Aquatic Plant and Algae Management and Endangered Species Stresses or Stressors, Risks or Benefits?

Similar documents
At the Front of a Storm: What Emerging Federal Processes for Endangered Species Risk Assessment will Mean to the Registration of Aquatic Herbicides

FIFRA/ESA Assessments and Beyond: How FESTF's Data Management Tool, Gopher, Answers Questions and Provides Options

Endangered Species Update

Process and criteria for efficient assessment of pesticide risk to endangered species

Aquatic Herbicide Toxicology

Growers, Pesticides, and Endangered Species: Results of MCFA ESA Workshop

PLANT AND ANIMAL DIVERSITY

Implementation of a Tiered Aquatic Life Use Framework for Minnesota Streams

ESA INFORMATION GUIDELINES FOR THE REGULATORY PROGRAM

Endangered Species: The Path for Coordinated Consultation

Endangered Species Assessments Conducted Under FIFRA: Fomesafen Registration Review Case Study

Meeting the Challenge: Invasive Plants in Pacific Northwest Ecosystems

Approaches for Incorporating Ecosystem Goods & Services in US Army Corps Planning and Benefits Evaluation*

Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Process Southeast Regional Office

LAWSUIT TO PROTECT SALMON FROM PESTICIDES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

Fish Ecology and Management Workshop. Fisheries management options

Ecological/Watershed Modeling. Cindy Ryals Taylor Carroll

Utilizing Ecosystem Services to Generate Support for Endangered Species Recovery

A Risk Assessment Process for Establishing Negligible Risk Earlier in National-Scale Endangered Species Assessments

Agency Organization Organization Address Information. Name United States Department of Agriculture

Butterfly-Safe Wine? Layering Incentives to Maximize Species Benefits on Private Lands

Matrix of Major Environmental Laws and Regulations Provisions Related to Components of an Indirect and Cumulative Impact Analysis 1 2

Setting a species-specific population model in the context of an aquatic food web model: a case study for the Topeka shiner

NDCEE. Ecosystem Banking Best Practices. Elizabeth Keysar, NDCEE/CTC. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Chris S. Pease U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force

Risk Management Approach to Identifying Options for Protecting the Monarch Butterfly

Environmental Fate and Effects Division: Who We Are and What We Do!

CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program (ERP)

Introduction. The Purpose of the Guidance Document

OUTLINE. Background on Glyphosate Use Areas Public Concerns Current Bans Options for Martin County

OVERVIEW. What is the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement?

Ray Temple Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Post Office Box 59, Portland, Oregon 97207, USA

National Marine Fisheries Service ESA/MSA Restoration Project Consultations. Oregon State Habitat Office Oregon Coast Branch Roseburg, Oregon

I. Introduction. II. General Agreements for Pesticide Consultation Process

BEFORE THE OREGON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION

Facts About Pesticides, Salmon, and the Endangered Species Act

CHNEP/SWFRPC Climate Ready Programs

The Analyses section, below, provides the basis for our conclusions and position.

Determine Certainty Program Framework of a Market Based Conservation Initiative for Longleaf Pine Habitat Improvements in Eastern North Carolina

Criteria for Identifying and Prioritizing Habitat Protection and Restoration Projects on the Lower Columbia River and Estuary*

CHAPTER. Climate Change CONTENTS. Introduction Climate Change Action Plan. Coastal Bend Bays Plan, 2nd Edition

National Agronomic Environmental

Projects must fall under one of the nine categories listed in Table 1.

Environmental Benefits and Performance Measures: Defining National Ecosystem Restoration and how to measure its achievement.

Water Quality Forum Ottawa County. Shannon Briggs Water Bureau, MDEQ

Pre-decisional Alternative Selection

Portland District Regulatory Branch Permit Streamlining for Restoration Projects

Section 7. ESA Implementation: Section 7. Red-cockaded Woodpecker Cyanea superba Gopher Tortoise Photo Courtesy of USFWS

OVERVIEW 2016 FIVE STAR & URBAN WATERS GRANT PROGRAM. January 7, 2016 NIRPC EMPC Meeting

California WaterFix (Alternative 4A)/Recirculated Environmental Analysis Frequently Asked Questions

NDCEE. Ecosystem Banking Best Practices. Elizabeth Keysar, NDCEE/CTC. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

A collaborative strategy for optimizing management of the river corridor. Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Requirements. for Improved Water Quality:

Water and Watersheds. Data Maps Action

Cheryl P. Ulrich, PE Weston Solutions, Inc NCER 2011

What is Community Based Social Marketing?

Chlorpyrifos, Diazinon, and Malathion Registration Review; Draft Biological

Review Indicators Alignment Review Evaluation / Recommendations

Outline of Risk Assessment Training and Experience (RATE): Basic Understanding and Application of Risk Assessments

Peninsular Florida Landscape Conservation Cooperative. Priority Resources Web Workshop March 22, 2016

Regulatory Program Workshop 26 September 2013

The Value of Branded Products. Jim Bean Marketing Manager Professional Vegetation Management Group BASF Corporation December 10, 2009

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG:

New Hampshire Wetland Program Plan

Economics of Pest Management: Present and Future Considerations Leah Duzy 2019 Georgia/Florida Soybean and Small Grain EXPO Perry, Georgia January

July 13, 2012 TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Considering the Cumulative Adverse Effects of Pipeline Development on Wetlands

Version: About the MOA Potential Q s and A s for EPA/Army Alaska Wetland Mitigation MOA 1. What does the MOA do (what does it not do)? o The n

Appendix G Alternative 4A (Proposed Project) Compatibility with the Delta Plan

Responsible Mining in the Lake Superior Basin Dec. 2013

Biscayne Bay Regional Restoration Coordination Team

SECTION 3: Water, Wetlands and Waterways

Climate Change Adaptation: Moving From Plans to Action on the South Fork Nooksack River, WA

NATIONAL ROAD MAP FOR INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT May 17, 2004

Information Sources for Pesticide Applicators

Endangered Species Act. Section 7 Programmatic

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

Weeds, Wildlife & Herbicides: BMPS for protecting special-status species when using herbicides for invasive plant management

Science Plan. Executive Summary. Introduction

ISRP Members. Robert Bilby, Ph.D., Ecologist, Weyerhaeuser Company. Charles Henny, Ph.D., Emeritus Research Scientist, U.S.

Linking Transportation and Conservation Planning Workshop

Bill Crowell, PhD, AICP Lindsey Smart, MS. Chesapeake Bay Program Science & Technical Advisory Committee 18 March 2014

Binational Action to Restore the Great Lakes

Pollinator Protection Plans

2.e Aquatic resource type (Cowardin system): Palustrine emergent Riparian Palustrine emergent

Specific Project Information Form For Construction of New or Modification of Existing Residential Overwater Structures

Developing Interim Milestones & Criteria to Measure Progress. Thomas E. Davenport

Control of Eurasian Watermilfoil in Mesocosms at Lake Tahoe

Green Remediation and Ecological Restoration for

San Diego IRWM Project Scoring Guidelines for Prop 84 Round 3 Drought Relief Grant Cycle. Scoring Guidelines

FIFRA and the ESA: Reconciling the Differences

3.9 Public Health and Vector Management

Assessing Stream Functions for Watershed Management in Oregon. Dana Hicks, Mitigation Policy Specialist Oregon Department of State Lands

Green Port Long Beach

Using the Transportation Planning Process to Support the NEPA Process

CCVATCH Scoring. Current Condition. Sensitivity-Exposure. Adaptive Capacity. Certainty. Overall Vulnerability

Performance Standard 6 V2

EFFECTS OF MEETING HOUSE GOLF CLUB UPON EDGARTOWN GREAT POND

June 20, Unreasonable Delay in Completing ESA Consultations on Pesticide Registrations BACKGROUND

Atlantic Salmon ESA Listing Workshop

Transcription:

Aquatic Plant and Algae Management and Endangered Species Stresses or Stressors, Risks or Benefits? Ashlea Frank for Bernalyn McGaughey Compliance Services International Aquatic Plant Management Society 2017 Daytona Beach, Florida

My apologies for not being able to be with you today! Bernalyn McGaughey 2

Aquatic Herbicides: Stressors or Stresses? The mixed impression of aquatic herbicides Tools that relieve stress by enhancing habitat recovery and benefiting ecosystems As stressors that pose a hazard to listed species http://diy.sepro.com/pondpak-with-sonar-q-2 3

A Few Basics Registration or re-registration of a pesticide by EPA is considered a federal action EPA authorizes the pesticide for use or uses described on the label The pesticide label defines the federal action 4

A Few Basics (2) Under section 7 of the ESA, EPA is required to consult the USFWS and NMFS to ensure that any federal action is not likely to jeopardize the existence of listed species and/or their designated critical habitat Consultations are typically completed on a single action but programmatic consultations, addressing multiple actions, have been completed for other types of federal actions 5

Programmatic consultation ( Yours to Dream ) The challenges to overcome ( Yours to Resolve ) Steps towards the goal ( Yours to Execute ) 7

Programmatic consultation Addresses multiple projects or actions with impacts similar in nature Requires applicants to take specific steps Establishes priorities for minimization, mitigation and conservation Helps maintain biological and ecological diversity Aims to standardize mitigation and compensation requirements Intended to streamline and simplify future projects/actions Future projects/action can be appended to consultation Can be re-evaluated over time 8

Stakeholders know what to expect Saves agency and stakeholder time and money Predictability Efficiency Programmatic Consultation Transparency Benefit Agreed processes and defined steps Species and ecosystem conservation are targeted and meaningful 9

The challenges It is likely that an aquatic herbicide treatment will be considered a wide ranging use with no spatial definition in exposure modeling Exposure will be calculated from maximum label rates and minimum dilution and degradation estimates Toxicity endpoints will be from most sensitive species and lowest published values with little consideration of data relevance and reliability Best management and state or local permitting practices and the protection they bring will not be considered in the species assessment process Assumed use rates and frequencies, and area of a waterbody treated, will be assumed to be unrealistically high 10

The challenges (continued) Action area of an aquatic herbicide treatment will likely consist of entire US, potentially affecting every ESA-listed species All available data, including monitoring, use information, and spatial datasets are not fully appreciated or used in the assessment process Process is currently not transparent so results are variable and unknown Resolving the challenges of the current interim process and its dysfunction will require a proactive effort on the part of the pesticide users and registrants 11

Steps towards the goal: Additional Research --Impacts of non-native plant introductions ---Benefits of management to endangered species and habitat Increased Documentation --Application processes --Best management practices --State and local regulations already in place Education --Habitat loss without invasive plant management --Application practices (field trips and presentations) Demonstrative pilots that collect data and tell the story Communication and Outreach --Continued subject matter expert interactions with federal agencies involved with the management of invasive aquatic plants 12

Demonstrative pilots that collect data and tell the story Collect elements that support BMPs and build toward programmatic consultation Potential to streamline the registration and consultation process Promote collaboration and consistent decisions Public outreach and education Lay groundwork to promote more rapid restoration of aquatic habitats 13

You can help!! Share your stories about successful aquatic weed management to improve endangered species habitats Know of any good sites that would make a pilot demonstration? Are you familiar with sites that institute management practices to reduce threats on endangered species (limitations on use, timing, proximity, etc.) or have you run into other issues with endangered species? 14

Thank you for this opportunity to share our thoughts and opinions Ashlea Frank Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499 253-473-9007 afrank@complianceservices.com