Protecting & Restoring Local Waters and the Chesapeake Bay

Similar documents
Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Challenges & Opportunities

Prioritizing Climate Change Impacts and Action Strategies

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN. Habitat GIT Meeting 9 May 2017

Full Title of Priority: Enhanced Analysis and Explanation of Water-Quality Data for the TMDL Mid-Point Assessment

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN. Update to Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board June 14, 2018

Chesapeake Bay Strategy Goals Framework

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Final draft January 29, 2014

Water Quality Standards Attainment

2014 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement:

The Chesapeake Bay Program

Climate Change Impacts of Most Concern for CB Agreement Goal & Outcome Attainment

The Chesapeake Bay Program Biennial Strategy Review System: A Guide to Your Quarterly Progress Meeting

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN - UPDATE. Update to Chesapeake Bay Program STAR January 25, 2018

Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

RESTORE CLEAN WATER ACTIONS: Federal Water Quality Two-Year Milestones for

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Scientific, Technical Assessment and Reporting (STAR) Team Briefing and Options Paper:

Planning Targets. For WQGIT Review Draft November 7, 2017

Fact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

Guiding the Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay: The EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership. Keely Clifford U.S. Embassy Paris

Julie Mawhorter, US Forest Service Northeast Area State & Private Forestry, Chesapeake Bay Program

Chesapeake Bay Updates. Agricultural Advisory Board June 18, 2014 Andy Zemba Interstate Waters Office

SUPPORTING CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION BY MODELING NUTRIENT SOURCES AND TRANSPORT

Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Restoration:

Sustainable Fisheries GIT: Fish Habitat

PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Y2012. Action Plan. Public Review Draft. Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Executive Order

Action Plan. Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Executive Order March 30, 2012

the ability to manage for a stable and among the jurisdictions, and productive crab population and fishery by implement accountable monitoring

MAST Training Webinar for Federal Partners

Fish Habitat Management Strategy Outline

Estuary Habitat Restoration STRATEGY 2012

2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision. October 19, 2017 PA Phase III WIP Steering Committee Meeting

2017 Revised Guide for Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Two-year Milestones

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s Interim Expectations for the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s Interim Expectations for the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

RESTORE CLEAN WATER ACTIONS: Federal Water Quality Two-Year Milestones for

Indicator Framework SUPPORTING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM INTO THE FUTURE. Management Board Meeting September 30, 2015

CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES AND RESTORATION PLAN

Chesapeake Bay: Citizen Science and Executive Order Michelle Ryan

The Chesapeake Bay TMDL

ITAT Workshop on Integrating Findings to Explain Water Quality Change

Testimony of Shari T. Wilson, Secretary Maryland Department of the Environment. Before. The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works

Reducing Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment Pollution Progress Update. Jeff Corbin, Senior Advisor to the EPA Administrator

CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL PHASE III WIP NORTHERN VIRGINIA OPENING STAKEHOLDER MEETING AUGUST 17, 2018 NORMAND GOULET NVRC

Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan

Session I: Introduction

STATE OF THE BAY IN 2012

SCIENCE PRIORITIES OF THE

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources

Incorporating monitoring, modeling and trends analyses into management decisions: a Choptank River example

Milestones Progress Report

Continuous Monitoring Network Strategy Continued Discussion. Peter Tango November 18, 2015 DIWG-INWG SERC

Septic Systems 4% Chemical Fertilizer: Agricultural Land 15%

Executive Order Draft Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay

Chesapeake Bay. report card

Chesapeake Bay Program in Pennsylvania. Karl G. Brown Executive Secretary PA State Conservation Commission

A Vision for a Healthy, Productive, and Sustainable Galveston Bay

Climate Change, Marsh Erosion and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL

THE CHALLENGE OF NUTRIENT CONTROL IN LARGE SCALE WATERSHEDS: EFFORTS IN THE U.S.

BAY BAROMETER. Health and Restoration. in the Chesapeake Watershed

Marel King, Pennsylvania Director Chesapeake Bay Commission

The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint:

The Midpoint Assessment and Phase III WIP

Prioritizing Habitat Projects in Areas of Concern Throughout the Great Lakes

Monitoring Data in Support of Mid-Point Assessment

Land Conservation & Chesapeake Restoration

Chesapeake Bay WIP Phase II Status in the COG Region

Full Title of Priority: Enhanced Analysis and Explanation of Water-Quality Data for the TMDL Mid-Point Assessment

FY2016 GIT Funding Process. Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting February 28, 2017

The Relationship of Agriculture, Water and the Environment

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM BAY BAROMETER HEALTH & RESTORATION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

Finalizing the Chesapeake Bay Health Index (BHI)

The Colley Bay Story: Successful Implementation of a Living Shoreline

Stormwater Quality Trades: Virginia Farms and Highways

Fact Sheet. Pennsylvania s Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy Goals for Nutrient and Sediment Reduction and Habitat Restoration

Anthony Moore Assistant Secretary for Chesapeake Bay Restoration

TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL)

Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Analysis and Methods Document Reducing Pollution Indicators Updated May 2018

Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Unnamed Tributary to Pitts Creek. Public Meeting March 26, Why Are We Here

Content Overview of the next Chesapeake Bay Ambient Water Quality Criteria Technical Addendum

Chesapeake Bay Foundation 101. Robert Jennings

partnership water Assessment DoD Chesapeake Bay program Journal Bay jurisdictions data IN THIS ISSUE Reaching the Halfway Point Workgroup local CBP

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Investment in the Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative: What s Different This Time Around

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Tracking and Accounting System Status Overview April 11, Pravin Rana Project Manager, EPA Office of Water

Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool CAST

Proposal for Responsive STAC Workshop: Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0

The Chesapeake Bay TMDL -

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

E3 Model Scenario Purpose and Definitions

Pennsylvania s Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan. Kick-Off & Listening Session June 5, 2017

The Chesapeake Bay TMDL

NOAA s Role in Coastal Zone Management in the Chesapeake Region

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AT FEDERAL FACILITIES & ON FEDERAL LANDS IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

The Chesapeake Bay TMDL. How did we get here?

THE STATE CHESAPEAKE BAY. A Report to the Citizens of the Bay Region OF THE

How Nutrient Trading Can Help Restore the Chesapeake Bay

Restoring the Water-Quality Conditions in the Chesapeake Bay: What is working and what still needs to be done

Habitat Conservation and Fisheries

Protocol for Setting Targets, Planning BMPs and Reporting Progress for Federal Facilities and Lands

Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force

Transcription:

Protecting & Restoring Local Waters and the Chesapeake Bay Restore America s Estuaries National Conference Gregory Barranco Chesapeake Bay Program Office November 2010

The Chesapeake Bay and Watershed Largest estuary in North America and the third largest in the world. Land-to-water ratio is 14:1; largest of any coastal water body in the world. Average depth of 21 feet. Supports more than 3,600 species of plants, fish and animals Home to almost 17 million people. About 150,000 new people move into the watershed each year. Tens of thousands of streams, creeks, and rivers are resources for communities throughout the watershed. 77,000 principally family farms. 2

Executive Order 13508 May 12, 2009 President Obama issues EO 13508 for the Protection and Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay Federal Leadership Committee EO Strategy Annual Action Plan and Progress Report 3

EO 13508 Chesapeake Bay Strategy May 12, 2010 Proposed FUNDING: $490.5M 4

EO FY2011 Action Plan September 30, 2010 Federal agencies release Fiscal Year 2011 Action Plan 5

Goal: RESTORE WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY OUTCOME: Meet water quality standards for dissolved oxygen, clarity/ underwater grasses and chlorophyll-a in the Bay and tidal tributaries by implementing 100 percent of pollution reduction actions for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment no later than 2025, with 60 percent of segments attaining standards by 2025. STREAM RESTORATION OUTCOME: Improve the health of streams so that 70 percent of sampled streams throughout the Chesapeake watershed rate fair, good or excellent as measured by the Index of Biotic Integrity, by 2025. Total FY2011 Funding: $236 M Major 2011 Initiatives: Complete and implement the Bay TMDL Initiate regulations to reduce Bay-specific nutrient and sediment pollution loads Grant support to states to improve implementation of practices, regulatory and accountability programs, and water quality monitoring $20 million through CBRAP grants Implement a Chesapeake Bay Compliance and Enforcement Strategy for stormwater, agriculture, and wastewater online map tracking to help target greatest sources of pollution 6

Goal: RESTORE WATER QUALITY AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION OUTCOME: Work with producers to apply new conservation practices on 4 million acres of agricultural working lands in high-priority watersheds by 2025 to improve water quality in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. FY2011 Funding $134.7 M Major 2011 Initiatives: Target conservation practices in high priority watersheds using the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Initiative and other USDA Farm Bill Programs Over $72 million in CBWI funding Monitor and assess changes in water quality Work with states and local partners to expand tracking and reporting systems for conservation practices 7

Goal: RECOVER HABITAT WETLAND RESTORATION OUTCOME: Restore 30,000 acres of tidal and non-tidal wetlands and enhance the function of an additional 150,000 acres of degraded wetlands by 2025. FY2011 Funding $10,051,789 Major 2011 Initiatives: Restore and enhance priority Chesapeake tidal and non-tidal wetlands and living shorelines Restore/protect 300 acres of priority marshes and 1,200 acres on private land in FY2011 Combat invasive species that threaten habitat Evaluate the use of coastal and marine spatial planning (CMSP) in the Bay Define stakeholder needs related to CMSP in the Bay Establish wetland geospatial specialist and technician positions 8

Goal: SUSTAIN FISH & WILDLIFE OYSTER OUTCOME: Restore native oyster habitat and populations in 20 tributaries out of 35 to 40 candidate tributaries by 2025. FY2011 Funding $3,570,519 BLUE CRAB OUTCOME: Maintain sustainable blue crab interim rebuilding target of 200 million adults (1+ years old) in 2011 and develop a new population target for 2012 through 2025. FY2011 Funding $37,500 BLACK DUCK OUTCOME: Restore a three-year average wintering black duck population in the Chesapeake Bay watershed of 100,000 birds by 2025. FY2011 Funding $384,427 Major 2011 Initiatives: NOAA and USACE to coordinate with MD, VA, to develop a baywide strategy and finalize the Native Oyster Restoration Master Plan Work with the states move to larger scale oyster restoration in Chesapeake Bay. Continue coordination with states and partners to sustain Bay blue crab population Identify critical factors affecting abundance and revise current blue crab abundance target 9

Goal: CONSERVE LAND & INCREASE PUBLIC ACCESS LAND CONSERVATION OUTCOME: Protect an additional 2 million acres of lands throughout the watershed currently identified as high conservation priorities at the federal, state or local level by 2025, including 695,000 acres of forest land of highest value for maintaining water quality. FY2011 Funding $41,347,793 PUBLIC ACCESS OUTCOME: Increase public access to the Bay and its tributaries by adding 300 new public access sites by 2025. FY2011 Funding $1,246,425 Major 2011 Initiatives: Invest in land protection at parks, refuges, around military bases and through LWCF and WRP/FRPP grants $30 million dollars for direct land protection. USGS will develop a watershed-wide, publicly accessible GIS-based land conservation targeting system to support sound land conservation planning, and strategic coordination. USGS and NPS will convene working sessions to develop scope and mechanisms for the system Will build on existing data; gaps filled through landscape surveys Develop watershed-wide public access plan to guide access expansion and invest in new access sites through matching grants FY 2011 Budget would double funding for Gateways program 10

Supporting Strategy: RESPOND TO CLIMATE CHANGE CLIMATE CHANGE OBJECTIVE: Minimize the vulnerability of the Chesapeake Bay watershed, including its habitats, public infrastructure and human communities, to adverse impacts from climate change. FY2011 Funding $4,104,561 Major 2011 Initiatives: Identify and assess risk to key watershed and coastal habitats from potential impacts of climate and land change Begin vulnerability assessments of coastal wetlands and other key coastal habitats Improve habitat restoration techniques to consider land elevation change, sea level rise and other changing conditions Analyze results of restoration efforts to update tidal wetland restoration techniques and guidance Provide climate and land change data to identify habitats and communities vulnerable climate change impacts Assist states and local communities with access to digital elevation information 11

Supporting Strategy: STRENGTHEN SCIENCE STRENGTHENING SCIENCE OBJECTIVE: Strengthen science to support ecosystem-based adaptive management, to more effectively prioritize, implement, monitor and evaluate the actions and policies needed, and to identify new threats to the health of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. FY2011 Funding $13,077,205 Major 2011 actions: Implement ecosystem-based adaptive management Transform the CBP science activities by increasing capacity from EO federal science actions Improve tools to target: Water-quality actions (CBP models, SPARROW models, GW models) Land conservation targeting system Enhance monitoring by establishing a Monitoring Alliance CBP watershed water-quality network Tidal monitoring and Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoy System 12

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 13

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Updates Basic Approach November 2009, EPA expectations July 1, allocations for pollution limits for nitrogen and phosphorus August 15, allocations for sediment September 1, Phase I draft WIPs Sept. 24 to Nov. 8, Draft TMDL and 45-day public comment period November 29, Final Phase 1 implementation plans December 31, Final TMDL established 14

Accountability for Results Establish Bay TMDL Develop Watershed Implementation Plans Set 2-Year Milestones Monitor Progress Adaptive Management Employ Federal Actions or Consequences 15

Bay TAS Chesapeake Bay Tracking and Accounting System System to analyze/track TMDL progress Access Data on TMDL, WLA, milestones, progress (at the level the data is available) Display in tables, graphs, charts Chesapeake Stat will likely use BayTAS and other data to present Bay TMDL Progress but the systems are different. Other systems might draw data from BayTAS States, EPA, CBPO; possibly local governments Public will be able to see data Spatial Scale: Basin-wide nutrient and sediment target loads Segment-wide loads possibly (States would need to report data to 16

ChesapeakeBay.net 17

ChesapeakeStat People, Process, and Information A systematic process within the Partnership of analyzing information and data to continually assess progress towards goals and adapt strategies and tactics when needed. A public website that promotes improved accountability, fosters coordination and promotes transparency by sharing performance information on goals, indicators, strategies and funding. Existing information is used and displayed in ways that better support decision-making. http://stat.chesapeakebay.net/ 18