hay thresher 695 692 655 657 622 651 609 Binder (Harvester) 97 84 86 96 99 65 64 Source: Jordan Ministry of Agriculture. Annual Report 2005.

Taha A. Al-Issa et al. 75 Table 4: Number of farm machines in Jordan for the years 2005 to 2010. YearMachine 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Tractors (Total) 5520 5483 5357 6844 5565 5674 Big tractor 4078 4053 3923 4898 3916 3848 Small & medium wheel tractor 969 946 892 1398 1008 1165 Chain tractor 17 17 21 19 16 22 Boom sprayer 456 467 521 529 625 639 Combine harvesters 74 80 76 78 82 71 Big seed drills 81 90 98 93 100 120 Small seed drills 42 47 49 35 32 80 Seed drills (Total) 123 137 147 128 132 200 Harvesters pulled by a tractor 66 60 74 69 63 61 Mobile grain & hay thresher 553 558 557 522 530 545 Binder (Harvester) 67 77 76 68 62 62 Source: Jordan Department of Statistics. Annual Report 2011. Table 5: Distribution of farm implements manufactured annually by medium, small enterprises and artisan *Workshops. Implement Need/yr Medium Scale Enterprise Small Scale Eterprise Full Capacity Production Sale Full Capacity Production Sale Thresher P.T.O. driven 50 None None None 20 20 20 Moldboard plow 120 90 80 75 50 35 35 Disc plow 60 85 60 45 65 45 35 Chisel plow 40 40 20 15 20 15 10 Rotary 30 20 15 1 10 8 8 Cultivator 7-9 tines 120 80 70 70 40 30 40 Disc harrow 10 10 8 8 5 5 3 Seed drill 10 10 5 3 None None None Sprayer unit-trailed 120 120 115 100 20 20 20 Sprayer unit-mounted 130 130 125 130 None None None Sprayer (manual) 100 None None None 100 90 80 Post hole digger 20 20 15 15 None None None Rigger 50 50 30 30 30 20 20 Potato planter 1 row 10 10 8 5 None None None Potato planter 2 row 10 10 8 5 5 3 2 Trailers 1.5-3 tons 200 80 70 65 70 65 55 Water tank 3m 3 200 150 180 120 50 45 40 *Manufacturing is limited to the assembly of trailers and water tanks. Source: Khdair, 2002.

76 Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 4(2), December 2015 References Aresvik, Oddvar. 1976. The Agricultural Development in Jordan. New York, Washington, London: Praeger. (Praeger Special Studies in International Economics and Development). D. O. S. 2003. Department of Statistics. Annual Report. Amman-Jordan. D. O. S. 2011. Department of Statistics. Annual Report. Amman-Jordan. FAO. 1991. Statistics of the Food and Agriculture Organization. Hamam, F. 1996. Agro-related metal working industry in Jordan. Submitted to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Casablanca-Moroco 21-24 May. Khdair, A. I. 2002. The Mechanization of Agriculture in Jordan: Progress and Constraints. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Vol. 33 No. 3. Lanzendorfer, M. 1985. Agricultural Mechanization in Jordan. A Study on its Processes in Socioeconomic Context. Gottingen, Germany. M. O. A. 2003. Ministry of Agriculture. Annual Report. Amman-Jordan. Salem, M. A. and B. A. Snobar. 1995. A socioeconomic Study on Technology Adoption and its impact on Lentil and Chickpea Production in Jordan. DIRASAT 22B (30: 689-705. Shadid, F. 2003. Farm machinery in Jordan and its manufacturing. Symposium on Tractors and Farm Machines in the Arab Countries. Damascus, Syria. April 3-6, 1993. Shadid, F. 2005. Agricultural Engineer. The directorate of farm machinery, the Ministry of Agriculture. Amman- Jordan. Personal communication. Snobar, B. A. and S. M. Arabiat 1984. The mechanization of agriculture and socioeconomic development in Jordan. DIRASAT 11(7): 159-200.