REPLACEMENT OF POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON WITH OZONE AND BIOLOGICAL FILTRATION FOR TASTE, ODOUR AND CYANOTOXIN REMOVAL. Dr Craig Jakubowski

Similar documents
Optimizing Conventional Treatment for the Removal of Cyanobacteria and Toxins [Project #4315]

Ozone for the Removal of Harmful Algal Bloom Toxins and Geosmin & MIB

WEFTEC.06. Lake Okeechobee, Actiflo, peroxone, surface water, Cyanobacteria

Cyanotoxin Evaluation and Treatment in the New York State Finger Lakes Region Pennsylvania AWWA Annual Conference

BARRABA WATER SUPPLY. Construction of Split Rock Dam Pipeline and Ancillary Works

SECURING THE SHIRES WATER SUPPLY. Barry Jones. Eurobodalla Shire Council

Removing Algal Toxins from the Toledo Tap

Oxelia OXIDATION-ENHANCED BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE FILTRATION

Granular Activated Carbon System

Class Environmental Assessment for Burloak Water Purification Plant Phase 2 Expansion Public Information Centre No.1

Optimization of High Rate DAF Process for Removal of Algae in Water Treatment Plant

Submerged Membranes to Replace Media Filters to Increase Capacity 4X for a Small Community. Richard Stratton, PE HDR Engineering, Inc.

A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation (CPE) Approach to Addressing HABs

biologically active filtration

J.K. ENGINEERING LTD. CONSULTING * RESEARCH * DEVELOPMENT

EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBONS (PAC) FOR TASTE AND ODOUR REDUCTION. Peta Thiel

SWAN HILL WTP POOLIFIER

Optimisation of granular media filtration: impact of chemical conditioning Con Pelekani & Loreline Kerlidou SA Water & Allwater

WATER TECH 2009 BANFF, ALBERTA, CANADA

REAL WORLD APPLICATIONS OF USING DYNAMIC SIMULATION SOFTWARE TO OPTIMIZE WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS OPERATIONS

New England Water Treatment Technology Assistance Center

THE USE OF UV/PEROXIDE FOR TREATING ALGAL DERIVED CONTAMINANTS IN DRINKING WATER. Terry Keep AWWA NYS Tifft Water Supply Symposium September 21, 2017

CHLORAMINE REPLACEMENT ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION

Trident. Package Water Treatment System

CHALLENGES OF RUNNING HAMILTON ISLAND WATER TREATMENT. David Dickson. Hamilton Island Engineering Services

Health Based Targets Application of Log Reduction Values. Phillip Fasham Manager Water Quality Regulations and Verification

COWRA S WATER TREATMENT PLANT - A CHANGE IN PROCESS CONTROL PHILOSOPHY. Ken Keliher. Cowra Council

IMPACT OF WATER QUALITY AND TREATMENT ON DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT FORMATION. David Cook. Australian Water Quality Centre

Comparing the Leopold Clari-DAF System to Upflow Contact Clarification

UCMR4 Cyanotoxins. What Will You Do If You Find Them? Keith W. Cartnick AWWA PA Annual Conference 2019

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES AT THE KOORLONG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. Derek de Waal Kevin Murphy

Construction of Rapid Sand Filters i) Media

Columbus Taste and Odor Event

Drift Water Treatment Works is the most westerly water treatment works in mainland England, situated just

Ready, Set, and Go: Deer Valley WTP East Basins Performance Testing, Start-Up, and Commissioning Toby Teegerstrom Brian Watson

POTABLE WATER COAGULANT TRIALS UTILIZING POLYALUMINIUM CHLORHYDRATE. Michael Dalton. Toowoomba City Council

Water distribution systems throughout

OPTIMISATION OF IMAGE FLAT WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Tony Humphries. Tony Humphries, Operator, SEQ Water

OPTIMISING FILTRATION AT DUNGOG WTP. David Turner. Hunter Water Australia

Trials and Tribulations of Building a Pilot Plant:

Treatment of all source water influent & effluent for user application, be it commercial, industrial, domestic, to defined & required standards.

Written submission from Scottish Water

Amherst, MA, Drinking Water System

City of Enderby Water Treatment Plant

WRF Webcast Biofilter Conversion Guidance Manual

Cary/Apex Water Treatment Facility- Ozone Biofiltration Pilot Study

DAFF AIR DISPERSION REVAMP. Wes Wilkie. Goulburn Valley Water

DW Module 23: Organic Removal Answer Key

Does ultrasound work for bluegreen algae control at lower cell counts (1000 cells/ml)? This would be for MIB/G control.

Drinking Water Audit Report

Side by Side Piloting of Process Alternatives Yields Direct Performance Comparison

Evaluation of Powdered Activated Carbon Feed System For Taste and Odor Removal at City of Camden WTP. Jane Gan

DBP Treatment Strategies. Learning Objectives. DBP Control Options Optimize existing facilities

THE BOSSIER CITY WATER TREATMENT PLANT (Background and Current Process Layout )

OVERCOMING CHLORAMINATION OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS AT WILLOW GROVE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Brendan Holt. Gippsland Water Authority

Treating Cyanotoxins with Granular Activated Carbon

Drinking Water Audit Report

SECTION 6.0 DESIGN CRITERIA, LAYOUTS, & HYDRAULICS

Dipti Shah, Town of Gilbert Tuesday, January 25, 2011

THIS POLICY DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAW

Managing an Emergency Situation at Rochester Water Treatment Plant. Greg Wood, Regional Operations Manager NSW/VIC/TAS

Innovative Improvements to a 53-Year Old Water Plant for HABs, Crypto, and Whatever Else the Maumee River Brings

Government Center Water Treatment Plant Kamphaeng Phet Province, Thailand

OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE : OPTIMISATION OF A NEW PACKAGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Melina Entwistle. North East Water Authority

techcommentary Issues for Ozone for Drinking Water Treatment Introduction Ozone in Drinking Water Treatment

Blue-Green Algae Information for drinking water system owners and operators

A Study of Water Treatment at the Bhandup Water Treatment Plant, Mumbai.

Monitoring, Predicting, Preventing and Controlling of (toxic) Cyanobacteria Blooms

Isabelle Papineau, Ph.D., École Polytechnique de Montréal Yves Dionne (V de G) and Benoit Barbeau (EPM)

WHEN ALL THE DUCKS LINE UP: CASE STUDIES ON HITS AND VERY NEAR MISSES. Leanne Wells. Department of Health

Meeting Manganese Removal Goals: A Pilot Study

HSGAC: A Site Specific Granular Activated Carbon Model Design Tool

Greater Kegalle Water Treatment Plant Kegalle, Sri Lanka

Agenda. Pretreatment Background Typical Contaminants Practical Examples Methods of Treatment and References

Village of Skaneateles Cyanotoxin Treatment Evaluation. Edwin C. Tifft Jr. Water Supply Symposium Erica Goldin September 20, 2018

Advancing the Design of a New 60 MGD Water Treatment Plant

Iron/Manganese Package Plant Pre-Engineered Ground Water Treatment. Village of Bolivar, NY

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

There is no sludge treatment process at NWTP. Sludge generated from sedimentation and backwashing is drained directly to the Khan River.

Comparing Carbons for Disinfection Byproduct Control. Maggie H. Pierce, EI Sara N. Gibson, PE Mark M. Bishop, PE David S.

OPTIMISING PAC DOSING TO REMOVE MIB AND GEOSMIN IN FOUR ADELAIDE METROPOLITAN WATER TREATMENT PLANTS. David Cook

Taste and Odor Mitigation Strategies Laboratory-Based Analysis

TRIHALOMETHANE FORMATION IN PUBLIC DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES

Elsham Water Treatment Works (WTW) is located approximately 10km east of Scunthorpe in North Lincolnshire

Issues. Issues (cont.) A multiple barriers approach is required to provide potable water

Lignite versus. bituminous GAC for biofiltration a case study

Ohio EPA HAB Update. OTCO Workshop March 7, Heather Raymond Ohio EPA HAB Coordinator

Nakhon Sawan Water Treatment Plant Nakhon Sawan, Thailand

Renovation of the Filters at the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant in Fort Collins, Colorado

Operational Plan. Municipality of Trent Hills

Seasonal Source Water Quality and Treatment Challenges Town of Newburgh s Chadwick Lake Filtration Plant

Expanding Capacity and Treatment. Treatment Plant

USING PARTICLE COUNTERS TO OPTIMISE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS. Michelle Colwell. Michelle Colwell, Water Treatment Technologist.

Integrating Ozone and Ion Exchange into a 40 Year Old Lime Softening Plant

THE SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF DESIGNING OZONE WITH A BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE FILTER

Hannibal Chloramine Replacement Evaluation

Disinfection and Disinfection Byproducts (DBP)

CEE 371 Water and Wastewater Systems

Natural organic matter in drinking water Ontario Water Works Association Water Treatment Seminar March 20, 2018

Optimizing Filter Conditions for Improved Manganese Control During Conversion To Biofiltration [Project #4448]

Transcription:

REPLACEMENT OF POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON WITH OZONE AND BIOLOGICAL FILTRATION FOR TASTE, ODOUR AND CYANOTOXIN REMOVAL Paper Presented by: Dr Craig Jakubowski Authors: Dr Craig Jakubowski, Principal Engineer, Paul Thompson, Manager Process Engineering, Hunter Water Australia Mike Brooks, Senior Engineer Utilities, Armidale Dumaresq Council 74 th Annual Water Industry Engineers and Operators Conference Bendigo Exhibition Centre 6 to 8 September, 2011 74 th Annual Victorian Water Industry Engineers & Operators Conference Page No. 131

REPLACEMENT OF POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON WITH OZONE AND BIOLOGICAL FILTRATION FOR TASTE, ODOUR AND CYANOTOXIN REMOVAL Dr Craig Jakubowski, Principal Engineer, Hunter Water Australia Paul Thompson, Manager Process Engineering, Hunter Water Australia Mike Brooks, Senior Engineer Utilities, Armidale Dumaresq Council ABSTRACT Malpas Dam is the source of water for the town of Armidale in the New England area of New South Wales, a community of 25,000 people. Since its commissioning, Malpas Dam has had a history of cyanobacterial (blue-green algae) events, with generally at least one bloom occurring per year. During the algal blooms, contamination of the raw water source with taste and odour compounds is common, and on occasions cyanotoxins have been detected. In the 1980s liver damage in the community was linked to a bloom of Microcystis. A robust barrier is therefore required to deliver safe and aesthetically pleasing drinking water to the Armidale community. The 40 ML/d conventional treatment process at Armidale WTP (coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration and chlorination) was not capable of removing the organic contaminants to target levels. A powdered activated carbon (PAC) facility was installed and provided a barrier for the micropollutants however this approach was expensive, time consuming for operational staff and presented a number of health and safety issues. The PAC system was unreliable and customer complaints were still forthcoming. This paper details the process of selecting, designing, building and operating an ozone and biological filtration process which has replaced the PAC dosing system and provided numerous water quality and operational benefits. KEY WORDS Ozone, Taste and Odour, Cyanotoxin, Intermediate Ozonation. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Armidale Water Treatment Plant (WTP) has a treated water production capacity of 40 ML/d and comprises coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, monosand open gravity filtration, fluoridation and chlorination. Raw water is sourced from Malpas Dam. Characteristics of the raw water are provided in Table 1. Cyanobacterial events in Malpas Dam are common, with generally at least one bloom occurring per year. Generally the events occur between November and March, however high levels of cyanobacteria have been recorded as early as August and persisted at times until July. During the algal blooms, contamination of the raw water source with taste and odour compounds is common, and at times algal toxins have been detected. Recently the predominant genus is Anabaena circinalis, which is capable of releasing the neurotoxin Saxitoxin. Algal counts in the order of 1.75 x 10 6 cells/ml of Microcystis aeruginosa and 4 x 10 6 cells/ml of Anabaena circinalis have been recorded. High levels of Microcystis aeruginosa in Malpas Dam in the 1980s were linked to liver damage in the Armidale community [1]. The primary taste and odour compound of concern from Malpas Dam has been geosmin, with levels as high as 1000 ng/l measured. 74 th Annual Victorian Water Industry Engineers & Operators Conference Page No. 132

These levels are extremely high considering that the odour threshold for geosmin is 4 ng/l. A robust barrier is required to deliver safe and aesthetically pleasing drinking water to the Armidale community. Table 1: Armidale WTP raw water quality characteristics. Parameter Units Average Minimum Maximum Turbidity NTU 1.3 0.2 12.5 True Colour Hazen Units 15.2 1 96 ph 7.8 7.2 8.7 Temperature O C 16.1 7 25 Alkalinity mg/l as CaCO 3 123.8 90 140 TOC mg/l 6.33 4.3 15.9 DOC mg/l 3.6 2.9 10.6 The conventional treatment process at Armidale WTP was not capable of removing the organic contaminants to target levels. A powdered activated carbon (PAC) facility was installed and provided a barrier for the micropollutants, however this approach was expensive, time consuming for operational staff, presented a number of health and safety issues and was unreliable. Historically, PAC has been dosed at Armidale WTP for periods of 4 to 6 months per year with doses ranging between 5 mg/l and 60 mg/l. The poor reliability of the PAC system meant customer complaints of unpalatable, foul smelling water were still reported on occasions. Operators worked on a rotating shift basis to maintain plant operations, which was most challenging during algal bloom events. Armidale Dumaresq Council (ADC) thus desired a continuous and reliable solution that also reduced the demands on operator resources. 2.0 INVESTIGATIONS In September 1998, ADC engaged Hunter Water Australia (HWA) to investigate the suitability of an ozone and biological activated carbon (ozone/bac) process to produce safe, palatable, odour-free drinking water for Armidale consumers. A technology review was first undertaken to identify suitable alternatives for the removal of taste and odours and cyanotoxins. A desktop feasibility study was then undertaken to determine how ozone could be applied and integrated at Armidale WTP and operational and cost implications. Intermediate and tertiary ozonation were considered potential options at this point. Pilot testing was undertaken from December 1998 to April 2000. The complete pilot programme and results are too extensive to be completely detailed in this paper. The key findings were that ozone/bac achieved excellent removal of MIB and geosmin levels up to the maximum tested of 2700 ng/l. Saxitoxin concentrations of 60 µg/l were removed with an ozone Ct of 4 mg.min/l, with biological filtration alone removing levels of 15 µg/l. Significant reductions in chlorine demand and trihalomethane (THM) formation potentials were also recorded. Bromate formation did not exceed the Australian Drinking Water Guideline limit of 0.020 mg/l. Intermediate ozonation was selected as the most appropriate technique for application of ozone, as it minimised the amount of additional infrastructure as it makes use of the current filter structures, providing a significant cost advantage. The is also limited available space at Armidale WTP and therefore installation of supplementary filters for biological filtration in addition to ozone generation and contacting would be a major challenge and require significantly more site works. 74 th Annual Victorian Water Industry Engineers & Operators Conference Page No. 133

While Armidale WTP has a hydraulic capacity of 40ML/day, the peak raw water usage in the 5 years prior to 2005 was only 21.9 ML/d; the 95-percentile flow was only 14.9 ML/d. This provided ADC a unique opportunity to use the existing plant filters to provide 10 minutes empty bed contact time (EBCT) at peak flows, while for most of the time greater than 15 minutes would be provided without the need for additional filter structures. ADC selected a maximum ozonation design flow of 22.5 ML/d for immediate production requirements. The system was designed however to be enable treatment of up to 29 ML/d if required in the future through addition of a third ozone generation train and modification to the existing filter structures to provide additional depth and hence EBCT. All piping and contacting infrastructure were designed and built for the ultimate 29 ML/d capacity. 3.0 UPGRADE PROCESS The conversion of the sand filters to GAC/BAC was undertaken first. Installation of the new media commenced in January 2007, following detailed assessment of the filter structures, underdrains and nozzles to identify any potential rectification works. No issues were identified in these areas. All filters were converted to GAC by April 2007. GAC of the same size as the original sand media was used in the upgrade and garnet replaced gravel layers. The strong organic adsorption capability of the fresh GAC had immediate benefits on treated water quality. Once all filters were converted to GAC around a 1 to 2 mg/l reduction in chlorine dosing requirements was observed. This adsorption capacity diminished over time as the adsorption sites were exhausted, however removal capability was maintained by colonisation of the media by bacteria and subsequent biodegradation of organics. During 2006, earlier conceptual designs for the ozone system were developed further to refine the design and finalise key process and design criteria. This included factors such as feed gas type, ozone injection techniques, ozone contactor configuration, hydraulics, power systems and control. Figure 1 is a schematic of the configuration selected for the upgrade. Table 2 presents the key design and operating criteria for the ozonation system. Figure 1: Upgraded Armidale WTP process schematic. Table 2: Ozonation system design and operating requirements. 74 th Annual Victorian Water Industry Engineers & Operators Conference Page No. 134

Requirement Units Criteria Maximum settled water flow ML/d 22.5 Ozone dose Maximum mg/l 6 Typical mg/l 2.5 Ozone generator feed gas - dry air Generated ozone concentration g.nm 3 30-40 Minimum ozone generation capacity kg/hour 5.6 No. of installed ozone generators - 2 Maximum cooling water temperature O C 30 Contactor hydraulic residence time at maximum water flow minutes 10 Minimum contactor water depth m 4 Number of contacting compartments - 4 Ozone contactor outlet stilling well residence time minutes 5 One of the key challenges was integrating the plant additions to the site, which neighbours closely residential dwellings. Aesthetic amenity and noise were critical considerations. In order to reduce the visual impact and not to block afternoon winter sun to neighbouring properties, the contactor position, geometry and height required careful consideration. To reduce the height of the structure a number of features were incorporated: Static mixing was selected over bubble diffusion for ozone injection as the water depth in the contactor is less critical. The contactor was constructed at lower than the natural surface level. A pump station was designed to return ozonated water to the filters. Stainless pumps were required for this due to the corrosivity of the ozonated water. A key objective of the design was to deliver an ozonation facility that met Council s expectations regarding access to equipment for operators and maintenance teams. Undertaking the design development process and incorporating these requirements gave tenderers a clear understanding of Council s vision and expectations. In June 2007, three contractors were selected through an Expression of Interest process to tender for the design and construction of the ozonation plant. Bricon Pty Ltd was awarded the tender in November 2007 for a tender value of $3.45M. Preliminary design drawings were issued in January 2008 with construction commencing in April 2008. The commissioning process was completed in February 2009. 4.0 OZONE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Ozone is generated from air. Comparisons between oxygen and air sources indicated that for this scale plant an air fed system was more economical. The ozone system installed features two ozone generation trains. Each train consists of a rotary screw air compressor, desiccant dryer, aftercooler, air receiver and ITT Wedeco SMA600S ozone generator. Each ozone generator has a capacity of 2.8 kgo 3 /hour at 40 go 3 /m 3 at a maximum gas flow of 70 Nm 3 /hr, and alone can apply an ozone dose of 3.0 mg/l at 22.5 ML/d. Space has provided for addition of both a third air preparation and ozone system in the future if treated water demand increases. Two Statiflo GDS (Gas Dispersion System) injection skids (duty/standby) featuring motive water pump and side stream static mixers were provided to mix ozone gas with the settled water feed. A sidestream of settled water is taken off the settled water main and is 74 th Annual Victorian Water Industry Engineers & Operators Conference Page No. 135

pumped through the sidestream static mixers and then re-injected into the main immediately upstream of a Statiflo DN600 inline static mixer prior to the entry to the ozone contactor. Ozonated water enters an inlet chamber in the ozone contactor and then passes through three over-under contacting compartments providing a combined 10 minute hydraulic detention time at a flow of 29 ML/d. Water flows over the last compartment outlet weir into a stilling chamber and is then pumped to the BAC filters. Ozone off-gas is treated by an ITT Wedeco COD200 ozone destructor installed in the ozone generation room. 5.0 RESULTS The commissioning of the intermediate ozone system and biological filtration at Armidale WTP has enabled the mothballing of the PAC plant. The onerous and time consuming tasks associated with operating and maintaining the PAC dosing system and addressing breakdowns and failures are significantly reduced such that plant operators have moved to a 35-hour day-work week. The combination of ozone and BAC has mitigated numerous taste and odour events since commissioning. Cyanotoxins have not been detected in Malpas Dam since installation of the ozonation plant and therefore it has yet to be challenged in this regard. In early February 2011, a significant bloom of Anabaena circinalis was detected, peaking at 660,000 cells/ml equating to a cyanobacterial biovolume of 165 mm 3 /L. Operational staff observed that the algae had died on the 5 th February and rainfall on 6 th February had washed the dead bloom over the dam spillway. Raw water quality entering the plant was very poor, with dissolved oxygen around 1 mg/l, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) 10.6 mg/l and a combined geosmin and MIB concentration of 299 ng/l, most of which was intracellular. The combined settled water geosmin and MIB concentration was 41 ng/l, well above the human detection threshold. Table shows the quality of the raw, settled, ozonated and filtered water on the 9 th February. It can be seen from Table that ozonation was removing around 83% of the settled water geosmin and MIB, with the biological filters providing approximately another 10% reduction. DOC removal by the ozonation and biological filtration process was 33% with ozone contributing 14% and biological filtration contributing 19%. Table 3: Armidale WTP water quality 9 th Feb 2011 during Anabaena circinalis event Parameter Units Raw Settled Ozonated Filtered Turbidity NTU 4.9 1.2 0.7 0.3 True Colour Hazen Units 40 15 <5 <5 ph 7.7 7.0 7.1 7.1 TOC mg/l 13.2 5.9 5.1 4.2 DOC mg/l 10.6 5.8 5.0 3.9 UVT % 49.8 72.3 87.2 92.3 Geosmin ng/l 282 27 4.7 2.8 MIB ng/l 17 14 2.3 <1 The ozone generators were operating at maximum capacity to apply an ozone dose of 7.8 mg/l to a flow of 190 L/s. The generators were operating in residual control mode, trying to achieve a 0.1 mg/l residual in the contactor outlet, however this could not be achieved due to the level of DOC. With the potential for cyanotoxin contamination and variation in ozone demand 74 th Annual Victorian Water Industry Engineers & Operators Conference Page No. 136

Council considered this the safest mode of operation at these times. There are opportunities to reduce the ozone demand through reduction of DOC prior to ozonation. Work is to be undertaken to examine whether enhanced coagulation (low ph coagulation) can be employed for this purpose. Since commissioning the ozone/bac process has resulted in a reduction in organic carbon in filtered water, and a subsequent reduction in chlorine dose for final disinfection along with a more persistent residual throughout the distribution system. 6.0 CONCLUSION The retrofit of the ozone/bac process to Armidale WTP has provided a continuously operating barrier to taste and odours and cyanotoxins. The new system has significantly reduced operating labour requirements for maintaining a taste and odour and cyanotoxin barrier, so much so that the plant is only attended during daylight hours and operators have moved to a 35-hour week from a rotating around-the-clock shift basis. Improved chlorine residual stability has also been achieved throughout the distribution system. The overall approach taken for the project ultimately resulted in a value for money solution that addressed the water quality challenges and site specific constraints. A significant contributor to the outcome was the piloting process, which enabled key design and performance criteria to be incorporated and considered in the design development process. Undertaking of the design development prior to tendering removed the water quality objectives risk from the contractor, as ozone doses and contact times were predefined. The design development also allowed Armidale Dumaresq Council to effectively manage the associated onsite risks and aesthetic aspects of the plant by pre-selection of the ozone feed-gas and the ozone injection technique and configuration of the ozone contactor. The delivery of a highly functional and operator friendly system, integrated on a challenging site, for a tender price of $3.5M represents significant value for a plant of this capacity. 7.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution to the project from Armidale Dumaresq Council s David Steller, Colin Maciver, Michael Porter and Luke Finnegan along with water treatment plant operators, led by Chris Keogh. The authors would also like to acknowledge the contribution of Andrew Boeren and Brad Nixon from Bricon Pty Ltd. Finally, we wish to acknowledge the contribution of the following project team members from Hunter Water Australia: Peter Dennis, Marnie Coates, Jeremy Smith, Jason Sandford, Owen Driscoll, Kevin Burgess and Darryl Beveridge. 8.0 REFERENCES Falconer I.R., Beresford A.M. and Runnegar M.T.C., 1983, Evidence of liver damage by toxin from a bloom of the blue-green alga, Microcystis aeruginosa. Medical Journal of Australia, 1: 511-514. 74 th Annual Victorian Water Industry Engineers & Operators Conference Page No. 137