NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

Similar documents
Critical Design Review

Flight Readiness Review Presentation

University of Florida Rocket Team Flight Readiness Review

System Level Design. Tasks: Aerodynamic Analysis, Atmospheric Measurements. Three Subsystems: Recovery Structural Aerodynamics and Flight Stability

Critical Design Review Presentation

Georgia Tech CDR VTC Slides. Project Simple Complexity Critical Design Review VTC Slides January 2015

University of Florida Rocket Team Preliminary Design Review

PROJECT. The University of Akron. NASA Critical Design Review. 26 January 2018

University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review

NUSPACE. Northeastern University Scientific Payloads: AtmosphericMeasurement and Controlled-Descent Experiment. Flight Readiness Review

Tacho Lycos PDR Presentation. November 14, 2016

Milestone Review Flysheet

PROJECT. The University of Akron. NASA Flight Readiness Review. 12 March 2018

Executive Summary. Team Jarts Rocket Design. Brett Foster, Joe Hintz, Eric Logisz, Cameron Schulz. Milwaukee School of Engineering

PROJECT. The University of Akron. NASA Critical Design Review. 12 March 2018

Georgia Tech NASA Flight Readiness Review Teleconference

Milestone Review Flysheet

PDR: CanSat-1.

Preliminary Design Review Presentation Tarleton State University NASA USLI

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

NASA Student Launch 2017

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 4, 2016

University of Florida Rocket Team Preliminary Design Report

S AMUEL G INN C OLLEGE OF E NGINEERING. Auburn University. University Student Launch Initiative Critical Design Review

Milestone Review Flysheet

Team RPGs Flight Readiness Review

Preliminary Design Review

NU HOPE. Northeastern University. High-altitude Object Protection Experiment

NASA USLI Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

2016 Northwest Indian College Space Center First Nations Launch Tribal Division Critical Design Report

TERMINATOR 5 BILL RILEY TRIPOLI LEVEL 3 CERTIFICATION PROJECT. Bill Riley Tripoli #12294

NASA USLI Critical Design Review (CDR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1999 Burdett Avenue Troy, NY 12180

Iowa State University CDR Presentation

Iowa State University PDR Presentation

Tacho Lycos 2019 NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Review

Flight Readiness Review

Harvard-Westlake School Preliminary Design Review. Summary

Georgia Tech Ramblin Rocketeers Critical Design Review

University of Mississippi Rocket Rebels

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Post Launch Assessment Review Project U.R.S.A. 1

NUSPACE Scientific Payloads: Atmospheric-Measurement and Controlled-Descent Experiment

Table of Contents. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona NSL 1

NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

Flying Bison Team Harding University Flying Bison

Northwest Indian College Space Center Team SkyWalkers USLI Flight Readiness Review

Northwest Indian College Space Center Team Skywalkers USLI Preliminary Design Review

Flight Readiness Review

University of Florida NASA Student Launch

University of Iowa AIAA USLI Flight Readiness Review 3/11/2016

Preliminary Design Review

Santa Cruz, CA 95064

Georgia Tech Ramblin Rocketeers Flight Readiness Review

NUMAV. Maxi-MAV. Northeastern University 267 Snell Engineering Boston, MA 02115

Eclipse-I Preliminary Design Review

Critical Design Review Report

Design and Construction of a Solid Experimental Sounding Rocket, Amy

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Proposal September 30, 2016

Abstract The following report presents the team s final rocket and payload design as it will be used to compete in the 8 th Intercollegiate Rocket

Flight Readiness Review

CAR High Power Rocket. Level 4 Certification Process

NASA Student Launch PDR Report

NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

Design, Construction, and Testing of West Virginia University s Wild & Wonderful II Sounding Rocket

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW November 4, 2016

Critical Design Review

A Comprehensive Study of Healing of Fargesia Furgosa from Hypergravity-Induced Damage

Ares First Stage Development Igniting the Next Generation of Launch Vehicles

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Student Launch. College and University Handbook

Argonia Cup Senior Capstone Competition Final Presentation

A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude

NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Review

A Study of Solar Irradiance as a Function of Altitude

Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch Project Proposal. 30 September Propulsion Research Center,

University of Mississippi Rocket Rebels

Team 83 Project Report for IREC 2018

Public Missiles, Ltd.

University of Mississippi Rocket Rebels. Project Presidium NASA Student Launch Initiative Proposal September 30, 2016

IO Project Technical Overview

Analysis of Pollen Distribution at Various Altitudes

TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS FOR THE HY-V SCRAMJET FLIGHT EXPERIMENT AND THE EFFECTS OF A RECOVERY SYSTEM

College and University Handbook

Tripoli Advisory Panel Documentation for PHOTON

The Effect of Gravitational Forces on Arabidopsis Thaliana Development

National Aeronautics and Space Administration University Student Launch Initiative. student launch projects

Overview & Status. The Reentry Breakup Recorder (REBR) A Black Box for Space Hardware. Vinod Kapoor. August 13, Senior Project Engineer

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW (CDR) Panther II Heavy: Measurement and CFD Prediction of Liquid Slosh Behavior During Model Rocket Flight

NASA Student Launch Proposal

ANUBIS. Payload User Guide Version 1.0 March 8 th, 2019

rocket s apogee. When this ejection occurs, the balloon and canister will no longer be

The Effect of Acceleration on the Crystallization of Sodium Acetate

Investigation of Orion Re-Entry Drogue Chute Aerodynamic Characteristics

SOFT RECOVERY SYSTEMS FOR GUN- FIRED PROJECTILE COMPONENTS

Critical Design Review Report

UVic Rocketry Hyak-1 Technical Report. Team 117 Project Technical Report for the 2018 IREC

P11562 MIS Frame and Stabilization Module Detailed Design Review

FAA APPROVED ROTORCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL SUPPLEMENT

Using FEMAP on the NESC Composite Crew Module

Soil Moisture Mapping

Drogue Activated System (DAS)

FAA APPROVED ROTORCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL SUPPLEMENT STC SR01164SE

Transcription:

NASA s Student Launch Initiative : Seniors 8 Juniors 2 Sophomores 6 Interdisciplinary 2 Preliminary Design Review Payload: Fragile Material Protection Freshman 5 1

Agenda 1. Team Overview 2. 3. 4. I. Airframe II. Electronic Payload III. Main Payload IV. Recovery V. Propulsion 5. 6. 2

Objectives Compete a high powered rocket that meets all specified criteria Reach an altitude between 5,125 ft. & 5,375 ft. Field a successful payload that produces useful vibration reduction data Transmit all data wirelessly to ground station 3

Team Structure 4

Airframe Objectives Remain intact Reusable Protect internal components 5

Airframe 6

Dimensions and Subsections 7

Weight Breakdown Total Weight: 35.19 lb 8

Decision Matrix Nosecone Shape Option Cost Drag Ogive Δ О Elliptical О Δ Conical О X 9

Decision Matrix Fin and Nosecone Material Option Cost Strength Ductility Carbon Fiber X О О Fiberglass О Δ Δ ULTEM X О О 10

Decision Matrix Body Tube Option Cost Strength Ductility Carbon Fiber X О О Fiberglass Δ Δ Δ Blue Tube О X X 11

Decision Matrix Bulkhead Material Option Cost Strength Weight Aluminum X О Δ Plywood O X O Fiberglass Δ Δ Δ 12

Altimeter (Electronic Payload) Objectives Accurately measure apogee Retrieve flight data wirelessly Be able to track the rocket with GPS Waterproof compartment 13

Altimeter Selection Decision Matrix Altimeter Option Cost GPS Ability Data Acquisition Altus TeleMega Δ O O Altus TeleMetrum O O Δ 14

Altimeter (Electronic Payload) Altus TeleMega Located in nosecone GPS and Apogee Easy to retrieve the data Detailed flight data can be used to compare to OpenRocket/Rocksim 15

Altimeter Mounting 16

Altimeter Mounting 5 O.D. 17

Payload Objectives NASA Given: Protect unknown fragile object Envelop of 3.5 in dia. and 6 in length May not add nor remove material Team Created: Reduce impact force by 50 percent Create valid mathematical model Reduce acceleration by 35 percent 18

Main Payload 19

Decision Matrix Payload Option Cost Force Reduction Acceleration Reduction Parallel Spring System Single Mounted Cylinder with Support Material Series and Parallel Spring System Δ X O O X X Δ O O 20

Conceptual Design Concentric cylinder design Series and Parallel spring design Wire rope isolators for 360 vibration coverage Easily removable Variable fill design 21

Mathematical Design Payload M 3 x 3 k 2 c 1 Housing M 2 x 2 k 1 c 2 Rocket M 1 x 1 F 22

ሶ ሶ ሶ Team Overview k 1 x 2 k 1 x 2 c 1 x 1 ሶ c 1 x 2 k 2 x 2 w 3 c 2 x 2 M 1 M 3 ΣF y = 0 = M 1 xሷ 1 = F + k 1 x 2 x 1 F k 1 x 2 w 2 + c 1 ( xሶ 2 ሶ c 1 x 2 x 1 ൯ k 2 x 3 c 2 xሶ 3 ΣF y = 0 = M 3 xሷ 3 = w 3 + k 2 x 2 x 3 + c 2 ( xሶ 2 ሶ x 3 ൯ M 2 k 1 x 1 ΣF y = 0 = M 2 xሷ 2 = w 2 + k x 2 x 1 c 1 xሶ 2 xሶ 1 + k 2 x 3 x 2 + c 2 ( xሶ 3 ሶ c 1 xሶ 1 x 2 ൯ 23

Mathematical Model Inputs Thrust curve Impact force Parachute deployment force Spring constant (k) values Damping coefficient (c) values Outputs Relative position graph Relative velocity graph Relative acceleration graph Relative force calculation 24

Recovery 25

Recovery - Objectives Two parachutes Drogue at apogee Main at low altitude 75 ft-lb f maximum Kinetic Energy Independent electronics Redundant altimeters Lockable arming switches Separate batteries Shear pins Tracking equipment and transmission 26

Recovery Dual-Deployment Reduce ground track during descent Drogue parachute at apogee Main parachute at 1000 feet http://www.arsabq.org/new_participants.htm 27

DROGUE MAIN 28

DROGUE CHUTE MAIN CHUTE BOW BULKPLATES 36 ELECTRONICS BAY 96 AFT BULKPLATES 25 35 29

Recovery Electronics Fully redundant, independent systems Black powder ejection charges Mounted to plywood sled 30

31 Team Overview Main Parachute Drogue Parachute On/Off Switch Primary Altimeter Primary Battery Primary Main Igniter Primary Drogue Igniter Primary Main Charge Primary Drogue Charge On/Off Switch Backup Altimeter Backup Battery Backup Drogue Igniter Backup Main Igniter Backup Drogue Charge Backup Main Charge PRIMARY CIRCUIT BACKUP CIRCUIT

Recovery Strength Aluminum bulkplates Steel U-bolts Tubular nylon tether 400 lbf max force 32

Decision Matrix Recovery Altimeter Option Cost Feature Set Power Draw PerfectFlite Stratologger CF O O Δ AltusMetrum EasyMini Δ Δ О Entacore AIM3 X O О http://www.perfectflite.com/slcf.html 33

Decision Matrix Recovery Harness Option Cost Strength Elasticity Elastic O X X Tubular Kevlar X O Δ Tubular Nylon Δ Δ О http://onebadhawk.com/1-tubular-nylon--2-loop.html 34

Decision Matrix Drogue Parachute Option Cost Descent Rate Max Force 24 Fruity Chutes Classic Elliptical O Δ X 36 Fruity Chutes Classic Elliptical O O Δ 48 Fruity Chutes Classic Elliptical Δ Δ О http://fruitychutes.com/parachute_recovery _systems/classic_elliptical_chutes.htm 35

Decision Matrix Main Parachute Option Cost Impact Max Force 72 Fruity Chutes Iris Ultra O X O 84 Fruity Chutes Iris Ultra O Δ Δ 96 Fruity Chutes Iris Ultra Δ O Δ http://fruitychutes.com/parachute_recovery _systems/iris_ultra_parachutes.htm 36

Recovery - Wind Speed (mph) Lateral Distance (ft) 0 7 5 576 Section Nose Cone & Payload Mass (lb) Kinetic Energy (ft-lbf) 9.19 20.9 10 1296 Recovery Bay 4.32 12.66 15 2087 20 3046 Booster 10.03 29.4 37

Propulsion Objectives The vehicle should attain an apogee between 5,125 feet and 5,375 feet The vehicle should remain below Mach 1 The motor mount should withstand propulsion forces and remain reusable for any following flights 38

Decision Matrix Centering Rings Option Cost Strength Weight Plywood O X О G10 Fiberglass Δ О О Aluminum Δ О X 39

Decision Matrix Motor Mount Design Option Cost Against Regulations Cluster Motor Mount O Δ X Single Motor Mount X Δ O 40

Motor Mount Design Inner Tube Blue Tube Bulkhead Aluminum 6061 T6 Centering Rings Aluminum 6061 T6 Bulkhead Centering Rings Inner Tube and Motor 41

Exploded Motor Mount Design 42

Manufacturer Cesaroni Technology Animal Motor Works AeroTech Inc Make L800 L1080BB-P L850W Total Impulse 3731 Ns 3686 Ns 3695 Ns Altitude 5428 ft 5330 ft 5379 ft Type Reloadable Reloadable Reloadable Max Thrust 1024 N 1258 N 1185 N Weight(Empty) 3.79 lb 4.13 lb 3.54 lb 43

Down-Selected Motor Manufacturer Make Total Impulse Altitude Type Max Thrust Weight (Empty) AeroTech L850W 3695 Ns 5379 ft Reloadable 1185 N 3.54 lb Level 2 motor Motor Selection Criteria: Altitude No K class Impulse Thrust Reloadable More design flexibility 44

Decision Matrix Fin Shape Option Stability Ease of Manufacturing Likelihood of Damage Clipped Delta Δ О Δ Trapezoidal X Δ О Tapered Swept О Δ X 45

Fins Root Chord: 11.5 in Tip Chord: 5.8 in Height: 7.5 in Surface Area: 63 in 2 46

Predicative Altitude Assurance Plan Verify four methods produce similar C d values Verify software ability to predict sub-scale altitude 1/2 Scale CFD Data Wind Tunnel Data OpenRocket Altitude Prediction Rocksim Altitude Prediction Test Flight Data Verify four methods produce similar C d values Verify software ability to predict full-scale altitude Full Scale CFD Data Wind Tunnel Data OpenRocket Altitude Prediction Rocksim Altitude Prediction Test Flight Data Altitude Prediction 47

Altitude Prediction: OpenRocket Software Program uses a model for the atmospheric conditions and for the wind Assumptions: Ideal Gas Wind speed uniaxial Earth is flat Wind turbulence based off wind farms Uses Runge-Kutta 4 48

Altitude (ft) Team Overview Predicted Altitude 6000 Altitude 5,379 feet Over estimate because: Software simulation Uncertainty in weight Plan to add ballast 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Time (s) 49

Altitude (ft) Team Overview Rocksim Predicted Altitude Altitude 5,368 ft Percent Difference of 0.2% Based off of OpenRocket as original value 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Time (s) 50

Basic Rocket Information Max Velocity and Acceleration 592 ft/s and 208 ft/sec^2 Mach Number 0.53 Thrust to Weight Ratio 5.61:1 Rail Exit Velocity 69.2 ft/s 51

Stability Stability: 3.69 cal. 69.92 in. 90.46 in. 52

Testing Plan Wind Tunnel Testing Parachute Testing Payload Testing Recovery/ Test Ejection Half Scale Model Full Scale Model 53

Overview and Requirements Officer Designation Checklists Certification and Liability Monitor Rules and Regulations 54

Personnel Hazard Analysis Black Powder Fire Rocket Propellant Major Severity Handheld Tools Low Likelihood Craft/Exacto Knives Heavy Machinery Epoxy Fumes High Likelihood Minor Severity Dust Particles *Full Analysis can be seen in PDR Report* 55

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Motor Mishandling/ Accidental Ignition Launch Failure Main Parachute Deployment Failure Major Severity Excessively Tight Coupler Low Likelihood Drogue Parachute Deployment Failure Instability During Flight High Likelihood Payload not Secured Properly Altimeter/Electronics Malfunction Minor Severity *Full Analysis can be seen in PDR Report* 56

Environmental Consideration Analysis Rocket Motor Ignition Major Severity Water Low Likelihood Debris from Rocket Strong Winds High Likelihood Humidity Epoxy Fumes Minor Severity Dust Particles *Full Analysis can be seen in PDR Report* 57

General Risk Assessment Major Severity Limited Resources Tight/Minimal Budget Low Likelihood Mismanagement of Time Increase in Regulations Underestimation of Scope of Work High Likelihood Minor Severity *Full Analysis can be seen in PDR Report* 58

Education Outreach Activities Engage 200 Students in STEM-related Activities Emphasis on Middle School Students Activities NTI STEMFest Hydraulic Robotic Arms Snap Circuits Engineering Rocks Egg Drop Competition Webelos Day Tennis Ball Launcher Optimization 59

Schedule: Reporting 60

Schedule: Design Phase 61

Budget 1% 3% Itemized Cost + Contingency Based on Risk 10% Item Forecasted Amount Pie Chart Color Operating $300.00 11% 26% Travel / Lodging $2,730.00 Launch Pad $220.00 Aerodynamics (Body) $1,400.00 Propulsion $2,500.00 Main Payload $500.00 6% 5% 2% Electronic Payload $670.00 Recovery $1,150.00 13% Scale Model $1,050.00 $100.00 Total $10,620.00 23% 62

Thank you for your time! Questions? 63