SUBMISSION OF TURKEY ON AGENDA ITEM 3 (MITIGATION SECTION OF DECISION 1/CP.21) OF AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON THE PARIS AGREEMENT (APA1-4)

Similar documents
The EIG s views on APA agenda item 3(b) and 3(c)

FCCC/APA/2018/L.2/Add.1

Submission by Saint Lucia on behalf of CARICOM. APA Agenda Item 3 - Nationally Determined Contributions: features, information and accounting

SUBMISSION BY THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

1. General reflections

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to the APA on transparency February 2016

FCCC/APA/2016/INF.1/Add.1

ACCOUNTING UNDER THE PARIS AGREEMENT

1 OVERARCHING CONSIDERATIONS AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES

The NDC Cycle in the Paris Agreement

MS WORD VERSION FOR WORKING PURPOSES ONLY

I. General Considerations on the Adaptation Communication

understanding of progress towards the long-term vision agreed under the Paris Agreement through the following benchmark targets:

Empowering the Ratchet-up Mechanism:

Informal consultations on the outcome of COP24 Summary of discussions Produced by the incoming Polish Presidency of COP 24

Republic of Korea. Submission on Art 6.2 and 6.4 of the Paris Agreement

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to the APA on Article 13: Transparency September 2017

Synthesis of submissions on agenda item 4 of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement

Matters relating to Article 14 of the Paris Agreement and paragraphs of decision 1/CP.21

NDC Features, Transparency and Ambition JUNE 2017

Informal note by the co-facilitators final version

Land use in a future climate agreement

SUBMISSION BY THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

EU Submission on Mitigation in the 2015 Agreement i

Paris Agreement on Climate Change. International Climate Change and Energy Law, Spring semester 2016 Prof. Dr. Christina Voigt

Background paper First session of the informal ministerial consultation Paris, July

The enhanced transparency framework. an analysis of the Paris Agreement

Elements of the 2015 Agreement Switzerland s views

Version 2 of 10 December 2015 at 21:00 DRAFT PARIS OUTCOME 1. Proposal by the President. Draft decision -/CP.21

Elements for a draft negotiating text 1

KEY ISSUES IN COMPLETING THE PARIS CLIMATE ARCHITECTURE

Executive Summary. September 2016

Decision -/CP.20. Lima call for climate action. Advance unedited version

PNG s FOCUSED SUBMISSION ON MPGs FOR THE TRANSPARENCY FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION AND SUPPORT REFFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 13 OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT

PNG s Legal Views on the Operations of Article 6.2

Links to the UNFCCC: NDCs and the global stocktake

DESIGNING THE ENHANCED TRANSPARENCY FRAMEWORK PART 1: REPORTING UNDER THE PARIS AGREEMENT

The IPCC Special Report on [1.5 C]: The context for the invitation by COP 21. Dr. Florin Vladu Manager, UNFCCC Secretariat Geneva, 15 August 2016

INTRODUCTION - BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Contextualizing Climate Action in Sustainable Development COP 24 Outcomes

SUBMISSION BY DENMARK AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

Thapelo Letete Environmental Resources Management South Africa

Federated States of Micronesia Intended Nationally Determined Contribution

FCCC/SBSTA/2013/INF.10

COP.21 - what is next for Eastern Partnership Countries

COP.21 - what is next for Eastern Partnership Countries

Features and implications of NDCs for carbon markets

Explaining the Paris Rulebook

COP22 Marrakech Glossary of Key Terms November Table of Contents

SORTING OUT DIFFERENT TYPES OF INDC, THEIR ATTRIBUTES, AND UPFRONT INFORMATION

NDCs and NDC implementation

Informal information note by the Co-Facilitators

Environmental Integrity Group (EIG), comprising Liechtenstein, Mexico, Monaco, the Republic of Korea, and Switzerland

12807/16 MS/ach 1 DG E 1B

The Paris Agreement and the EU NDC

JULY 2015 DECODING INTENDED NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTIONS (INDCS): A Guide for Understanding Country Commitments

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Work Stream 1 October 2014

INTEGRATING NATIONAL MRV SYSTEMS: LINKAGES BETWEEN MRV OF NAMAS, FACILITY- LEVEL REPORTING, AND NATIONAL INVENTORIES

OUTCOME OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. 3486th Council meeting. Environment. Brussels, 30 September 2016 PRESS

Major Economies Business Forum: Intended Nationally Determined Contributions: From Good Intentions to Implementation

SUBMISSION BY IRELAND AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

INDCs: APPROACHES AND TEMPLATES FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. SBI, UNFCCC 3 June 2015

ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF THE PARIS RULEBOOK

DRAFT TEXT on. ADP 2-3 agenda item 3 Implementation of all the elements of decision 1/CP.17. Version 4 of 22 November 2013 at 05:45 hrs

13th of January Subject: Mandates of Adaptation Committee and LDC Expert Group based on paragraphs 41, 42 (b) and 45 of Decision 1/CP.21.

Training programme GHG emission trends and projections

This submission is supported by Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia. Riga, 29 May 2015

Session SBI41 (2014)

Version 2 of 13 December 2018 at 18.15

Understanding Land Use in the UNFCCC

POLICY BRIEF. UNFCCC Accounting for Forests: What s in and what s out of NDCs and REDD+ Donna Lee and Maria J. Sanz

SUBMISSION BY NORWAY ON APA AGENDA ITEM 7

Accounting for mitigation targets in Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement

DRAFT TEXT on. Version 08/12/ :23. Draft text produced under the APA Co-Chairs responsibility

Decision 19/CMP.1 Guidelines for national systems under Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto Protocol

ecbi Transparency of Action and Support under the Paris Agreement Harro van Asselt, Romain Weikmans, Timmons Roberts and Achala Abeysinghe

Article 6.4 and the future of offsetting

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to SBSTA on Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement October 2017

FCCC/TP/2012/2. United Nations

Tracking progress towards NDCs and relevant linkages between Articles 4, 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement

Tracking progress towards NDCs and relevant linkages between Articles 4, 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement

International Civil Aviation Organization ASSEMBLY 38TH SESSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

EEAC Working Group Energy Workshop Brussels 17 June 2016

FCCC/TP/2012/5. United Nations

THE PARIS AGREEMENT (UNFCCC COP.21) CCIM CCPIE Stakeholder Dialogue 11 March 2016

DRAFT TEXT on. Version 08/09/ :59

ENHANCING NDCS BY 2020: ACHIEVING THE GOALS OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT

AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON FURTHER COMMITMENTS FOR ANNEX I PARTIES UNDER THE KYOTO PROTOCOL

TRAINING MATERIAL FOR THE PREPARATION OF BIENNIAL UPDATE REPORTS FROM NON-ANNEX I PARTIES: REPORTING MITIGATION ACTIONS AND THEIR EFFECTS

DESIGNING THE RATCHET-UP PROCESS: LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE TALANOA DIALOGUE AND LEVERAGING THE TRANSPARENCY FRAMEWORK

12901/18 JV/bsl 1 TREE.1.B

International Climate Change : Perspectives on Paris

EU Presidency priorities for COP.19/CMP.9. Vilnius, 30 October 2013

Significance of the Paris Agreement (PA) under Current Context

Increasing ambition and action in NDCs through forest landscape restoration

A Brief Analysis of Indonesia's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC)

REDD+ Academy. National Forest Monitoring Systems (NFMS) for REDD+

Elements of the outcome. Note by the Chair

41 st Session of Subsidiary Body on Implementation. Multilateral Assessment CYPRUS

Paris Agreement summary

Transcription:

SUBMISSION OF TURKEY ON AGENDA ITEM 3 (MITIGATION SECTION OF DECISION 1/CP.21) OF AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON THE PARIS AGREEMENT (APA1-4) Turkey welcomes the invitation to the Parties by Ad hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement (APA) to submit their views on the agenda item 3, Further guidance in relation to the mitigation section of decision 1/CP.21 specifically on: (a) features of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) as specified in paragraph 26; (b) information to facilitate clarity, transparency and understanding of NDCs as specified in paragraph 28; and (c) accounting for Parties NDCs as specified in paragraph 31. Turkey s Views On The Differentiation of Further Guidance In Relation To The Mitigation Section Of Decision 1/CP.21 Turkey supports the views particularly on differentiation on Further Guidance on ICTU 1 and also accounting and Turkey believe that these guidance must respect the nationally determined character of the contributions, adhere to the principles of the Paris Agreement and the Convention, and must be flexible so as to accommodate the diversity of all kinds NDCs which are also nationally determined as well as national circumstances. The guidance should recognize that countries will nationally determine the pathways by their NDCs to achieve their respective contributions depending on their development priorities, and therefore the guidance should certainly not aim to convert all Parties NDCs into a single form of absolute form of GHG reductions. I. Features Nationally determined is the most crucial feature of Parties contributions according to Article 3 and 4 of the Paris Agreement. Further guidance phrase in this item must not undermine nationally determined nature of contributions and it must not mean to adjust the content of NDCs. Features are not rules that prescribe what exactly NDCs should look like, nor do they prejudge the level of ambition of Parties mitigation actions so the guidance should assist Parties in national determined and non-intrusive manner. It should create the operational essentials for submission and communication of NDCs. The features of the NDCs should reflect differentiated responsibilities, different national circumstances, development levels, capacities and needs of Parties and CBDR-RC. Contribution of NDCs towards achieving the goal of the Convention must be determined in a country driven manner. Turkey in a view that these features of NDCs were already treated within the overall architecture of the Paris Agreement. Identifying new features or elaborating existing ones would imply a renegotiation of the Paris Agreement. There is no need for any such guidance beyond simple recognition of existing features also they are also outlined in Articles 3 and 4 the Paris Agreement. 1 The Information Necessary for Clarity, Transparency and Understanding. 1

A. Identify and list existing features There is no need for any such guidance beyond simple recognition of existing features also they are also outlined in Articles 3 and 4 the Paris Agreement. II. Information Summary The guidance provided in Para 27 is not mandatory. It is clearly indicated in the language of this paragraph that the information to be provided by Parties communicating their NDCs is discretionary, optional and non-exclusive in nature, because it uses words indicating discretionary intent such as may, as appropriate, and inter alia. Specific information of Parties NDCs should take into account their diversified climate actions, different national circumstances and capacities and also support received. The purpose of the information is to enhance the clarity, transparency and understanding of Parties NDCs. Parties may submit additional information, as appropriate, on a voluntary basis for their progress to be tracked. This encouragement of providing additional information must be non-intrusive. On differentiation, we see the diversity of the NDCs as a key strength of the Paris Agreement. Through the concept of national determination, the Agreement safeguards this diversity and operationalizes the principle of CBDR-RC & NC. In determining their individual NDCs, Parties take into account their national circumstances, capabilities, and different starting points. A. Objectives Be a tool or reference document to assist Parties in preparing and communicating their NDCs in line with the Paris Agreement; Suitable for and relevant for the whole range of NDCs (target types, national capacities and circumstances); Not present an additional burden on all Parties, Not be prescriptive; Not aim to enable the quantification of NDCs or provide quantitative information; B. Capacity of developing countries Developing countries, in particular LDCs and SIDS, require support in order to progressively improve the information included to contextualize their NDCs. Recognize different starting points and capacities; Flexibility shall be provided to parties based on their NDC/type of NDCs, Incentive mechanisms should be established by the CMA to encourage and support developing country Parties to prepare, communicate and implement their NDCs and to provide relevant information in a successive and durable manner; 2

Provide continuous and adequate support to developing country Parties to identify their capacity-building needs and increase their capacity for enhancing the clarity, transparency and understanding of their NDCs over time; Consider to identify their capacity-building needs and increase their capacity for enhancing the clarity, transparency and understanding of their NDCs over time, including what support would be required relative to what is available; Work with partners to build the capacity to improve the provision of information over time and support the implementation of NDC. C. Procedural elements a. Channel Vehicle for communicating is the NDC, submitted to the NDC registry, Parties may provide additional or updated information at any time if party decides it is necessary. b. Timing/Application Second and/or subsequent NDCs/any future NDC submission; Parties should apply the guidance for information of NDCs to their subsequent NDCs (with the timeframe from 2031 onwards); Guidance should not apply retrospectively to NDCs (or INDCs) already submitted; Parties may elect to apply such guidance to their existing NDCs (most of which are pre- 2030); LDCs and SIDS, in the light of their special circumstances, are encouraged to apply the guidance to the extent possible; c. Revision Review and, if necessary, revision of guidance at a future point following experience with implementation. The CMA shall define the year of the first review of the guidance, with a view to revising it on a regular basis. SUBSTANTIVE ELEMENTS ON INFORMATION Channels for putting forward the information: Vehicle for communications the NDC; With the NDC, 9-12 month in advance of the relevant session of the CMA; Parties may provide additional or updated information that are useful to facilitate the clarity, transparency and understanding at any time on a voluntary basis. Timing of application of the further guidance for information: Parties should apply the guidance for information of NDCs to their subsequent NDCs (with the timeframe from 2031 onwards) 3

Application and Revision: Parties shall apply this guidance for NDCs communications pursuant to Paris Agreement Art. 4.9, Art. 4.11, or para. 22 of 1/CP.21; LDCs and SIDS, in the light of their special circumstances, are encouraged to apply the guidance to the extent possible; The CMA shall define the year of the first review of the guidance, with a view to revising it on a regular basis. A. Quantifiable information on reference point (including, as appropriate, a base year) Quantifiable information on base year or base period, reference year or reference period, as applicable tailored to the type of target and indicators determined by the Party. Absolute emissions reduction target o Emissions levels for the base and target years in terms of CO2 eq. o Headline number in terms of emission reduction in % BAU target o Baseline, including emissions level in terms of CO2 eq. o Emissions level for the target year in terms of CO2 eq. o Headline number in terms of emission reduction in % Intensity target o Base and target years o Intensity level for the base year. o Headline number in terms of intensity reduction in % o index value for the base year o Assumptions of models utilized and whether these assumptions are consistent overtime Policies and measures o Qualitative description of the policies and measures, including adaptation co-benefits o Quantitative information on expected emissions from the policies and measures (if possible) Emission Peaking target o Peak year o Indicators the party will use to assess the attainment of the objective. B. Time frames and/or periods for implementation This section of the appendix does not need much elaboration. A simple cross reference to the consideration by the CMA of Article 4.10 would be sufficient. 4

C. Scope and Coverage Information on the sectors and gases included in NDC (the sectors and GHG gases defined by IPCC guidelines) and coverage of NDC (e.g., economy-wide) If not all IPCC gases and/or sectors are included party may provide, if appropriate, an explanation for any gases and/or sectors excluded. Information on whether NDCs include mitigation, adaptation and/or means of implementation based on voluntary basis. D. Planning Processes Nationally determined planning processes, Information on the domestic planning processes conducted in the design of the NDCs, as appropriate, How the Party s NDC has been anchored in domestic mitigation measures, Information on legal and institutional arrangements, Information on any conditional element beyond headline number. E. Assumptions and Methodologies Information on the accounting approaches and relevant emissions estimation methodologies to be used. Metrics and methodologies used to estimate emissions (in accordance with methodologies and common metrics assessed by the IPCC and adopted by the CMA); Metrics and methodologies IPCC inventory guideline, GWP value used. If a Party has referred to an absolute, economy-wide target o Further information to help understand the NDC; o Multi-year or single year targets, (budget-based or single year approach) If Party has referred to a BAU baseline or scenario: o Assumptions used and sources for data series that form part of the NDC target (e.g. GDP, population, energy use, type of model used if NDC is based on projected values, past trends); o Model used to develop BAU baseline; If a Party has referred to emission intensity (e.g. emissions per capita or per GDP): o Data sources used to calculate the index (e.g. population or any other macroeconomic indicators); o Source and type of GDP used, if applicable; o Past trends; o Projections, if available; o Timing and parameters of updates. If a Party has referred to an emission peaking target: 5

o Intended date of the peak; o Expected peak emission level, if available; o Expected rate of emissions decline after peak, if available. o If a party has referred to the implementation of policies and measures (intended or proposed): o Detailed list and scope of intended or proposed policies and measures to be implemented, with sectors and gases involved; o Implementation milestone; o Estimated quantified emissions impact (if available) and underlying assumption; If a Party has referred to achieving carbon/emission neutrality: o Information explaining the Party s definition of carbon or emission neutrality; o Accounting approach used for carbon neutrality; o How emissions from the land sector will be accounted for; o Explanation whether and to what extent units from international market mechanisms or other compensation activities/credits will be used to reach target. o Further technical information on mitigation contributions as necessary e.g. any additional technical information the Party deems relevant to specify their GHG and/or non-ghg. F. Fairness and Ambition How the party considers that its NDC is fair and ambitious, in the light of its national circumstances; o Information on how the NDC reflects the Party s highest possible ambition reflecting its CBDR-RC in the light of different national circumstances; e.g. using illustrative indicators such as [...] o Explanation on conditional part of the contribution, if relevant, Turkeys Views on Additional general information on the NDC There is no need to additional information on the ICTU of NDCs that are not existing in PA and also COP21 decisions, this would be the renegotiation of Paris Agreement. III. Accounting Summary: The Guidance on Accounting Turkey believes that the guidance on accounting; should not to undermine the national determination of NDCs. 6

Different national circumstances, capacities and starting points should be taken into account. should not aim to address the challenges encountered in preparing the synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions. should not aim to enable the quantification of NDCs or provide quantitative information and should not aim to tracking progress of parties NDCs. should be facilitative and practical in order to assist Parties in meeting their accounting obligations under the Paris Agreement. be a tool or reference document to assist Parties in preparing and communicating their NDCs in line with the Paris Agreement and decision 1/CP.21; should be limited those elements in para 31, there is no need to renegotiate or elaboration of PA. should accommodate the diversity of NDCs and different national capacities and circumstances. should apply only to relevant quantified elements of NDCs and not cover the full suite of information to be reported under Article 13, paragraph 7(b), such as broader reporting on policies and measures. is inherently different from guidance on transparency, and is intended to give a sense of the planned actions by Parties, which can then be evaluated against actuals in the transparency framework So the total impact of NDCs should be assessed individually. According to the PA article 4.13 each party are responsible for their NDCs individually and this paragraph also aims to promote environmental integrity, transparency, accuracy, completeness, comparability and consistency, and ensure the avoidance of double counting, in accordance with guidance adopted by CMA. A. Understanding of accounting Being responsible for NDCs: o Parties should explain their NDCs in the communication and implementation stage in a responsible manner individually, not collectively. B. Objectives The guidance on accounting should not aim to enable the quantification of NDCs, provide quantitative information or not aim to tracking progress of parties NDCs. Promote mutual trust among Parties and to provide the public a clear, accurate and comprehensive explanation on what Parties are planning to do on climate change; Help/assist Parties in fulfilling existing obligations under the Paris Agreement Article 4; Be flexible for all parties particularly for LDCs and SIDS, and promote progression and ambition; 7

The adoption of further requirements to all parties is contingent upon the provision of new, additional and adequate resources to meet their agreed full costs, or a portion of those costs. C. Capacity of developing countries In accordance with Article 13, paragraph 14 and Article 13, paragraph 15, support shall be provided to assist developing country Parties in the accounting of their NDCs, including integrating and incorporating accounting elements in national MRV systems; Continuous and adequate support shall be provided to developing country Parties to increase their relevant capacities on implementing the guidance for accounting; Incentivizing mechanisms should be established by the CMA to encourage and support developing country Parties to apply the guidance for accounting; Support is addressed under other APA and SBSTA agenda items; Capacity concerns must be addressed through strong and sustained capacity building support and frameworks for developing countries not in the guidance, which should be common and applicable to all. Flexibility to be provided to developing country Parties, in particular LDCs and SIDS, in the scope and level of details related to application of the relevant guidance, with specific accounting approaches in developing country Parties NDCs to be nationally-determined by the Parties concerned, in line with the general guidance referred to in Article 4.13 of the Paris Agreement and paragraph 31 and 32 of decision 1/CP.21; Recognize the special circumstances of LDCs and SIDS in terms of the accounting provisions applied, and that progressive improvement in accounting systems is dependent on support provided. D. Drawing from approaches under the Convention and the Kyoto Protocol E. Principles Outline of the existing methods and guidance under the Convention and IPCC with references to the appropriate decisions and/or IPCC Publications. Preserve the national determination of NDCs by respecting the accounting approaches embedded in their NDCs Reflect equity and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances, stated in Article 2.2 of the Paris Agreement, Consistent with the scope of NDCs and covering both actions and support component of NDCs in accordance with Article 3 of the Paris agreement; Flexibility to be provided to all Parties in the scope and level of details related to application of the relevant guidance; F. Procedural elements 8

a. Channel The guidance on reporting on accounting is inherently different from guidance on transparency, and is intended to give a sense of the planned actions by Parties, which can then be evaluated against actuals in the transparency framework. b. Timing/Application c. Revision Parties may elect to apply the guidance for accounting in their NDCs up to 2030; In accordance with paragraph 32 of decision 1/CP.21, Parties shall apply the guidance for accounting in their subsequent rounds of NDCs (from 2030 onwards). Review and, if necessary, revision of guidance at a future point following experience with implementation. The CMA shall define the year of the first review of the guidance, with a view to revising it on a regular basis. G. Specific elements Parties account for anthropogenic emissions and removals in accordance with methodologies and common metrics assessed by the IPCC and adopted by the CMA (decision 1/CP.21, para. 31(a)) o Parties strive to use the most recent methods, guidance and metrics produced by the IPCC and adopted by the CMA. o Parties should use the same methodologies and metrics throughout the time frame of their NDC. o Additional guidance for Parties with mitigation targets that are based on strategies, plans and actions for low GHG emission development Parties strive to include all categories of anthropogenic emissions or removals in their nationally determined contributions and, once a source, sink or activity is included, continue to include it (decision 1/CP.21, paragraphs c and d). 9