Air Quality Monitoring: Ozone Attainment Status

Similar documents
Final Revisions to the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 )

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

NO 2 Primary NAAQS Final Rulemaking

Final Updates to National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Ozone. October 2015

2017 Ozone Summary SOURCES. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

2011 Ozone Summary NATURE AND SOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

2005 Ozone Summary. Since ground-level ozone needs sunlight to form, it is mainly a Ozone is bad down here Cars, trucks,

Oregon. 800 NE Oregon St. #640 Portland, OR (971)

Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)

2010 Ozone Summary NATURE AND SOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. Figure 2. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

Fine Particles in the Air

2014 Ozone Summary. Figure 1: Good and Bad Ozone. POLLUTION THAT FORMS GROUND-LEVEL OZONE, A PRIMARY COMPONENT OF SMOG.

Wildfires: Smoke Impacts and Public Health Protection

OUR NATION'S AIR STATUS AND TRENDS THROUGH 2015 WELCOME!

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard USEPA Proposed Revision. November 26, 2014

Indoor Air Pollution. Indoor air pollution can be an even greater health threat than outdoor air pollution. Common pollutants often

Americans on Ground Level Ozone

Revisions to National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution. Webinar for States and Local Agencies December 19, 2012

ECONOMIC IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH AIR QUALITY

Department of the Environment. The 2006 Healthy Air Act New Clean Air Act Power Plant Requirements Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Act of 2009

Reducing Air Pollution Protecting Public Health. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation

Criteria Pollutants. Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

2016 Nitrogen Dioxide Summary

National Ambient Air Quality Standards, Implementation Plans and Public Participation. Laura McKelvey U.S. EPA

Air pollution is caused by high concentrations of gases and particles emitted form combustion sources (vehicles, power plants, industries)

Overview of the Human Health and Environmental Effects of Power Generation: Focus on Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ), Nitrogen Oxides (NO X ) and Mercury (Hg)

Air Pollution Chapter 21. Atmosphere as a Resource

U.S. EPA Region 4 Air Quality Update

Executive Summary PM2.5 Plan. SJVUAPCD Executive Summary. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District December 20, 2012

Residential Wood Combustion Workshop

North American Emission Control Area Drivers and Progress

Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Health Risks ( edited for AHS APES)

Ozone Air Quality Standards: EPA s Proposed January 2010 Revisions

Maryland Clean Air Progress Report

The Road to a Cleaner Future

Interesting facts about coal-fired power plants, mercury, and other pollutants:

Borough of Red Bank. EPA Vehicle Emissions Reduction Education Grant. KICKOFF MEETING October 13, 2011

Air Quality Rules Update: CAIR CAMR

Air Pollution Poses Severe Health and Environmental Risks

MEDIA PACKAGE. Pollution Prevention, Remediation and Air Quality Division

Air Quality Management (AQM) Clean Air Act (History, Objectives, NAAQS) Non-attainment regions

2010 Sulfur Dioxide Summary

Air Quality in the San Joaquin Valley

RE: Comments on the first External Review Draft of the Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter EPA/600/R-18/179

The EU and Air Quality protecting health & environment

Air Pollution, Smog and Health Impacts

Air Quality Program

What is air pollution?

Human Health and Environmental Effects of the Clear Skies Initiative

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Air Quality Report - August 2015

OEC Tackles Big Public Health & Environmental Problems

Agenda. Background PM2.5 Attainment Plan Public Workshop

State Implementation Plans for Federal 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 Standards San Joaquin Valley Eastern Kern County

Air Pollution. tutorial by Paul Rich. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company / ITP

Chapter Introduction. 1.2 Purpose. 1.3 Background. 1.4 Ozone Production and Health Effects. 1.5 Responsibilities of Agencies

Alan Jones Policy Office Long Range Planning Division Tennessee Department of Transportation

What is the Transport Rule?

CE 326 Principles of Environmental Engineering Prof. Tim Ellis

Going One Step Beyond in North Denver

Environmental Regulatory Changes Potentially Affecting Coal Fired Facilities

Americans make the equivalent of round

Wildfire Mitigation Plan for the Sacramento Federal Nonattainment Area for PM 2.5. (Aerial view of the Tubbs and Pocket fires, 10/12/2017)

GAO AIR POLLUTION. Air Quality and Respiratory Problems in and Near the Great Smoky Mountains. Testimony

Healthier Home Healthier You

2012 Nitrogen Dioxide Summary

THE ROAD TO CLEAN AIR Public Health and Global Warming Benefits of Advanced Clean Car Standards

Pollution Prevention, Remediation and Air Quality Division

BACKGROUND TO THE 1993 GENERAL PLAN AS AMENDED

The Air We Breathe. A report on Garfield County air quality monitoring results for

Particulate Matter Regulations Presentation. Mecklenburg County Land Use and Environmental Services Agency Air Quality Division

Knocking Over Pollutants

Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule. March 2014

Commanding Clean Air. The Clean Air Act of 1970 as a Model for U.S. Environmental Policy Clean Air Act

Interindividual Variability: Regulatory Considerations

Implementation Issues for the PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM 2.5 NAAQS

CE 213A Introduction to Environmental Science

The European Environment Agency (EEA) is an independent EU agency.

Imperial County Air Quality. Felipe Solorzano. San Diego State University: Undergraduate. Project duration: March 2014-August 2014

AIR POLLUTION TRAGEDY: A CASE STUDY. {Air & Air Pollution

7.1 BICYCLE RIDERSHIP Estimated Current and Increased Bike Ridership

Polluted Playgrounds. Toxic air near schools in South East England. A report by Keith Taylor MEP

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Air Quality Report - September 2013

Chapter 10. Air Quality

2006 Sulfur Dioxide Summary

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution

Transportation Impacts on Air Quality

I. NACAA Supports EPA s Proposal to Set a New 1-Hour Standard for Sulfur Dioxide

Changes in the Ozone Standard: What will the impact be? February 9, 2016 Sara G. Smith

What is idling? Or: leaving your car engine running when parked

Pollution: Los Angeles: Worst Air Quality in USA

Pima Association of Government s Air Quality Forum June 23, 2015

Ontario Climate Policy Gaps

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Ozone

HEALTH FACTORS Physical Environment

Department of Health RESPONSE TO HUMAN HEALTH SECURITY LENS TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Human exposure and health effects of air pollution in priority areas. Rico Euripidou Rico Euripidou

SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Board of Directors Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Transcription:

As of April 13, 2015 (#C117-1002) - Four Corners (#C097-2002) 2015 17-Mar 2015 56 16-Mar 2014 4-May 2014 64 1-Apr 2013 61 15-Mar 2013 16-Mar 2012 71 28-Jun 2012 22-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 64 2014 3- Attainment Average: 64 58 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 61 - Winter Park (#095-2002) School (#L095-0008) 2015 59 3-Apr 2015 17-Mar 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 66 2014 3- Attainment Average: 61 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 10- Historic Ozone Attainment Status Source: Florida Department of Enviromental Protection

As of May 1, 2015 (#C117-1002) - Four Corners (#C097-2002) 2015 58 18-Mar 2015 59 22-Apr 2014 4-May 2014 64 1-Apr 2013 61 15-Mar 2013 16-Mar 2012 71 28-Jun 2012 22-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 64 2014 3- Attainment Average: 64 59 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 62 - Winter Park (#095-2002) School (#L095-0008) 2015 59 30-Mar 2015 58 20-Mar 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 66 2014 3- Attainment Average: 61 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 61 10- Historic Ozone Attainment Status Source: Florida Department of Enviromental Protection

As of June 15, 2015 (#C117-1002) - Four Corners (#C097-2002) 2015 9-May 2015 61 1-May 2014 4-May 2014 64 1-Apr 2013 61 15-Mar 2013 16-Mar 2012 71 28-Jun 2012 22-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 64 2014 3- Attainment Average: 64 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 63 - Winter Park (#095-2002) School (#L095-0008) 2015 59 18-Mar 2015 61 9-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 66 2014 3- Attainment Average: 61 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 62 10- Historic Ozone Attainment Status

As of July 7, 2015 (#C117-1002) - Four Corners (#C097-2002) 2015 9-May 2015 61 1-May 2014 4-May 2014 64 1-Apr 2013 61 15-Mar 2013 16-Mar 2012 71 28-Jun 2012 22-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 64 2014 3- Attainment Average: 64 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 63 - Winter Park (#095-2002) School (#L095-0008) 2015 59 18-Mar 2015 61 9-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 66 2014 3- Attainment Average: 61 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 62 10- Historic Ozone Attainment Status

As of August 24, 2015 (#C117-1002) - Four Corners (#C097-2002) 2015 9-May 2015 61 1-May 2014 4-May 2014 64 1-Apr 2013 61 15-Mar 2013 16-Mar 2012 71 28-Jun 2012 22-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 64 2014 3- Attainment Average: 64 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 63 - Winter Park (#095-2002) School (#L095-0008) 2015 59 18-Mar 2015 61 9-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 66 2014 3- Attainment Average: 61 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 62 10- Historic Ozone Attainment Status

As of October 5, 2015 (#C117-1002) - Four Corners (#C097-2002) 2015 9-May 2015 59 22-Apr 2014 4-May 2014 64 1-Apr 2013 61 15-Mar 2013 16-Mar 2012 71 28-Jun 2012 22-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 64 2014 3- Attainment Average: 64 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 62 - Winter Park (#095-2002) School (#L095-0008) 2015 59 9-May 2015 59 7-May 2014 3- Attainment Average: 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 66 2014 3- Attainment Average: 61 2015 -to- 3- Running Average: 61 10- Historic Ozone Attainment Status

EPA Strengthens Ozone Standards to Protect Public Health/Science-based standards to reduce sick days, asthma attacks, emergency room visits, greatly outweigh costs Release : 10/1/2015 Contact Information : Enesta Jones, Jones.enesta@epa.gov, 202-564-7873, 202-564-43; En español: Lina Younes, younes.lina@epa.gov, 202-564-9924, 202-564-43 WASHINGTON Based on extensive scientific evidence on effects that ground-level ozone pollution, or smog, has on public health and welfare, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level ozone to parts per billion (ppb) from ppb to protect public health. The updated standards will reduce Americans exposure to ozone, improving public health protection, particularly for at risk groups including children, older adults, and people of all ages who have lung diseases such as asthma. Ground-level ozone forms when nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) react in the air. Put simply ozone pollution means it hurts to breathe for those most vulnerable: our kids, our elderly and those suffering from heart and lung ailments, said EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy. Our job is to set science-backed standards that protect the health of the American people. Today s action is one of the most important measures we can take for improving public health, reducing the costs of illness and protecting our children s health. EPA examined nearly 2,300 studies in this review of the ozone standards including more than 1,000 new studies published since the last review of the standards in 2008. Scientific evidence shows that ozone can cause a number of harmful effects on the respiratory system, including difficulty breathing and inflammation of the airways. The revised standards will significantly improve public health protection, resulting in fewer premature deaths, and thousands fewer missed school and work days and asthma attacks. For people with lung diseases like COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) or the 23 million Americans and 6 million children living with asthma, these effects can aggravate their diseases, leading to increased medication use, emergency room visits and hospital admissions. Evidence also indicates that long-term exposure to ozone is likely to be one of many causes of asthma development. And studies show that ozone exposure is likely to cause premature death. The public health benefits of the updated standards, estimated at $2.9 to $5.9 billion annually in 2025, outweigh the estimated annual costs of $1.4 billion. Local communities, states, and the federal government have made substantial progress in reducing groundlevel ozone. Nationally, from 19 to 2014, average ozone levels have fallen 33 percent, while the economy has continued to grow. And by 2025, EPA projects that existing rules and programs will bring the vast majority of the remaining counties into compliance. Advances in pollution control technology for vehicles and industry along with other emission reduction standards, including Tier 3 clean vehicle and fuels standards, the Clean Power Plan and the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, will significantly cut smog-forming emissions, helping states meet today s updated ozone standards. To ensure that people are alerted when ozone reaches unhealthy levels, EPA is extending the ozone monitoring season for 32 states and the District of Columbia. This is particularly important for at-risk groups, including children and people with asthma because it will provide information so families can take steps to protect their health on smoggy days. EPA also is strengthening the secondary ozone standard to ppb, which will improve protection for trees, plants and ecosystems. New studies since the last review of the standards add to evidence showing that repeated exposure to ozone reduces growth and has other harmful effects on plants and trees. These types of effects have the potential to harm ecosystems and the benefits they provide. The Clean Air Act provides states with time to meet the standards. Depending on the severity of their ozone problem, areas would have until between 2020 and 2037 to meet the standards. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to review the ozone standards every five years to determine whether they should be revised in light of the latest science. Today s action comes after a thorough review and public comment process. The agency received more than 430,000 written comments on the proposed standards and held three public hearings. Source: EPA News Release - http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/bd4379a92ceceeac257350400c27/ffe8a2d2a59797b3257ed000724bf0!opendocument