Passively Aerated Composting of Manure Slurry

Similar documents
Basics of Composting Poultry Litter and Swine Bedding. Sanjay Shah North Carolina State University 16 November 2010

Composting Composting principles

COMPARISON OF BIOFILTER RESIDENCE TIME

Composting Manure Certified Livestock Manager Training Workshops

A Comparison Of Penetration Resistance Of Transitional Organic And Conventional Soils

Case Study : The Dynamics of an Organic Compost Operation. Presented by: L. G. (Larry) Conrad, P.Eng. Chair, The Compost Council of Canada

COMPOSTING C:N Ratios of Various Compost Materials

This page is for on-line indexing purposes and should not be included in your printed version.

On-Farm ASP Composting

Cornell Waste Management Institute

Composting Principals

Manure is recognized: Solarization and use of compost in vegetable crops. Manure production. Why manure is a problem today but was not 50 years ago

Controlling Dust and Odor From Open Lot Livestock Facilities. Livestock and Poultry Environmental Stewardship

COMPOSTING POULTRY LOSSES

Compost Production and Utilization. Addy Elliott Department of Soil and Crop Sciences Colorado State University

Quantifying the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as a result of composting dairy and beef cattle manure

Composting of Poultry Offal Demonstration Project

Fax: (+39) Web site:

Thomas Herlihy. NC State University Vermicomposting Workshop Raleigh, NC

COMPOSTING ORGANIC MATERIALS TO MAKE ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENTS

D. Reduced emission manure storage techniques

Agricultural and Biological Engineering. Biological Manipulation of Manure: Getting What You Want from Animal Manure

HANCOCK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

A simplified guide on compost making

Food Safety Begins on the Farm: A Grower Self Assessment of Food Safety Risks. Compost Use COMPOST USE

Developing a Recipe for Composting Livestock Manure

EUROVENT. The ventilated laying battery for exceptional b i rd perf o rmance with dry manure pro d u c t i o n

Backyard Composting. Addy Elliott Department of Soil and Crop Sciences Colorado State University

MANURE MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES OF LIQUID SYSTEMS AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE COMPOST BEDDED PACK SYSTEM Joseph Taraba

The Biology of Composting

Review of composting and anaerobic digestion of MSW & a methodological proposal for a mid-size city

Optimal use of the Hosoya system in composting poultry manure

Management, Handling, Transfer, Storage and Treatment of Manure and Litter from Poultry Production Facilities

Seventh International Symposium on Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes (1SAFPW95)

Microturbine Operation with Biogas from a Covered Dairy Manure Lagoon

REDUCTION IN MANURE WEIGHT AND VOLUME USING AN IN-HOUSE LAYER MANURE COMPOSTING SYSTEM UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS

Composting. What is Composting?


A punch planter with adjustable seed spacing

COMPOSTING 101 to 450 Paul Walker Illinois State University - Normal

Kansas Irrigated Agriculture s Impact on Value of Crop Production

Alternative Systems for Cultivating and Side Dressing Specialty Crops for Improved Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Composting Manure for Value Added Markets

Land Application of Compost

Composting on Horse Farms

Study on Using Biological Sludge from Vinh Loc Industrial Park to Produce Composting Product

4/13/2009. Farm Scale Composting: Environmental Benefits, Challenges, and Economics OUTLINE

Environmental problems facing the livestock

Avian Bird Flu Response in BC - Composting Birds and Manure. John Paul, Ph.D. Transform Compost Systems Ltd. Abbotsford, BC Canada

Compost: Quality Considerations. DeAnn Presley, KSU Agronomy, RESEARCH & EXTENSION

Nutrient composition and nutrient losses during composting of chicken manures as affected by addition of sawdust

Manure Composting for Livestock & Poultry Production

Large Scale Vermicomposting of Agricultural Byproducts

COMPOSTING EMPTY FRUIT BUNCHES OF OIL PALM

Economics of Tunnel Ventilation for Freestall Barns

Use of Electromagnetic Soil Surveys to Locate Areas of Nutrient Buildup

Low emission manure spreading techniques

A POWERFUL CHOPPER FOR BIG BALES

The University of Wisconsin-Platteville

Managing Compost Bedded-Pack Barn/Waste System

Barnyard Manure and Composts

LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* Manure on Your Farm: Asset or Liability? By Craig Cogger, Washington State University

Solvita Compost Emissions Test

Working Group Agriculture and Environment March 2011 Agri-environmental data needs

Poultry Litter as a Fuel to Heat Broiler Houses

FLOW DYNAMICS IN MILKING PARLOR CLEAN-IN-PLACE SYSTEMS

Participant Identification. Compost for the Small and Midsize Farm. Motivations: Why use Compost?

NC State Vermicomposting Workshop RT Solutions, LLC -Worm Power June, 2009

Low Cost Equine Manure Composting

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Feedlot Manure Composting

Determination of the Ethylene Oxide Control Efficiency from Catalytic Oxidizers. A Guidance Document

Biofiltration is. The average odor. Treating Odor Emissions from Buildings Biofilters

From City to Farm: Greenbin-derived Compost Agricultural Trials. Compost Council of Canada Workshop January 22, 2013

A POWERFUL CHOPPER FOR BIG BALES


Tillage Practices and Sugar Beet Yields 1

Compost Pilots and Demos

Lagoon And Wetland Treatment Of Dairy Manure

Composting Animals. Materials Needed

(R-Rb) x. = [%Ca x a x (1-Ma)] + [%Cb x b x (1-Mb)] + [%Cc x c x (1-Mc)] [%Na x a x (1-Ma)] + [%Nb x b x (1-Mb)] + [%Nc x c x (1-Mc)]

Appropriate Storage Manure Handling Recycling or Disposing Protecting ti Water Quality

QUALITY COMPOST FOR BETTER CROP YIELDS

Gerald Reid Harold Keener Mary Wicks

APPENDIX E COMPOSTING MADE SIMPLE WITH AG-BAG ENVIRONMENTAL S ECOPOD TECHNOLOGY

Introduction. Objective: Livestock operations Current trend is towards large confined operations

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Equipment for different scales of composting

Farm Digesters and Digestion 101 by Mark Moser

Slurry Grass Crops. Soil. Water. Livestock. The Environment

Study on Characteristics of Bioslurry and FYM for Mechanized Application

Organic Burial Composting of Cattle Mortality

Making compost on dairy farms

Managing Manure in Vegetable Production

A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO COMPOSTING

Town of Bethlehem Food Scraps Composting Pilot Aerated Static Pile Method, Spring-Summer 2017

Dairy Housing Compost Bedding Pack Barns H. House

NCLE Composting Protocols. October 19, 2016

Chapter 6 Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRPs)

Composting in Your Backyard

INFOSheet. Introduction. Do These Problems Sound Familiar?

Transcription:

Paper No. 924519 AN ASAE MEETING PRESENTATION Passively Aerated Composting of Manure Slurry by N.K. Patni Research Scientist Agriculture Canada Ottawa, ON KIA 0C6 L. Fernandes, Assistant Professor W. Zhan Graduate Student Department of Civil Engineering University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5 P. Jui Research Scientist Agriculture Canada Ottawa, ON KIA 0C6 Written for presentation at the 1992 International Winter Meeting sponsored by THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS Nashville Convention Center Nashville, Tennessee 15-18 December 1992 SUMMARY: Cage layer poultry manure slurry was composted at high initial moisture content in passively aerated static piles using peat and chopped straw as bulking agents. Continuous monitoring of temperature distribution at several locations per pile was used to determine process characteristics. Good quality compost was obtained in 7-10 weeks. KEYWORDS: Static pile, poultry manure, compost The author(s) is solely responsible for the content of this technical presentation. The technical presentation does not necessarily reflect the official position of ASAE, and its printing and distribution does not constitute an endorsement of views which may be expressed. Technical presentations are not subject to the formal peer review process by ASAE editorial committees; therefore are not to be presented as refereed publications. Quotation from this work should state that it is from a presentation made by (name of author) at the (listed) ASAE meeting. EXAMPLE: From Authors last name, Initials. Title of Presentation". Presented at the Date and Title of meeting, Paper No. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2950 Niles Rd., St. Joseph, MI 49085-9659 USA. For information about securing permission to reprint or reproduce a technical presentation, please address inquiries to ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, Michigan 49085-9659 USA Voice: 616.429.03(X) FAX: 616.429.3852

PASSIVELY AERATED COMPOSTING OF MANURE SLURRY N.K. Patni 1, L. Fernandes 2, W. Zhan 3, P.Y. Jui 4 ABSTRACT Laying hen manure slurry with 89% moisture content (MC) was composted using the static pile passive aeration composting system using peat and chopped straw as bulking agents. Initial moisture contents of the compost mixtures were 73% and 80% in the peat piles and 76% in the straw pile. Each treatment was replicated in three piles. The distribution and variation of pile temperatures, monitored continuously or intermittently at up to 33 locations in each of the piles, was not uniform throughout the pile, although most of the compost attained a temperature 55 C of more. Temperature variation amongst the replicate piles, and at symmetrical locations within the piles, was very similar. The role of aeration pipes, and of direct diffusion of air into the piles, in providing pile aeration needs to be better understood. Composting time increased with increase in the initial moisture content in the peat piles. The quality of the compost product was good. INTRODUCTION In recent years the interest in composting liquid manure has increased in response to the concern for abatement of pollution from manures as well as for the preservation and stabilization of manure nutrients for crop production. At the present time, composting of manure slurry is not popular at most farms because of its high water content and the additional handling that is necessary to carry out this process. Composting of the traditional farmyard or "solid" manure, i.e., manure plus bedding without added water, has probably been practised by farmers for several centuries. 1 2 3 4 Research Scientist, Centre for Food and Animal Research, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Research Scientist, Research Program Service, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6. -1-

The feasibility of using passively aerated static piles or windrows for composting of wastes containing high moisture content such as fish wastes, crab scrap and farm animal manure slurries was recently demonstrated by Mathur et al. (1986, 1990). The static pile passive aeration (SPPA) composting system is operationally simple, and requires low labor and energy input because the need for turning or forced aeration of piles is eliminated (Rynk et al., 1992). Although the feasibility of using the SPPA system has been demonstrated, basic information on the thermophilic temperature development and distribution in such systems is limited and inadequate. The need for such information is directly related to the estimation of the effectiveness of the passive aeration mechanism, and of its ability to destroy pathogenic organisms and weed seeds. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of high initial moisture content of the compost mixture on temperature distribution and variation in SPPA compost piles made from poultry manure slurry with peat and straw, and to determine the physical and chemical characteristics of the compost material. The study was a collaborative effort of Agriculture Canada Research Branch and the University of Ottawa. MATERIALS AND METHODS Poultry manure slurry containing 89% moisture was mixed with peat to obtain two levels of moisture content, 73% and 80%, denoted as Treatment I and Treatment II. In Treatment III, barley and oat straw, chopped to 2.5 cm length, was mixed with the same poultry manure slurry to obtain an initial moisture content of 76%. Pile preparation: Weighed amounts of peat or straw and poultry manure were downloaded into a farm-scale feed mixer which was equipped with weighing scales and mixing augers. After thorough mixing for 30 minutes or more, compost mixtures were discharged from the side chute of the feed mixer into a small front end loader which was used to make the piles. All compost piles were prepared in an open-front, roofed barn. The 3.35 m piles were 1 m high, and trapezoidal in cross section with a base of 3.4 m x 2.3 m, and a top of 1.4 m x 0.3 m. A wooden frame was used to have a uniform initial shape and size of the piles. Three replicate piles were used for each of the three treatments. -2-

To prepare the piles, a base of loose peat or unchopped straw was made on level ground, and two 3.6 m long, 10 cm diameter ABS pipes were laid on it (Fig. 1). The pipes had two rows of 1.2 cm diameter perforations. They were placed such that the perforations faced upwards to allow passive movement of air upwards and sideways in the compost mixture, under the influence of convection currents induced by the heat generated in the pile. An envelope of nylon mesh was used on the pipes to prevent plugging of the perforations by the compost mixture. The compost mixture was deposited on top of the aeration pipes, and shaped into the pile configuration. It was then covered with a 5 cm layer of untreated peat or straw. Thermocouples set in rigid plastic frames made of ducting pipe were laid at three levels in the piles while it was being prepared (Fig. 1). A total of 33 thermocouple locations were used for continuous automatic temperature monitoring in one pile under each treatment. In the two replicate piles for the treatments, temperatures were monitored manually at 23 locations corresponding to 23 locations in the piles with continuous temperature monitoring. Multi-Channel Automatic Data Logging Systems were used to log the temperature data over a 4-month period. Compost analysis: Compost samples were collected 13 times and analyzed for moisture content (MC), volatile solids (VS), ash, and ph according to methods described by McKeague (1978). Total carbon and total nitrogen (C and N) were determined using a LECO CHN-600 Analyzer. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Temperature Distribution and Change The change in average temperature of the piles, in which temperature was monitored continuously at 33 locations, is shown in Fig. 2 for the three treatments, namely, peat mixture with 73% initial moisture (Treatment I), peat mixture with 80% initial moisture (Treatment II), and straw mixture with 76% initial moisture (Treatment III). The temperature started rising on day 1 in all treatments (day 0 was the day the piles were made). The active composting time was about 45, 115, and 75 days in treatments I, II, and III, respectively. Reduced pore space and the greater moisture content due to the extra manure in the Treatment II pile than in the Treatment I and III piles resulted in a much longer composting period in the former. Air supply is a key factor in the composting process, and any reduction or delay in its supply would lead to increased composting time. About -3-

Fig. 1. Compost Pile Configuration. -4-

Fig. 2. Average temperature variation in piles with 33 temperature measurement locations. -5-

twice the manure was contained in Treatment II piles (initial bulk density 530 kg/m 3 ) than in the Treatment I pile (initial bulk density 325 kg/m 3 ). Results in Figure 2 show that although it is feasible to compost poultry manure/peat at the high initial MC of 80%, a cost in terms of a long composting period is involved. The straw compost mixture (Treatment III) was slow to heat up, but it attained the highest temperatures amongst the treatments. There was good agreement for temperature change among the three replicate piles for each treatment. The average temperature, for the 23 measurement locations in the three replicate piles for Treatment II is shown in Fig. 3. The good agreement among the three piles indicates that the compost mixture was well-mixed initially, and that similar average temperature can be expected in piles with similar geometry. This is supported by the observation that symmetrically positioned locations in different parts of the pile exhibited similar temperature variation. A typical example is shown in Fig. 4 for Treatment II. Temperatures differed at various locations in the piles during the composting process. This difference was more pronounced at the start than at the end of the composting period. The location of the aeration pipes and the pile initial moisture content also appeared to influence the temperature variation. The temperature variation at four similar locations at the bottom of the pile are shown in Figs. 5, 6 and 7 for Treatments I, II and III, respectively. The relative location of the four measurement sites 2, 5, 7 and 11 are also shown. Figures 5, 6 and 7 show that the rise and fall of temperature occurred earliest at the periphery location 2, followed by the interior location 5, and then 7. This appears to indicate that more air for biochemical oxidation and heat generation was available initially at the periphery (location 2) of the piles than at the interior locations (5, 7, 11). Thus diffusion of air into the compost mass may also have had a role in the composting process. The relative amount of air supplied by diffusion through the porous compost mass and by passive aeration through the pipes needs to be established. It is also possible that movement of passive aeration air at sites 5 and 7 was hindered by compression of the compost mass at these sites due to the weight of the increasing amount of material above these sites. The role of the aeration pipes in supplying air is illustrated somewhat by the temperature distribution at location 11 in Figs. 5, 6 and 7. The temperature at site 11 rose earlier than at site 7 in all three treatments presumably in response to a greater availability of air at Site 11 than at site 7. It should be noted that in Treatment II (Fig. 6), the temperature at sites 5 and 7 did not increase much above 45 E C. This has implications with respect to possibly incomplete -6-

Fig. 3. The average temperature profile in three replicate piles of Treatment II (peat & manure at 80% initial MC). -7-

Fig. 4. Temperature similarity at symmetrically positioned locations in the pile under Treatment II. -8-

Fig. 5. Temperature profiles at different locations at the bottom of the pile in Treatment I. -9-

Fig.6. Temperature profiles at different locations at the bottom of the pile in Treatment II. -10-

Fig. 7. Temperature profiles at different locations at the bottom of the pile in Treatment III. -11-

destruction of pathogens under Treatment II conditions. Figure 7 shows two temperature peaks at some locations. The reason for this is not clear at this time. From the large data base of continuous temperature measurements at the 33 locations within the piles, it was possible to establish temperature distribution profiles under the three treatments (Figs. 8, 9 and 10). In Treatment I, temperature distribution at days 5, 10 and 30 (Fig. 8) suggests that heating in the pile started at the periphery initially and then progressed to the pile interior. Most of the pile reached temperatures of 50 E C or more. In Treatment II (Fig. 9), heating again appears to have started initially at the periphery and then in the interior. However, as also noted above (Fig. 6), the temperature in some parts of the interior of the pile did not reach more than 45 E C. In Treatment III (Fig. 10), temperatures rose earlier, and to higher values, than in the peat piles. However, it appears that temperatures near the periphery at the bottom did not increase beyond 40 E C. Temperature distribution in Treatment II on day 70 was similar to that in Treatment III on day 60. The results in Figs. 8, 9 and 10 seem to suggest that direct diffusion of air into the compost piles may play a significant role in the initial stages of the composting process. Compost Quality The initial and final values of the compost mixture properties are shown in Table 1. The initial C/N ratios in the two peat treatments were much lower than the usually recommended values of 25 to 30. Low C/N ratios are supposed to promote ammonia losses. However, much higher concentrations of ammonia gas were measured under Treatment III than the other two treatments (Fig. 11). This shows that acidic peat was quite effective in controlling loss of nitrogen, as ammonia gas, from the compost piles. Most of the ammonia evolution from the piles was over in the initial three weeks. The compost product from all three treatments had good nutrient and fertilizer value. The product had dark brown colour, loose structure, and earthy smell, which are characteristics of good quality compost. CONCLUSIONS 1. It is feasible to use SPPA systems to compost high moisture content manure slurries with suitable bulking agents. 2. The relative role of air supply via aeration pipes and by diffusion through the pile surface needs to be better understood for improved design of the SPPA systems. -12-

Fig. 8. Temperature distribution profile for Treatment I piles (peat & manure at 73% initial MC). -13-

Fig. 9. Temperature distribution profile for Treatment 11 piles (peat & manure at 80% initial MC). -14-

Fig. 10. Temperature distribution profile for Treatment III piles (chopped straw & manure at 76% initial MC). -15-

Fig. 11. Ammonia gas concentrations on pile surfaces. -16-

Table 1. Initial and final properties and composition of the compost mixtures. Treatments* Property I II III Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Moisture Content % 73 66 80 73 76 48 Volatile Solids % DM 87 86 81 79 82 69 Ash %DM 12 13 18 20 17 30 ph 6.2 7.6 7.2 7.3 7.9 9.4 C/N ratio 16 15 13 10 23 12 * Treatments I, II, and III consisted of 73, 80 and 76% initial moisture content mixtures of poultry manure slurry with peat, peat and chopped straw, respectively. -17-

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The assistance of R.W. Allen, A. Olson, M. Lemieux and other staff at Agriculture Canada is greatly appreciated. REFERENCES MATHUR, S.P., DAIGLE, J.Y., LEVESQUE, M., and DINEL, H. 1986. The feasibility of preparing high quality compost from fish scrap and peat with seaweeds or crab scrap. Biol. Agric. and Hortic. 4:235242. MATHUR, S.P., PATNI, N.K., and LEVESQUE, M.P. 1990. Static pile passive aeration composting of manure slurries using peat as a bulking agent. Biological Wastes, 34: 323-333. MCKEAGUE, A. 1978. Manual on Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, The Canadian Society of Soil Science, Ottawa, Ontario, 212 pp. RYNK, R. et al. 1992. On-Farm Composting Handbook. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853-5701. p. 29. -18-