TERR 6 VALLEY ELDERBERRY LONGHORN BEETLE

Similar documents
TERR 2 INVASIVE/EXOTIC PLANT SPECIES

LAND 2 Multiple Use Opportunity Assessment

VEGETATION AND INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PLAN

A.21 VALLEY ELDERBERRY LONGHORN BEETLE (DESMOCERUS CALIFORNICUS DIMORPHUS) Legal and Other Status. Species Distribution and Status

A.23 VALLEY ELDERBERRY LONGHORN BEETLE (DESMOCERUS

RIPARIAN MONITORING PLAN

3.0 Proposed Action and Alternatives Proposed Action License Term Project Facilities to be Licensed...

CONNECTING. Big Chino Valley Pumped Storage Project. Energy Infrastructure

MANZANITA LAKE PLANNING UNIT Willow Creek Watershed

Application for a New License Major Project Existing Dam

Biological Assessment. Threatened & Endangered Plant Species. Ash Valley Grazing

Subject: Technical Memorandum Number 2 Noxious Weed Surveys

Prepared by: PacifiCorp 825 NE Multnomah Street Portland, OR 97232

Vegetation Cover Type Mapping Study Plan for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington

CITY OF PATERSON, NJ AND GREAT FALLS HYDROELECTRIC COMPANY JOINT AGENCY / STAKEHOLDER MEETING AUGUST 3, 2016

Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC Project No. 2079)

Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project FERC Project Number P INDEX to License Documents

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact. North Fork Pole Barn Decommissioning

Battle Creek Salmon and Steelhead Restoration Project January 2017

Appendix B Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report

2015 General Rate Case. Generation Volume 7, Part 2 Hydro Capital

FINAL WILDLIFE and VEGETATION RESOURCES STUDY PLAN. Blue Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Expansion. Prepared by:

Soils Study. Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 2911) June Long View Associates, Inc. Ridgefield, Washington

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION & MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF CHICO PLANNING DIVISION

Appendix 12 Revised Our House and Log Cabin Diversion Dams and New Bullards Bar Reservoir Large Woody Material Management Plan

Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No Draft License Surrender Application. September 9-10, 2008

Parish s Alkali Grass (Puccinellia parishii)

HABITAT AND POPULATIONS OF THE VALLEY ELDERBERRY LONGHORN BEETLE ALONG THE SACRAMENTO RIVER 1

Amended Application for a New License Major Project Existing Dam

Published November 3, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Sacramento Municipal ) Project No Utility District )

134 FERC 61,195 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle for the University of California, Davis Campus Projects

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, DC February 10, Subject: Scoping Document 1 for the Kaweah Hydroelectric Project

Annual Vegetation and Noxious Weed Management Report Santa Felicia Project 2015 Reporting Period

~ate: d~o/~o/h. h ~~~ Date:,;z//o/a?0/6. Managing Water in the West. Upper Sacramento River Anadromous Fish Habitat Restoration Project

Hydropower Project License Summary KERN RIVER, CA KERN CANYON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-178) This summary was produced by the

INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND

Takatz Lake Project - Alaska

Hydropower Project License Summary PIT RIVER, CA PIT 1 HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2687) Pit River below Pit 1 Powerhouse

4.0 Existing Information and Need for Additional Information

Presenter: CLYDE HUNT. Project Manager Memphis District August 2010

BIG CREEK HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEM

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C June 29, 2009

SOUTH FORK AMERICAN RIVER (CHILI BAR), CALIFORNIA

Relicensing Planning for Hydroelectric Watersheds

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT S UPPER AMERICAN RIVER PROJECT (FERC NO. 2101)

Meacham Creek Restoration Project

Final Training Manual to Evaluate Habitat Quality of Vernal Pool Ecosystem Sites in Santa Rosa Plain

FERC Relicensing of Hawks Nest Project (FERC NO. 2512) Glen Ferris Project (FERC NO )

AQ 2 Fish Population Technical Study Plan Kaweah Project (FERC Project No. 298)

Hydrologic Characteristics of the Owens River Basin below the Upper Owens River

RE: Fishery evaluation for South, Old Cow Creek Hydroelectric Facilities

Lower Cherry Aqueduct Emergency Rehabilitation (44896) Scoping Package

Dear Ms. Bose, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the application by Juneau Hydropower Inc. for a

Short Form Botany Resource Reports:

Botany Resource Reports:

TOLEDO BEND PROJECT FERC NO FINAL LICENSE APPLICATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DRAFT SEDIMENT and EROSION CONTROL PLAN. BLUE LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (FERC No. 2230) EXPANSION. Prepared by:

If any questions arise concerning this application, please contact us.

Long-term Management Plan For The Mitigation Bank

Long-term Management Plan For The Mitigation Bank

Low Impact Hydropower Institute AMENDED Application for Low Impact Hydropower Certification: Island Park Hydroelectric Project

LOWER DRUM PLANNING UNIT Yuba-Bear River Watershed

Public Meeting, November 3, /3/11

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE SURRENDER

2.4 Description of the No Action and Action Alternatives

Mt. Elizabeth Drive Fuel Reduction Project (30422) Decision Memo

This is a project which if approved would construct and operate a 60-megawatt photovoltaic solar plant on 640 acres of agricultural land.

Blue Lake Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2230) Expansion Environmental Analysis

Errata sheet for the Connecticut General Permits May 2, 2017

COMBINED AQUATICS STUDY PLANS CAWG-3-FLOW-RELATED PHYSICAL HABITAT IN BYPASS REACHES

Fall River Mills Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat. LCP Volume II Supporting Analysis for Recommendations

Camp Far West Hydroelectric Project

Overview of Recent Developments in California Environmental Laws

Amador Water Agency 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Revised Public Draft. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment

5.2 Comprehensive Development and Recommended Alternative. 5.4 Consistency with Comprehensive Plans

Programmatic Environmental Compliance and Permitting for Invasive Weed Control and Habitat Restoration Projects. Presented by: Ron Unger

Appendix I: Fixed-400,000 af Flood Storage Operation

2.0 Resource Management Goals of Agencies with Jurisdiction Over the Resource to be Studied

KILARC RESERVOIR PLANNING UNIT Cow-Battle Creek Watershed

Public Notice. Public Notice No. Date: April 8, 2016 CENAP-PL-E Comment Period Closes: May 9, 2016

KINGS RIVER PLANNING UNIT Kings River Watershed

For forebay flushing the following general sequence of events occurred:

Programmatic Environmental Assessment Forest-Wide Erosion Abatement USDA Forest Service Shawnee National Forest

2.0 Resource Management Goals of Agencies with Jurisdiction Over the Resource to be Studied

April 26, 2018 INITIAL STUDY REPORT MEETING

RECREATION MANAGEMENT PLAN

MONONGAHELA RIVER, WV

Warm Springs Hydro LLC 5203 South 11 th East Idaho Falls, ID

Appendix D - Evaluation of Interim Solutions

Errata sheet for the Connecticut General Permits March 26, 2019

BATTLE CREEK HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC NO LICENSE AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR BATTLE CREEK SALMON AND STEELHEAD RESTORATION PROJECT

Further information of project proposals is available on the World Wide Web at:

Case Study 15. Moonlight Crossing Concrete Box Vented Ford


Nestlé Waters North America Inc. Special Use Permit San Bernardino National Forest Project Proposal

The Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy

FALL RIVER MILLS PLANNING UNIT Pit-McCloud River Watershed

The Wyoming Wildlife Advocates also value the Caribou-Targhee National

Transcription:

TERR 6 VALLEY ELDERBERRY LONGHORN BEETLE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (VELB) (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus) habitat mapping and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) protocol-level surveys were completed near Project facilities and recreation features by reviewing existing information, conducting agency consultation, and completing surveys during the spring and summer of 2004 at facilities not surveyed in 2002 or 2003. VELB habitat surveys were conducted in conjunction with special-status plant surveys and incorporated into a GIS database. There were six elderberry shrubs identified at the Project facilities not previously surveyed. No shrubs had signs of VELB exit holes. 2.0 STUDY OBJECTIVES Determine the location of VELB habitat (i.e., elderberry shrubs below 3,000 feet) at Project facilities not surveyed in 2002 or 2003. 3.0 STUDY IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 STUDY ELEMENTS COMPLETED Completed surveys for VELB habitat at Project facilities and recreation features in the study area not surveyed in 2002 or 2003, in conjunction with special-status plant surveys. Conducted protocol-level surveys in accordance with USFWS Conservation Guidelines for Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (USFWS 1999) for all elderberry shrubs identified in the study area. 3.2 OUTSTANDING STUDY ELEMENTS There are no outstanding study elements. TERR-6-1

4.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 4.1 REVIEW OF EXISTING INFORMATION Existing documentation on VELB in the study area was compiled, reviewed, and analyzed. This included a review of: (1) CDFG s Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFG 2004); (2) USDA-FS s Threatened, Endangered, and Forest Service Sensitive Species Database for the Terrestrial Species of the Sierra National Forest (USDA-FS 2004); (3) USFWS Conservation Guidelines for Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (USFWS 1999); and other relevant documents included in the 2002 TERR 6, Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle, Technical Study Report (TSR) (SCE 2003). 4.2 VELB HABITAT MAPPING During the spring and summer of 2004, surveys for elderberry shrubs located below 3,000 feet in elevation were conducted at Project facilities and recreation features in the study area. The following is a list of locations surveyed in 2004: Stevenson 12 kv Project Power Line Rock Trap Flushing Channel, Mammoth Pool Powerhouse Mammoth Pool Powerhouse Tunnel Muck Site Manifold 2.4kV Project Power Line Adit 1, Tunnel 8 Angler Access Stairway at Mammoth Powerhouse Parking Area near Mammoth Powerhouse Gate Access Road from 8S03 to Mammoth Pool Penstock Surveys were conducted in conjunction with the lower elevation special-status plant surveys on April 19-21 and July 6-7, 2004. Refer to the 2002 TERR 6, Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle TSR (SCE 2003) for detailed methodology. 4.3 USFWS PROTOCOL LEVEL SURVEYS A protocol-level survey was conducted in accordance with the USFWS Conservation Guidelines for Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (USFWS 1999) because it was determined that elderberry shrubs could potentially be affected, in the future, by Project operations or maintenance activities. Surveys were completed on April 19-21 and July 6-7, 2004. Refer to the 2002 TERR 6, Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle TSR (SCE 2003) for detailed methodology. TERR-6-2

5.0 STUDY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 5.1 REVIEW OF EXISTING INFORMATION There is the potential for VELB to occur in the Project area in elderberry shrubs below 3,000 feet in elevation. The life history, habitat requirements, and known occurrences in the Project vicinity of VELB are described in the 2002 TERR 6, Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle TSR (SCE 2003). 5.2 VELB HABITAT MAPPING Field surveys were conducted in the spring and summer of 2004 in conjunction with the special-status plant surveys. Refer to the 2002 TERR 3, Special-status Plant Populations TSR (SCE 2003) for survey methodology. There were six elderberry shrubs detected in the 2004 study area. Five shrubs were identified along the Manifold 2.4kV Project Power Line and one shrub was identified adjacent to the Mammoth Pool Powerhouse Tunnel Muck Site (Figures TERR 6-1a and TERR 6-1b, and Appendix A). No beetle exit holes were observed on any of the shrubs. 5.3 USFWS PROTOCOL-LEVEL SURVEYS There were six elderberry shrubs detected during the VELB habitat mapping surveys in 2004. Stem counts were completed on each and the diameter size classes were determined (Appendix A). There were 47 stems that were greater than or equal to 1 inch and less than or equal to 3 inches in diameter ( 1 and 3), none of which had evidence of beetle exit holes. There were 38 stems greater than 3 and less than 5 inches in diameter (>3 and <5), none of which had evidence of beetle exit holes. A total of 12 stems greater than or equal to 5 inches ( 5) in diameter were associated with these shrubs, none of which had evidence of beetle exit holes. 6.0 LITERATURE CITED California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2004. Rarefind 2, California Natural Diversity Database. Electronic database. Sacramento, California. Southern California Edison. 2003. 2002 Technical Study Report Package for the Big Creek Hydroelectric System Alternative Licensing Process prepared by Southern California Edison. October 10, 2003. U.S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (USDA-FS). 2004. Threatened, Endangered, and Forest Service Sensitive Species Database for the Terrestrial Species of the Sierra National Forest. Electronic database. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Conservation Guidelines for Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle, Sacramento. TERR-6-3

FIGURES

Placeholder for Figures Non-Internet Public Information These Figures have been removed in accordance with the Commission regulations at 18 CFR Section 388.112. These Figures are considered Non-Internet Public information and should not be posted on the Internet. This information is provided in Volume 4 of the Application for New License and is identified as Non-Internet Public information. This information may be accessed from the FERC s Public Reference Room, but is not expected to be posted on the Commission s electronic library, except as an indexed item.

APPENDIX A Results of 2004 VELB Habitat Mapping and Protocol-Level Surveys

Appendix A. Results of VELB Habitat Mapping and Protocol-Level Surveys. Diameter 1" and 3" >3" and <5" 5" Total Stem Count Total Stem Count Total Stem Count Site # Location GPS Coordinates Exit Holes Present 1 6 8 1 2 10 12 2 3 7 6 4 4 6 2 3 5 15 9 2 6 3 1 0 Total 47 38 12 Mammoth Pool PH Tunnel Muck Site 37 13 23.5 N 119 20 29.1 W No signs of exit holes 37 08 44.3 N 119 23 21.9 W No signs of exit holes 37 08 44.7 N 119 23 21.9 W No signs of exit holes 37 08 44.7 N 119 23 21.9 W No signs of exit holes 37 08 46.5 N 119 23 24.3 W No signs of exit holes 37 08.645 N 119 23.313 W No signs of exit holes TERR 6-A-1