Document Title: Site Recruitment and Initiation for Papworth Sponsored Studies

Similar documents
R&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development. NHS Staff Trust-Wide THIS IS A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT

Document Title: Handling of drug alerts and recalls of IMPs

R&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development

Document Title: Annual Progress Reports (APRs) Document Number: 056

Standard Operating Procedure. Vendor Management

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. 17. Study Close Down

RESEARCH AUDIT Standard Operating Procedure

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office

Study Files and Filing

Site Initiation and Activation

Louise Brook Clinical Trials Quality Monitor. Date

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE TRAINING POLICY FOR PERSONNEL UNDERTAKING RESEARCH. UHB015 Version No: 2 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No:

RD SOP32 Gaining MHRA Approval

Computer System Validation & Backup

Research Study Close-down and Archiving Procedures

ESSENTIAL DOCUMENTS DURING THE CLINICAL CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Writing a Protocol for CTIMPs

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the Development, Management & Control of Research-Related SOPs

Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) Management Standard Operating Procedure

Sponsorship of Clinical Research Studies

Ethical Approval. Document Number: 012

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

R&D Manager Hillingdon Hospital. Revision History Effective Date Reason For Change. recommendations Version no:

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Index of Standard Operating Procedures for all research Sponsored by the UHL

Trial Committees SOP Number: 47 Version Number: 2.0 Effective Date: 01/02/2017 Review Date: 01/02/2019

Once notified of the end of trial, a Research Manager, on behalf of the Sponsor, will contact the CI to arrange a close down monitoring visit.

Investigator Site File Index (Medical Devices)

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. STH Researcher. Investigator Site File

STUDY DOCUMENTS. DOCUMENT NO.: CR007 v4.0. Marise Buçukoğlu ISSUE DATE: 07 MAR 2017 EFFECTIVE DATE: 21 MAR INTRODUCTION

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 23 July 2015 Review date: 23 July 2017

ESSENTIAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONDUCT OF A CLINICAL TRIAL

Conducting Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office

Trial Master File. SOP No. SOP 7

End of Study Notification, Close-Out and Reporting Sponsored Research. Noclor/Spon/S11/01. SOP Reference ID:

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 410. Set up and Initiation of an Investigator Site

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 21 December 2017 Review date: 21 December 2019

Standard Operating Procedure. GCP Auditing of Research Studies

Position Description Clinical Research Associate

IMP Management and Accountability

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Standard Operating Procedure

Index of Standard Operating Procedures for all research Sponsored by the UHL

Trial oversight SOP for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. 14. Amendments to Research Studies

Investigator Site File Index (CTIMP)

Job Summary. Job Title: Clinical Trial Coordinator. Grade: 6. Job reference: MBP Department: Cardiovascular Sciences

Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/003 Page 1 of 9 Version 2.0

Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving

Date: 21 st May 2014 Version: 5 Page 1 of 11. Principal Author Name D. Skelhorn Signature: D. Skelhorn Date: 22 nd May 2014

Marie-Claire Good, RG and GCP Manager James Rickard, Deputy Chief Pharmacist Technical Services Cheryl Lawrence, Senior Research Pharmacist

SPONSOR INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCT (IMP) MANAGEMENT

Confirming Research Study Capacity and Capability

RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES FRAMEWORK. Streamlining the management and governance of R&D studies in the NHS

Management and Accountability of Investigational Medicinal Products in the King s Clinical Research Facility

Standard Operating Procedure

Trial Master File / Investigator Site File Index Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Standard Operating Procedure. GCP Auditing of Research Studies. SOP effective: 23rd January 2018 Review date: 23rd January 2020

RDSOP16 Writing a GCP Compliant Protocol for Non-CTIMPs. Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

Management and Accountability of Investigational Medicinal Products in the King s Clinical Research Facility

Controlled Document Number: Version Number: 7 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

Policy Checklist. March Date for further review March Name of Policy: Purpose of Policy:

This policy supersedes the following which much now be destroyed:

Phase 1 studies and The Over- Volunteering Prevention System (TOPS)

OFFICE FOR RESEACH PROCEDURE. Site Initiation and Close-out

UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, UNIVERSITY OF LOUGHBOROUGH & UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST JOINT RESEARCH SUPPORT OFFICE

Details: Approval: Distribution & Storage:

Quality Assurance QA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR FDA or Pharmaceutical Sponsored Audits

Author Signature: Date: 10 October 2017 The author is signing to confirm the technical content of this document

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 725 CAPACITY, CAPABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF TRIALS HOSTED BY NNUH

Date: 23 rd December 2014 Version 5 Page 1 of 8 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR TRIAL INITIATION AND SITE SET UP (NWORTH 3.03)

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 320. Developing a Research Protocol

Preparation of Research SOPs

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 310

Title: Audit and Inspection of the IEC. SOP Code: SOP/24/V1.0. Effective date: 03/05/2013

Audit and Regulatory Inspection Nopanan Yaibuathes Clinical Research and Compliance Manager Roche Thailand Ltd.

Sally Burtles, Director of Research Services & Business Development

Standard Operating Procedure: Obtaining Informed Consent from Competent Adults for Research Studies. SOP Number: SOP-QA-9 Version No: 1

DOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE. Health and Safety Policy Statement

Regulatory Documentation and Submissions for C2012 Clinical Trials DCP SOP #1

Trust Policy Unpaid Leave Policy & Procedure for Medical & Dental Staff

Hospital Authority (HA) Guide on Research Ethics (for Study Site & Research Ethics Committee)

Standard Operating Procedure: Obtaining Informed Consent from Competent Adults for Research Studies. SOP Number: UoA-NHSG-SOP-010 Version No: 2

NHS Tayside Effective Date: 24/7/2009

POLICY MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Inspections: an academic perspective

Research Study Amendments

STUDY CLOSURE AND ARCHIVING

Version Number: 004. On: June 2018 Review Date: June 2021 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 10

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 19 February 2016 Review date: 19 February 2018

Trust Policy Policy for the Award of Honorary Contracts for Retired Senior Medical and Dental Staff

GCP INSPECTION FINDINGS Singapore Research Ethics Conference 2018

RD SOP27 Implementing a Drug Recall for IMP/NIMP

Risk Assessment Procedure

Development and Management of Procedural Documents Policy

Transcription:

Document Title: Site Recruitment and Initiation for Papworth Sponsored Studies Document Number: SOP015 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by: RM&G Manager, R&D Administration Manager, Research Officers R&D Administration Manager Research and Development Research and Development NHS Staff Trust-Wide Review due: August 2016 THIS IS A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT Whilst this document may be printed, the electronic version maintained on the Trust s Intranet is the controlled copy. Any printed copies of this document are not controlled. Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Not to be reproduced without written permission. Key Points of this Document a. This document sets out the procedures to be followed by all Papworth Staff who are involved in the recruitment and initiation of investigator sites (from now on referred to as sites ) for Papworth sponsored research studies. b. It aims to provide clear guidance on the steps involved in the selection of sites, the assessment and initiation of a site, and who is responsible for obtaining the local approvals necessary for a study to commence, to ensure compliance with the Trust s policies. Version 3.0 Review Date: August 2016 Page 1 of 7

1 Purpose and Contents a. This document defines the Trust s procedures for the recruitment and initiation of sites for participation in Papworth Studies. This includes the selection of sites, approach, assessment and set-up. b. The document clarifies who is responsible for the selection and recruitment of sites and obtaining local approvals. c. The document aims to provide clear guidance on performing the site initiation procedure. d. The subsequent assessment and monitoring of research study data is outside the scope of this SOP and is described in SOP 016: Monitoring Papworth Sponsored Studies. 2 Roles & Responsibilities e. This Policy applies to all personnel that are conducting research at the Trust including: staff that are full or part-time employees of the Trust, those working at the Trust with employment contracts funded partially or wholly by third parties including those within CUHP AHSC and those seconded to and providing consultancy to the Trust, and to students undertaking training at the Trust. f. Staff involved in the preparation, review and dissemination of SOPs must comply with the requirements set out in section 4. g. Senior Managers within R&D are responsible for identifying the need for a new SOP and arranging its production, review, ratification and implementation. The task of preparing the SOP may be delegated to R&D personnel who are deemed to have the appropriate knowledge and experience. h. Senior Managers within R&D are responsible for identifying and arranging provision of any training that the introduction of a new SOP will require for staff to be able to perform their role in compliance with the SOP. i. It is the responsibility of the department s personnel to ensure that they are familiar with and adhere to all current SOPs, and have signed the relevant log in their training record. 3 Policy a. This SOP is mandatory and, as per the Trust s Information Governance and Records Management framework, non-compliance with may result in disciplinary procedures. Version 3.0 Review Date: August 2016 Page 2 of 7

4 Procedure The following three steps must be performed: Site Recruitment - this is the process of selecting appropriate sites (ie NHS Trusts) to participate in the study. Site Approval - the process of obtaining the necessary approvals (regulatory, ethical, NHS R&D) for sites to participate in the study. Site Initiation - this process ensures that all required trial documentation is in place and that the protocol and trial procedures are reviewed with the investigator and the investigator s trial staff in accordance with the protocol, SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s). Site approval and site initiation can be done in any order or consecutively. 4.1 Site Recruitment a. The Chief Investigator (CI) is responsible for selecting appropriate Principal Investigators (PI) and sites for a particular study although this task may be delegated to a member of the study team. b. Each PI must demonstrate by education, training and experience that they are suitable to lead the study at their site and they must have adequate resources to properly conduct the study. This must be evidenced in the form of a current curriculum vitae (CV) or other documentation and stored in the trial master file (TMF). Training must include current GCP training. c. Once selected the potential PIs will be approached by the CI or member of the study team, to assess interest and willingness to participate in the study. d. Once participation has been agreed in principle potential PIs and institutions are evaluated by the CI and study team to confirm their suitability. A pre-study visit may be necessary. The following must be assessed: qualifications and training requirements of the site staff potential to recruit suitable patients adequate facilities / equipment / resources to conduct the study e. The site selection process and rationale for selection of a particular site must be documented and stored in the TMF. Version 3.0 Review Date: August 2016 Page 3 of 7

4.2 Site Approval f. Following confirmation of suitability as a site, the sponsor will provide the site with all the necessary documents and information to allow the site to: submit the SSA form obtain local R&D approval g. All sites need to be listed on the CTA (if appropriate) and Ethics application forms. Addition of a site following submission of these forms is a substantial amendment (see SOP037 Amendments to Research Documents of Papworth Sponsored Studies post Trust Approval) h. Sites will be requested to provide copies of the following documents: Delegation log a template delegation log will be provided by the sponsor for completion by the site. The individuals that need to be on the delegation log will vary from study to study but must include at least the PI. CVs for all individuals on the delegation log. Each CV must be current and signed/dated by the individual within the past 2 years. Evidence of GCP training for all individuals on the delegation log. Evidence can be a copy of the GCP training certificate or an entry in the CV. GCP training must have been completed within the past 2 years. If training was over 2 years ago the individual needs to undertake appropriate GCP training asap. Laboratory normal ranges and accreditation certificates- for haematology and biochemistry laboratories (if appropriate to study). R&D approval letter 4.3 Site Initiation i. The CI is responsible for site initiation and this may be delegated to a member of the research study team. j. Site initiation must be completed prior to the site opening to recruitment (before any trial related procedures are carried out). Initiation can be done in parallel with section 4.2. k. For CTIMP and non-ce marked devices the initiation visit will be on-site. For other studies it can be performed remotely via tele-conference or e-mail although it may be necessary to visit the study site to complete the initiation process. l. Each study activity covered in the initiation must be discussed with at least one member of the study team who has been delegated responsibility for the activity. Version 3.0 Review Date: August 2016 Page 4 of 7

m. The PI must attend the relevant parts of the initiation and subsequently sign the front page of the study protocol. A copy of the signed protocol must be provided to the sponsor. n. The following procedure should be followed for the initiation: Provide each site with an Investigator File. Ensure that investigators and other study team members are familiar with study requirements, adverse event reporting procedures, the relevant regulations, their roles and responsibilities Provide the site with the necessary documents, equipment and training to perform the required study related activities (ie CRF completion training) Milestones should be agreed Procedures regarding monitoring and auditing should be agreed o. Site initiation visits must be documented and any issues raised addressed promptly (see Guidance Document GD002 Example Initiation Report Form). Documentation must include a site initiation check list to record the topics covered in the initiation process. Initiation reports will be reviewed by the trial manager and signed by the CI. A copy of the report will be provided to the site and a copy filed in the TMF. 4.4 Opening Sites to recruitment p. The approvals must be in place, the initiation performed and the appropriate Regulatory Green Light (RGL) checklist (FRM023 RGL Checklist for Papworth Sponsored Studies) form completed (forms available from R&D) prior to a site being open to recruitment. A copy of the RGL checklist form will be filed in the TMF. 5 Risk Management / Liability / Monitoring & Audit a. The R&D SOP Committee will ensure that this SOP and any future changes to this document are adequately disseminated. b. The R&D Department will monitor adherence to this SOP via the routine audit and monitoring of individual clinical trials and the Trust s auditors will monitor this SOP as part of their audit of Research Governance. From time to time, the SOP may also be inspected by external regulatory agencies (e.g. Care Quality Commission, Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency). c. In exceptional circumstances it might be necessary to deviate from this SOP for which written approval of the Senior R&D Manager should be gained before any action is taken. SOP deviations should be recorded including details of alternative procedures followed and filed in the Investigator and Sponsor Master File. Version 3.0 Review Date: August 2016 Page 5 of 7

d. The Research and Development Directorate is responsible for the ratification of this procedure. Version 3.0 Review Date: August 2016 Page 6 of 7

Further Document Information Approved by: Managment/Clinical Directorate Group Approval date: (this version) Ratified by Board of Directors/ Committee of the Board of Directors: Date: This document supports: Standards and legislation Key related documents: Research and Development Directorate 8 th November 2013 STET N/A Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 and all associated amendments. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2005) Trust Research Policy Research and Development Documents: SOP016: Monitoring of Papworth Sponsored Studies SOP037: Amendments to Research Documents of Papworth Sponsored Studies post Trust Approval Equality Impact Assessment: Does this document impact on any of the following groups? If YES, state positive or negative, complete Equality Impact Assessment Form available in Disability Equality Scheme document DN192 and attach. Groups Disability Race Gender Age Sexual orientation Religious & belief Yes/No NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Positive/Negative Review date: August 2016 Other Version Control Version Date effective Valid to Approved by Date of approval 1.0 July 2011 RDD 2.0 10th Feb 2012 February 2014 RDD 10th Feb 2012 3.0 20 th Dec 2012 August 2016 RDD 8 th Nov 2013 4.0 Version 3.0 Review Date: August 2016 Page 7 of 7