LUD PRINCIPLE. Figure 1 LUD Detail. Silicone compound squeezed around piston

Similar documents
USE OF NEW AND MODIFICATION OF TRADITIONAL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS CAN ADD TO BRIDGE SEISMIC RESILIENCY

Seismic isolation of the Jamuna multipurpose bridge. M.G. Castellano, A. Cestarollo - JJOJO &/wz%%mo D. - f D - Abstract

TechStar Lock-Up Devices & anti-seismic expansion joints in Southern Asia

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC ISOLATED SYSTEMS IN BRIDGES

PERFORMANCE OF MECHANICAL SEISMIC LOAD TRANSMISSION DEVICE BASED ON IMPACT

Bridge articulation No. 1.04

Seismic isolation of continuous bridges through curved surface sliders combined with shock transmission units

Structural Bearing Assemblies

Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges

Seismic Devices. Connection Isolation Dissipation

ECONOMICAL DESIGN OF EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT BRIDGES

Real-Time Hybrid Testing of Laminated Rubber Dampers for Seismic Retrofit of Bridges

MIDAS Training Series

STUDY ON SHAKING TABLE TESTS OF ISOLATED BRIDGE MODEL WITH LRB

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle

LUD LOCK-UP DEVICE ESSENTIAL PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES AGAINST S SEISMIC, BRAKING AND TRACTION FORCES

Types : Metal rockers, rollers or slides or merely rubber or laminated rubber, POT - PTFE

Offering a step-change in seismic technology

Modjeski and Masters, Inc. Consulting Engineers 04/18/06 St. Croix River Bridge 3D Analysis Report Introduction

SILER Project Training course on seismic protection of lead-cooled reactors

Seismic Design and Retrofit. Reginald DesRoches Professor and Associate Chair Georgia Institute of Technology

INSTALLATION MANUAL FOR MODULAR EXPANSION JOINT (LG SYSTEM)

The content for this class has been provided by the following PB employees: With assistance from: Martine Klein, P.E. Narration by Greg Metzger, PB

Retrofit Measures for Superstructures, Bearings, and Seats

SINGLE CELL STRIP SEAL JOINT SYSTEMS

Vibration control of a building model with base isolation

JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (JCIET) INNOVATIVE ISOLATION TECHNIQUES FOR SEISMIC FORCES. Ar.Anurakti Yadav LNCT College, Bhopal

Seismic Evaluation of a 1930 Steel Bridge with Lightly Reinforced Concrete Piers

In-plane testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted sleeve

Colebrand International Limited Regent Street London W1B 5TD Telephone: +44(0)

SEISMIC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF LONG-SPAN CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE

Recent Developments in Stay Cable Systems

SECTION VIBRATION CONTROLS FOR PLUMBING PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

Research on seismic safety, retrofit, and design of a steel cable-stayed bridge

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT OF BRIDGES USING SMART MATERIALS

APPLICATION OF THE POWERFUL TMD AS A MEASURE FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT OF OLD BRIDGES

1994. Seismic behavior characteristic of high damping rubber bearing through shaking table test

ICSS(4): A DESIGN APPLIED FOR A SUPER LONG MULTI-SPAN BRIDGE

Seismic Design Criteria of a Cable- Stayed Bridge- An Owner s Perspective

SECTION VIBRATION CONTROLS FOR HVAC PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

Seismic Response of Simply Supported Deck Bridges with Auxiliary Superelastic Devices

CONTROL EFFECT OF LARGE TUNED MASS DAMPER APPLIED TO EXISTING HIGH-RISE BUILDING FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT

ABC-UTC. Research Progress Report (Feasibility Study) Title: Alternative ABC Connections Utilizing UHPC. March, 2017

Base Isolation In Seismic Structural Design

BOAST. West Coast. Set to open this spring, the tallest building on the West Coast resists wind and seismic drifts with massive braces.

CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF AN INNOVATIVE STEEL SHEAR WALL SYSTEM

Isolation of Base MR. BHASKAR BHATT P.G.STUDENT STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING GRAPHIC ERA UNIVERSITY, DEHRADUN, INDIA

Lessons learned: 3.2.Stability concepts

Using friction dampers for improving earthquake response of self-variable stiffness RC framed buildings

The New, Balanced Cantilever, Bridge over Acheloos River in Greece

with Fillers Department of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C

INTRODUCTION DISC BEARINGS

APPENDIX B. LOAD FRAME. This Appendix will describe the philosophy in the design and operation of the loading system.

ON SEISMIC RETROFIT STRATEGIES OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES - EXPERIENCES LEARNED FROM CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE

Types of Structures and Loads

Innovative Wharf Details: Elastomeric Bearing Pile-Deck Connection and Finned Monopile Erik Soderberg, SE 1 ; Derrick Lind, SE 2 ; Sugi Loni, SE 3

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDINGS: CURRENT WALL-TO-SLAB CONNECTIONS

Facilitating innovative bridge design the bearings and expansion joints of the Golden Ears Bridge

SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON BASE ISOLATED BRIDGES

Behavior of a multiple spans cable-stayed bridge

SECTION PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES

ITT Infrastructure Products

KEYWORDS: Barge Stability, Steel Truss Erection, Horizontal Sliding of Steel Trusses

INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND TESTING OF A SEISMIC RETROFITTED STEEL DECK TRUSS BRIDGE

Seismic Evaluation of the Historic East-Memorial Building Retrofitted with Friction Dampers, Ottawa, Canada

Basarab Cable Stayed Bridge in Bucharest

Design of A Special Bridge for Taiwan High Speed Rail Project Lot C296

BRIDGE JOINT PERFORMANCE IN CALIFORNIA

THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF A FIVE-STORY NEW TIMBER BUILDING IN JAPAN

EVALUATION OF LAMINATED HOLLOW CIRCULAR ELASTOMERIC RUBBER BEARING

John James Audubon Bridge

The Effect of Seismic Isolation on the Dynamic Behavior of Cable-Stayed Bridges

Seismic isolation of LFR Reactor Buildings

MAURER Seismic Isolation Systems Products and Technical Information

SECTION VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

DARTMOUTH COLLEGE DESIGN September 15, 2004 &CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF TENSION FOR RUBBER BEARINGS

Seismic Rehabilitation of Selby Condominium Complex, Montreal (Quebec), Canada

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

Rocking Seismic Isolation of Bridges Supported by Direct Foundations

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION OF MODULAR BRIDGE EXPANSION JOINTS SYSTEM

Dynamic Stability of Elastomeric Bearings at Large Displacement

Design of Izmir Bay Crossing Bridge

TIME Group Inc. ISO9001 International Quality Certificate. Highway and Bridge Testing Machine

Masonry infills with window openings and influence on reinforced concrete frame constructions

SECTION VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES IN HOUSING CONSTRUCTION

Engr. Thaung Htut Aung M. Eng. Asian Institute of Technology Deputy Project Director, AIT Consulting

Student Services & Classroom Addition SECTION VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF SANDWICH STRUCTURE COMPRISED OF GLASS FIBER REINFORCED CORE: PART 1

SECTION VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR HVAC PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A REINFORCED CONCRETE ARCH BRIDGE

Rail-Structure Interaction using MIDAS. Sean McAuley, P.E. Scott Henning, P.E.

We have engaged Beacon Construction Consultants to act as the price estimate reviewer.

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF A DUCTILE RETROFITTED DECK-TRUSS BRIDGE ABSTRACT

Viscous Wall Dampers GUIDELINES FOR MODELING

The construction technology of Chongqing Chaotianmen Bridge

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORE WALL

Transcription:

Seismic Devices

LUD (Lock Up Device) DEFINITION A Lock Up Device (LUD) is a plasto-elastic unit that provides the engineer a simple method of temporarily creating a fixed connection, when desirable, that otherwise would remain as a moveable connection. The device is sometimes referred to as a shock transmission unit or STU. The device is connected to either side of adjoining structures or between elements of structures, where expansion and contraction occur. Upon a sudden dynamic load, the device locks up and transmits the load through the structure. In effect, the device creates a rigid link within a fraction of a second and is modeled as a fixed connection during the shock loading. Once the shock load is removed, the device reverts to its benign influence and the structure behaves in a normal manner. The LUD does accommodate all slow movements associated with a bridge structure such as thermal movement, shrinkage, and creep. A sudden load causes the transmission rod to accelerate through the silicone compound within the cylinder. The acceleration quickly creates a velocity where the silicone cannot pass fast enough around the piston. At this point the device locks up, usually within a half second. Seismic forces are cyclic. The device is designed to perform in either tension or compression. As the reversal in motion occurs during an earthquake, the device locks almost instantaneously in each direction. All sudden shock loadings affect the LUD. These would also include wind loads and breaking forces. LUD PRINCIPLE DESCRIPTION The mechanism consists of a machined cylinder with a transmission rod that is connected at one end to the structure and at the other end to the piston inside the cylinder. The medium within the cylinder is a specially formulated silicone compound, precisely designed for the performance characteristics of a specific project. The silicone material is reverse thixotropic. During slow movements caused by temperature change in the structure or shrinkage and long-term creep of concrete, the silicone is able to squeeze through the gap between the piston and cylinder wall. By tuning the desired clearance between the piston and the cylinder wall, different characteristics can be achieved. Figure 1 LUD Detail Silicone compound squeezed around piston

2 3 LUD Applications SINGLE SPAN BRIDGE The simple span bridge is an ideal bridge where the LUD can create strengthening through the sharing of load. As detailed below, the simple span bridge has a sliding (expansion) bearing and a fixed bearing at each pier. Any load that occurs at mid span must be accommodated by the fixed bearing. If LUDs span the expansion joints, deck to deck, the LUD locks the sliding bearing during the loading. This creates great redundancy within the structure. The applications below suggest a remedy for large brake loads. During the braking action, the LUD locks, creating a bridge that, during this shock loading, has nothing but fixed connections. Therefore, all piers and abutments are sharing the load, greatly reducing the forces of any single pier. This reduces the horizontal forces acting upon any single pier to 25% of the original design. When considering the cost of bridge replacement, this cost-effective method of strengthening the bridge should be considered. LUD LUD LUD Sliding Bearing Fixed Bearing Figure 2 Simple span bridge with LUDs deck to deck Continuous Girder Bridge A steel or concrete continuous girder can also be greatly strensider the case of the four-span continuous girder below. There is only one fixed pier which must take all loads. In many bridges designed before the current AASHTO guidelines for seismic reactions, the fixed pier is unable to withstand the theoretical forces of an earthquake. A simple solution is to add the LUDs at the expansion piers so that all three piers and abutments share the seismic load. The adding of the LUDs is quite cost effective as compared to strengthening the fixed pier. Lock Up Device for Earthquake Impact Load Absorption Fixed Pier A Sliding Bearing Allows for Slow Movement A Lock Up Device Direction of Movement Section A-A Pot Bearing Lock Up Device Section Through Pier Figure 3 Continuous Girder Bridge with LUDs

LUD Applications (Continued) Cable Stayed Bridge Large span bridges often have extremely large displacements due to seismic reactions. The ideal large span design would have the tower integral with the deck to reduce these large displacements. However, when the tower is integral with the deck, the forces of shrinkage and creep, as well as thermal gradients, greatly affect the tower. It is a much simpler design to connect the deck and tower with LUDs, creating the fixed connection when desired but permitting the deck to move freely during normal operations. This reduces the cost of the tower and yet, due to the LUDs, eliminates the large displacements. Recently, all major structures with long spans are utilizing the LUD. These projects include the Cape Girardeau Bridge in Missouri, the Sidney Lanier Bridge in Georgia, and the Maysville Bridge in Kentucky. RETROFIT In the United States, the focus of bridge engineering is on the retrofitting of our nation s bridges and highways. A major contributor to the retrofit of bridges centers on the seismic upgrading of our current bridges to the 1994 AASHTO Code. The LUD can play a significant role in assisting the engineer in upgrading the structure at a minimum cost. In addition, bridges can be strengthened against wind loads, acceleration, and braking forces. The LUD can also be used in bascule bridges, elevated light rail structures, or pipelines. The LUD can be used in both the longitudinal direction and in the transverse, acting as a shear key. Design Criteria In order to design an LUD, it is necessary to know the following: Rate of expansion and contraction during normal operation Total stroke (mm, in.) of the transmission rod through full range of normal movement Ultimate design force to be transmitted through the LUD Geometry of the surrounding application Design code that is applicable Preference in corrosion protection

4 5 Testing Capabilities Largest structural bearing/dynamic STU testing facility in the USA. TechStar s load testing capability is the largest structural bearing/dynamic STU testing facility in the USA. Statically, the testing frame has a vertical load capacity of 6 million pounds (28,000 kn). The hydraulic controls of the testing frame allow it to be dialed down for testing of small loads such as 100 kips. The horizontal capacity is 1.9 million pounds with a travel/stroke range of 15 inches (380 mm) with the same dial down capacity for light load testing. TechStar s auxillary STU testing hydraulic controls provide the same in-triplet mounted horizontal rams a dynamic capacity of 1.9 million pounds at 6.5-7.0 mm/second velocity in both tension and compression. The structural frame is rated above 2 million pounds. This is the largest dynamic load testing capability within the USA except for Caltran s lab in San Diego. The TechStar facility is the only lab available on short notice for full dynamic testing with outside independent supervision. TechStar has tested bearings up to 7 million pounds vertical load for State DOTs and has tested STUs for projects including for the government of South Korea.

TESTING TESTING The LUD can be tested to determine if the desired performance is achieved. Full-scale testing of any unit is possible. Three tests are commonly required: 1) the Impressed Deflection Test, 2) the Simulated Dynamic Force Transfer Test, and 3) the Simulated Cyclical Force Transfer Test. Screwed into Test Machine Crosshead Adapting Fixture The Impressed Deflection Test, or IDT, verifies the rate at which normal movements occur within the device. Every device must be tuned to the precise movement rate and range of the bridge application. The Simulated Dynamic Force Transfer Test, or SDFT, determines the ultimate force that the device will transfer upon lock up. The Simulated Cyclical Force Transfer Test, or SCFT, provides assurance that as the reverse cyclic movement occurs, the device locks up as intended. Potentiometer LUD Piston Screwed into Test Machine Piston Test Machine Piston Test Machine Piston (LVDT) Figure 4 - Schematic of Testing Press TechStar LUD at Independent Laboratory

6 7 TESTING DATA Impressed Deflection Test Simulated Dynamic Force Transfer Test 6 Imposed Displacement, In. 4 2 0-2 -4-6 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Elapsed Time, Hours Applied Load, Kips 500 400 300 200 100 0-100 -200-300 Displacement, In. 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0-0.1-0.2-0.3-0.4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14-400 -0.5 Test Machine Piston -500 LUD Piston Acceptance Limit 50 40 Elapsed Time, Seconds Developed Force, Kips 30 20 10 0-6 -5-4 -3-2 -1 0-10 1 2 3 4 5 6-20 -30-40 Acceptance Limit -50 Imposed Displacement, In. Simulated Cyclical Force Transfer Test Applied Load, Kips 500 400 300 200 100 0 200-100 205 210 215 220 225-200 -300-400 -500 Elapsed Time, Seconds Note: The testing data in this section is for a 450 kip, ± 6 stroke device.

Installation 1 2 3 4 6 5 Support bracket being readied for placement. 1 Lifting support bracket into position. Tightening bolts on support bracket. 2 Bracket ready for LUD installation. 3LUD attached to shipping bracket ready to be installed. Lifting LUD into position. LUD attached at slide bearing. 4 LUD has a 300 ton capacity. Placing LUD into position ready for pin placement. 5 Stainless steel pins connecting LUD to brackets. LUD attached at slide bearing. 6 LUD has a 300 ton capacity.

8 9 Lead Rubber Bearings Lead Core Rubber Bearings (LRB) consists of a laminated rubber and steel bearing with steel flange plates for mounting to the structure. Ninety percent of our isolators have an energy dissipating lead core. The rubber in the isolator acts as a spring. It is very soft laterally but very stiff vertically. The high vertical stiffness is achieved by having thin layers of rubber reinforced by steel shims. These two characteristics allow the isolator to move laterally with relatively low stiffness yet carry significant axial load due to their high vertical stiffness. The lead core provides damping by deforming plastically when the isolator moves laterally in an earthquake. The shims for isolators are cut to exacting tolerances by laser. The steel mounting plates are machined by computer-controlled milling machines that give high production throughput and accuracy. Molding each bearing takes 8 to 48 hours depending on the size of the bearing. The curing phase is continuously monitored to ensure that the rubber is uniformly cured throughout the bearing. Lead core seal plate Connector plate Natural rubber Lead core Inner-table steel plate

High Damping Rubber Bearings The TechStar HDRB isolators contain a layers of rubber and reinforcing steel plates. These components let the HDRB isolate the bridge/building/ structure due to the horizontal stiffness and they can dissipate energy up to 16% damping due to high damping rubber compound. A HDRB isolators fulfill the following requirements: Transmit the vertical loads due to permanent and accidental effects; Capacity to support horizontal loads due to service load conditions with very low displacements; Capacity of isolate the structure by shifting the fundamental vibration period to an optimal and safe level; Capacity to dissipate energy to reduce the horizontal displacement of the isolated structure with respect to the ground. B C A D Type 500 600 700 Vertical Load Max (kn) 550 550 383 Displacement (mm) 650 650 383 Horizontal Stiffness (kn/mm) 750 750 383 Equivalent Viscous Damping 10% 10% 10% A (mm) 550 650 750 B (mm) 550 650 750 C (mm) 383 383 383 D (mm) 500 600 700 t q 207 207 207 HDRB s do not damage the structure that remains due to the elastic response for high intensity earthquakes with no interruption of the structural function. This is a primary goal for strategic structures (hospitals, control rooms, etc.)

10 11 NOTABLE Projects Carquinez Bridge, California 1 Oakland Bay Rollout, California 2 3Silver Jubilee Bridge, UK Canadian National Railway, Canada 4 5 Geoje Bridge, South Korea 1 2 5 3 4

D.S. TechStar, Inc. 1219 West Main Cross Street Findlay, Ohio 45840 USA Tel: +1-419-424-0888 Fax: +1-419-424-5959 www.techstar-inc.com