Air Division. Emissions Test Protocol And Test Report Requirements

Similar documents
Alabama Department of Environmental Management Air Division Planning Branch Emission Measurement Section

GENERAL TESTING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

METHOD 1A - SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES FOR STATIONARY SOURCES WITH SMALL STACKS OR DUCTS. NOTE: This method does not include all of the

Southwest Clean Air Agency NE 99 th St, Suite 1294, Vancouver, WA 98682

Guidance for Portable Electrochemical Analyzer Testing Used for Compliance Monitoring

Common CEMS RATA Failures and Risks. Paula Metz Alliance Source Testing, LLC Technical Services Assistant Manager

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Policy No Draft Div Pol Yr

METHOD BERYLLIUM SCREENING METHOD. Analyte CAS No. Sensitivity Beryllium (Be) Dependent upon analytical procedure used

Method X: Determination of Metal Concentrations in Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)

METHOD 17 - DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES. NOTE: This method does not include all of the

Technical Manual Guidelines for Compliance Stack Emission Test Programs

Technical Manual Guidelines for Compliance Stack Emission Test Programs

MAJOR SOURCE OPERATING PERMIT

STATE OF WYOMING AIR QUALITY DIVISION PORTABLE ANALYZER MONITORING PROTOCOL

METHOD 2C - DETERMINATION OF GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE IN SMALL STACKS OR DUCTS (STANDARD PITOT TUBE)

Test Report TR1R0

ECMPS Reporting Instructions Quality Assurance and Certification

SUBPART EE Check-OFF FORM July 11, 2005

Stack Testing Oversight in New Jersey

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT COM 2025

METHOD 4 - DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT IN STACK GASES. NOTE: This method does not include all the

June 8, Submitted to: The Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC. Prepared by:

ECMPS Reporting Instructions Quality Assurance and Certification

EXAMPLE: TEST PLAN FOR SOLVENT BASED PRINTING & COATING PROCESS SOURCES

EPA Method 1 Field Procedures Example:

METHOD 5A - DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM THE ASPHALT PROCESSING AND ASPHALT ROOFING INDUSTRY

Procedure for Writing Technical Procedures

RATA/Compliance Testing. Judith Aasland

METHOD 3 - GAS ANALYSIS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT. NOTE: This method does not include all of the

PART B AIR AND AIR EMISSIONS TESTING

Mercury Sampling: A Comparison of Common Test Methods

Test Report TR1R1

Nitric Acid Production Project Protocol Version 1.0 ERRATA AND CLARIFICATIONS

STATEMENT OF BASIS Mannington Mills, Inc. dba Mannington Wood Floors Epes, Sumter County, Alabama Facility/Permit No

Manitoba Environment

1. Overview 2 2. Definitions 2 3. Laboratory Testing Criteria 2. A. Laboratory Qualifications 2. B. Analysis of TSS Samples 2. C.

Compliance Measurements. Mike Klein & Robert Kettig BTS (609)

TEST REPORT SCOPE: EMISSIONS, EFFICIENCY AND OUTPUT FUEL: EPA TEST FUEL (CRIBS) TEST STANDARD: EPA MODEL: SOLUTION 2.

Emissions Testing Report 2014

Emissions Testing Report 2015

MODULE 2A GENERAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

AAETI Anil Agarwal Environment Training Institute SELF- INSPECTION

Dan Deatsch Thompson Environmental Consulting

Planning a Successful Air. TCEQ Conference Austin, Texas May 4 5, 2010

DAILY LIFE of CEMS QA & PM

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS AND TESTS DIVISION. CERTIFIED AGGREGATE PRODUCER PROGRAM ITM No P

TEST REPORT. REPORT NUMBER: MID-001b REPORT DATE: November 10, 2016

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AIR DIVISION INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING ADEM FORM 110 APPLICATION FOR AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE

REDUCE FLOW BIAS THROUGH AUTOMATED TESTING

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY APCD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR EMISSION VERIFICATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL/GROUNDWATER CLEANUP (CSC) PROCESSES

Joette L. Steger, Joan T. Bursey, and David Epperson

ABB Measurement & Analytics Monitoring cement plant stack emissions using FTIR

Operator Declaration Regarding Measurement and Reporting Requirements. The Alberta Energy Regulator has approved this directive on April 4, 2016.

NC DAQ Source Test Observers Checklist - Particulate Testing EPA Methods 1-5 (40 CFR 60 Appendix A) Line by line explanation and references.

METHOD 30B DETERMINATION OF TOTAL VAPOR PHASE MERCURY EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED COMBUSTION SOURCES USING CARBON SORBENT TRAPS

Measurement and Reporting of Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions, Using a Sorbent Trap Monitoring System (DRAFT 9/25/08)

Attachment 2. Quality Assurance and Operating Procedures for Sorbent Trap Monitoring Systems

Method Implementation Document for BS EN * - Application to manual stack emissions monitoring

RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

TEST REPORT. EVALUATION CENTER Intertek Testing Services NA Inc Murphy Drive Middleton, WI 53562

Document No.: NOKETL / IPPC Licence No.: W

TITLE 250 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

ADEM LTF Contractor QAPP Review Checklist

BetaGuard PM Particulate Monitoring for Portland Cement MACT

Method Implementation Document (MID 1948)

Meet Ja, H2S, and BTU flare regulations while reducing your total cost of ownership

Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

Proposed Guidelines for the Reduction of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Natural Gas fuelled Stationary Combustion Turbines

Chapter 15. Air Monitoring. Source Sampling

Air Monitoring Directive Chapter 5: Quality System

Review of ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc. Continuous Emissions Monitoring Data from a 2014 Drill Rig Study at Kuparuk Drill Site 2N

PERMIT APPLICATION FOR RECLAIMED WATER REUSE (RWR)

Determination of the Ethylene Oxide Control Efficiency from Catalytic Oxidizers. A Guidance Document

2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Method No.: 8.06/2.0/M Effective Date: January 4, 2012 Location: ###

1. Overview 2 2. Definitions 2 3. Laboratory Testing Criteria 2. A. Laboratory Qualifications 2. B. Analysis of TSS Samples 2. C.

METHOD 201A - DETERMINATION OF PM EMISSIONS. 1.1 Applicability. This method applies to the in-stack measurement of

MONITORING PROTOCOL IN SUPPORT OF THE CANADA-WIDE STANDARDS FOR MERCURY EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION PLANTS

EXHIBIT 2-2-C SCHEDULES

PURPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION

STATIONARY SOURCE AUDIT SAMPLE PROGRAM [VOLUME 1, MODULE 1] GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR STATIONARY SOURCE AUDIT SAMPLE PROVIDERS

A. This Section includes administrative and procedural requirements for quality assurance and quality control.

PART II QUALITY ASSURANCE

METHOD DETERMINATION OF PM EMISSIONS. (Exhaust Gas Recycle Procedure) 1.1 Applicability. This method applies to the in-stack

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOL (QAP)

KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP THREE PART PUMP TEST CHECKLIST. APPLICANT: Road Name: TAX MAP Sheet/Block/Lot Date Submitted: Name of Project (If Any):

Stephenson CO-GENERATION PLANT STACK EMISSION TESTING TOOHEYS PTY LTD LIDCOMBE, NSW PROJECT NO.: 5938/S24635/18 DATE OF SURVEY: 12 MARCH 2018

Air Monitoring Directive Chapter 8: Ambient Audit

ECMPS Reporting Instructions Emissions

TITLE 250 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

STATEMENT OF BASIS Dudley Lumber Company, Inc. Salem, Lee County, Alabama Facility Permit No. 206-S003

Flow Meter Calibration

AIR & EMISSIONS TESTING GROUP

Emissions Testing Report

Comparison of Dry Sorbent Injection of Sodium Bicarbonate, Lime, and Carbon and Their Control of Dioxins/Furans, Mercury, Chlorides and Sulfur Dioxide

EMISSION MEASUREMENT TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER NSPS TEST METHOD. Method 10 - Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Stationary Sources

PURCHASING QUALITY CLAUSES

QUALITY AGREEMENT. The following Agreement has been concluded between

A signed statement from the manufacturer listing the protocol requirements and indicating that all of the requirements were met or exceeded.

Are You Really Ready for a RATA? August 5, 2015 CIBO Portland Maine Bob Davis Project Director TRC Environmental

Transcription:

Air Division Emissions Test Protocol And Test Report Requirements May 18, 2018

Introduction The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for test protocols and reporting stack tests under the jurisdiction of the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM). This document does not supersede established regulations, but provides guidance where the regulations may not be clear or do not address issues that commonly occur. EPA Methods in this document refers to test methods found in Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 51, Part 60, Part 61 and Part 63 or any other method for which EPA approval has been granted for its use. Facility Environmental personnel and testing consultants should use this document as a guide for submitting test protocols and test reports to the ADEM. Failure to follow these guidelines may result in testing delays and/or test report approval delays. General Information All data gathered by the test team that is relevant to the stack test (with the exception of data recorded directly by analyzers) will be recorded in non-erasable ink and signed and dated by the person(s) gathering the data. Changes to data sheets can be made by marking out the erroneous information with a single line and initialing the change. The use of white-out is not acceptable to make corrections. If computers are utilized to store and record test data without the benefit of a separate chart recorder, a printed or electronic copy of the data for the run observed will be given to the ADEM observer. If there is a valid reason that all test runs cannot be performed in a single day, the remaining test runs must be performed within seven calendar days of the initiation of the test. When a test run is determined to be invalid after the test or when a third run cannot be completed due to circumstances beyond the test team s control, the average of two runs may be accepted upon approval by the Chief of Air Division, Chemical Branch or Energy Branch, except for sources that fall under 40 CFR Part 63 regulations which must include 3 runs. The pollutant run average must include 3 consecutive valid test runs. If a run is deemed invalid, the data must be included in the test report along with an explanation for why the run was deemed invalid. Pretest Protocol Submission All stack tests conducted to demonstrate compliance with EPA or ADEM regulations, must have a written protocol submitted to Air Division s Chemical Branch or Energy Branch at least 15 business days before the start of the test, unless specified otherwise in the applicable regulation. Protocols for test methods that require audit samples from an EPA certified provider should be submitted at least 30 calendar days before the scheduled test date. The Chemical or Energy Branch permit writer will review the protocol to ensure its applicability to the regulations. The Air Division s Emissions Measurement Section (EMS) will review the protocol to ensure the viability of the testing methodology. All deviations from EPA Methods and/or regulations or special circumstances related to the source must be approved by the EMS and Chemical Branch or Energy Branch permit writer: and when necessary, the EPA. Allowed deviations are not automatically approved for future tests. For sources regulated under 40 CFR Part 63 regulations, major method modifications must be approved by the EPA. When a protocol has been approved, it must be followed in the field. Deviations from EPA Methods and/or regulations that occur during testing that were not described in the protocol and approved prior to the test will be reviewed in the field by the EMS or Chemical Branch or Energy Branch personnel that are present and again in the office when results are submitted to determine if the results will be accepted as valid. A

pretest meeting may be held at the request of the facility or this office. The necessity for such a meeting and required attendance will be determined on a case-by-case basis. The test protocol must contain the following: 1. The name, location, and facility number of the facility. 2. A description of the source(s) to be tested, the permit number(s) associated with each source, and a description of the processes to be tested including the feed rate, operating parameters used to control or influence the operations, and the rated capacity. 3. The date(s) of the test(s). 4. The pollutant(s) being tested, the EPA test method(s) to be used, length of runs and a complete description of the sampling train to be used including the type of probe lining, type of media filter, probe cleaning method, solvent used for sample recovery, instrument spans, sample analysis procedures and any other relevant information. 5. A detailed description of any proposed modifications to the EPA test method(s) and prior approval documentation if applicable. 6. Applicable regulations and pollutant emissions limits. 7. The name, telephone number and e-mail address of the testing firm and contact. 8. If audits are required, there must be a statement indicating that audits will be ordered from one of the approved audit providers and will be available for inspection on-site. For State Implementation Plan (SIP) sources subject to ADEM regulations but not EPA regulations, if the permit provisos or ADEM Admin. Code div. 335-3 regulations do not specify stack test details, testing will adhere to the most applicable EPA regulations and test methods as closely as possible. Test protocols that are deemed to have insufficient information for approval by the EMS staff, must be resubmitted with all requested revisions. This process may result in a delay of testing until an acceptable protocol is received, reviewed and approved. Test Report Submittals The test report is due at the office of the Air Division within 30 calendar days of completion of the source test, unless otherwise specified in the applicable regulation or permit. The test report shall be in unbound hardcopy form and must include all data outlined in the Test Report Format section below. Areas to be given special attention are: 1. The emission rate is to be presented in terms of the standard applicable to the source being tested. 2. Complete documentation of process input must be included with correctness validation by responsible plant personnel. 3. A drawing of the source to be tested, to include the diameter of the stack and the upstream and downstream distances to disturbances. 4. The summary for the report must include a statement of the compliance status of the source. 5. Any deviations to the testing methodology, either in sampling or analysis, along with the reason for the change. A complete set of sample calculations for one run shall be included in the test report. Calculations should be performed using the List of Equations included in this document. All

calculations should be performed retaining one decimal figure more than the acquired data. Calculated results should not be rounded until after all calculations are final. Raw Data / Field Data Copies of the original raw field data and all laboratory data sheets must be included in the test report. Data must be certified by the person responsible for its generation. A chain of custody form shall be included in the report documenting the handling of samples. The report must indicate if the samples were collected and analyzed by a single individual. Include all relevant calibration documentation for the dry gas meter, pitot tube coefficient, thermocouples, magnehelic gauges, electronic flow measurement devices, nozzle diameter measurements, instrument calibrations, chromatograms and audit results. If an Orsat or Fyrite is used, documentation showing the standardization checks of the reagents and operator (as described in sections 11.4 and 7.1 of EPA Method 3) must be available on- site during testing. The reagents must be standardized at least once every three stack tests in which they were used. Gas cylinders used in EPA Method 3A must be certified using EPA Protocol and have copies of their certification sheets included in the report. EPA Method 3A calibration, drift, and bias data must also be included. Any correspondence between the Air Division and the testing firm concerning procedures, or between the Air Division and the source pertaining to specified operating conditions during the test period, should be included. Any test performed for engineering or compliance purposes must be reported to the Air Division regardless of compliance status indicated by the results. This includes all test runs whether valid or not. In addition to the above requirements, the reporting requirements in all applicable subparts in 40 CFR Parts 51, 60, 61, 63 or 75 must be met. Below is an example report format; other report formats are acceptable if all the information listed below is included in the report. TEST REPORT FORMAT I. Introduction 1. Report Certification by Responsible Party 2. Statement of purpose of test and compliance status 3. Personnel involved (consultants, plant personnel & observers, if present) 4. Location and date 5. Type of process tested and control method (including complete description of control devices) 6. Type of pollutants to be tested 7. Other background and pertinent information 8. Special circumstances encountered during testing II. Summary of Flow Parameters and Emission Rates 1. Tabular & narrative presentation of test results Tabular to include the following: a. Sampling period (time of day)

b Stack gas temperature ( F) c. Moisture content (% volume) d. Stack gas velocity (fps) e. Volumetric flow rate (SDCFM) at 68 F, 29.92 in Hg f. Pollutant mass rate (lb/hr) g. Pollutant concentration (grains/sdcf) h. Pollutant concentration adjusted for diluent gas (if applicable) i. Average process weight rate (tons/hr) j. Allowable emissions in proper units k. % isokinetic (if applicable) 2. Statement of the significance of results III. Description of Installation and Process Operation 1. Flow diagram 2. Type and quantity of fuel and/or process raw materials used during test (validated by responsible plant personnel) 3. Detailed description of method used to determine heat input or process weight 4. Description of operating conditions during test with discussion of any changes in operation for the purpose of testing 5. Relationship between results and any unusual operating conditions IV. Sampling and Analytical Procedures 1. Description of sampling train (with diagram) 2. Description of any modification to specified equipment and /or methods 3. Dimensional sketch showing sampling ports in relation to breaching and to upstream and Downstream disturbances with a block diagram showing sampling points V. Results 1. Parameter sheets 2. Complete calculations from at least one run of test that is being reported 3. All Raw field data (validated by team leader) 4. Laboratory report (validated by analyst) 5. Laboratory audit results 6. Calibration, bias, and drift data 7. Any related reports 8. Nomenclature and equations used 9. Equipment Calibration Data 10. Chain of custody sheets 11. Copies of EPA Protocol gas cylinder certification sheets. 12. QSTI and AETB certifications 13. VE certifications 14. Source operation/production data