Global Warming: A Threat Not to Be Ignored

Similar documents
EPA FACT SHEET: Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants

California and Climate Change: AB 32 and Beyond. Adrienne Alvord, Environmental Policy Director Office of Senator Fran Pavley 6 May 2009

Do now pg 85. In at least 2 sentences, explain the difference between climate change and global warming

The Road to a Cleaner Future

I. Overview. II. Background. Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Emissions Standards

Updated Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Connecticut

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: Updates

Global Ocean and Atmosphere Temperature Trends Compared

Cars and Global Warming

STAFF REPORT: INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR RULEMAKING

CLIMATE CHANGE EPA S ROLE IN PRESIDENT OBAMA S ACTION PLAN

A Climate Benefits Analysis as a Result of Development of Federal Offshore Wind Energy Leases ABSTRACT

Emissions, Accumulations, and Targets for Reduction

Reducing oil dependence.

Why the Northeast Should Limit Pollution from Transportation

Sea Level Rise Threats to Energy Infrastructure

A Blueprint for Action. Policy Options to Reduce Illinois Contribution to Global Warming

Analysis of Options for Reducing Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic

Fast Facts. U.S. Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Rating the States on Their Risk of Natural Gas Overreliance

Climate Change & Small Island Developing States

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

THE BIG DEBATE Can the global community tackle climate change without the USA?

MIT Carbon Sequestration Initiative

U.S. Emissions

Carol Werner, Executive Director Environmental and Energy Study Institute

Path to the Paris Climate Conference. American Progress in Cutting Carbon Pollution Could Pave the Way for Global Action

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND STATEMENT ON U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION

MIT Carbon Sequestration Initiative

2014) (amending 40 C.F.R. Part 60).

Electricity Technology in a Carbon-Constrained Future

THE CONSUMER BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT. Mark Cooper, Director of Research JANUARY 2012

WG2 SPM. General Regional Impacts To California specifics. IPCC Scenarios

U.S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Energy Sources 2006 Flash Estimate

Regulatory Announcement

Air Pollution & Climate Change

Climate Change Frequently Asked Questions Scrambled Information Source: EPA Climate Change FAQ

STAAR Science Tutorial 55 TEK 8.11D: Human Dependence on Ocean Systems

GLOBAL WARMING: WHAT SHOULD BE DONE?

A BETTER CANADA A CLEANER ENVIRONMENT: The Development of Motor Vehicle Fuel Consumption Regulations

Global Warming. Science of global warming Greenhouse gases Other contributors Observed changes. The future

Global Warming. By William K. Tong. Adjunct Faculty, Earth Science Oakton Community College

What life Could Be like in a Warmer World

EPA FACT SHEET: Reducing Carbon Pollution From Power Plants Details About the Proposal for New Sources

Overview and Background: Regulation of Power Plants under EPA s Proposed Clean Power Plan

Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Transportation

California Climate Change Initiatives

working internationally to tackle climate change

GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE

Comprehensive Greenhouse Gases Inventory for the State of Ohio

Why New York State Needs a Clean Transportation System

CLIMATE CHANGE AND ACID RAIN. Mr. Banks 7 th Grade Science

Fossil Fuel Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions

A Blueprint for Action

U.S. Efforts to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Transportation Sector

Decarbonization: Energy Policy Planning in California and Its Implications for the Northeast

Updated State-level Greenhouse Gas Emission Coefficients for Electricity Generation

Too Much Pol ution State and National Trends in Global Warming Emissions from 1990 to 2007

APPENDIX B: CITY OF RED LODGE BASELINE INVENTORY

Seventh Biennial Report on Progress toward Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals

Teaching Time: 1 hour and 15 minutes

Clean and Secure Energy Actions Report 2010 Update. GHG Policies

Linking the FDES and Climate Change Statistics

State CO2 Emission Rate Goals in EPA s Proposed Rule for Existing Power Plants

Fast Facts. U.S. Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions

From Science to Regulation-- California s Air Quality Program

Global Climate Change

Drivers of future U.S. carbon dioxide emissions: insights from the Annual Energy Outlook 2011

Economic Analysis of Feebates to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Light Vehicles for California

Carbon Sequestration, Its Methods and Significance

Microeconomics: Principles, Applications, and Tools

Air Emissions 101. What are Some Types of Emissions? Oil & Gas Emissions: In Context VOC

Too Much Pollution. State and National Trends in Global Warming Emissions from 1990 to Environment America Research and Policy Center

Too Much Pol ution State and National Trends in Global Warming Emissions from 1990 to 2007

Too Much Pol ution State and National Trends in Global Warming Emissions from 1990 to 2007

Too Much Pol ution State and National Trends in Global Warming Emissions from 1990 to 2007

Ethanol. America s Homegrown Fuel

Impacts of a Modest Carbon Tax: A Review of the Success of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative

Northeast Low Emission Vehicle Program Overview

Summary of Climate Action Panel Recommendations. Colorado Emissions

Overview of Recent State Climate Change Mitigation Actions

4.8 GREENHOUSE GAS INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Section 4.8 Greenhouse Gas

The Bright Prospects of Renewable Energy

Environmentally Beneficial Electrification. Keith Dennis Senior Director- Strategic Initiatives NRECA

GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE

Climate Change and Waste Reducing Waste Can Make a Difference

An Introduction to California's Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Program

MANUAL FOR REDD PROGRAM

The President s Climate Action Plan and the Role of States

Summary of the California State Agencies PATHWAYS Project: Long-term Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scenarios

U.S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions in 2009: A Retrospective Review

Everything you need to know about biomass - Interesting energy articles - Renewables-info.com

More is Less: Environmentally Beneficial Electrification (EBE)

Is the Climate Changing? Is the Climate Changing? Is the Climate Changing? Is the Climate Changing? 12/13/2016. Yes!

Chapter 4. California Environmental Quality Act Evaluation. 4.1 Determining Significance Under CEQA

Outpacing the Nation: RGGI s environmental and economic success

Trends in. U.S. Delivered Coal Costs: July 2012

Teacher Guide Fossil Fuel Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions

The President s Action Plan to Address Climate Change

Transcription:

State Clean Cars Programs: An Effective Way to Slash Global Warming Pollution 10-State Clean Car Standards to Cut 64 Million Metric Tons of Global Warming Emissions per Year by 2020 Shrinking glaciers, rising global temperatures, increasingly severe storms, and alarming scientific predictions have led to increasing public concern about the impacts of global warming on the environment, health and society. But while the Bush administration and federal policymakers continue to resist efforts to reduce global warming pollution, many states are taking dramatic, effective actions to address the threat including the adoption of the Clean Cars Program which sets limits on global warming pollution from cars, light trucks and SUVs. The 10 states that have adopted the Clean Cars Program will cut global warming pollution from cars, light trucks and SUVs by 64 million metric tons per year in 2020, while saving consumers money and reducing the nation s reliance on oil. The reduction in global warming pollution that will result from the new standards is significant on a global scale, equivalent to the national annual emissions from all but 47 of the world s countries. Put another way, by 2020 the Clean Cars Program will eliminate as much carbon dioxide annually as is produced by 63 coal-fired power plants generating enough power for nearly a quarter of U.S. homes. At the same time, the standards could reduce gasoline consumption by as much as 7.2 billion gallons per year in 2020 nearly as much as is consumed by all the vehicles in Florida in a year and save consumers up to $16.7 billion annually at the pump in 2020. Global Warming: A Threat Not to Be Ignored Human activities particularly the burning of fossil fuels have changed the composition of the atmosphere in ways that threaten dramatic alteration of the global climate. The first signs of warming are already appearing and future changes will have serious impacts on our nation s future. Temperatures are already rising, with 2005 tied for the hottest year on record. 1 Nine of the 10 hottest years on record have occurred within the last decade. Hurricanes and cyclones have become more powerful, with almost twice as many Category 4 or 5 hurricanes between 1990 and 2004 as in the previous 15 years. 2 Sea levels have risen 3.9 to 9.8 inches in the past century. 3 Future temperature increases and changes in precipitation patterns may alter the distribution of plants and change crop productivity. Water supplies may dwindle as higher temperatures - 1 -

increase evaporation. Higher sea levels may flood coastal areas, especially in Gulf Coast and South Atlantic states, causing property damage, eroding beaches and raising the salinity of drinking water supplies. Stronger storms may increase the damage. Public health may suffer as heat-related deaths rise and insect-borne diseases spread. The federal government has taken no serious action to reduce the pollution that contributes to warming. Individual states, however, have begun to fill the policy void, adopting a variety of measures to curb global warming pollution. Among the most powerful of these policies are the vehicle global warming emission standards designed by the state of California and since adopted by nine other states. The Clean Cars Program: Reducing Global Warming Emissions The Clean Air Act allows states to choose between complying with federal vehicle emission standards and adopting the more protective standards known as the Clean Cars Program implemented by the state of California. Unlike current federal standards, the Clean Cars Program includes limits on global warming pollution. Beginning in model year 2009, the program will require automakers to reduce the average amount of global warming pollution from their cars, light trucks and SUVs. By 2015, new cars will be required to emit 34 percent less global warming pollution on average, and light trucks 25 percent less pollution. 4 These aggressive, yet achievable standards will result in significant reductions in global warming pollution. To date, 10 states California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington have adopted the Clean Cars Program. 5 What Is the Clean Cars Program? The Clean Cars Program is a series of air pollution standards adopted by the state of California. The Clean Air Act allows other states with serious air pollution problems to adopt the standards as well. There are three components to the program: The Low-Emission Vehicle program, which sets strong standards for emissions of smogforming and toxic air pollutants. The Zero-Emission Vehicle program, which promotes advanced-technology vehicles such as hybrids, fuel-cell vehicles and electric vehicles. Global Warming Emission Standards, which establish limits on emissions of pollutants that contribute to global warming. Light-duty vehicles in these 10 states are projected to release 364 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (MMTCO 2 ) in 2020, the result of increasing vehicle travel, growing use of SUVs and light trucks, and stagnant fuel economy. By adopting the Clean Cars Program, annual emissions will be reduced by an average of 18 percent, to 300 MMTCO 2 in 2020. (See table, next page.) Cumulative emission reductions from the inception of the program through 2020 are even greater, totaling 335 MMTCO 2. 6-2 -

Light-Duty Vehicle Emissions by State in 2020 (MMTCO 2 ) 7 State Projected With Clean Cars Program Reduction Percent Reduction California 161.7 132.6 29.1 18% Connecticut 15.1 12.2 2.8 19% Maine 7.4 6.1 1.3 18% Massachusetts 25.2 20.5 4.6 18% New Jersey 55.0 45.1 9.9 18% New York 52.6 43.4 9.1 17% Oregon 13.0 11.2 1.8 14% Rhode Island 4.4 3.6 0.8 18% Vermont 3.8 3.2 0.7 18% Washington 26.2 22.5 3.7 14% Total 364 300 64 18% The combined global warming pollution reduction is significant on a global scale. The annual savings projected for 2020 are equal to the national global warming emissions from all but 47 of the world s countries today. 8 These savings are also equal to the amount of pollution produced by 63 500-megawatt coal-fired power plants in a year. 9 That many plants generate enough electricity to serve 23 million homes annually, or nearly one quarter of U.S. households. 10 The cumulative global warming emission reduction from the program between 2009 and 2020 are equivalent to taking 68 million of today s cars off the road for an entire year. 11 Saving Energy and Saving Money The Clean Cars Program could reduce U.S. petroleum consumption and save money for consumers. Automakers use a variety of technologies to meet the standards including technologies to reduce gasoline use, allow for the use of low-carbon vehicle fuels, or reduce global warming emissions from air conditioning. Depending on how automakers choose to comply with the standards, the Clean Cars Program could lead to a reduction in gasoline use of as much as 7.2 billion gallons annually in 2020 saving as much fuel as would be saved if every driver in America parked their cars for 19 days out of the year. 12 Put another way, the standards could save as much as gasoline as taking 13.1 million of today s cars off the road, or nearly as much gasoline as is currently used by all the vehicles in Florida in a year. 13 Reduced gasoline consumption could also translate into consumer savings at the pump. At today s average fuel prices ($2.33 per gallon), consumers could save up to $16.7 billion at the pump in 2020. 14 These savings would more than offset the additional cost of vehicles complying with the program. The state of California projects that vehicle owners will save a total of $41 to $81 each year due to the standards and that is assuming gasoline costs only $1.74 per gallon. 15-3 -

States Must Be Free to Act States freedom to adopt California air emission standards has led to cleaner air and technological advances that have benefited all Americans. Unfortunately, major automakers have fought stronger emission standards at every turn and have now filed suit to undermine the ability of any state to adopt emission standards for global warming pollution. In addition, a push could be forthcoming to get Congress to limit states ability to follow California in the setting of strong automobile emission standards. The 10 states that have adopted the Clean Cars Program have taken leadership in reducing America s contribution to global warming. The federal government should follow their lead by limiting global warming pollution from cars, power plants, and factories and taking other steps to reduce global warming pollution, save energy, and save consumers money at the pump. Notes 1 Marcia Baker and Brenda Ekwurzel, Union of Concerned Scientists, 2005 Vies for Hottest Year on Record, 18 January 2006. 2 P.J. Webster, et al, Changes in Tropical Cyclone Number, Duration, and Intensity in a Warming Environment, Science, 16 September 2005. 3 United Nations Environment Program, Vital Climate Graphics: Observed Climate Trends, downloaded from www.grida.no/climate/vital/19.htm, 12 January 2006. 4 California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Rulemaking, Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Regulations to Control Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Motor Vehicles, 6 August 2004. 5 Pennsylvania has also adopted elements of the Clean Cars Program and is now engaged in rulemaking to update and enforce the standards. 6 Annual savings for each state except California were extracted from the analyses referenced above. Cumulative savings for California were calculated using the average ratio of cumulative savings to 2020 savings in other states except Washington, which is assumed to begin the program in model year 2010. 7 Lower percentage reductions for Oregon and Washington are likely the result of methodological differences in the studies used to estimate the reductions, not reduced effectiveness of the program in those states. Estimated emission reductions come from three different analyses. For Northeastern states, we relied on an analysis conducted by the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), as presented in Northeast State GHG Emission Reduction Potential from Adoption of the California Motor Vehicle GHG Standards, Summary of NESCAUM Analysis, October 2005. The California Air Resources Board included its estimate for California in Regulations to Control Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Motor Vehicles, Final Statement of Reasons, 4 August 2005. For Oregon and Washington, we calculated the emission reductions using the methodology described in Jeremiah Baumann and Elizabeth Ridlington, OSPIRG Foundation, Cars and Global Warming: How the Clean Cars Program Curbs Global Warming Pollution in Oregon, October 2005. Historic and projected vehicle-miles traveled data for Washington were obtained from Brian Calkins, Transportation Economist, Washington State Department of Transportation, Forecast of Fuels, Vehicles, and Related Data Through 2031, November 2004. 8 U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, International Energy Annual 2003, 11 July 2005. 9 Emissions from coal-fired power plants were calculated using the following assumptions. Each 500 MW plant produces 3.94 million megawatt-hours of power annually. Average energy consumption per MWh generated was calculated from U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-906/920 for 2004 for all coal-fired power plants in the U.S. The carbon intensity of coal was obtained from U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2002. 10 Based on electricity consumption per household data from U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey: Household Energy Consumption and Expenditures Tables, Table CE1-4c. Total Energy Consumption in U.S. Households by Type of Housing Unit, 2001. - 4 -

11 Based on 550 gallons of fuel per vehicle in 2003 from U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2003, downloaded from www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs03/index.htm, 16 January 2006 and carbon dioxide emissions of 19.654 pounds per gallon of gasoline from U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Program, Fuel and Energy Source Codes and Emission Coefficients, downloaded from www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/coefficients.html, 10 January 2006. 12 Calculated assuming 19.654 pounds of carbon dioxide per gallon of gasoline, per U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Program, Fuel and Energy Source Codes and Emission Coefficients, downloaded from www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/coefficients.html, 10 January 2006. Total gasoline consumption from U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Prime Supplier Sales Volume for 2004, 5 January 2006. 13 Based on 550 gallons of fuel per vehicle in 2003 and annual highway gasoline consumption of 7.9 billion gallons in Florida in 2003 from U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2003, downloaded from www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs03/index.htm, 16 January 2006. 14 Current price of gasoline from U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update, 9 January 2006. 15 Meszler Engineering Services, GHG Emission Standards for Vehicles: An Overview of California s Pavley Requirements, presentation to Rhode Island GHG Process Stakeholders, 28 April 2005. - 5 -