PROJECT. The University of Akron. NASA Flight Readiness Review. 12 March 2018

Similar documents
PROJECT. The University of Akron. NASA Critical Design Review. 12 March 2018

PROJECT. The University of Akron. NASA Critical Design Review. 26 January 2018

Critical Design Review

Georgia Tech CDR VTC Slides. Project Simple Complexity Critical Design Review VTC Slides January 2015

Critical Design Review Presentation

NUSPACE. Northeastern University Scientific Payloads: AtmosphericMeasurement and Controlled-Descent Experiment. Flight Readiness Review

Flight Readiness Review Presentation

System Level Design. Tasks: Aerodynamic Analysis, Atmospheric Measurements. Three Subsystems: Recovery Structural Aerodynamics and Flight Stability

University of Florida Rocket Team Flight Readiness Review

Milestone Review Flysheet

University of Florida Rocket Team Preliminary Design Report

Georgia Tech NASA Flight Readiness Review Teleconference

University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review

Executive Summary. Team Jarts Rocket Design. Brett Foster, Joe Hintz, Eric Logisz, Cameron Schulz. Milwaukee School of Engineering

University of Florida Rocket Team Preliminary Design Review

PDR: CanSat-1.

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

NASA Student Launch 2017

Preliminary Design Review Presentation Tarleton State University NASA USLI

Tacho Lycos PDR Presentation. November 14, 2016

Iowa State University CDR Presentation

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

Milestone Review Flysheet

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 4, 2016

Milestone Review Flysheet

NU HOPE. Northeastern University. High-altitude Object Protection Experiment

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Post Launch Assessment Review Project U.R.S.A. 1

Iowa State University PDR Presentation

S AMUEL G INN C OLLEGE OF E NGINEERING. Auburn University. University Student Launch Initiative Critical Design Review

Table of Contents. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona NSL 1

Team RPGs Flight Readiness Review

University of Florida NASA Student Launch

NUSPACE Scientific Payloads: Atmospheric-Measurement and Controlled-Descent Experiment

Harvard-Westlake School Preliminary Design Review. Summary

NASA USLI Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

TERMINATOR 5 BILL RILEY TRIPOLI LEVEL 3 CERTIFICATION PROJECT. Bill Riley Tripoli #12294

NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

University of Iowa AIAA USLI Flight Readiness Review 3/11/2016

Preliminary Design Review

NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

NASA USLI Critical Design Review (CDR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1999 Burdett Avenue Troy, NY 12180

Flight Readiness Review

Tacho Lycos 2019 NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Review

Georgia Tech Ramblin Rocketeers Critical Design Review

Santa Cruz, CA 95064

NUMAV. Maxi-MAV. Northeastern University 267 Snell Engineering Boston, MA 02115

2016 Northwest Indian College Space Center First Nations Launch Tribal Division Critical Design Report

Georgia Tech Ramblin Rocketeers Flight Readiness Review

Eclipse-I Preliminary Design Review

Northwest Indian College Space Center Team Skywalkers USLI Preliminary Design Review

University of Mississippi Rocket Rebels

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Proposal September 30, 2016

Design and Construction of a Solid Experimental Sounding Rocket, Amy

Flight Readiness Review

Team 83 Project Report for IREC 2018

Northwest Indian College Space Center Team SkyWalkers USLI Flight Readiness Review

rocket s apogee. When this ejection occurs, the balloon and canister will no longer be

NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Review

Ares First Stage Development Igniting the Next Generation of Launch Vehicles

Argonia Cup Senior Capstone Competition Final Presentation

Abstract The following report presents the team s final rocket and payload design as it will be used to compete in the 8 th Intercollegiate Rocket

Flight Readiness Review

Critical Design Review Report

University of Mississippi Rocket Rebels

Preliminary Design Review

A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude

NASA Student Launch PDR Report

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Student Launch. College and University Handbook

SAFETECH 4.9K ST60-X v1.0. User s manual. Opale-Parachutes.com. Please read this manual before first use.

F-SERIES: FF XT SPECIFICATIONS Exterior Swinging Four-Fold Door Systems

Critical Design Review

IO Project Technical Overview

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW November 4, 2016

Flying Bison Team Harding University Flying Bison

Design, Construction, and Testing of West Virginia University s Wild & Wonderful II Sounding Rocket

HIGH MAST CAMERA POLE ASSEMBLY GENERAL

TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS FOR THE HY-V SCRAMJET FLIGHT EXPERIMENT AND THE EFFECTS OF A RECOVERY SYSTEM

WALL MOUNTED ARTICULATING JIB CRANE

CAR High Power Rocket. Level 4 Certification Process

A Comprehensive Study of Healing of Fargesia Furgosa from Hypergravity-Induced Damage

UVic Rocketry Hyak-1 Technical Report. Team 117 Project Technical Report for the 2018 IREC

Tripoli Advisory Panel Documentation for PHOTON

OPTIONS ARE LISTED IN RED, PLEASE MODIFY THESE AREAS AS NEEDED BASED ON YOUR PROJECT CONSULT MANUFACTURER FOR ADDITIONAL OPTIONS OR MODIFICATIONS.

Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch Project Proposal. 30 September Propulsion Research Center,

F-SERIES: F SPECIFICATIONS Four-Fold Door Systems

80M 4-Square. An antenna project to obtain a bigger signal on the 80 Meter (3.5 to 3.8 MHz) amateur radio band. Bruce Whitney W8RA

SOFT RECOVERY SYSTEMS FOR GUN- FIRED PROJECTILE COMPONENTS

SAFETECH 3.2K ST v1.0. User s manual. Opale-Parachutes.com. Please read this manual before first use.

The Effect of Acceleration on the Crystallization of Sodium Acetate

This guide can be used to prepare a specification for incorporating wall bracket jib cranes into a competitively bid construction project.

VSS-2 ½ D HIGH HEAD SUMP PUMP FREE STANDING

PRE-INSTALLATION GUIDE

HARRIS RECON DRONE. Sean F Flemming, Senior in Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan

Low Cost HALO Cargo Airdrop Systems

FF200, FOUR-FOLD DOORS CONSULT MANUFACTURER FOR ADDITIONAL OPTIONS OR MODIFICATIONS.

SECTION VIBRATION CONTROLS FOR HVAC PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

Analysis of Pollen Distribution at Various Altitudes

CITY OF MOUNT DORA LIFT STATION CHAINLINK FENCE AND GATE SPECIFICATIONS

SECTION SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOORS

Houston Community College 3200 Main Parking Garage November 15, 2010 Houston Community College

Transcription:

PROJECT The University of Akron NASA Flight Readiness Review 12 March 2018

Rail Exit velocity of 23 Ft/s Corkscrew flight up to 960 Ft Ballistic crash landing near launch site The University of Akron College of Engineering

Software Simulations 4,242 Ft Predicted Altitude from OpenRocket OpenRocket RASAero 4,325 Ft Predicted Altitude from RASAero 960 Ft Actual Altitude Reached

Total Mass: 38.7 Pounds Key Vehicle Dimensions Total Length 101 inches Body I.D. 5 inches Body O.D. 5.125 inches Vehicle Wall Thickness 0.125 inches Key System Dimensions Nose Cone 26 inches Payload Bay 14.5 inches Electronics Bay 6.125 inches Parachute Bay 23.75 inches Engine Bay 20.5 inches

Stability Calculations Stability Characteristic OpenRocket RASAero Hand CP (in) 77.39 77.80 74.27 CG Wet (in) 64.15 63.90 65.04 CG Post Burnout (in) 60.975 60.90 57.74 Stability Margin on Launch Rail 2.57 2.66 2.66 Stability Margin Post Burnout 3.47 3.28 3.01 Stability Margin > 2.5 using all methods

FLIGHT CHARACTERISTICS Flight Profile Calculations Open Rocket RASAero Thrust to Weight Ratio 7.2 7.2 8 Ft. Rail Exit Velocity (ft/s) 52.8 53.4 12 Ft. Rail Exit Velocity (ft/s) 65.1 66.3

The Von Karman wound nose cone with PLA nose cone tip. Design Highlights Carbon Fiber Body PLA Tip Length: 26 with 7.25 shoulder Weight: 0.953 lb

Above Motor Bay 0.2 lb Incremental Weights of 0.125 Thick Aluminum Disks Secured by Nuts and Washers over Threaded Rods Nose Cone Tip Hollow Nose Cone Tip with room for Weight Addition along Threaded Rod Secured by Fastening Tip to Nose Cone Body with Retaining Plate

ABS FIN CAN Three Piece Assembly 3-D Printed Location: Motor Bay Hardware Fastened To Centering Rings and Fins FIBERGLASS DELTA FINS 8 Root Chord 6 Semi Span 1/8 Thick Flutter Safety Factor: 1.3

Commercially purchased Aeropack system to retain the motor Thrust Plate distributes thrust force of motor Centering Rings epoxied to motor mount tube to align motor concentrically

Air Brakes Connected to the Stability Ballast above the Motor Bay 3D Printed ABS Casing In-flight Analysis with Arduino Determines Deployment

Features Arduino Uno to rotate a servo motor based on input from an accelerometer and altimeter Increase drag on launch vehicle Enables target altitude to be reached with greater accuracy

Shear and Compression Testing of Body Tubes Wind Tunnel Tests for 1:5 Scale Model with and without Airbrakes and Full Scale Fin

Stress Analysis Body Tube Bulkheads Fins Fin Can Fluid Flow over Nose Cone

Chosen motor for test flight changed from the Cesaroni L995 to the Competition motor Cesaroni L1050 Motor Preparation Procedure Responsibility - Akronauts Mentor: Jerry Appenzeller

1. 1. 2. Drogue Parachute deployed from the lower body tube of the rocket Altitude: Apogee Main parachute deployed from upper body tube of the rocket once tender descender is opened Altitude: 500 ft. 2.

Drogue Parachute Diameter (in): 17 Area (sqft): 1.520 Estimated Fabric Weight (lb): 0.02 Design: Hemispherical Material: Ripstop Nylon Drag Coefficient: 1.30 Terminal Velocity: 120 ft/s Main Parachute Diameter (in): 106.5 Area (sqft): 59.37 Estimated Fabric Weight (lb): 0.48 Design: Toroidal Material: Ripstop Nylon Drag Coefficient: 1.86 Terminal Velocity: 16.05 ft/s

Drift distance calculations ensure the rocket does not drift outside of the permitted launch field Drogue and Main Wind Speed (mph) Time (sec) Drift (ft) 0 70.97 0 5 70.97 520.423 10 70.97 1040.917 15 70.97 1561.34 20 70.97 2081.763

At apogee, the velocity of the launch vehicle is 0 ft/s. Here are the Kinetic Energy calculations at this key phase during flight. Kinetic Energy Calculations at Apogee Component Upper Rocket Body Lower Rocket Body Weight (lb) Mass (slug) Kinetic Energy (ft-lbf) Potential Energy (ft-lbf) 17.479 0.543 0 92,283 16.327 0.507 0 86,165 System Total 33.806 1.051 0 178,619

At main deployment, the velocity of the launch vehicle is 120 ft/s. Here are the kinetic energy calculations at this key phase during flight. Kinetic Energy Calculations at Main Deploy Component Upper Rocket Body Lower Rocket Body Weight (lb) Mass (slug) Kinetic Energy (ft-lbf) Potential Energy (ft-lbf) 17.479 0.543 3909 8742 16.327 0.507 3650 8162 System Total 33.806 1.051 7567 16921

Landing Kinetic Energy was calculated to ensure no single section of the rocket descends with a dangerous force Kinetic Energy Calculations upon Landing Component Weight (lb) Mass (slug) Kinetic Energy (ft-lbf) Upper Rocket Body 17.479 0.543 69.97 Lower Rocket Body 16.327 0.507 65.36 System Total 33.806 1.051 135.33

Number Part Name QTY Rated Force (lb) 1 U-Bolt 2 1075 2 Long Quick-Link 2 2400 3 Shock Cord 3 2375 4 Eye-to-Eye Swivel 2 3000 5 Bridle 2 6000 6 Short Quick-Link 6 1400 7 Shroud Lines 24 400 8 Hardware and Ropes Used Connection Line to Inner Shroud Lines 1 1400 Connections Between Hardware and Ropes

Bulkhead Assembly for Drogue Attachment Components U-bolt Three holes for threaded rods for airbrakes Bulkhead Assembly for Main and Drogue Attachment/Ejection Components U-bolt 2 Ejection charge holes for ejection wires to go through

Black Powder Ejection 1 system for drogue ejection 1 redundant system for drogue ejection Total of 2 ejection systems: 2.1 grams of black powder for ejection and 2.75 grams for redundant ejection charge Jolly Logic Chute Release 1 system for main release 1 redundant system for main release Ground test performed with built in system for each to ensure full release prior to each launch.

Ground tests for the Jolly Logic Chute Releases were conducted to ensure that the releases worked properly and that redundancy worked. The two releases were wrapped around the main parachute. They were connected to each other, so a redundant system was formed. Both releases were turned on and set to do a ground test by putting the setting below the lowest altitude. This test proved to be very successful.

A secondary back up system capable of deploying drogue Features RRC3 Missile Works Altimeters, Two Pole Rotary Switch, and 9 V Batteries

RTx/GPS Telematics Navigator System Provides real-time bearing and distance Operates on Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) radio band (902MHz to 928MHz)

Two wheeled Self balancing Ultrasonic navigation Servo-driven latch releases spring loaded solar panel arm

Rover wheel diameter: 4.70 Rover length wheel to wheel: 11.47 Rover body length: 8 Rover body height: 2.57 Rover body depth: 3.54

Black powder charges to pressurize payload bay and break shear pins Compressed springs to push payload out of the two sections 6 rods to secure the payload during flight Eye Bolts for ease of installation

Designed with Raspberry Pi 3B Code written in python Self balancing via MinIMU 9 v5 chipset Obstacle avoidance using ultrasonic sensor

WRC + Remote Control System by Missile Works 4 remote control outputs Operates on the license free ISM band Operational range of 20 miles

Updating of FMEA, PHA and Environmental Risk Assessment Tables Verification Column References Overhaul of NASA and Team Compliance Verification Final edits to Safety Procedures

QUESTIONS