Draft Alternatives and Screening Criteria

Similar documents
8: Transportation Demand &

The Role of Transportation Systems Management & Operations in Supporting Livability and Sustainability

Town of Lexington Planning Board

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

I-880 ICM Systems Engineering Management Plan TAC Meeting

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

THE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT

Guidance for Responding to the Transportation 2040 Prioritization Measures

Transportation Problems and Issues Excerpts from WWW Links

7.0 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

Congestion Management Process Update

Gateway Corridor Transitway

Developing New Revenue Streams For Transit

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

Transportation Demand Management and the NEPA Process

1RUWKZHVW#:LFKLWD 0DMRU#,QYHVWPHQW#6WXG\

MOTOR MPO CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS (CMP)

Project Evaluation Criteria

Executive Summary. Study Background

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Fairfax Transportation Committee I-66 Multimodal Improvements Inside the Beltway. January 20, 2015

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Commonwealth Transportation Board I-66 Corridor Briefing Outside the Beltway Route 15 to I-495

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Chapter 5. Congestion Management Program. Chapter 5

Demand Reduction Assumptions Used For Travel Demand Analysis of EIS Alternatives

Report of the Results and Recommendations To the County Executive and County Board. From SOUTHWEST DANE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Mobility 2025 Update: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 945

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

Capitol Expressway Light Rail Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ANNOTATED OUTLINE

TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results

3 INTERSTATES. The Carolina Crossroads Project Team Welcomes You

Chapter 3 Transportation System Management & Operations and Travel Demand Management

Hartford Area ITS Architecture. Stakeholder Meetings March 2004

CHAPTER 8 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Los Angeles County Congestion Reduction Demonstration Project

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

MPO Member Communities:

Click to add title. Maximizing your Marketing Power

MARION COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2035

Currituck County Moyock Mega-Site Market Feasibility Study March 28, 2016

I-710 Project Committee Meeting

Blacklands Corridor Feasibility Study

I-95 / I-395 Integrated Corridor Management. Hari Sripathi, P.E. Regional Operations Director

North Central Texas Council of Governments. Workshop TxDOT Dallas

CSU Channel Islands Parking and Transportation Demand Management Study

Stakeholder Advisory Committee Presentation

1996, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT FOR INTERPROVINCIAL TRAVEL

Chapter 2 Transportation Policy Plan Strategies

TRANSIT ACCESS CHECKLIST 1

Section 11: Transportation Strategies Toolbox

Regional Transit System Plan

9.0 Meeting the Challenges

INTEGRATED MOBILITY PLAN

KAW CONNECTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS (CMP) WEST MEMPHIS MPO

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

TRANSPORTATION BEYOND TOMORROW Sustainable Transportation Master Plan

PSRC s 2018 Regional FTA Competition Project Evaluation Criteria

ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, PLANNERS 340 County Road, Suite 6-C, Westbrook, ME (207) FAX (207)

Transportation Planning Methods for Improving Mobility in Developing Activity Centers in Orange County, California

Bow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

10.0 Congestion Management Process

Appendix L Greenhouse Gas 4-part Strategy

Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement Public Hearing

Los Angeles County Sustainability Summit Your Community: Smart Growth and Community Development

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

IPSWICH NORTHERN ROUTES STUDY. Stage 1 Progress

Initial Alternative One: No Build

SECTION III - REGIONAL ARTERIAL SYSTEM. The Regional Arterial System is a subcomponent of a broader regional thoroughfare system.

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

HB2 Implementation Policy Guide

6.1 Integrated Land Use and Transportation Planning Approach

CHAPTER 8. Congestion Management

Transportation, Parking & Roads

September Public Meetings. Developing a Blueprint for the Corridor

MEMORANDUM #4. DATE: November 4, Warrenton TSP Project Management Team. Ray Delahanty, AICP, DKS Associates Kate Petak, EIT, DKS Associates

SAN DIEGO FORWARD THE REGIONAL PLAN OUR REGION AT A CROSSROADS. A PLAN TO GUIDE OUR WAY. VISION. Healthy Environment & Communities

Charlotte Region HOV/HOT/Managed Lanes Analysis. Technical Memorandum Task 1.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA

Moving Washington Toward Sustainability: WSDOT Planning Actions in Response to HB 2815 and EO 09 05

Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Performance Dashboard

Appendix E Technical Description of the Modeling Framework

Summary. Preliminary Alternative Development and Screening. DEIS July 23, 2018

GOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Funding Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Los Angeles Region

Interstate 70 Corridor Study

Unified Corridor Investment Study Performance Dashboard

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

Project Prioritization for Urban and Rural Projects TEAM CONFERENCE March 7, 2018

IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)?

Transcription:

Draft Alternatives and Screening Criteria 1

*Reasonable Alternatives 1. Initial Screening Use a series of yes/no questions to determine what alternatives are reasonable. Viable Alternatives 2. Quantitative Screening Use quantifiable measures to compare reasonable alternatives and determine which ones should advance. Detailed Draft EIS Alternatives 3. Alternatives Refinement Compare designs, costs, and quantitative effects on the natural and human environment. Determining Reasonable Alternatives* Quantitative Screening Engineering, i resource specific analysis, cost comparison Recommended Alternative 4. Preferred Solution Develop recommended alternative into the detailed solution. Include mitigation for adverse environmental impacts, context sensitive design, and reflect input received from stakeholders. Preferred Alternative *We are currently at this point in the process. 2

Reasonable Alternatives Practical given today s technology and feasible in terms of economics No Build Provides a baseline for comparison Build Reasonable solutions to the transportation problems Mass Transit System and Demand Management New Location Roadway Upgrade Existing Ei i Corridor 3

No Build Continue current maintenance and operations into the future. 4

Build Upgrade Add new lanes and improvements primarily within the existing Loop 1604 right of way. New Location Build a new road parallel to Loop 1604. 5

Mass Transit Bus Dedicated bus lanes and expansion of conventional bus service. Rail Light rail or commuter rail. 6

Transportation Management Transportation System and Demand Management Combination of new bicycle/pedestrian lanes and associated infrastructure; rideshare, park and ride, short term rental car, and bicycle rental facilities; expand taxi service; vanpools and carpools. Increase telecommuting and flexible work hours and manage development through new land use controls. 7

Alternatives Screening Criteria Screening Criteria Answer six questions What, Why, and Where? Need and Purpose Congestion Relief and Sft Safety When and How? Planning and Programming Funding and Timing Who? Environment and Community Aquifer and what s important to you Criteria may be deleted, added or modified based on your input. 8

Screening Criteria #1 and #2 Congestion Relief 1. Reduces bottlenecks and chokepoints. 2. Decreases average travel time within ihi the corridor. 9

Screening Criteria #3 and #4 Safety 3. Corrects some roadway geometric deficiencies. 4. Reduces the number of conflict points (i.e. on and off ramps, merging, and intersections). 10

Screening Criteria #5 and #6 Planning and Programming 5. Consistent with local transportation planning efforts. 6. Solution can be developed, permitted, funded, and initiated in the near term (within 5 years). 11

Screening Criteria #7, #8, #9 and #10 Community and Environment 7. Maximizes i use of the Loop 1604 right ihtof way and minimizes new right of way requirements. 8. Includes or could accommodate multiple modes of transportation. 9. Minimizes adverse effects to federally designated Threatened and Endangered species. 10. Preserves water quality and quantity within the Edwards Aquifer. 12

Proposed Scoring A 90% to 100% B 80% to 89% C 70% to 79% D 60% to 69% F 0% 59% Any alternative that receives a C (70%) or better will be carried forward into the next step of the evaluation process as a stand alone alternative. Proposed scoring is scalable to accommodate adding and deleting screening criteria based on your input. 13

Alternative Screening Alternative accomplishes criteria? Evaluation Criteria No Build Upgrade Loop 1604 Parallel Road Bus Heavy Rail Light Rail TSM TDM Congestion Relief #1 Congestion Relief #2 Safety #3 Safety #4 Planning and Programming #5 Planning and Programming #6 Community and Environment #7 Community and Environment #8 Community and Environment #9 Community and Environment #10 SCORE F B F B F D B B 14

Recommended Alternatives 1. Bus Dedicated bus lanes, expansion of conventional bus service, and/or accommodate express bus service. 2. Upgrade Add new lanes and improvements primarily within the existing Loop 1604 right of way. 3. Transportation System and Demand Management Combination of new bicycle/pedestrian lanes and associated infrastructure; rideshare, park and ride, short term rental car, and bicycle rental facilities; expand taxi service; vanpools and carpools. Increase telecommuting and flexible work hours and manage development through new land use controls. 4. No Build Continue current maintenance and operations and safety improvements. Although No Build does not pass the screening, it is required to be carried forward. 15