SDHM 3.1 User Workshop Morning Session. Instructor: Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.

Similar documents
San Diego Hydrology Model (SDHM 3.0) Reviewer Workshop. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

Bay Area Hydrology Model

Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) Software Introduction. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

INFILTRATION FACILITY MODELING

Hydromodification Computer Modeling

Tualatin River Urban Stormwater Tool (TRUST) User Manual

Porous Pavement Flow Paths

LID PLANTER BOX MODELING

GROUNDWATER RECHARGE. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc., 2010

Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3.0. User Manual

THE SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION (APWA) ANNOUNCE A SEMINAR DEMONSTRATING The BMP Sizing

WWHM4 MODELING USING NATIONAL MAP

Bay Area Hydrology Model User Manual

Bay Area Hydrology Model. User Manual

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures

Permeable Pavement Hydrologic Modeling

HMP 101 Hydromodification Management Plan for Santa Clara Valley Guidance for Local Implementation

The Bay Area Hydrology Model A Tool for Analyzing Hydromodification Effects of Development Projects and Sizing Solutions

Hydrologic Modeling for Green Roofs, Rainwater Harvesting and LID Foundations

Krista Reininga, PE Hydromodification and What it Means for the Design of Stormwater Facilities

Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures

Design Example Residential Subdivision

Stormwater Treatment Measure Sizing and Design Considerations SMCWPPP C.3 Workshop June 21, 2017

Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc.

Appendix F. Flow Duration Basin Design Guidance

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY

Analysis of Runoff Reduction and Hydrologic Cycle Utilizing LID Concepts

A Case for the Design and Modeling of BMP Infiltration and LID Techniques. By: Bob Murdock

Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport in the Napa River watershed: now and a possible future

Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs

Design Handbook. Low Impact Development Best Management Practices

Modeling the Veolia Water Technologies TTT (Thistle Tube Throttle) in Washington

10/16/2013. The Big Picture of LID and Green Infrastructure. Learning Objectives

LID & Detention Pond Sizing Tool to Address Hydromodification and Water Quality in Clackamas County

Pinellas County Stormwater Management Manual Training Workshop SMALL COMMERCIAL AREA CASE STUDY

Capturing Storm Water in Semi-arid Climate

Low Impact Development in Western WA Municipal Stormwater Permits

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR THE SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY HYDROMODIFICATION CONTROL BMP SIZING TOOL

CHAPTER 4. Hydrologic Analysis

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP) INFEASIBILITY WORKSHEET FOR ON-SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Effectiveness of Non-Structural Measures in Watershed Restoration

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

Appendix B Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist

California Construction General Permit Web Conference. Session III: Hydromodification Management

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

Tom Dalziel, Contra Costa Clean Water Program Dan Cloak, Dan Cloak Environmental Consultants

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

Stormwater Treatment Practice (STP) Calculator Instructions

15A NCAC 02H.1005 STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS: COASTAL COUNTIES

Incorporating Restoration Planning and Transportation Controls into the Valley Creek Watershed Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan

Concurrent Session B: LID Design Specifications (Chapter 4 in Draft Manual)

CENTRAL COAST POST-CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE SERIES 1

EXAMPLE Stormwater Management Plans w/ CSS BMP Sizing Calculator (v2.1)

Planning Considerations for Stormwater Management in Alberta. R. D. (Rick) Carnduff, M. Eng., P. Eng. February 20, 2013.

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview

SWMM5 LID Control for Green Infrastructure Modeling

SECTION 4 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

Appendix F: Sample Design Calculations & Worksheets Intentionally Left Blank

GreenPlan Modeling Tool User Guidance

Water Balance Methodology

Shirley E. Clark, Ph.D., P.E. October 5, /30/2012

CENTRALIZED BMPS TYPICALLY PUBLICLY OWNED & MAINTAINED BMPS, TREATING A LARGE (>20 ACRES) URBAN DRAINAGE WITH MULTIPLE LAND

DRAINAGE PLAN AND REPORT OLD DENVER ROAD

Analyzing the Changes to the Hydrologic Cycle. with the Implementation of LID Techniques in Korea

Latest MWELO Updates + Storm Water Requirements Kliffs Notes New Storm Water Permit and BMP Design Manual: Impacts on Future Development Presented

Application of the SWAT Hydrologic Model for Urban Stormwater Management

Appendix A Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form

Santa Margarita Region of Riverside County

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data

4c Using WinSLAMM to Evaluate LID Practices Hands-on Workshop. Using WinSLAMM to Evaluate LID Practices

Chapter 2 - Hydrologic Analysis

3.2 INFILTRATION TRENCH

Introduction. Welcome to the Belgium Study Abroad Program. Courses:

Watershed Modeling of Copper Loads to San Francisco Bay

Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)

Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS

Southeast Policy Area Drainage Study

San Francisco State University Site 1 Vegetated Infiltration Basin Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Environment, Energy, Security & Sustainability (E2S2)

Stream Buffers Sharpest Tool in the SWM Toolbox Tom Hegemier, PE, D.WRE, CFM

Hydrologic Analysis of a Watershed-Scale Rainwater Harvesting Program. Thomas Walsh, MS, PhD Candidate University of Utah

How Climate Change Impacts Urban Runoff and Water Quality Design

June 27, 2012 Holly Galavotti U.S. EPA

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

STORMWATER RETROFIT AND LID COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM G

Water Resources Management Plan

Names: ESS 315. Lab #6, Floods and Runoff Part I Flood frequency

City of Gig Harbor Stormwater Management and Site Development Manual

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

New Draft Model BMP Design Manual for San Diego Region

The Texas A&M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory (HMI) Questionnaire

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

Opti-Tool: A BMP Optimization Tool for Stormwater Management in EPA Region 1

Stormwater Volume and Treatment Methods Simplifying the Numbers. IAFSM March 10, Presented by: Tom Powers P.E., CFM, LEED AP, CPESC

Module 6 Temporary Pond and Silt Fence. Noboru Togawa. Presented to: Dr. Pitt Construction Site Erosion Control

L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation

June 2017 C.3 Workshop Sizing Example. Section II.B Sizing Volume-Based Treatment Measures based on the Adapted CASQA Stormwater BMP Handbook Approach

Transcription:

SDHM 3.1 User Workshop Morning Session Instructor: Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. www.clearcreeksolutions.com

SDHM 3.1 San Diego Hydrology Model Developed for: San Diego County and cities Replaces SDHM 3.0

SDHM 3.1 Changes from SDHM 3.0 New SDHM 3.1 HSPF parameter values. New vertical orifice outlet control option. New drawdown criteria.

SDHM 3.1 Changes from SDHM 3.0 Note: Because of the above listed changes, projects that have been created in SDHM 3.0 (and earlier SDHM2015) will not work in SDHM 3.1. To convert these older projects to SDHM 3.1 the user needs to manually re-input the project information into a new SDHM 3.1 project file. The project results will change and the hydromod mitigation facility may need to be re-sized.

Presentation Introduction SDHM Background and Theory SDHM and HSPF SDHM Application SDHM Demo Questions & Answers

Introduction SDHM 3.1 software platform is part of WWHM, which was originally developed for the State of Washington Department of Ecology. Now used in California, Oregon, Washington, and Texas.

Introduction SDHM 3.1 is available free from the Clear Creek Solutions, Inc., web site. www.clearcreeksolutions.com Go to Free Software Downloads.

SDHM Background and Theory Flow duration threshold requirements: based on erosive flows. Erosive flow range: varies by location (percent of 2-yr flow to 10-yr flow)

SDHM Background and Theory Flow duration threshold requirements: Default range: 10% of 2-yr flow to 10-yr flow

SDHM Background Flow Duration Analysis: Percent of time the flow exceeds a specific value. Requires continuous simulation hydrology to compute flow duration.

SDHM Background Single event modeling doesn t work because: Single-event flow frequency standards are based on inappropriate assumptions. Single-event modeling cannot compute flow durations (percent of time flows exceed a specific value).

SDHM Background Continuous simulation hydrology models the entire hydrologic cycle for multiple years. Stormwater runoff = surface runoff + interflow.

SDHM Background Distribution of San Diego annual rainfall and runoff: Blue: Evapotranspiration Green: Groundwater Yellow: Interflow Red: Surface Runoff A Soil C Soil Impervious

SDHM Capabilities SDHM 3.1 uses HSPF continuous simulation hydrology to compute stormwater runoff for both predevelopment and post-development conditions. Predeveloped Developed

SDHM Capabilities SDHM 3.1 continuous simulation computations from HSPF (included in software). HSPF runs in the background with local parameter values and local meteorological data. HSPF sponsored and funded by EPA and USGS.

How HSPF works Drainage areas are divided into pervious land segments based on soil, vegetation, and land slope and impervious land segments. Pervious and impervious segments are linked to conveyance pathways (pipes, ditches, ponds, streams, rivers, lakes, etc.) Historic rainfall and evaporation are used as input.

How HSPF works The entire water cycle is modeled on a hourly time step for multiple years. The model computes changes in soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and runoff every time step. Three types of runoff: surface runoff interflow groundwater/base flow

SDHM 3.1 The user selects the rainfall station from the available list (same as SDHM 3.0).

How SDHM works User locates project on county map, inputs pre- and post-development land use, and proposed mitigation measure(s). Predevelopment and mitigated flows are compared at Point of Compliance (POC). Mitigated flows are not allowed to exceed flow duration standards.

SDHM Basic Elements 13 elements: 1. Landuse Basin 2. Trapezoidal Pond 3. Storage Vault 4. Storage Tank 5. Irregular-Shaped Pond 6. Gravel Trench Bed 7. Sand Filter 8. Open Channel 9. Flow Splitter 10. Time Series 11. SSD Table 12. Lateral Flow Soil Basin 13. Lateral Flow Impervious Area

SDHM Pro Elements 3 elements: 1. Biofiltration 2. Porous Pavement 3. Green Roof

How SDHM works User outputs report file and project file. Output files can be submitted to the permitting agency for approval. Permitting agency can load project file and rerun analysis, if needed. Report file summarizes input data and output results.

How SDHM works Guidance/help is provided by SDHM 3.1 User Manual Program Help File Training Workshops Phone and Email Support

SDHM Application Example: Convert undeveloped land to suburban residential housing.

SDHM Application Stormwater Vault Sizing Example Predevelopment land use: Project: 10 ac D soil, Natural vegetation (NatVeg), Moderate land slope (5-15%) 1 ac C soil, Rock, Flat land slope (0-5%) Developed mitigated land use: Project: 6.5 ac D soil, Urban landscape with no irrigation (UrbNoIrr), Moderate slope 1.0 ac D soil, Urban landscape with irrigation (Urban), Moderate slope 1.0 ac Impervious, Flat slope 2.5 ac Impervious, Moderate slope

SDHM Application Stormwater Vault Sizing Example 12 steps from start to finish: 1. Select project location. 2. Set up Predevelopment land use scenario. 3. Set up Mitigated (developed) land use scenario. 4. Calculate lower and upper HMP thresholds based on Predevelopment runoff. 5. Calculate lower and upper HMP thresholds based on USGS regional equations (optional).

SDHM Application Stormwater Vault Sizing Example 12 steps from start to finish: 6. Compare sets of threshold values (optional). 7. Change thresholds (optional). 8. Size Mitigated scenario HMP facility. 9. Review analysis. 10. Produce report. 11.Save project. 12.Exit SDHM.

SDHM Application: Step 1 User selects land development location and places red dot on map. Then selects rainfall station record.

SDHM Application: Step 2 User sets up Predevelopment land use scenario. Selects Landuse Basin element.

User inputs Predevelopment land use. SDHM Application: Step 2 Pre: C, Rock, Flat: 1 ac D, NatVeg, Mod: 10 ac

SDHM Application: Step 2 User connects Landuse Basin element to Point of Compliance (POC 1).

SDHM Application: Step 2 POC 1 shows up in the lower right corner of the Landuse Basin element.

SDHM Application: Step 2 User computes Predevelopment scenario runoff by clicking on the Run Scenario button.

SDHM Application: Step 3 User sets up Mitigated land use scenario using the same procedures as used in Step 2.

SDHM Application: Step 3 User inputs Mitigated (developed) land use. Mit: D, Urban, Mod 1.0 ac D, UrbNoIrr, Mod 6.5 ac Impervious, Flat 1.0 ac Impervious, Mod 2.5 ac

SDHM Application: Step 3 User connects Landuse Basin element to Point of Compliance (POC 1).

SDHM Application: Step 3 ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING THE Q2 AND Q10 FLOW FREQUENCY VALUES FOR COMPARISON WITH THE USGS REGIONAL VALUES we will select the exit from this Landuse Basin element as the Point of Compliance for the Mitigated scenario. We will change the location of the Mitigated POC when we size our HMP facility in Step 8.

SDHM Application: Step 3 User computes Mitigated scenario runoff by clicking on the Run Scenario button.

SDHM Application: Step 4 User calculates the lower and upper HMP thresholds based on the Predevelopment runoff.

SDHM Application: Step 4 The Predeveloped Q2 value is 1.7417 cfs; the Q10 value is 3.9846 cfs.

SDHM Application: Step 5 User calculates the lower and upper HMP thresholds based on USGS regional equations (this step is done outside of SDHM and is optional). USGS Q2 and Q10 calculation method: Q2 = 3.60*(A^0.672)*(P^0.753) Q10 = 6.56*(A^0.783)*(P^1.07) Where A = drainage area (sq. miles) P = mean annual precipitation (inches)

SDHM Application: Step 5 P = mean annual precipitation (inches) Mean annual precipitation values for the standard 18 San Diego County rain gages are shown in the table below. Rain Gage Mean Annual Rainfall (in) Bonita 8.9 Borrego 3.2 CCDA Lindbergh 9.9 Encinitas 10.3 Escondido 13.9 Fallbrook 15.3 Fashion Valley 10.4 Flinn Springs 13.2 Kearny Mesa 11.1 Lake Cuyamaca 30.9 Lake Henshaw 22.4 Lake Wohlford 17.0 Lower Otay 10.5 Oceanside 11.8 Poway 12.2 Ramona 14.4 San Onofre 11.6 San Vicente 12.7 Santee 13.1

SDHM Application: Step 5 For 11 acre site in Fashion Valley: A = 11 ac = 0.0171875 square miles P = 10.4 inches USGS Q2 = 1.368 cfs USGS Q10 = 3.337 cfs

SDHM Application: Step 6 User compares the two sets of threshold values (optional). The Predeveloped Q2 and Q10 values from Step 4 are: Pre Q2 = 1.7417 cfs Pre Q10 = 3.9846 cfs The USGS Q2 and Q10 values from Step 5 are: USGS Q2 = 1.368 cfs USGS Q10 = 3.337 cfs

SDHM Application: Step 6 User selects the set with the largest Q2 value. The Predeveloped Q2 and Q10 values from Step 4 are: Pre Q2 = 1.7417 cfs (use this set) Pre Q10 = 3.9846 cfs (use this set) The USGS Q2 and Q10 values from Step 5 are: USGS Q2 = 1.368 cfs USGS Q10 = 3.337 cfs

SDHM Application: Step 6 Lower and upper HMP thresholds: Lower: 10% Q2 = 0.17417 cfs Upper: Q10 = 3.9846 cfs Note: No need to change SDHM default lower and upper HMP thresholds in Step 7.

SDHM Application: Step 7 Change thresholds (optional): View, Options, Duration Criteria. (1) Default: SDHM (2) User input: USGS

SDHM Application: Step 8 User selects and sizes the Mitigated scenario HMP facility based on the lower and upper threshold values selected in Step 6. For this example project we will size a stormwater storage vault.

SDHM Application: Step 8 User disconnects the Mitigated scenario Landuse Basin from POC 1.

SDHM Application: Step 8 User adds a Storage Vault element for the HMP facility.

SDHM Application: Step 8 User connects the Landuse Basin element to the Storage Vault element.

SDHM Application: Step 8 User connects the Landuse Basin element to the Storage Vault element.

SDHM Application: Step 8 User connects the outflow (Outlet 1) from the Storage Vault element to POC 1.

SDHM Application: Step 8 POC 1 shows up in the lower right corner of the Storage Vault element.

SDHM Application: Step 8 User inputs initial vault specifications or uses Auto Vault to size vault storage volume and outlet control configuration.

SDHM Application: Step 8 User inputs Auto Vault sizing info: (1) Amount of sizing (little to everything possible). (2) Vault Depth (including freeboard). (3) Outlet structure (1 orifice + notch or 3 orifices no notch).

SDHM Application: Step 8 User options: Create Vault: Creates a vault from scratch, ignoring userinput dimensions and outlet control values. Optimize Vault: Starts with user-input dimensions and outlet control values and tries to improve on them.

SDHM Application: Step 8 Sizing is done by iterating to find the smallest vault dimensions (length and width) that produce outflow that meets the HMP flow duration criteria.

SDHM Application: Step 8 Iterations continue until no smaller vault dimensions (length and width) meet the HMP flow duration criteria..

SDHM Application: Step 9 User reviews the flow duration analysis. Flow duration (10% of 2-year to 100% of 10-year)

SDHM Application: Step 9 SDHM 3.1 computes the vault drawdown/drain time for the maximum (riser height) stage:

SDHM Application: Step 9 SDHM 3.1 computes the vault drawdown/drain time for the maximum (riser height) stage: 1 day, 6 hours, 43 minutes.

SDHM Application: Step 10 User produces Project Report:

SDHM Application: Step 10 Project Report summarizes statistics and whether or not the facility meets the jurisdiction s standards.

User saves project file. SDHM Application: Step 11

User exits SDHM. SDHM Application: Step 12

After Sizing Facility User outputs report file and project file. Output files can be submitted to the permitting agency for approval. Permitting agency can load project file and rerun analysis, if needed. Report file summarizes input data and output results.

SDHM 3.1 File Types Project file:.whm Backup project file:.wh2 Database file:.wdm Report file:.rtf or Report file:.pdf

SDHM: LID Options SDHM 3.1 includes the following LID options: Dispersion of impervious surface runoff on adjacent pervious surface (example: roof runoff to lawn). Biofiltration to filter and infiltrate stormwater. Infiltration to retain and infiltrate stormwater. Porous pavement to retain and infiltrate stormwater.

SDHM 3.1 Questions? Contact: Doug Beyerlein 425.225.5997 beyerlein@clearcreeksolutions.com Joe Brascher 360.943.0304 brascher@clearcreeksolutions.com