FREEWAY RESPONSIVE SYSTEM IH 10 TxDOT Houston. Steve Chiu, TxDOT Roma Stevens, P.E., PTOE, TTI

Similar documents
Apply DynusT Model for Incident Management along Loop 101 Corridor

A Unique Application of Railroad Preemption with Queue Mitigation at a Roundabout Interchange

Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS)

Transit Signal Priority in the Denver Metro. Bart Przybyl, P.E., PTOE

Ramp Reversal Research. Roy Parikh, P.E. TxDOT Fort Worth District

A Tutorial on Establishing Effective Work Zone Performance Measures

The Secrets to HCM Consistency Using Simulation Models

Evaluation of Truck Signal Priority at N Columbia Blvd and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Intersection

The New Highway Capacity Manual 6 th Edition It s Not Your Father s HCM

Transportation Management Data:

DRAFT. Draft Carbon Monoxide (CO) Traffic Air Quality Analysis

Adaptive Signal Control Technology (ASCT) for Rural Applications Lessons Learned from the Bell Rd ASCT Pilot Project

Development of TSP warrants. to-day variability in traffic demand

OPTIMIZING RAMP METERING STRATEGIES

Applications of Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model for Integrated Networks

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Pottstown Pike Congestion Mitigation Feasibility Study

TRANSFORM66: OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY

Automating Variable Speeds and Traveler Information with Real-Time Traffic and Weather

AGENCY MEETING. I-10E Planning & Environmental Linkages Meeting #1 TxDOT Houston District

Urban Street Safety, Operation, and Reliability

Ramp Metering District

Goleta Ramp Metering Study

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

Florida International University; University of Central Florida. Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE (Dr. Haitham Al-Deek from UCF is Co-PI)

Evaluation of Freeway Work Zone Merge Concepts

SECTION II CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITIES

ScienceDirect. Metering with Traffic Signal Control Development and Evaluation of an Algorithm

Natural Diversion At Temporary Work Zone Lane Closures on November 1992 Urban Freeways In Texas. G.L. Ullman Research Report

Traffic/Mobility Analytics

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

Dynamic Lane Merge Systems

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Update

Active Traffic Management in Michigan. Patrick Johnson, P.E. HNTB Michigan Inc.

Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) Versus Anonymous Wireless Address Matching (AWAM) also known as Bluetooth

FREEWAY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (PeMS): AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS TOOL

US 75 Integrated Corridor Management System Using Technology and Partnership to Maximize Transportation System Capacity

Adaptive Traffic Control OCTEC Meeting

Developing a Successful ICM Project. Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Director Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Loop 289 Corridor Study Phase I

I-90 ALLSTON INTERCHANGE

SIEMENS CONCERT: City of Seattle

CITY OF CLOVIS Traffic Impact Study Guidelines

Conclusions & Lessons Learned

Regional Cashless Tolling Planning Study ASSESSMENT OF FUTURE IMPACTS TO I-76 INTERCHANGES AND ADJACENT ROADWAYS

Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report

UPTOWN TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Low-Cost Improvements for Recurring Freeway Bottlenecks

Scope of Services Traffic Signal Retiming Contract FM NO Florida Department of Transportation District Four

CHAPTER 2: MODELING METHODOLOGY

Applying Micro-simulation i tools for Project Development- University of Florida Traffic Seminar Jaimison Sloboden, PE RS&H

ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF SECURITY MEASURES AT GATES OF SEAPORTS ON TRAFFIC OPERATION

BCEO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

City of Berkeley. Guidelines for Development of Traffic Impact Reports

Policy Research CENTER

Atherton Street Traffic Signal & ITS Improvements

1. Controlling the number of vehicles that are allowed to enter the freeway,

SPECIAL PROVISION Description of Project, Scope of Contract and Sequence of Work

Analytical Tools and Decision Support Systems SANDAG I-15 ICM. ITS PA January 30 th, 2014

Telling the Freight (trucking/goods movement) story:

3.6 GROUND TRANSPORTATION

Monitoring and Assessing Arterial Traffic Performance

Traffic Data Quality Analysis. James Sturrock, PE, PTOE, FHWA Resource Center Operations Team

by Melisa D. Finley, P.E. Transportation Short Course October 11, 2017

Route 7 Connector Ramp MODIF IE D I N T ER C H A N G E M OD IFICATIO N R E PO RT TRA N S F O R M I : I N S ID E THE BE LTWAY

VISSIM PROTOCOL FOR SIMULATION ON FREEWAYS

Evaluation Study of Inflow Traffic Control by Ramp Metering on Tokyo Metropolitan Expressway

COMPARISON OF SPUI & TUDI INTERCHANGE ALTERNATIVES WITH COMPUTER SIMULATION MODELING

Developing a Large Scale Hybrid Simulation Model of the Minneapolis Metropolitan Area

SIMULATION OF TRUCK SAFETY INSPECTION PROCEDURES AT THE TEXAS/MEXICO BORDER

TecNote Modeling 4-Phase Diamond Interchange Operation With Synchro / SimTraffic

INTERSTATE HIGHWAY (IH) 635

Jim Alexander Director of Design and Engineering, Southwest Light Rail Transit Project

Multi-Resolution Traffic Modeling for Transform 66 Inside the Beltway Projects. Prepared by George Lu, Shankar Natarajan

US 75 Integrated Corridor Management

Intelligent Movement of Goods Will Trucks/Trains be able to Operate More Efficiently?

Ramp Metering. Chapter Introduction Metering strategies Benefits Objectives

BILLINGS BYPASS UPDATE

THE EFFECTS OF ENTRANCE RAMP CLOSURE ON FREEWAY OPERATION DURING MORNING PEAK PERIODS. Roy C. Lautzenheiser Engineering Research Associate

Variable Speed Advisory/Limit and Coordinated Ramp Metering for Freeway Traffic Control

SERPM 7/DTA Application FSUTMS Users Group Meeting

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 103/08. Advice Regarding the Assessment of Sites for Ramp Metering

DEVELOPMENT, ANALYSIS, AND DESIGN OF A NEW PARKWAY AT GRADE INTERSECTION (PAGI)

Evaluation of A Dynamic Late Merge System PART I EVALUATION OF A DYNAMIC LATE MEREGE SYSTEM

I 95 EXPRESS LANES SOUTHERN TERMINUS EXTENSION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

Use of TMC Data for Performance Measurement and Improving Operations. National Rural ITS Conference August 25, 2014 Ming Shiun Lee URS Corporation

OKI Congestion Management System Analysis. Data Collection Report Year 1

Finding a Reliable Route between Two Points in a Transportation Network Using GIS

UNIT V TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

Volume to Capacity Estimation of Signalized Road Networks for Metropolitan Transportation Planning. Hiron Fernando, BSCE. A Thesis CIVIL ENGINEERING

ASCT Systems Engineering

Evaluation of Rural Interstate Work Zone Traffic Management Plans in Iowa Using Simulation

Examining the Differences between Travelers Revealed versus Actual Travel Time Savings

CONNECTED CORRIDORS ICM CALIFORNIA AND THE NEXT 20 YEARS

Appendix G Analysis of Project Impacts Compared to Existing Conditions

Pensacola RTMC Operator Quiz

NCDOT I-540 Ramp Metering in Raleigh, Lessons Learned. Meredith McDiarmid NCDOT Transportation Mobility and Safety October 2018

Technical Memorandum Work Order #4-F. Prepared for. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County

Transcription:

FREEWAY RESPONSIVE SYSTEM IH 10 TxDOT Houston Steve Chiu, TxDOT Roma Stevens, P.E., PTOE, TTI Oct 14, 2015

FREEWAY MOBILITY Address Congestion

AIM Help alleviate freeway traffic through signalized intersections when freeway traffic level of service is deteriorating. 3

ISSUES Where to displace freeway traffic when freeway traffic is no longer free flowing. Due to : incident, constructions, and various things that slowdown free flowing condition. 4

CONCEPT Sensor Monitor Freeway Condition Output info to intersections Intersections respond 5

DESIGN Sensors monitor freeway conditions Sensors output contact when conditions met Sending contact information to intersections Intersections receive information Intersections react to the input 6

DESIGN Using the Wavetronix Radar sensor to monitor both direction of freeway. Monitoring freeway vehicle speed, volume, or occupancy. Using contact closure radio to send contact signals to traffic signal cabinets when preset freeway condition threshold is reached. Using two contact inputs to generate 3 timing plans. Ex: on-off plan 1 (inbound condition), off-on plan 2 (outbound condition), and on-on plan 3 (both). 7

DESIGN 8

DESIGN IH 10 - limits from west of SH 6 to Mason 9

EQUIPMENT Wavetronix HD Sensor with Criteria Signaling feature Click! 513 contact closure Intuicom 900 MHz radio with I/O contact closure Econolite ASC 3 traffic signal controller 10

INSTALLATION Adapt existing freeway sensors Installed additional equipment for responsive system-click 513! and Click 300! Install antennas and I/O communication equipment at sensor locations and at intersections. 11

INSTALLATION Sensors 12

INSTALLATION Sensors 13

INSTALLATION I/O or contact closure radio 14

INSTALLATION Intersection antenna 15

INSTALLATION Signal Cabinet 16

INSTALLATION Contact Closure Inputs - Test A&B West Bound Test A Input East Bound Test B Input 17

INSTALLATION Attach Logic Ground 18

SETUP AND OPERATION Sensor setup how many lanes and directions Contact closure interval criteria setup - speed, volume and/or occupancy. Program radio for contact closure inputs and outputs at sensor location and traffic signal cabinet. Connect the radio contact closure outputs at the intersection to the designated input terminals. 19

SETUP AND OPERATION 20

SETUP AND OPERATION 21

SETUP AND OPERATION 22

TRAFFIC PATTERN PM Traffic 23

FREEWAY INCIDENT 24

SETUP AND OPERATION Radio setup allows all intersections to receive all 3 sensor outputs 25

DATA COLLECTION All the data collection is done by the HD sensor at 30 seconds interval. Click 513 pulled data every 5 seconds. When all criteria are met then contact closure closed. 26

CONTROLLER LOGIC STATEMENT Inbound Statement Outbound Statement Both Statement IF: IF CIB CODE ON 160 AND CIB CODE OFF 161 THEN: SET ACTION PLAN ON 10 ELSE: IF: IF CIB CODE OFF 160 AND CIB CODE ON 161 THEN: SET ACTION PLAN ON 11 ELSE: IF: IF CIB CODE ON160 AND CIB CODE ON161 THEN: SET ACTION PLAN ON12 ELSE: Test A = CIB CODE 160 Test B = CIB CODE 161 27

CONTROLLER ACTION PLAN Action plan 10- Max 3 time is Checked for Phase 8 (West Bound Frontage Road) 28

RESULTS 29

DATA (01/16/2015 PM) Alarm Log For Barker Cypress intersection 30

DATA (02/12/15 AM) Alarm Log For Green House intersection 31

INCIDENT ON 05/08/2015 IH 10 WITH FREEWAY CLOSED 32

Freeway Condition Info\EFPlayer.exe 20150212-0730_20150212-0800(greenhouse).avr (AM) 20150116-1600_20150116-1800(correct data).avr (PM) 33

OTHER USES Monitor exit ramp condition. When the exit ramp traffic is backup, the sensor can trigger a low priority preemption, a TSP (Transit Signal Priority) input or an alternative timing plan to clear the exit ramp traffic. With Peer to Peer feature, adjacent intersection can also react to the new action plan. 34

COST HD SENSOR- 1 POWER SUPPLY- 1 CLICK! 513-1 I/O RADIO- 2 ANTENNA- 2 Total : approx. $11,000.00/ location Additional intersection : $3500.00 35

BENEFITS What are the benefits? Can we quantify? What happens to cross-street traffic? Is it always the solution? 36

BENEFITS CALCULATIONS Install more sensors to collect VERY DETAILED travel time data and queue lengths More costs to document the benefits Micro-simulation using VISSIM to document the benefits Less expensive Collected exit and entry ramp volumes Collected turning movement counts at intersections Timing plans Mainlane volumes from Wavetronics Travel time data from travel map for model calibration 37

SIMULATION PROCESS Developed a VISSIM model Freeway segment between SH 6 and Mason Road Frontage between SH 6 and Greenhouse Road focus on Barker Cypress, WB direction and PM Peak Period Going outbound, Barker Cypress signal is the first TxDOT maintained signal for changing timing plans Barker Cypress Entry from Barker Cypress Exit to Greenhouse Road WB Exit to Barker Cypress 38

Typical Volumes in Study Segment 1344 1588 2146 4106 1526 7765 720 297 39

MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS PM Peak Hour Throughput Freeway throughput Cross street and EB Frontage throughput WB Frontage road throughput Delay Delay for freeway Delay for WB frontage approach Delay for SB approach Overall Intersection Delay 40

MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS PM Peak Hour (4:00 to 5:00) Throughput Freeway Increased by 500 vph Cross street and EB Frontage Decreased by 115 vph WB Frontage Increased by 380 vph Delay WB Freeway 64 Veh-hrs WB frontage approach 130 s/veh, 86 Veh-hrs SB approach Increased by 62 s/veh, 13 veh-hrs Total Intersection 68 veh-hrs 41

User Benefits of Delay Savings Value of Time - $21.90 per hour Delay savings for one hour of PM peak = 132 vehicle hours Delay savings for PM peak = 2*132 =264 vehicle hours Monetary value of delay savings/weekday = 264*21.90 = $5,780 System cost per intersection $11,000 Breakeven period 2 days PM peak 42

CONCLUSION Using frontage road to alleviate freeway traffic during less desirable level of service can be an alternative solution to freeway traffic congestion. 43

GOING FORWARD Do a sensitivity analysis to identify when and where it is most beneficial What happens if intersection is fully saturated Closely spaced intersections along X-street Off-peak incident condition Develop a guidance document Time of Day triggering 44

Questions??? 45

Contact Steve Chiu Texas Department of Transportation Houston District Steve.Chiu@txdot.gov P: (713) 802-5936 Roma Stevens, P.E., PTOE Associate Research Engineer Texas A&M Transportation Institute romastevens@tamu.edu P: (713) 613-9216 46