House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 15, Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy

Similar documents
House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 8, Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy

HOUSE BILL 332: Energy Policy Amendments

Renewable Portfolio Standards

Energy Efficiency in North Carolina and Southeast Energy Efficiency in North Carolina and Southeast

SB 838: Oregon Renewable Energy Act Establishing an Oregon Renewable Energy Standard

Outline. Introduction to Wisconsin. Barriers to Generating Electricity from. Incentives and Regulations Intended to

SB 838: Oregon Renewable Energy Act Establishing an Oregon Renewable Energy Standard

Fred Stoffel. Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. May 19, Utility Resource Planning Fundamentals

What is Demand Response?

Ameren Missouri. Renewable Energy Standard Compliance Plan Prepared in Compliance with 4 CSR

Potential Impacts of a Renewable and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard in Kentucky

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Ameren Missouri. Renewable Energy Standard Compliance Plan Prepared in Compliance with 4 CSR

SECTION III RATE SCHEDULES Page 56

Missed Opportunities for Efficiency in Virginia

Making Sense of U.S. Energy Markets

2016 Integrated Resource Plans. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015

EEI Financial Conference November 6 8, 2016

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY 218th LEGISLATURE

CURRENT FEDERAL AND REGIONAL ELECTRIC POLICY ISSUES FOR THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION

Outstanding Unresolved Issues

Renewable Energy Plan 2013 Biennial Review Lansing Board of Water & Light MSCP Case No. U-16619

Using DSM to Help Meet Clean Air Act Requirements: A Case Study

Report to the Environmental Review Commission and Joint Legislative Utility Review Committee January 2009

Implementation of the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (REPS)

CCA Terms Glossary. Valley Clean Energy Alliance. i CCA Terms Glossary

Analysis of House Bill 589, Competitive Energy Solutions for NC (Version 3)

DRAFT 8/11/08. I. Renewable Portfolio Standard. (a) The Commission shall establish minimum numerical portfolio standards for each investorowned

Senate Bill 350 Study

Economic Impact Analysis of Clean Energy Development in North Carolina 2017 Update

Demand-Side Management and Energy Efficiency in Florida

Rate Design and Resource Planning

Resource and Financial Impact of Clean Line P&E HVDC Delivered Wind Resources for TVA

Ì739598nÎ LEGISLATIVE ACTION... The Committee on Communications, Energy, and Public Utilities (Fasano) recommended the following:

Department of Legislative Services

State CO2 Emission Rate Goals in EPA s Proposed Rule for Existing Power Plants

2015 ISO/RTO Metrics Report. Summary. November 2015

Avoided Energy Costs in Maryland. Assessment of the Costs Avoided through Energy Efficiency and Conservation Measures in Maryland.

STANDARD CONTRACT RIDERS - (Continued) RIDER NO. 9 DAY-AHEAD HOURLY PRICE SERVICE

Wabash Valley Power 2017 Integrated Resource Plan

State Legislation and Regulations Supporting Nuclear Energy

Workshop H. PJM Basics: An Introduction to PJM Interconnection and How its Energy and Capacity Markets Operate

Public Service Commission of West Virginia

Bill Fehrman President and CEO

Renewable Energy Plan 2011 Biennial Review Lansing Board of Water & Light MSCP Case No. U-16619

2007 Integrated Resource Plan

Summary of Net Metered Projects as of June 30, Small Net Metered Projects as of 6/30/2016 Small Group Host Projects as of 6/30/2016

ILL. C. C. No. 10 Commonwealth ELECTRICITY 3rd Revised Sheet No. 29 Edison Company (Canceling 2nd Revised Sheet No. 29)

Winter Polar Vortex

New Entrants in Electric Generation in the Tennessee Valley

Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service

Southeast Sustainability Opportunities

Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act Standards

RATE DS-4 LARGE GENERAL DELIVERY SERVICE

SNAP. Sustainable Natural Alternative Power. and other interconnections topics. presenter: Todd Hoener

2009 Integrated Resource Plan. PNUCC Board of Directors Meeting. January 7, Copyright 2010 Portland General Electric. All Rights Reserved.

Investigation into the Effectiveness of. Solar Programs in Oregon

Entergy Louisiana: Analysis of Long- Term Achievable Demand Response Potential. Draft Report October 12, 2018

RATE 665 RENEWABLE FEED-IN TARIFF

Energy and Climate Report

ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Second Revision of Sheet No Canceling First Revision of Sheet No. 37-1

Association of Corporate Council

CUSTOMER GUIDE TO PJM BILLING

2011 IRP Public Input Meeting. December 15, Pacific Power Rocky Mountain Power PacifiCorp Energy

Renewable Electricity Procurement in California

Electric Utility Regulation, Energy Needs and Emerging Issues. Florida Energy Systems Consortium Summit

Renewable Energy Standard & Renewable Energy Investment. Julie Baldwin, MPSC Staff

Draft Renewable Portfolio Standard Rule

Incentives to Increase Renewable Energy. Linda M. Wagner Senior Legal and Policy Advisor Illinois Commerce Commission

APSC Docket No U Entergy Arkansas, Inc Integrated Resource Plan

RE: UM 1729 Standard Avoided Cost Purchases from Eligible Qualifying Facilities Compliance Filing

Impacts of Grid Regulation Policies in the United States Renewable Energy Market

Electricity Prices in the Tennessee Valley

Comparison of Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) Programs in PJM States

A Utility Perspective on Coal Utilization and West Virginia s Electric Infrastructure

GLOSSARY OF TERMS January 2017

Rates vs. Energy Efficiency

Hybrid Utility Regulation in the United States Midwest: Achievements & Challenges

Ohio RPS, EE and DR Mandates

Utility-centered Approach to Energy Efficiency: Duke Energy s Save-a-watt Model. Jared Lawrence Vice President, Customer Strategy and Innovation

Ohio Energy. Workshop O. PJM 201 A Deeper Dive Into the Regional Electricity Market Operated by PJM and How Electricity Prices Are Impacted

Electric Power Outlook for Pennsylvania

Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1396

1136 Longworth House Office Building 1136 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC Washington, DC 20515

Solar Photovoltaic Volumetric Incentive Program 2015 Report to the Legislative Assembly

State Incentives for Biomass Products and Power

CCA Pilot Project Update

Strategic Plan. Renewable Energy. July 23, 2014

Community-Based Renewable Energy

REQUEST FOR INNOVATIVE ELECTRICAL CONSERVATION PROGRAMS. Gainesville City Commission Energy Conservation Workshop April 19, 2004

Wholesale Electricity Markets. New England Independent System Operator. Commissioner Mark Vannoy Maine Public Utilities Commission

Presented by. Chairman Edward S. Finley North Carolina Utilities Commission

Ì926992QÎ LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate...

The Potential Impact of Solar PV on Electricity Markets in Texas SEIA and the Energy Foundation June 19, 2012

MICHIGAN RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD SUMMARY

Saving Energy, Saving Money:

Transcription:

House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 15, 2017 Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy

At A Glance North Carolina 112 years of service 3.3 million retail customers in 83 counties 15,400 employees; 7,000 retirees $1.5 billion payroll $138 million in property taxes to N.C. local governments 56,000 square miles of service territory More than 32,000 megawatts of electric generating capacity in the Carolinas Two utilities Duke Energy Carolinas Duke Energy Progress 2 March 15, 2017

Public Utility Compact Utility s obligation: Have an obligation to serve all customers in its assigned territory Charge only those rates allowed by the Commission Commission s obligation: The utility is allowed a reasonable opportunity to recover its costs (including earning a fair return for its investors) Other companies generally cannot provide retail electric service inside defined territories 3 March 15, 2017

Base Rates vs. Riders Base Rates Periodic adjustments to rates resulting from comprehensive rate filings and proceedings for all costs not recovered through riders Riders Scheduled adjustments to rates for discrete components of costs (e.g., fuel, renewables, energy efficiency) Also known as trackers, clauses and adders 4 March 15, 2017

NC Riders Annual Proceedings Fuel Cost Adjustment Costs include: fuel burned, certain purchased power costs, variable environmental costs and net gains/losses on the sale of fuel or fuel related by-products Annual rider adjustment can result in an increase or decrease in rates, billed as cents per kilowatt hour (kwh) Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (REPS) Costs recovered include: costs of renewable energy certificates (RECs), research and development costs (limited to $1 million per year), and labor and administrative costs related to compliance Demand Side Management/Energy Efficiency (DSM/EE) Costs recovered include: costs to develop and implement programs, net lost revenues (not to exceed 36 months) Joint Agency Asset Rider (JAAR) DEP only Costs recovered include: non-fuel costs associated with the purchase of generating assets from the North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency (NCEMPA) Fuel costs and fuel savings are included in the fuel rider 5 March 15, 2017

Residential Customer Bill Examples Duke Energy Carolinas Base Rate and Miscellaneous $ 93.16 Basic Facilities Charge $ 11.80 Fuel Rider $ (6.18) REPS Rider $ 0.91 DSM/EE Rider $ 4.29 Total Bill $ 103.98 Based on 1,000 kwh usage Duke Energy Progress Base Rate and Miscellaneous $ 92.63 Basic Customer Charge $ 11.13 Fuel Rider $ (11.81) REPS Rider $ 1.29 DSM/EE Rider $ 7.76 JAAR Rider $ 2.23 Total Bill $ 103.23 Based on 1,000 kwh usage 6 March 15, 2017

Average Customer Rates Data from Summer 2016 EEI Typical Bills Report 14.0 13.23 12.0 10.0 8.0 11.0 10.72 7.96 7.91 7.89 7.15 11.12 9.23 11.99 10.1 8.76 Residential 6.0 Commercial 4.0 Industrial 2.0 0.0 Duke Energy Progress Duke Energy Carolinas National Average South Atlantic Average 7 March 15, 2017

NC Policy on PURPA Congress enacted the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA) in 1978 and FERC enacted PURPA regulations Cogeneration and renewables facilities less than 80 MW are defined as Qualifying Facilities or QFs and have the right to force any utility to buy their power FERC enacts PURPA regulations but state commissions implement them, including calculation of avoided cost. Utilities have tariffs approved by state commissions that establish prices for certain types of QFs and QF sales. Timing of obligation (LEO) Term of contracts (15 years; there is no FERC minimum requirement) Standard rates 5 MW capacity limit for standard contracts (FERC requirement is100 kw) 8 March 15, 2017

Avoided Cost Calculation Methodology Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress use the peaker methodology to calculate avoided costs The peaker method is a proxy for a combination of resources (peaking, intermediate, and baseload) and their trade off in production costs Components of avoided cost tariff rates: Avoided Capacity Capacity value is the annual cost of peaking capacity from a new simple cycle combustion turbine, including fixed operating and maintenance (O&M) costs based on publicly available data The annual cost is allocated seasonally, then hourly, to determine the appropriate capacity rate expressed in cents/kwh Avoided Energy Energy value reflects the difference in variable costs (fuel, variable O&M, etc.) between two simulation model runs The first is the base case run, the second assumes 100 MW of free energy in each hour The difference is identified by on peak and off peak periods in order to determine the appropriate energy rate expressed in cents/kwh 9 March 15, 2017

PURPA Comparison in Southeastern States State 1 North Carolina Pay Rate DEC = $56.20 per MWh DEP = $55.30 per MWh Maximum Contract Term Fixed or Variable Rates Size Limits 15 year Fixed 5MW 2 Indiana $32.34 per MWh 1 year Variable 20 MW 3 Kentucky <=100 kw = $30.78 per MWh >100 kw = PJM LMP. No Standard Term Variable 20 MW 4 Ohio PJM LMP No Standard Term Variable 20 MW 5 South Carolina 6 Florida 7 Mississippi DEC = $51.20 per MWh DEP = $45.96 per MWh Actual Avoided Cost Ex-Post 2015 average was ~$26/MWh Highest On Peak Rate = $36.20 July - October 10 year Fixed 2 MW Annual Renewal Variable 80 MW 5 year Fixed 100 KW 8 Georgia Solar Avoided Rate = $40.10 5 year Fixed 100 KW 9 Alabama 10 West Virginia All schedule rates < $40 per MWH Peak = $34.30 per MWh Off Peak = $22.20 per MWh > =1 Year > =1 Year Variable Updated Annually Variable Subject to revisions 100 KW 100 KW NC has the highest avoided cost rates, and the longest fixed rate term for utility-scale solar of any utility in the Southeast 11 Virginia Fx of PJM LMP > =1 Year Variable 20 MW 12 Tennessee All schedule rates < $30 per MWH > =1 Year Variable Updated Annually 100 MW 13 Maryland PJM LMP No Standard Term Variable 100 KW 14 Louisiana Fx of MISO LMP Negotiated Term Variable 20 MW 15 Arkansas Fx of MISO LMP >100 KW min 5 yr Term Variable 20 MW 10 March 15, 2017

Duke Energy NCUC Avoided Cost Filing Proposing a change to NC rules related to PURPA Reduce contract size from 5 MW to 1 MW Reduce contract term from 15-year fixed rates to 10-year term with a 2-year adjusted energy rate No capacity payments in years; no capacity is needed in the utilities IRPs (Integrated Resource Plans) Proposes a competitive RFP process for renewables Provides a way to meet least cost requirements for customers Provides a way to obtain curtailment rights and dispatchability rights for variable renewable resources 11 March 15, 2017

NC Ranked #2 in the Nation for Connected Solar 12 March 15, 2017

House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 8, 2017 Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy

At A Glance North Carolina 112 years of service 3.3 million retail customers in 83 counties 15,400 employees; 7,000 retirees $1.5 billion payroll $138 million in property taxes to N.C. local governments Two utilities Duke Energy Carolinas Duke Energy Progress 2 March 8, 2017

Maintaining Reliable Energy Infrastructure 56,000 square miles of service territory More than 32,000 megawatts of electric generating capacity in the Carolinas 19,400 miles of high-voltage transmission lines 170,600 miles of distribution lines 42 lakes and more than 3,000 miles of managed shoreline 3 March 8, 2017

Public Utility Compact Utility s obligation: Have an obligation to serve all customers in its assigned territory Charge only those rates allowed by the Commission Commission s obligation: The utility is allowed a reasonable opportunity to recover its costs (including earning a fair return for its investors) Other companies generally cannot provide retail electric service inside defined territories 4 March 8, 2017

Base Rates vs. Riders Base Rates Periodic adjustments to rates resulting from comprehensive rate filings and proceedings for all costs not recovered through riders Riders Scheduled adjustments to rates for discrete components of costs (e.g., fuel, renewables, energy efficiency) Also known as trackers, clauses and adders 5 March 8, 2017

NC Riders Fuel Cost Adjustment Renewable Energy and Energy Portfolio Standard (REPS) Demand Side Management/Energy Efficiency (DSM/EE) Joint Agency Asset Rider (JAAR) DEP only 6 March 8, 2017

Fuel Cost Adjustment Overview Representative level of fuel costs included in base rates; the fuel rider adjusts for actual fuel costs incurred Costs include fuel burned, certain purchased power costs, variable environmental costs and net gains/losses on the sale of fuel or fuel related by-products Annual rider adjustment can result in an increase or decrease in rates, billed as cents per kilowatt hour (kwh) 7 March 8, 2017

REPS Overview Recovers cost of compliance with Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard, which requires DEP and DEC to supply a percentage of their NC retail sales with renewable energy Current percentage = 6 percent Renewable energy resources include solar, wind, hydropower, geothermal, and biomass Types of cost recovered include: cost of renewable energy certificates (RECs), research and development costs (limited to $1 million per year), and labor and administrative costs related to compliance with the standard REPS costs are billed as a dollar amount per account and capped by customer account Residential $34/year Commercial $150/year Industrial $1,000/year 8 March 8, 2017

DSM/EE Overview Recovers the costs of implementing programs designed to help increase efficiency, reduce energy consumption and save customers money on their energy bills Billed as cents per kwh Types of costs recovered include cost to develop and offer programs, net lost revenues (not to exceed 36 months), a utility incentive based on kw and kwh savings achieved Net lost revenues and utility incentives are based on independently evaluated and measured results Eligible non-residential customers may opt out of either or both rates if they have their own DSM and EE programs Commercial customers with annual consumption of 1,000,000 kwh or greater in billing months of the prior calendar year and all industrial customers may apply 9 March 8, 2017

JAAR Overview Allows Duke Energy Progress to fully recover the non-fuel costs associated with the purchase of generating assets from the North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency (NCEMPA) Fuel costs and fuel savings are included in the fuel rider North Carolina Senate Bill 305 provided the framework to recover the North Carolina retail portion of all reasonable and prudent costs incurred to acquire, operate, and maintain the proportional interest in the electric generating facilities purchased from a joint agency Acquisition costs ($1.2 billion) associated with the transaction, levelized over remaining life of assets, including financing costs Incremental operating costs additional depreciation/amortization, taxes, financing costs, and O&M associated with owning and maintaining acquired assets Billed as rate per kw for schedules with a demand charge and cents per kwh for all other schedules 10 March 8, 2017

DEC Residential Customer Bill Example Base Rate and Miscellaneous $ 93.16 Basic Facilities Charge $ 11.80 Fuel Rider $ (6.18) REPS Rider $ 0.91 DSM/EE Rider $ 4.29 Total Bill $ 103.98 Based on 1,000 kwh usage 11 March 8, 2017

DEP Residential Customer Bill Example Base Rate and Miscellaneous $ 92.63 Basic Customer Charge $ 11.13 Fuel Rider $ (11.81) REPS Rider $ 1.29 DSM/EE Rider $ 7.76 JAAR Rider $ 2.23 Total Bill $ 103.23 Based on 1,000 kwh usage 12 March 8, 2017

Average Customer Rates 14.0 13.23 12.0 10.0 8.0 11.0 10.72 7.96 7.91 7.89 7.15 11.12 9.23 11.99 10.1 8.76 Residential 6.0 Commercial 4.0 Industrial 2.0 0.0 Duke Energy Progress Duke Energy Carolinas National Average South Atlantic Average 13 March 8, 2017

NC Policy on PURPA on PURPA Congress enacted the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA) in 1978 and FERC enacted PURPA regulations Cogeneration and renewables facilities less than 80 MW are defined as Qualifying Facilities or QFs and have the right to force any utility to buy their power FERC enacts PURPA regulations but state commissions implement them, including calculation of avoided cost. Utilities have tariffs approved by state commissions that establish prices for certain types of QFs and QF sales. Timing of obligation (LEO) Term of contracts (15 years; there is no FERC minimum requirement) Standard rates 5 MW capacity limit for standard contracts (FERC requirement is100 kw) 14 March 8, 2017

Avoided Cost Calculation Methodology Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress use the peaker methodology to calculate avoided costs The peaker method is a proxy for a combination of resources (peaking, intermediate, and baseload) and their trade off in production costs Components of avoided cost tariff rates: Avoided Capacity Capacity value is the annual cost of peaking capacity from a new simple cycle combustion turbine, including fixed operating and maintenance (O&M) costs based on publicly available data The annual cost is allocated seasonally, then hourly, to determine the appropriate capacity rate expressed in cents/kwh Avoided Energy Energy value reflects the difference in variable costs (fuel, variable O&M, etc.) between two simulation model runs The first is the base case run, the second assumes 100 MW of free energy in each hour The difference is identified by on peak and off peak periods in order to determine the appropriate energy rate expressed in cents/kwh 15 March 8, 2017

PURPA Comparison in Southeastern States State 1 North Carolina Pay Rate DEC = $56.20 per MWh DEP = $55.30 per MWh Maximum Contract Term Fixed or Variable Rates Size Limits 15 year Fixed 5MW 2 Indiana $32.34 per MWh 1 year Variable 20 MW 3 Kentucky <=100 kw = $30.78 per MWh >100 kw = PJM LMP. No Standard Term Variable 20 MW 4 Ohio PJM LMP No Standard Term Variable 20 MW 5 South Carolina 6 Florida 7 Mississippi DEC = $51.20 per MWh DEP = $45.96 per MWh Actual Avoided Cost Ex-Post 2015 average was ~$26/MWh Highest On Peak Rate = $36.20 July - October 10 year Fixed 2 MW Annual Renewal Variable 80 MW 5 year Fixed 100 KW 8 Georgia Solar Avoided Rate = $40.10 5 year Fixed 100 KW 9 Alabama 10 West Virginia All schedule rates < $40 per MWH Peak = $34.30 per MWh Off Peak = $22.20 per MWh > =1 Year > =1 Year Variable Updated Annually Variable Subject to revisions 100 KW 100 KW NC has the highest avoided cost rates, and the longest fixed rate term for utility-scale solar of any utility in the Southeast 11 Virginia Fx of PJM LMP > =1 Year Variable 20 MW 12 Tennessee All schedule rates < $30 per MWH > =1 Year Variable Updated Annually 100 MW 13 Maryland PJM LMP No Standard Term Variable 100 KW 14 Louisiana Fx of MISO LMP Negotiated Term Variable 20 MW 15 Arkansas Fx of MISO LMP >100 KW min 5 yr Term Variable 20 MW 16 March 8, 2017

NC Ranked #2 in the Nation for Connected Solar 17 March 8, 2017