Manure Application Setback Comparisons in the EPA Region 7: The National Setbacks Database

Similar documents
Missouri Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Nutrient Management Technical Standard

LAND APPLICATION METHODS - SETBACKS

Reviewing Manure Management Plans - FAQ

Manure Management Manual Revisions

How does the MN P index relate to MPCA policies?

VIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT (VPA) PERMIT APPLICATION. FORM B - ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (AFOs)

Wisconsin s Improving Nutrient Management WI Dept. of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection

LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Got Barnyard Runoff? By Chris Henry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and Joe Harner, Kansas State University

VIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT APPLICATION FORM D MUNICIPAL EFFLUENT AND BIOSOLIDS

IOWA LIVESTOCK ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS & MANURE AGREEMENTS

ORDINANCE NO. 1. A large concentrated animal feeding operation as described in Table 1 in Section 3.07.

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Permit Application for an Animal Feedlot or Manure Storage Area

Nutrient and Manure Management in PA

Manure Irrigation Workgroup Meeting December 13, 2013 ATTACHMENTS

APPENDIX D CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATION REGULATIONS

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (ac.) CODE 590

Phosphorus Update. Addy Elliott Colorado State University Department of Soil and Crop Sciences

Antonio Mallarino Professor, Department of Agronomy. Introduction

Computer-Assisted Nutrient Management Tutorials. Computer-Assisted Nutrient Management Planning: An Overview

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

COUNTY COUNCIL OF CECIL COUNTY, MARYLAND LEGISLATIVE SESSION DAY BILL NO

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Permits on Public Notice - Dairy Cattle

State Regulations Fact Sheet - Wisconsin

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Permits on Public Notice - Dairy Cattle

South Fish Creek Watershed Animal Waste Storage and Management

The Minnesota Livestock Producer s Guide to Feedlot Rules

Yankton County Zoning Ordinance. Amendments

CAFO Fact Sheet series Fact Sheet #12: CAFO Requirements for the Beef Production Area By Brent Auvermann, Texas A&M University

Maps for Nutrient Management Planning

Assessing Regional Water Impacts of Biofuel Production Scenarios

EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF ALL CROP NUTRIENTS SAVE TIME AND MONEY INVEST THOSE DOLLARS ELSEWHERE PHOSPHORUS AFFECTS SURFACE WATER (EUTROPHICATION)

Nutrient Management Program Update. Bryan Harris Maryland Department of Agriculture Nutrient Management Program Website:

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Vegetative Treatment Systems for Managing Open Lot and Barnyard Runoff for AFO s

IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SUMMARY

COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR CERTIFIED CNMP PROVIDERS

Livestock Facility Siting. Chris Clayton Division of Agricultural Resource Management

PERMITTING & CONSTRUCTING ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS IN SOUTH DAKOTA. A whitepaper by:

AEN-103 Stormwater BMPs for Confined Livestock Facilities Steve Higgins and Sarah Wightman, Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering

Regulation of Land Application of Biosolids in Select U.S. States

Strategies for Phosphorus Management on Cropland. Renee Hancock, NE NRCS State Water Quality Specialist

2nd Bulletin of the Minnesota Agriculture Water Quality Certification Program and Assessment Tool

Morgan County Planning Commission. Petition for: Text Amendment. Article 4 Zoning Districts and Maps

Whatcom County Farm Plan

HOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION

Regional Summary Nutrient Availability Coefficients. John Lory Caitlin Conover University of Missouri

WHATCOM COUNTY STANDARD CONSERVATION FARM PLAN PLANNING WORKBOOK: Checklist and Action Plan

MANURE MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON PHOSPHORUS LOSS WITH SURFACE RUNOFF AND ON-FARM PHOSPHORUS INDEX IMPLEMENTATION. AN OVERVIEW OF ONGOING RESEARCH

WHATCOM COUNTY STANDARD FARM CONSERVATION PLAN PLANNING WORKBOOK: Checklist and Action Plan

Section 1 - General Information (All farms must complete this section)

Site Selection for Dairy Housing Systems Susan W. Gay, Extension Engineer, Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech

Subsurface Drains: Principals and Practice

Feedlot Construction Setbacks from Open Water and Wells

Alternative EAW Form for Animal Feedlots ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

REDWOOD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 17 FEEDLOT REGULATIONS SUBDIVISION 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 4

Manure Storage for Environmental Management Systems

Door County SWCD 2016 Nutrient Management Plan Review For Haberli Farms Inc. Registered Agent Office Joseph C Haberli 6945 Memorial Dr.

Biosolids Rules Ohio Administrative Code

Data Collection for Nutrient Management Plan Development

AFOs, CAFOs and MAFOs

(i) The nitrogen agronomic rate.

(i) The nitrogen agronomic rate.

An Overview of Wisconsin s Livestock Facility Siting Law

Chapter 63 Animal Manure and Nutrient Management Page 1 of 25

Implementing Management Practices to Reduce Pollution Potential Contributed to Livestock Waste

Agronomy Facts 40 Nutrient Management Legislation in Pennsylvania: A Summary of the 2006 Regulations

The Illinois Livestock Management Facilities Act. and how it might impact a producer interested in Methane Production

County: City: State: Zip: Phone#: Person Permit Issued To: Farm Physical Address: Phone#:

for The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution

SOIL P-INDEXES: MINIMIZING PHOSPHORUS LOSS. D. Beegle, J. Weld, P. Kleinman, A. Collick, T. Veith, Penn State & USDA-ARS

Alternative EAW Form for Animal Feedlots ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

Town of Friday Harbor PO Box 219 / Friday Harbor / WA / (360) / fax (360) /

THE FUTURE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN WISCONSIN

HOW TO MANAGE A LIVESTOCK YARD

CHAPTER 26 ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT

Riparian Corridors and Required Setbacks

Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program Program Update

FIELD PHOSPHORUS RISK ASSESSMENT

216 CONFINED FEEDING REGULATIONS Definitions and Regulations. Article 2. Ordinance # / September 12, 2016 Ordinance # / October 10, 2016

Subsurface Drainage: Principals and Practice. Adapted from presentations by John Panuska and Matt Ruark,, December 2008

RIVER WATCHER NEWSLETTER High Island Creek & Rush River Watershed 319 TMDL Projects

Dairy, Manure and AFO/CAFO 101. Karl Czymmek PRO-DAIRY Program Cornell University Black River Watershed

Voluntary Water Quality Conservation Plan

PENNSYLVANIA PHOSPHORUS INDEX UPDATE

Comparison State Policy Requirements, Proposed LAMP and Current County Regulations

University of Wisconsin Discovery Farms Staff 2013 Wisconsin Corn / Soy Expo Wisconsin Dells, WI

Title 130 Livestock Waste Control Regulations: Summary of Land Application Requirements Amended Effective October 4, 2011

Roles of the Fertilizer Industry in Nutrient Management Planning

Controlling runon and runoff:

SUBCHAPTER 12.1: MANURE AND WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE

Permitting Animal Feeding Operations in Maryland

MARYLAND AGRICULTURAL NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS

Objective 1: Manage the demonstration site using common agricultural practices and monitor runoff quantity and quality.

Nutrient Management Issues in Tennessee

CHAPTER 4 - EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE OF DUBUQUE COUNTY, IOWA. Adopted March 29, 2010.

RIPARIAN PROTECTION Questions & Answers

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

Transcription:

Manure Application Setback Comparisons in the EPA Region 7: The National Setbacks Database

Manure Application Setbacks: What do We Mean? Defined as the distance from the identified sensitive area where manure application is not allowed.

Mapping Setback Features

Application Setbacks: Where are they defined? Federal CAFO rule. State regulatory agencies. State animal feeding operation regulations. Well head protection regulations. State NRCS standards (typically Nutrient Management or Waste Utilization standards). County ordinances.

Missouri s National Setbacks Database Goal: One-stop resource for setback requirements. Planners need to know relevant restrictions in each state. Integrated into software. Purdue s Manure Management Planner. Missouri s NMTracker web-based farm mapping program. Supported by: University of Missouri Extension and Natural Resource Conservation Service

Factors affecting Setback Distances State. Method of application. Agency/authority. Placement of manure. Setback feature. Time to incorporation. Resource sensitivity. Time of year. Operation type. Slope. Operation size. Ground cover in setback. Animal type. Ground cover in field. Storage type. Soil test phosphorus Manure form. Presence of snow and/or ice.

Features Requiring a Setback in at Least One State Public drinking water well Public drinking water lake/impoundment Public drinking water intake structure. Agricultural well Plugged well Abandon well Other wells Cistern Open tile/drainage inlet Plugged tile/drainage inlet Agricultural drainage well Developed spring Undeveloped spring Intermittent stream/arroyo Perennial stream River/waterway/canal Drainage ditch Roadside ditch Grassed waterway centerline Sinkhole Losing stream Cave Mine or quarry Other surface-groundwater connection Rock outcrop Lake Water impoundment Private impoundment, no outlet Agricultural drinking water lake/impoundment Water/sediment control basin Designated wetland Other wetland Ocean Estuary Public road Property boundary Residence (owned) Residence (non-owned) Business (owned) Business (non-owned) Public use area Pubic use facility Incorporated area

Manure Application Setbacks: Where is the Water? River/Waterway/Canal

Manure Application Setbacks: Where is the Water?

Manure Application Setbacks: Where is the Water? 1:24,000 topo map blue-line streams

Manure Application Setbacks: Where is the Water? Intermittent stream Grassed waterway Concentrated flow Intermittent stream?

National Setbacks Database: http://nmplanner.missouri.edu/

National Setbacks Database: http://nmplanner.missouri.edu/

National Setbacks Database: http://nmplanner.missouri.edu/

National Setbacks Database: http://nmplanner.missouri.edu/ Iowa: Last checked 9/2012

National Setbacks Database Iowa: Last checked 9/2012

Iowa: Last checked 9/2012

National Setbacks Database: Critical Challenges Have we found all sources of manure application setback requirements in your state? Have we correctly interpreted those requirements? Maintaining setbacks database. When have regulations of standards changed?

Varied approach through the region State SD MN WI NE IA IL KS MO Operation Types CAFO CAFO AFO CAFO Large CAFO Small or Medium CAFO or AFO Confined Feeding Operation Open Feedlot Feeding Operation Small Confined Feeding Operation CAFO AFO CAFO Swine CAFO CAFO

Set Back Distance (range, feet) Perennial Stream/Lake 2200 2000 High 1800 Low 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 IA IL KS MN MO NE SD WI Choices 5 4 3 5 6 3 2 20

Set Back Distance (range, feet) Drinking Water Well 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 IA IL KS MN MO NE SD WI Choices 4 1 3 1 1 3 3 1

Factors Affecting Setback Distances State Permit Type Vegetation in setback Vegetation in field Application down-slope Method of Application Type of animal Form of manure Type of storage Soil test phosphorus MO All Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes IA CFO Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Sensitive water resource Small CFO Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes KS All Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No NE Large CAFO Yes No Yes No No No No No No Small or Med CAFO; AFO No No No No No No No No No SD CAFO Yes No No No No No No Yes No WI All Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes

Other Restrictions Affecting Setback Distances Permit State Designation Applications, frozen and/or snow-covered ground Slope prohibition MO All Surface application prohibited Prohibited, slope >20% IA CFO, Small CFO No application of liquid manure 12/21-4/1 for snow-covered ground and 2/1-4/1 for frozen ground. Only applies to operations required to have a manure management plan. Limited on ground with >10% slope. Injection preferred on these slopes. Only applies to operations required to have a manure management plan. KS All Liquid applications prohibited None, must meet P Index NE CAFO, AFO None None SD CAFO Application of liquid manure prohibited; application of solid manure to be avoided, setback must be 100 feet. Irrigation prohibited, slope >6% Winter application, prohibited slope >4% WI Large Dairy and Large CAFO Small CAFO <12% solids, surface application prohibited. > 12% solids, surface applications prohibited in 2/1 to 3/31 Extensive rules in this area. <12% solids, surface application prohibited. Slope >9%, solid manure > 12% solids, surface applications prohibited in 2/1 to 3/31.

Non-Water Features with Setbacks State SD MN WI NE IA IL KS MO Non-water Features None None Inhabited Dwelling None Non-owned Residence Business, Church, School Other public use area Property Boundary Residence, Not Part of the Facility None Non-owned Occupied Residence Public Use Areas Public Road Property Boundary

Set Back Distance (range, feet) Non-Owned Inhabited Structure 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 IA IL KS MN MO NE SD WI Choices 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 2

How you can help If you see mistakes please contact us. John Lory. LoryJ@missouri.edu Chris Gross. chris.gross@wdc.usda.gov If your state has made changes please contact us. John Lory. LoryJ@missouri.edu Chris Gross. chris.gross@wdc.usda.gov Food for thought. Can we get regional recommendations? Why does operation size affect setback requirements? Simplify means: simple to find simple to understand simple to implement.

Questions?