Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Roundup Efficacy Using Drift Reduction Nozzles

Similar documents
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Envoke Weed Control/Crop Tolerance Test

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Spring Burndown Test

Adjuvant Studies in Soybean

4/11/2010 (C4 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia. Palmer amaranth seed return as impacted by weed management program.

(21 08 CRRLL-21 Corn Herb Study Cadet Resource) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

Cucumber No-Till Weed Management Study.

Roundup ProMax for Henbit, Mouseear Chickweed, and Seedling Tall Fescue Control

HERBICIDE EVALUATION IN ARKANSAS COTTON, 1999

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel

Previous Crops Previous Pesticides Year 1. soybean various 2002

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

Comparison of "Full Load" Glyphosate Formulations in Roundup Ready Soybean - Waterhemp.

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Rattail fescue control in chemical fallow

2016 Demonstration of the herbicide components in dicamba soybean, PRE plus POST and POST only applied at 3 and 6 inch weed at Rochester, MN.

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Kansas State University Field Pansy Control In No-Till Fields Going To Corn

Effect of Linex Application Rate and Timing on Sweetpotato Katie Jennings NC State University

Influence of rainfall amount, rainfall timing, organic matter, and soil ph on sulfentrazone dry pea injury and yield (2004)

1/17/2010 (Veg27 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 6 University of Georgia Weed and pepper response to a potentially new fumigant.

EVALUATION OF DRIFT RETARDANTS (DRIFT CONTROL AGENTS) TWO-YEAR SUMMARY

Accelegrow. Accele-Grow-M. accelegrow.com. Accelegrow Technologies, Inc. PO BOX 569 West Point, GA

Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 13/May/2003. Pest Description Pest 1 Type: W Code: ABUTH Abutilon theophrasti Common Name: Velvetleaf

There were no apparent differences in corn stand. No corn injury was observed on May 25. However, on June 5, 3 to 10% injury was observed with EPOST

Kansas State University Field Pansy Control In No-Till Fields Going To Soybeans

2014 Giant Ragweed Control with Diflexx Herbicide in Field Corn in Rochester, MN.

where as pyroxasulfone at lbai/a and Dual at 1.2 lbai/a failed to provide acceptable control (63% and 33% respectively)

Evaluation of Pendimethalin CS and EC.

THE EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON HERBICIDE EFFICACY AND OAT YIELD I

Weed Management in Strip-Tillage Corn.

CONCLUSIONS

University of Illinois Crop Sciences Department ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF FUNGICIDES ON CORN YIELD AND DISEASE

Performance of Flumioxazin on Lychee. IR-4 Project: P Submitted by: Wilfredo Robles, University of PR, Mayaguez.

Table 1. Application timing, plant stages, environmental conditions Date 5/5 5/25 6/1 6/12 Treatment POST II (C) PRE (A) POST I (B)

Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2015)

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

Ronald E. Talbert Brian V. Ottis Mayank S. Malik Andrew T. Ellis A R K A N S A S A G R I C U L T U R A L E X P E R I M E N T S T A T I O N

Foliar Nitrogen Fertilization of Irrigated Maize University of Nebraska South Central Agricultural Laboratory

Evaluation of the "Fit" of Amber and Rave in Tall Fescue Pastures

(01-ASC-10) Common ragweed leaf no. - numerous height (inch) - 2-4

HERBICIDE COMBINATIONS AND ADJUVANTS FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SUGAR BEET

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO. Joel Felix Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2009.

WEED CONTROL RESEARCH WITH LABELED AND NEW HERBICIDES

2007 Pasture and rangeland results.pdf 1

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2010 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, UNIV. GUELPH, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Table 1. Application timing, plant stages, environmental conditions in Date 5/4 5/24 6/2 6/17 Treatment Temperature (F) Relative Humidity (%)

DOES GLYPHOSATE PLUS STAPLE OR ENVOKE APPLIED TOPICALLY TO ROUNDUP READY COTTON IMPACT FRUIT SET OR SEED YIELD?

No significant differences in corn stand between treatments were determined. No PRE applied treatment caused corn injury when observed on May 29,

INFLUENCE OF GLYPHOSATE-FUNGICIDE COMBINATIONS ON WEED CONTROL, SPRAY PENETRATION, AND YIELD IN GLYPHOSATE RESISTANT SOYBEAN

Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 19/May/2003

Conducted Under GEP (Y/N): Y Guideline Description: To Protocol

Evaluation of Foliar-Applied Insecticides in Soybean

Influence of Different Herbicides on Weeds and Dry Beans at Scottsbluff, NE during the 2008 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

Foliar applied insecticides, application rates, and application timings for the control of the Soybean Aphid insecticide (2016)

Using Applied Research on Your Farm

Seeded Cover Crops in Sugarbeet

Treatment Date June 3 June 28 July 8 July 19 July 29

R. Allen Straw, SW VA AREC, VPI Farm Rd., Glade Spring, VA 24340,

(TA-05-03) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Osprey tank mix study -- broadleaf control. Phone No:

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2009 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN COLLEGE FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Common Pokeweed Management in Field Crops A Final Report to the Pennsylvania Soybean Board, Kelly Patches and William Curran

ECONOMICS OF WEED CONTROL AND NITROGEN RATE DECISIONS FOR CORN

2018 Product Use Guide

Evaluation of Wet-Blade and Broadcast Spray Applications for Tall Fescue Seedhead Suppression

Cotton population and yield following rye and crimson clover termination with roller/crimper and herbicides in an Alabama no-till system

2005 Annual Research Report. Refinement of Roadside Vegetation Management Practices in Oklahoma. Produced under OSU/ODOT Joint Project: 2157

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES IN CARAWAY IN HARVEST YEAR, Loimaa

Evaluation of Command Tank Mixes for Broadleaf Weed Control in Pumpkins, R. Allen Straw and M. Angela Harrison. Interpretative Summary

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley

IR-4 MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page 1

Calibration of Sugarcane Sprayers

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia

The research objectives are to evaluate the effectiveness of various approaches for Palmer amaranth control.

PEST MANAGEMENT: WEEDS. Carfentrazone and Quinclorac Combinations at Various Rates and Timings for Broad Spectrum Weed Control in Rice

HERBICIDE SCREENING TRIALS IN GARBANZO BEANS. Kurt Hembree 1. Objective: Evaluate preemergent herbicides for weed control and crop response.

Use of Residual Herbicides for Tough to Control Weeds in Snap Beans Final Report for 2012

Foliar Fungicide Study Block 5S Beaumont, TX 2009

WEED CONTROL IN PUMPKINS & SQUASH RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

CONTROL OF VOLUNTEER SOYBEANS IN CORN. Travis D. Courtney

2010 Pepper Weed Control Richard Smith, Farm Advisor, University of California Cooperative Extension Monterey County

EVALUATION OF REDUCED APPLICATION RATES OF ACETOCHLOR TO REDUCE CONCENTRATION IN TILE DRAINAGE WATER

OILSEED RAPE AND TURNIP RAPE / CONTROL OF SCLEROTINIA STEM ROT EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDE TREATMENTS WITH AMISTAR

Introduction. Materials and Methods

Planting Date vs. Rice Water Weevil Beaumont, TX 2006

Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2011) Summary Background

Evaluation of Sharpen Herbicide in Dormant Alfalfa

Trial: 2002-maxyield A Comparison of Corn Herbicide/Insecticide Programs Bruce Potter, Jodie Getting University of Minnesota SWROC

Evaluation of High Input vs. Low Input Corn (Zea mays L.) Production Systems

PAGE #1 TRIAL # US 811/16/ : PSOYSYS* /10/2017 APPLICATIONS

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial SEEDING RATES

California Pepper Commission Complete Annual Report, 2011

LATE SEASON WEED CONTROL IN SUGAR BEETS WITH POSTEMERGENCE APPLICATIONS OF FRONTIER HERBICIDE

2017 Turfgrass Proceedings

EVALUATION OF ATTRIBUT SUPER AT LOWER DOSES IN WHEAT IN 2011

PAGE #1 TRIAL # US 281/16/ : USDICMT*C /09/2017 APPLICATIONS

HERBICIDE COMPARISONS ON BROADLEAF WEED CONTROL IN WHEAT James R. Martin and Dottie Call Department of Agronomy

SUGARCANE WEED MANAGEMENT

EVALUATION OF NEW AND GENERIC HERBICIDES FOR ODOT ROADSIDE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

Transcription:

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management Experiment number...: 03SB03JG Location...: Ben Hur Research Farm Baton Rouge, LA Experimental design...: Randomized complete block Number of reps...: 4 Plot size...: 10 x 25 Row width/# per plot...: 15 /7 Soil type...: clay loam %OM...: 1.9 ph...: 6.3 Planting date...: 06-20-03 Harvest date...: N/A Crop/Variety...: Soybean/Asgrow AG5902 Uniform std. treatment...: N/A Application type...: POST Date applied (mm/dd/yy)...: 07-13-03 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm)...: 12:55-01:30p Incorporation equipment...: N/A Incorporation depth...: N/A Air/Soil temperature (F)...: 86/93 Wind (mph, direction)...: 5-7/WSW Cloud cover (%)...: 80 Relative humidity (%)...: 66 Soil/Leaf surface moist...: moist/dry Crop stage/height...: V4/7-10 Sprayer type/mph...: trctrca/see comments Nozzle type/size...: see comments Boom ht/#noz/spacing(in)...: 18 /4/20 GPA/psi...: 15/26 Applied by...: Etheredge Weed species (population/ft 2 ).: (height/# leaves) ECHCG (15)...: 7-12 /7-10 SEBEX (4-6)...: 2-8 /2-4 SIDSP (1)...: 1-3 /3-4 PHYLA (1)...: 2-4 /5-7 IAQTA (2)...: 2-4 /3-5 IPOLA (2)...: 5-15 /2-5 Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days...: 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week...: 0.61/0.21 3rd week/4th week...: 0.03/0.05 1

Project Code: 03SB03JG Spraying Systems,, DG TeeJet, and, and Greenleaf Technologies AirMix and TurboDrop nozzles were evaluated. Roundup WeatherMAX was applied at a rate of 23.3 oz/a (1 lb ai/a) in spray volumes of 2.5, 5, and 10 gallons per acre. In analyzing the data as a factorial arrangement of treatments (spray nozzle x spray volume) there was no significant effect observed due to either factor or with the interaction of the two factors. Findings indicate that when the same rate of Roundup WeatherMAX was applied, weed control was equivalent regardless of the nozzle selection or spray volume. Furthermore, findings showed that weed control with Roundup WeatherMAX was not sacrificed when the herbicide was applied at the low spray volume of 2.5 gallons per care. Averaged across nozzles and spray volumes, barnyardgrass was controlled 96% 15 days after treatment; hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, and prickly sida were controlled 74, 71, and 85%, respectively. By 37 days after treatment, barnyardgrass control averaged 98% and control of hemp sesbania and morningglory was at least 90%. 2

ECHCG SEBEX control control Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 07-28-03 07-28-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 15 DA-A 15 DA-A 1 10 GPA 97 a 75 a 2 10 GPA 95 b-f 75 ab 3 10 GPA 97 ab 75 a 4 10 GPA 95 def 74 ab 5 10 GPA 94 ef 75 ab 6 10 GPA 96 a-e 75 a 7 5 GPA 97 abc 75 a 8 5 GPA 96 a-d 75 a 9 5 GPA 96 a-d 75 a 10 5 GPA 96 a-e 71 b 11 5 GPA 95 def 75 a 3

ECHCG SEBEX control control Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 07-28-03 07-28-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 15 DA-A 15 DA-A 12 5 GPA 96 a-f 73 ab 13 2.5 GPA 94 ef 75 ab 14 2.5 GPA 96 a-e 75 ab 15 2.5 GPA 96 a-e 73 ab 16 2.5 GPA 94 f 75 a 17 2.5 GPA 94 f 72 ab 18 2.5 GPA 95 c-f 72 ab 19 Nontreated 0 g 0 c LSD (P=.05) 2.0 3.7 Standard Deviation 1.4 2.6 CV 1.56 3.68 Replicate F 4.577 1.301 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0063 0.2835 Treatment F 963.194 174.103 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 4

IPOLA SIDSP control control Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 07-28-03 07-28-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 15 DA-A 15 DA-A 1 10 GPA 73 a 85 ab 2 10 GPA 71 a 83 c 3 10 GPA 68 a 85 ab 4 10 GPA 70 a 85 ab 5 10 GPA 73 a 85 ab 6 10 GPA 72 a 85 ab 7 5 GPA 69 a 85 ab 8 5 GPA 67 a 85 ab 9 5 GPA 71 a 85 ab 10 5 GPA 74 a 85 ab 11 5 GPA 73 a 85 ab 5

IPOLA SIDSP control control Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 07-28-03 07-28-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 15 DA-A 15 DA-A 12 5 GPA 71 a 84 bc 13 2.5 GPA 69 a 84 bc 14 2.5 GPA 69 a 83 bc 15 2.5 GPA 70 a 85 ab 16 2.5 GPA 74 a 86 a 17 2.5 GPA 68 a 84 bc 18 2.5 GPA 74 a 85 ab 19 Nontreated 0 b 0 d LSD (P=.05) 7.6 2.1 Standard Deviation 5.4 1.5 CV 8.04 1.84 Replicate F 4.600 3.053 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0061 0.0361 Treatment F 36.891 697.651 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 6

Soybean ECHCG injury control Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 07-28-03 09-03-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 15 DA-A 52 DA-A 1 10 GPA 0 a 98 a 2 10 GPA 0 a 98 a 3 10 GPA 0 a 98 a 4 10 GPA 0 a 98 a 5 10 GPA 0 a 98 a 6 10 GPA 0 a 98 a 7 5 GPA 0 a 98 a 8 5 GPA 0 a 98 a 9 5 GPA 0 a 98 a 10 5 GPA 0 a 98 a 11 5 GPA 0 a 98 a 7

Soybean ECHCG injury control Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 07-28-03 09-03-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 15 DA-A 52 DA-A 12 5 GPA 0 a 98 a 13 2.5 GPA 0 a 98 a 14 2.5 GPA 0 a 98 a 15 2.5 GPA 0 a 98 a 16 2.5 GPA 0 a 98 a 17 2.5 GPA 0 a 98 a 18 2.5 GPA 0 a 98 a 19 Nontreated 0 a 0 b LSD (P=.05) 0.0 0.0 Standard Deviation 0.0 0.0 CV 0.0 0.0 Replicate F 0.000 0.000 Replicate Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000 Treatment F 0.000 0.000 Treatment Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000 8

SEBEX IPOSS control control Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 09-03-03 09-03-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 52 DA-A 52 DA-A 1 10 GPA 91 a 91 ab 2 10 GPA 91 a 90 ab 3 10 GPA 91 a 91 ab 4 10 GPA 95 a 88 ab 5 10 GPA 95 a 88 ab 6 10 GPA 88 a 88 ab 7 5 GPA 95 a 95 a 8 5 GPA 91 a 95 a 9 5 GPA 88 a 91 ab 10 5 GPA 95 a 83 b 11 5 GPA 91 a 95 a 9

SEBEX IPOSS control control Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 09-03-03 09-03-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 52 DA-A 52 DA-A 12 5 GPA 95 a 91 ab 13 2.5 GPA 95 a 88 ab 14 2.5 GPA 91 a 93 a 15 2.5 GPA 95 a 88 ab 16 2.5 GPA 88 a 91 ab 17 2.5 GPA 95 a 86 ab 18 2.5 GPA 95 a 91 ab 19 Nontreated 0 b 0 c LSD (P=.05) 7.7 9.6 Standard Deviation 5.5 6.8 CV 6.24 7.97 Replicate F 0.791 4.005 Replicate Prob(F) 0.5041 0.0120 Treatment F 61.220 37.813 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 10

Soybean injury % Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 09-03-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 52 DA-A 1 10 GPA 0 a 2 10 GPA 0 a 3 10 GPA 0 a 4 10 GPA 0 a 5 10 GPA 0 a 6 10 GPA 0 a 7 5 GPA 0 a 8 5 GPA 0 a 9 5 GPA 0 a 10 5 GPA 0 a 11 5 GPA 0 a 11

Soybean injury % Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Growth Appl 09-03-03 No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Stage Code 52 DA-A 12 5 GPA 0 a 13 2.5 GPA 0 a 14 2.5 GPA 0 a 15 2.5 GPA 0 a 16 2.5 GPA 0 a 17 2.5 GPA 0 a 18 2.5 GPA 0 a 19 Nontreated 0 a LSD (P=.05) 0.0 Standard Deviation 0.0 CV 0.0 Replicate F 0.000 Replicate Prob(F) 1.0000 Treatment F 0.000 Treatment Prob(F) 1.0000 12