ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 014 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

Similar documents
GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 19 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage: 1330 County: Marquette

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 18 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #172 Entry Year: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 3032 County: Iron

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 40 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acres 2327 County: Menominee

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 020 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #50 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 9 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 49 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 155 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 129 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 148. ENTRY YEAR: 2009 Compartment Acreage: 1,571 County: CHEBOYGAN

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT # 9 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 1775 GIS acres County: Marquette

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 194 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

Gwinn Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment 211 Entry Year: 2009 Compartment Acreage: 584 County: Marquette

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 4. ENTRY YEAR: 2007 Compartment Acreage: 1,348 County: OTSEGO

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 146 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 137. ENTRY YEAR: 2008 Compartment Acreage: 3,655 County: Cheboygan

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 37 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 43. ENTRY YEAR: 2009 Compartment Acreage: 3,343 County: CHARLEVOIX

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 277 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 40 ENTRY YEAR: 2009

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 51 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 19 ENTRY YEAR: 2013

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 135 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT # 57 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 1686 County: Menominee

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #187 County Year: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 600 County: Iron

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 19 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 134 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 008 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 113 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage: 2772

CRYSTAL FALLS FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT #73 - ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: County: Dickinson

GWINN FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT 58 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 137 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 48 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 55 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 202 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 247 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

Gwinn FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION. COMPARTMENT #227 ENTRY YEAR: 2010 Compartment Acreage: 1564 County: Marquette

SHINGLETON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 85 ENTRY YEAR: Compartment Acreage: 1927 County: Schoolcraft

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 153. ENTRY YEAR: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 1,387 County: Cheboygan

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 21 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

Compartment Review Presentation

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 18 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 122 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Today, jack pine dominates the western ½ of the compartment while aspen is somewhat more prevalent in the eastern ½.

Gwinn Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment 104 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1,291 County: Alger

NEWBERRY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 63 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

Compartment Review Presentation

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 120 ENTRY YEAR: 2007

Compartment Review Presentation

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #76 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1212 County: Dickinson

Sault Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment # 49 Entry Year: 2013 Compartment Acreage: 1,929 County: Chippewa

NEWBERRY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 60 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

ROSCOMMON FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 152 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #61 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 157 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

COMPARTMENT PRESENTATION

BARAGA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #28 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

Newberry Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #42070 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 2,860 County: Chippewa

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #33 ENTRY YEAR: 2002

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #101 Entry Year: 2012 Compartment Acreage: 1248 County: Dickinson

Compartment Review Presentation

Crystal Falls Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #193 Entry Year: 2012 Compartment Acreage: 1258 County: Iron

Watershed and Fisheries Considerations: Lyons lake to the NE with no real access and Whiskey Creek which runs through the compartment.

Shingleton Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #174 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1418 County: Alger

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 186 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

Draft Revision Date: April 28, 2008, Aug. 2008, 10/20/08

TRAVERSE CITY FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 246 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 116 ENTRY YEAR: 2012

PIGEON RIVER COUNTRY MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #17 ENTRY YEAR: 2001

GRAYLING FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 194 ENTRY YEAR: 2008

Sault Ste Marie Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment # 54 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 1,210 County: Chippewa

Baraga Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #11 Entry Year: 2014 Compartment Acreage: 3353 County: Baraga

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

ATLANTA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT #22 ENTRY YEAR: 2010

SAULT FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 112 ENTRY YEAR: 2011

Compartment Review Presentation

Gwinn Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #047 Entry Year: 2012 Compartment Acreage: 1909 County: Marquette

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

CADILLAC FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Compartment Review Presentation

Gwinn Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment 35 Entry Year: 2013 Compartment Acreage: 1, 505 County: Marquette

Sault Ste Marie Forest Management Unit Compartment Review Presentation Compartment #124 Entry Year: 2013 Compartment Acreage: 1,908 County: Mackinac

GAYLORD FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT: 58. ENTRY YEAR: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 1,793 County: Antrim

Transcription:

ESCANABA FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT COMPARTMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION COMPARTMENT # 014 ENTRY YEAR: 2011 Compartment Acreage: 1000 County: Menominee Revision Date: August 5, 2009 Stand Examiner: Joe Durbin, Forester FMFM, Bill Rollo and Craig Albright, Wildlife Division Legal Description: T36N R27W Sections 10, 11, 14, 15 and. Management Goals: This compartment is part of a block of land located about 7 miles north of Stephenson, MI; about 1 mile west of US-41 in central Menominee County. It is a mix of lowland and upland forest and non-forested types. Lowland types are primarily cedar, swamp conifer, lowland hardwoods and lowland brush. Upland types are mostly aspen, spruce-fir and northern hardwoods. Much of the compartment has organic soils supporting mature stands of cedar and swamp conifer. Cedar also occurs in many of the upland stands. Proposed for treatment are 112 acres which include 9 stands. No prescribed stands are factor limited. Of the proposed treatments, 56 acres (2 stands) are northern hardwoods to be select cut followed by scarification and treatment to breakup the sedge groundcover, 32 acres (4 stands) of aspen and lowland conifer type to be final harvested with reserves, 14 acres (1 stand) of lowland conifer type to be seed-tree harvested and 10 acres (2 stands) of northern hardwoods to be under-planted sparsely with spruce for diversity. The Little Cedar River flows through the east portion of the compartment. Soil and Topography: The topography is mostly level to gently rolling with some eskers. The soils are primarily poorly-drained muck and peat, poorly-drained sands and well-drained sands. The major soil series are Lupton, Cathro, Onaway, Rousseau, Nadeau and Tawas. Ownership Patterns, Development, and Land Use in and Around the Compartment: This compartment is well blocked with a few scattered private in-holdings. The Little Cedar River flows through the eastern portion of the compartment separating portions of several forties. Private land near this compartment is used mainly for farming and recreation--mainly hunting, trapping, ORV riding and fishing. Several private landowners reside near the compartment however there are also many absentee owners. In-holdings are owned by absentee owners with access over roads on state land. Unique, Natural Features: The MNFI GIS layer indicates that no known element occurrences are within or near this compartment. Archeological, Historical, and Cultural Features: None are known within the compartment, however, potential is reported in nearby areas. Special Management Designations or Considerations: Stands along the Little Cedar River are considered for Special Conservation Areas - Little Cedar River riparian corridor and habitat for wildlife species that utilize mature forest conditions. Watershed and Fisheries Considerations: Design road access and harvesting to protect the Little Cedar River and tributaries from impediments and sedimentation. Wildlife Habitat Considerations: This compartment is located at the west edge of the central Menominee County farm belt and is primarily a lowland conifer landscape. Nearly half of this compartment is cedar

swamp and mixed swamp conifer. Most of this acreage will simply be maintained for wildlife cover due to the difficulty in achieving cedar regeneration, but 32 acres will be harvested and regenerated to a mixture of spruce, fir, and tamarack. Uplands of aspen, spruce-fir, and northern hardwood make up the remainder of the compartment. Nearly all of the aspen is less than 30 years old and will be allowed to mature. Two northern hardwood stands will be select cut and possibly treated with anchor chains or herbicide to reduce the sedge mat which is impeding regeneration. Wildlife Division may consider underplanting spruce in 2 hardwood stands which lack diversity. The Little Cedar River flows through the east edge of the compartment. Forest stands adjacent the river have been designated a Special Conservation Area to promote mature forest conditions. Natural processes will be allowed to operate in these stands to increase the volume of snags, cavity trees, den trees, and dead woody debris on the forest floor Mineral Resource and Development Concerns and/or Restrictions: Surface sediments consist of coarsetextured till in drumlins and glacial outwash sand & gravel and postglacial alluvium. The glacial drift thickness varies between 10 and 50 feet. The Ordovician Prairie du Chien group and Cambrian Trempealeau Formation underlie the glacial drift. The PdC and Trempealeau could be quarried for dolostone. This Compartment has not been previously leased for metallic exploration. A gravel pit is located in Section 13 and potential is good on the upland drumlins. No economic oil and gas production has been found in the UP. Vehicle Access: Access into this compartment is from the north through Compartment 15 using county road Zemba Lane and Klatt Road or Homestead Lane. Access is also available from the south using County Road 360 and crossing various private ownerships along a gated woods road. Survey Needs: Six survey corners are needed for the recommended treatments. Recreational Facilities and Opportunities: Popular recreation includes hunting, trapping and fishing. No developed recreational facilities exist at present. The potential for developed recreational activities within this compartment may include cross-country skiing, snowmobiling and ORV trail riding or canoeing on the Little Cedar River. Fire Protection: The compartment has a low risk for wildfire due to the current timber types and extent of poorly drained soils. However, if wildfires do occur, access could be improved to most of the compartment with minimal road improvements including some widening and placement of fill and a few culverts. Additional Compartment Information: None. **** Cover type details, proposed treatments and stands designated as FDF are listed in the attached reports: Cover Type by Age Class Cover Type by Management Objective Compartment Volume Summary Proposed Treatments No Limiting Factors Proposed Treatments With Limiting Factors **** The following information is displayed on the attached compartment maps: Base feature information, stand numbers, cover types Proposed treatments Proposed road access system Suggested potential old growth

8/13/2009 7:47: AM Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Operations Inventory System Individual Compartment Report TABLE 3: Page 1 of 1 ESCANABA RIVER STATE FOREST ESCANABA FOREST MGT UNIT MENOMINEE COUNTY COMPARTMENT: 14 Table 3 (acres shown in boxes) STAND AGE CLASS COVER TYPE Not Coded 0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99 100-109 110-119 120-129 130-139 140-149 150-159 All Aged Total Aspen 18 84 57 6 6 3 2 3 179 Cedar 7 6 4 1 45 173 357 Lowlnd Brush 34 34 26 6 6 Lowlnd Poplr 38 Mx Swmp Cnfr 8 6 8 47 6 1 18 14 10 118 8 Paper Birch 8 Spruce Fir 12 23 17 35 9 13 3 112 Swamp Hrdwds 23 13 2 38 Upland Hdwds 5 13 13 76 107 9 Water 9 Total 9 38 113 108 94 27 4 7 41 23 87 4 136 45 173 91 1000

8/13/2009 7:47:26 AM Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Operations Inventory System Individual Compartment Report TABLE 3A: Page 1 of 1 ESCANABA RIVER STATE FOREST ESCANABA FOREST MGT UNIT MENOMINEE COUNTY COMPARTMENT: 14 Table 3A (acres shown in boxes) MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE TYPE COVER TYPE A S V C G H J I L P N Q X O B R K Y F E T D U M Z W Total A Aspen 179 179 C Cedar 357 357 L P Q B F E M Z Lowlnd Brush 34 34 Lowlnd Poplr 38 38 Mx Swmp Cnfr 118 118 Paper Birch 8 8 Spruce Fir 112 112 Swamp Hrdwds 38 38 Upland Hdwds 107 107 Water 9 9 Total 179 357 34 38 118 8 112 38 107 9 1000

8/13/2009 7:47:29 AM Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Operations Inventory System Individual Compartment Report TABLE 10: Page 1 of 1 ESCANABA RIVER STATE FOREST ESCANABA FOREST MGT UNIT MENOMINEE COUNTY COMPARTMENT: 14 Table 10 - COMPARTMENT VOLUME SUMMARY - ALL STANDS COMPARTMENT SUMMARY TOTAL VOLUME Hardwood 4732 Cds Hardwood 94 Mbf Softwood 12848 Cds Softwood 202 Mbf Sum TotVol 18172 Cds CUT VOLUME Hardwood 641 Cds Hardwood 31 Mbf Softwood 976 Cds Sum CutVol 1679 Cds Total Cmpt Acres Acres Proposed For Cut... 102 1000

Stand ESCANABA FOREST MGT UNIT Proposed Treatments Compartment: 14 With NO Limiting Factors Cover Type Acres Age Site Index Mgt Obj Condition Method Cut Harvest Priority Cultural Need 8 43 65 northern hardwood unevenaged selection 2 natural regeneration Entry Year: 2011 FDF Status Nice quality hardwood poles. Selectcut to 70-80 residual BA. Leave some larger beech. Long term MO is M. Follow in-stand retention guidelines. Acceptable regeneration includes a mixture of the current species. Encourage scarification to breakup thick grass ground cover. ##After Pre-review: Post harvest scarify with anchor chains and followup with herbicide. 20 14 116 40 mixed swamp mature seed tree 1 conifer Fir and spruce seedling emerging from moss and geround cover under current overstory. Harvest now before more timber blows over or breaks. Site is wet with occasional islands of high ground. Clearcut with reserves--leave seed trees along the boundary of the north, west and south edges. Long term MO is Q. Leave no retention in the middle of the stand. Acceptable regeneration is a mixture of spruce, fir, tamarack and cedar. ##After pre-review: Change MOC to seed tree harvest and leave 10 BA of mixed species--mostly cedar. 25 13 89 65 northern hardwood mature selection 2 natural regeneration Selectcut this stand with stand 8. Selectcut to 70-80 residual BA. Long term MO is M. Follow in-stand retention guidelines. Acceptable regeneration includes a mixture of the current species. Encourage scarification to breakup thick grass ground cover to help regeneration. ##After Pre-review: Post harvest scarify with anchor chains and followup with herbicide. 38 6 74 65 northern hardwood immature 0 planting Wld : Stand on a NE-SW ridge. Fair quality HM poles but good quality basswood. Several basswood poles are wind damaged. Last treated on contract 038-97-01 in 1998-2001. Treat next entry. GLO notes from 1852 had white pine, hemlock, lynnwood, fir, beech, and ironwood in the hardwood stands. Would like to plant the canopy gaps and edge of stand with a limited amount of suitable pine/spruce species (white spruce/white pine/hemlock). BA is 110, so I will be concentrating on gaps and the edges. Approximately 250-500 trees. 99 3 50 55 aspen (upland) mature final harvest 1 Stand on NE-SW ridge. Stand variable--, B6 and. Final harvest now with thinning of stand 25. Some hemlock in stand. Clearcut with reserves--retain all hemlock, white pine and yellow birch to meet retention guidelines. Long term MO is A. Acceptable regeneration includes aspen or a mixture of current species. 102 4 74 65 northern hardwood immature 0 planting Wld : very little M regen. Some beech poles in stand. Stand last treated on contract 038-97-01. GLO notes from 1852 had white pine, hemlock, lynnwood, fir, beech, and ironwood in the hardwood stands. Would like to plant the canopy gaps and edge of stand with a limited amount of suitable pine/spruce species (white spruce/white pine/hemlock). BA is 110, so I will be concentrating on gaps and the edges. Approximately 250-500 trees. Sedge is dominant ground cover. White spruce is the most suitable pine species for this stand. 126 2 66 65 aspen (upland) mature final harvest 1 Narrow ridge along property line. Cut now before more falls down. Aspen is blowing over and has conks. Fir is also dying out. Treat with nearby stands 127 and 128. Final harvest. Stand is only two acres-- recommend no in-stand retention. Long term MO is A. Acceptable regeneration is aspen or a mixture of current species. 127 9 95 50 swamp hardwoods mature final harvest 1 Stand variable. E5 and in east part; T6 in center and B6 along west side.; Treat with nearby stands. Clearcut with reserves. Retain cedar in pockets in the SE and SW portions of the stand. Also retain a some paper and yellow birch for seed source. Long term MO is E, T or B, or a mixture of the current species. Acceptable regeneration is a mixture of current species. 128 18 95 45 mixed swamp mature final harvest 1 conifer Total Acres... Mostly tam. Treat with nearby stands. Clearcut with reserves Retain a 1 acre pocket/strip along the southeast edge of the stand. This pocket/strip is a mixture of species but has a greater component of cedar. Long term MO is Q. Acceptable regeneration includes a mixture of the current species. 112 Page 1 of 1 8/13/2009

Proposed Treatments With Limiting Factors Compartment: 14 Entry Year: 2011 Stand Cover Type Acres Age Site Index Mgt Obj Condition Method Cut Harvest Priority Cultural Need FDF Status TREATMENT LIMITING FACTORS: Total Acres... 0 Page 1 of 1 8/13/2009

87 39 0"W 87 39 0"W 87 38 0"W Compartment 14 T36N, R27W, Sec. 10, 11,14,15, County: Menominee Unit: Escanaba YOE: 2011 Acres: 1,000 GIS Calculated Stand Examiner: Joe Durbin Map Revised: 8/04/2009 Map Phase: Pre-Review Covertype & Treatment Map 10 15 11 14 61 12 30 C4 63 62 60 66 1 Q2 64 P4 11 10 F2 35 127 100 14 P3 29 114 108 8 800 17 33 16 115 13 C9 34 67 46 P4 5 52 56 53 6 39 59 75 126 100 128 100 32 15 57 81 102 011 25 800 125 7 50 51 21 36 119 3 4 120 99 100 71 77 19 130 84 Q4 129 31 24 49 F3 54 48 9 45 55 26 37 83 2 88 82 80 85 74 79 73 121 78 C9 124 123 97 113 28 117 112 118 20 200 92 F1 86 40 94 87 105 B6 116 44 106 93 18 76 90 96 110 109 41 107 91 68 47 27 70 65 72 23 89 43 98 42 104 95 111 69 38 011 101 E5 Legend Miris Corners Highway County Paved Roads County Gravel Roads Paved Roads Poor Dirt Roads Water Features Stand Boundaries Treatments 011 - Planting/Hand tools 100 - Final harvest 200 - Seed tree 846 - Selection/Natural regeneration A - Aspen B - Paper Birch C - Northern White Cedar E - Swamp Hardwoods F - Upland Spruce or Fir L - Lowland Brush M - Northern Hardwoods P - Balsam Poplar, Swamp Aspen, Swamp White Birch Q - Mixed Swamp Conifers Z - Water 1 0.5 0 1 Miles 87 38 0"W

87 38 0"W Stand Boundary Map Compartment 14 T36N, R27W, Sec. 10, 11,14,15, County: Menominee Unit: Escanaba YOE: 2011 Acres: 1,000 GIS Calculated Stand Examiner: Joe Durbin Map Revised: 8/04/2009 Map Phase: Pre-Review 10 11 15 14 94 93 3 125 4 64 11 10 P4 F2 9 31 45 63 62 108 12 66 14 P3 16 35 1 Q2 115 29 81 67 37 34 40 116 44 129 48 130 38 47 72 27 23 89 76 70 90 111 43 98 96 110 109 65 42 95 41 104 106 102 128 68 18 105 B6 117 126 13 C9 127 113 28 36 17 33 20 97 50 51 21 114 30 C4 112 56 86 55 26 53 6 119 39 7 84 87 Q4 59 54 88 83 75 120 82 85 80 46 25 74 P4 99 79 73 121 24 78 C9 71 124 15 77 19 92 F1 123 49 F3 8 61 60 2 5 57 52 32 91 69 107 118 101 E5 Legend Miris Corners Highway County Paved Roads County Gravel Roads Paved Roads Poor Dirt Roads Water Features Stand Boundaries 1 0.5 87 38 0"W 0 1 Miles

87 38 0"W Dedicated & Proposed Special Conservation Area Map Compartment 14 T36N, R27W, Sec. 10, 11, 14, 15, County: Menominee Unit: Escanaba YOE: 2011 Acres: 1,000 GIS Calculated Stand Examiner: Joe Durbin Map Revised: 8/04/2009 Map Phase: Pre-Review 10 11 15 14 61 12 30 C4 63 62 60 66 1 Q2 127 64 P4 11 10 F2 35 14 P3 29 114 108 17 33 8 16 115 13 C9 34 67 56 53 39 46 P4 128 32 15 126 38 57 5 52 6 59 75 25 81 125 7 50 51 21 36 102 119 3 4 120 99 71 77 19 130 84 Q4 129 31 49 F3 54 24 48 9 45 55 26 113 28 37 83 112 88 82 80 85 74 79 73 121 78 C9 124 123 97 117 118 2 92 F1 86 40 94 20 87 105 B6 116 44 106 93 18 76 90 96 110 109 41 107 91 68 47 27 70 65 72 23 89 43 98 42 104 95 111 69 101 E5 Legend Miris Corners Dedicated Special Conservation Areas OI Special Conservation Areas Potential Old Growth Stands Cold Water Streams 1 0.5 0 1Miles 87 38 0"W

Report Date: 08/04/2009 Escanaba Mgt. Unit Compartment: 014 DEDICATED CONSERVATION AREA DETAILS Page 1 of 1 * This is a list of Dedicated Biodiversity Areas for this compartment along with a 1/4 mile buffer surrounding the compartment. Refer to Dedicated Conservation Area Map for areas that the below listed Conservation Areas are located. Conservation Area Type Description ERA = Ecological Reference Area HCVA = High Conservation Value Area SCA = Special Conservation Area