Economic, Social & Environmental Management Program for Brazilian Soybeans

Similar documents
Economic, Social & Environmental Management Program for Brazilian Soybeans

Principles and Criteria for Defining Global Sustainable Beef

ADM Commitment to No Deforestation, No Peat and No Exploitation

4 th Road Show Brazilian Soy Sustainability

THE U.S. SOY INDUSTRY IS A TRUSTED PARTNER, PROVIDING ITS CUSTOMERS WITH A TOTAL QUALITY EXPERIENCE: HIGH-PERFORMING PRODUCTS DELIVERED BY THE MOST

Ruth Potopsingh PhD Director of Sustainable Energy School of Graduate Studies, Research and Entrepreneurship University of Technology, Jamaica

Tim McAllister. Managing environmental issues related to beef an international perspective. Lethbridge Research Centre Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada

Sustainability management in the value chain: from farm to table. Prof. PhD. Roberto Fava Scare Carla C. Martoni Pereira Gome Andressa Balarin Berto

10055/17 MKL/io 1 DGB 1A

COSMEBIO CHARTER. General Assembly 7 June 2011

POLICY BRIEF FOREST CODE AND RURAL CREDIT:

Metrics Models and Tools for Evaluating the Impacts of Biofuels

The Euromines Guidelines for Sustainable Development

Building a Sustainable Supply Chain in South America

START. 4 Steps to Understand the Low-Carbon Economy

Determine Certainty Program Framework of a Market Based Conservation Initiative for Longleaf Pine Habitat Improvements in Eastern North Carolina

The Evolving Role of Trading Companies in Food Chains*

The Future is Here: The View from U.S. Soybean Fields. What does this mean, how do we get to long term sustainability and resilience?

SUSTAINABILITY POLICY

Geographical indications:

Second opinion on Export Development Canada (EDC) s framework for Green bonds

S U Z A N O P U L P A N D P A P E R. Communication on Progress J U L Y J U L Y

Operational efficiency

Farm Perspectives Study, 2014 Main Findings

Transport and Sustainable Rural Livelihoods Session: 5.3 Part 1

Soil Food & Biofuels Is this sustainable?

Michigan State University Consumers Energy Company Project Phase 1

NATURAL RESOURCES SUSTAINBALE INVESTING GUIDELINES

NATURAL RESOURCES SUSTAINABLE INVESTING GUIDELINES

Regione Marche. Development Programme Non techincal summary. Roma, June 2015

The Current Status of the Hungarian Agri-Food Chains Related to Sustainability: Challenges and Barriers

Platform of Brazilian Low Carbon Agriculture Plan: Opportunities to Cooperation with GRA

Assessing and Redefining Policies towards Africa in a New Global Scenario: Intersecting Perspectives between Brazil and Morocco

Certification System

UNWRAPPING AMBITIOUS PACKAGING COMMITMENTS IN THE U.S.

UNWRAPPING AMBITIOUS PACKAGING COMMITMENTS IN THE U.S.

Global Reporting Initiative G3.1 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Covalence EthicalQuote Criteria

Financing Landscape Programs Integrating Different Financing Sources

1 st Azerbaijan Conference SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

CPFL Renováveis in the market

Basic information on the MSS proposal

SUSTAINABILITY MATERIAL TOPICS

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of XXX

Brazilian Tobacco Production

AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

Environmental goods and services in the ESCWA region Opportunities for SMEs

Ford Code of Human Rights, Basic Working Conditions and Corporate Responsibility Pre-Site Visit Facility Survey

Environmental Responsibility Policy

U.S. Bancorp Environmental Responsibility Policy

AGROECOLOGY, FAMILY FARMING AND PUBLIC HEALTH

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

International Trade and Biodiversity. Ben Kamphuis Debrecen, May 29, 2011

Climate and Agricultural Preservation Plan Action Plan Outline. HLUET Committee August 17, 2017

Soy Sustentabilidade. Moratorium

LIST OF SUSTAINABILITY POLICY

Introducing the Standard for Responsible Mining Draft v.2.0

KEYSTONE FOODS. Corporate Social Responsibility Program Overview

Bioeconomy Development in Brazil: Contributions and Challenges of National Policies

Agricultural Production Standard (APS) At a Glance

Agricultural Production Standard (APS) At a Glance

Context. R-PP versions submitted to FCPF in 2010: Draft January 12 April 19 May 9 June 12

Ford Code of Human Rights, Basic Working Conditions and Corporate Responsibility Pre-Site Visit Facility Survey

Olive oil for the world 2017 SUSTAINABILITY HIGHLIGHTS0

Greening Agriculture Policies and Laws

CEO s Statement of Continued Support for the UN Global Compact and Its Ten Principles

Amazon Fund - information from the internet-

SUBMISSION ON RANKING MARCH 4, 2002 MMSD DRAFT REPORT CHAPTER 16 SUGGESTIONS

Review Indicators Alignment Review Evaluation / Recommendations

Committee Chair Permanent Members Additional Members Meets

PRESENTATION SUSTAINABILITY PLAN Repsol Angostura

THE SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS FROM CROP

Business Working Responsibly CR/Sustainability Governance Section. What it examines

GRI content index Core - Gemalto 2017

Green Cleanup Standards Initiative

Review and Improvement of CSR Activities

2. Background of the leather sector

Integrated Farm Assurance Standard Version 5. Key Changes & New Requirements Crops Base - Fruit & Vegetables Certification

Erie County, New York FARMS FOR THE FUTURE. Executive Summary. An Agricultural and Farmland Preservation and Protection Strategy

China Airlines Co., Ltd. Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development Best Practice Principles. Chapter I General Principles

GREEN CHOICE (SUSTAINABLE TOURISM STANDARD) CU GREEN CHOICE SUSTAINABLE TOURISM STANDARD

The Brazilian sugarcane sector experience: promoting sustainability with adequate tools

LATIN AMERICAN CACAO INITIATIVE

AGRIBUSINESS: Driving force of the Brazilian Economy

October 20th, The Sustainability Agenda of the Brazilian Sugarcane Industry

WHAT MATTERS TO OUR STAKEHOLDERS

Chair s Summary G8 Environment Ministers Meeting. Kobe, Japan May 24-26, 2008

College of Lake County Sustainability Center

SoCoProject. «Soil Conservation Agriculture : An Answer to European Challenges» Konrad Schreiber Engineer in CA Development 2008, May, the 22 nd

REDD+ Safeguards and Safeguard Information Systems

Sustainability Challenges in Indian Sugar Sector. Roshan Lal Tamak Executive Director (Sugar)

International Sustainable Purchasing Charter

Overview. 1. Background. 2. Biofuels in the United States and Canada. 3. Policy objectives. 4. Economic consequences. 5.

ILLINOIS LICENSURE TESTING SYSTEM

According to the Articles of Association, CORC is committed to rural development in agriculture sector by means of cooperative societies.

No. Detail Page. CS 25 Organise and deliver customer service 3. CS 26 Understand the customer service environment 5

Olds College Sustainability Strategic Plan

Pegatron Corporation Corporate Social Responsibility Practice Principles

BIO-PLASTIC (BP) PRODUCTION FROM MANDIOCA (CASSAVA/YUCA) AS RAW MATERIAL IN ARTIGAS, PARAGUAY

PRESENTATION SUSTAINABILITY PLAN Norway

Supporting Apprenticeship in Canada

Transcription:

Economic, Social & Environmental Management Program for Brazilian Soybeans 2012

1 PRESENTATION Brazilian soybeans cover 23 million hectares, or 24% of the world s planted acreage, making Brazil the second largest producer of this oilseed. The 2011/2012 crop estimate is a record production of 74 million tons. Soy is currently Brazil s main agricultural crop, in both volume and income generation, representing 11% of total exports, with 250,000 rural producers in 17 states, generating 1.5 million direct and indirect jobs. Since the introduction of soybeans into Brazil, new technologies have contributed to a more sustainable production. The highlights are: no till that increases the soil s water retention capacity and reduces the processes of erosion and carbon emission; precision agriculture that increases productivity and makes it possible to reduce the use of fertilizers, agricultural chemicals and fuel; and genetic improvements that maximize productivity and increase soybean resistance and quality. Even with the significant advances in Brazilian soybean production, continuous improvements must be made in the productive processes to increase sustainability, associated with biodiversity preservation, maintenance of water resources and quality of life for rural workers and local communities. The challenge to continuously improve the economic, social and environmental indices for agricultural production is tied to the rural producers ability to manage their production difficulties on a daily basis. For this reason, in recognition of the fact that the rural producer needs support to improve his administration effectively, the productive chain has united to organize the Soja Plus Program.

2. SCOPE OF THE SOJA PLUS PROGRAM 2.1. Mission: To promote economic, social and environmental management in rural properties and in the other elements of the productive chain, guaranteeing continuous improvement in Brazil s soybean production, processing and trading processes. 2.2. Vision: To be the most effective program in the sustainable development of Brazilian soybeans. 2.3. Values: Ethics, transparency, excellence and innovation. 2.4. Work Dynamics: Diagnose challenges and opportunities; promote actions of support and encouragement; monitor performance indices; and recognize advances made. Diagnose Recognize Promote Monitor 2.5. Property Management Modules: The Soja Plus Program presents a work methodology based on the following five management modules applied to the property: 2.5.1. Quality of Life at Work - Occupational Health Occupational Health Medical Control Plan Procedures guaranteeing access to control quality of water, food and installations in good conditions for the workers Procedures for first aid, medical assistance and prompt help in the case of accidents

- Occupational Safety Environmental Risk Prevention Plan Procedures for the orientation and use of Individual Safety Equipment - Labor Relations Plan for controls over legal requirements and working hours Procedures for employee orientation as regards activities (handling chemicals, operating machinery, environmental risks, health and safety) 2.5.2. Best Production Practices - Management of Production Practices Monitoring of the positive and negative impacts on soil and water Mapping the environmental and social risks of the operations Monitoring greenhouse gas emissions from the use of fuel Plan to reduce, reuse, recycle Procedures to use conservationist techniques Plan for the responsible use of chemicals - Management of Impacts on Natural Resources Mapping natural resources (water resources, areas of permanent preservation and legal reserve) Identification of risks Procedures to mitigate impacts 2.5.3. Financial and Economic Feasibility Prepare a financial plan Implement cost controls Adopt risk management mechanisms 2.5.4. Product Quality Plan to evaluate risks and critical control points Monitor the use of possible contaminants Procedures for production, transportation, storage and processing 2.5.5. Social Responsibility Procedures for interactions with society and resolution of conflicts of interest Plan for participating in individual and collective social projects

3. ACTIVITIES TO BE DEVELOPED For improvement efforts to be ever more perceptive and efficient, the organizers and partners will do the following: Publish, clarify and make the producer aware of economic, social and environmental matters; Produce and distribute technical material to implement best agricultural practices; Offer rural property management tools; Form multiplication agents; Organize training and field days; Evaluate the degree of learning related to the material presented; Verify the efficiency of the actions related to the implementation of best practices in the production units; Recognize and publish annually the advances obtained in a statistical bulletin, participants reunion, seals of quality and certification of production units; Organize an exchange of experiences among producers and establish comparative references; Prospect financial incentives for producers who reach a high level of management and who seek a differentiated market.

4 HOW TO PARTICIPATE - Rural Producers: Producers interested in participating in the Program should register on the site www.sojaplus.com.br. They will receive technical material to implement best agricultural practices and use rural property management tools. Producers and employees will also be able to participate in training, field days and an exchange of experiences with other properties. - Rural Producer Trade Unions: These institutions can be supported when they form multiplication agents, promote field days, train producers and employees. - Public Sector: The institutions that formulate and incentivate public policies for the governance of agricultural production can become partners in training programs and technical assistance to ensure that rural properties are socially and environmentally adequate. Public institutions will also receive information bulletins on regional sustainability indices for setting the direction of priority policies. - Businesses in the Sector: Input, processing and trading companies can sponsor Soja Plus Program activities, support field days, promote training events and offer benefits for registered producers. With these initiatives, the sponsoring companies contribute to the sustainability of agribusiness, meet market demands and can promote the company s brand as socially just and environmentally adequate. - NGOs/Universities: The participating Non-Governmental Organizations and universities can act in the development of research projects, production of teaching materials and follow-up of criteria and indices. These institutions can also help form multiplication agents in best agricultural practices, financial and economic feasibility, product quality and social responsibility. - Financial Agents: The participation of financial agents will allow a strengthening of partnership ties with rural producers and the businesses in the sector, a reduction in the costing credit risks and an increase in the offer of credit to implement management techniques, natural resource mapping, recovery of degraded areas, recovery of areas of permanent preservation and legal reserve, as well as the possibility of publishing and marketing the actions developed.

5 EXPECTED RESULTS The general result expected from implementing the Soja Plus Program is to contribute to the conservation of natural resources, governance of productive activities and the social well-being of workers, rural producers and local communities. The Soja Plus Program was conceived to stimulate sustainable production in accordance with environmentally correct, socially just and economically viable performance requirements that are adequate for Brazil s reality. The Soja Plus Program will also increase economic opportunities and promote greater efficiency in the production of Brazilian soybeans.