K-State Research and Extension Annual Agent Performance Review

Similar documents
Extension Agent Self Evaluation

Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service

TEMPLATE 1.6A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TEMPLATE FOR:

Dictionary of Functional Competencies for Career Banding

Performance Evaluation Workshop. Human Resources December 2018

Manager, Supervisor & CEMA Skill Set Model County of Santa Clara

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service County Extension Agent Performance Appraisal Instrument

S O C I AL W O R K S U P E R V I S O R Schematic Code ( )

Executive Director Position Profile

Family, Career and Community Leaders of America, Inc. Adviser Mentor National Award Guidelines

Job Description: Operations Manager September 2017

ROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE POSITION DESCRIPTION FOR THE EXECUTIVE/MANAGING DIRECTOR

Office of Human Resources. Executive Manager EA1766

OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE EXTENSION EDUCATOR MENTORING PROGRAM. Administrative Guidelines

Common Recommendations to Improve Nonprofits and Their Order of Implementation

Office of Human Resources. Executive Manager - LA3059

K-State Research and Extension New Agent Professional Development Overview

BOARD STANDING COMMITTEE CHARTER

Assessment of: Mr. Sample. 13/545 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004 Tel: Fax:

Mott Community College Job Description

POSITION DESCRIPTION. Operating Theatre Scheduler

Dictionary of Functional Competencies for Career Banding

University Students Council of the University of Western Ontario Position Description CLUBS FINANCE COORDINATOR

Job Posting Youth To Youth Program Coordinator - HQ

Southern California Public Power Authority Position Description

F I N AN C I AL M AN AG E R Schematic Code ( )

PROGRAM COORDINATOR JOB DESCRIPTION

Performance and Professional Growth Systems

NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION EXPANDED FOOD AND NUTRITION EDUCATION PROGRAM

COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CML November 19 December 10, 2018

MSCC SUPERVISOR PROBATIONARY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

JOB DESCRIPTION Victoria County Public Health Department Director (SALARY RANGE $105, ,000 per annual)

Immediate Supervisor s Name and Classification Job Title: Suzy McCormack; Association Issue Leader

LITERACY AOTEAROA WELLINGTON MANAGER

POSITION DESCRIPTION. Issue 1. Business Unit Department My Forever Family. Position number MFF03. Employee s Signature. Reports To CEO Reviewed By

S & T Management Core Competency Profile

PSBA Standards Effective School Governance

Education Liaison: The Performance Evaluation Process (PEP)

Public Housing Revitalization Specialist GS Career Path Guide

University of California, Los Angeles Employee Performance Evaluation Form

Self-Assessment for the CoSN Certified Education Technology Leader (CETL ) Certification Exam

Limestone District School Board Performance Appraisal Professional Development & Learning Plan Support Staff

Reporting to the Board of Directors, the Executive Director is responsible for the overall successful leadership and management of the agency..

NGB Position Descriptions

VICTORIA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR. Full-Time Salary Range $85, ,000 per annual Open Until Filled

Monitoring Standards and Practices

REGION 11 California Core Competencies [Grant Managers]

JAMAICA NATIONAL HERITAGE TRUST

The Path to National Leadership Opportunities

The position reports directly to the President and indirectly to the Board of Directors.

Position Technical Advisor-BCC, Bangladesh Grade D2. & Location Activity, Plan International Based in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Nonfaculty Performance Evaluation (blank form for draft work)

LEADERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES

Ed.D. in Organizational Leadership Core Leadership Understandings. Program Competencies

Competency Model. Level B. Level C Applies to: Manager Coordinator. Applies to: Assistant Vice President Assistant Dean Director

Board Orientation. For New Board Members

IACBE Annual Report For Academic Year:

Assistant Deputy Minister Profile

Performance Management. Leadership Roundtable May 14, 2008

Position Description

Stanislaus County Workforce Planning

SYNFAST OIL CHANGE SERVICE CENTER MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE REVIEW FORM

POSITION DESCRIPTION Head of School ECG College

BOSA COMPETENCY MATRIX Minnesota Administrative Licensure. Superintendent

Southeast Technical Institute JOB DESCRIPTION. Vice President of Academic Affairs

POSITION DESCRIPTION

CP#47-15 Chief Executive Officer Evaluation

Competencies Checklist for CE. Tier 1 Core Public Health Competencies Checklist

Generating Members, Volunteers and Leaders in Community Organizations

Executive Director Evaluation

Director of Member Experience IDB IIC FCU Member Services and Marketing Departments Job Description

Immediate Supervisor s Name and Classification Job Title: Vacant -- Association Resource Educator

The School District of Lee County Division of Operations

Personnel Systems and Benefits

BBCBC Professional Development Training Plan & Course Catalog FY 16/17

Volunteer Research, Knowledge, Competency (VRKC) Taxonomy for 4-H Youth Development. VRKC Taxonomy Overview

United Way of Kankakee & Iroquois Counties Job Description Executive Director

Dynamic Leadership How to Develop, Inspire and Retain an Effective Team

STEPS INVOLVED IN VOLUNTEER PLACEMENT

O VERVIEW. This evaluation tool will help answer the questions:

Northern Tasmanian Natural Resource Management Association

JOB DESCRIPTION. Evaluation Type Assistant Principal. FLSA Exempt. Date Revised May 2018

A.S.K Leadership Framework and Definitions

Arkansas Extension Core Competencies Model and Definitions

CHAIR OF THE BOARD POSITION DESCRIPTION

POSITION DESCRIPTION

STAFF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Position Description & Expectations

The Fed INROADS. Program Goals

Agent Performance Overview. Major Job Responsibility Educational Programming

GSBA Governance Team Self-Assessment

Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Assessing the Effectiveness of a Leader Induction Program

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA JOB DESCRIPTION

UAB Performance Management 07/03/2018. Title Page 1

EXECUTIVEVIEW360 ExecutiveView360 Profile for: Sally Sample Envisia Learning Feb Envisia Learning, Inc.

Executive Director, League of California Cities Employees assigned to Institute for Local Government

Virginia Association of Governmental Purchasing. Mentor-Protégé Program

Administrative and Professional Staff (Unclassified) Performance Evaluation Model A

Indicator Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Effective Highly Effective

Clear Writing Recognition Process

Transcription:

K-State Research and Extension Annual Agent Performance Review Objectives of the Performance Review Process 1. Provide opportunity for self-assessment. 2. Increase job understanding and satisfaction. 3. Recognize areas in which performance consistently meets or exceeds expectations. 4. Establish any areas where development is needed. 5. Provide an opportunity to plan for professional growth. In partnership with the area extension director*, assessment of agent effectiveness is one of the most important responsibilities of the local board. Assessment is an ongoing process that continues during the program year through board meetings and quarterly impact reports. It culminates in the annual performance review between October and February. Directions for the Agent Performance Review Process The extension agent will provide the following documents to the area director* and board members: Current year s Action Plan Extension Agent Performance Review Form (with examples of impacts) Annual Accomplishment Report Professional Development Plan (Include experiences that will strengthen core competencies as well as support the primary area of program focus.) Next year s Action Plan The External Feedback form is an optional component of the agent performance review. Extension agents may identify a group of individuals who are familiar with the local impact of their program and who do not serve on the extension board. (Examples: Program Development Committee, Master Gardeners, or 4-H club leaders.) The agent may send the form to those individuals at any time during the year. Completed feedback forms are to be sent to the area director* and will be considered by the director in the summary of the agent s performance. A timeline for implementation of the agent performance review process is attached. In this process, the agent s effectiveness is evaluated in five categories: 1) Program Planning, Implementation, Reporting and Evaluation 2) Professionalism and Self-Management 3) Volunteer and Staff Development 4) Interpersonal and Communication Skills 5) Administrative and Management Skills *In counties or districts with five or more agents (or four agents if this model is adopted by the board and area director) the responsibility for evaluating agents work performance is delegated by the area director and local board to the county or district director. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service

County Timeline Ongoing: Agent Reports Agents will provide board members with quarterly impact reports based on their action plans. Concerns Any programming or performance concerns should be addressed during monthly board meetings not introduced during the performance review process. External Feedback External audiences or partners of extension programs may be identified and feedback forms distributed during the program year to provide feedback for the final review process. Completed External Feedback forms are to be sent to the area extension director.* February or March Board Meeting Board members should be oriented to their role in the agent s performance review process. The Agent Performance Review Module on the Board Leadership site is recommended for use in this orientation. (www.oznet.ksu.edu/ boardleadership) September through November Preparation Agents provide the board members and area director* with the following documents: Current year s Action Plan Extension Agent Performance Review Form, on which the agent has provided specific examples of impacts made in each area Annual Accomplishment Report Professional Development Plan Next year s Action Plan Performance Review Board members add their comments to each section and forward to the area director.* Performance Review Summary The area director* will complete the Performance Review Summary. October through February Evaluations The area director,* board chair and agent will meet to review the Extension Agent Performance Review Form, Summary and Professional Development Plan. Any follow-up actions will be documented, listing specific concerns, methods to address the concerns and date by which further action will be taken. Signatures The area director,* board chair and agent will sign and date the form. The area director and agent will each receive a copy. Executive Session The board chair, or county or area director, will provide the board members with an oral summary of the review form that was provided to the agent. District Timeline Ongoing: Agent Reports Agents will provide board members with quarterly impact reports based on their action plans. Concerns Any programming or performance concerns should be addressed during scheduled board meetings not introduced during the performance review process. External Feedback Forms External audiences or partners of extension programs may be identified and feedback forms distributed during the program year to provide feedback for the final review process. Completed External Feedback forms are to be sent to the area extension director.* May or June Board Meeting Board members should be oriented to their role in the agent s performance review process. The Agent Performance Review Module on the Board Leadership site is recommended for use in this orientation. (www.oznet.ksu.edu/ boardleadership) September through November Preparation Agents provide the board members and area director* with the following documents: Current year s Action Plan Extension Agent Performance Review Form, on which the agent has provided specific examples of impacts made in each area Annual Accomplishment Report Professional Development Plan Next year s Action Plan Performance Review Board members will add their comments to each section and forward to the area director.* Performance Review Summary The area director* will complete the Performance Review Summary. October through February Evaluations The area director,* board chair and agent will meet to review the Extension Agent Performance Review Form, Summary and Professional Development Plan. Any follow-up actions will be documented, listing specific concerns, methods to address the concerns and date by which further action will be taken. Signatures The area director,* board chair and agent will sign and date the form. The area director and agent will each receive a copy. Executive Session The board chair, or district or area director, will provide the board members with an oral summary of the review form that was provided to the agent. *In counties or districts with five or more agents (or four agents if this model is adopted by the board and area director) the responsibility for evaluating agents work performance is delegated by the area director and local board to the county or district director. 8/1/08

CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT Extension Agent Performance Review Form Name Date County/District Instructions: Following are the criteria for assessing extension agent effectiveness. In preparation for the performance review process: Agents will provide specific examples of impacts made during the current program year (October 1 September 30) toward at least three of the indicators in each section. Board members will then individually add their comments regarding the agent s performance, ability and competency in each area. Board members will forward their comments to the area director.* The area director* will summarize the board s comments and complete the Performance Review Summary. Performance reviews are confidential documents that are not to be viewed by or discussed with anyone other than the agent, board members and area director.* *In counties or districts with five or more agents (or four agents if this model is adopted by the board and area director) the responsibility for evaluating agents work performance is delegated by the area director and local board to the county or district director. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service

1) Program Planning, Implementation, Reporting and Evaluation Indicators a) Subject Matter Proficiency Possesses subject matter proficiency related to job responsibility b) Program Need Identification Works with program development committees to assess local needs and identify major educational priorities related to K-State Research and Extension core mission themes c) Underserved Audiences Identifies underserved audiences and develops and implements a plan to reach them d) Collaborative Relationships Collaborates with relevant organizations to plan and implement educational programming e) Program Development and Implementation Implements educational programming with an identifiable, deliberate sequence of planned activities through which clientele gain knowledge, acquire skills, make decisions and change behaviors f) Teaching Skills Demonstrates teaching skills by serving as a presenter of information g) Use of Technology Uses appropriate technology in program delivery h) Evaluation of Impact Develops and implements a system for evaluating impact of several major educational programming efforts i) Communication of Impact Communicates impact of educational programming through quarterly impact reports

2) Professionalism and Self-Management Indicators a) Enhances the Image of K-State Research and Extension Represents K-State Research and Extension in a manner that reflects well on the agent and on all other employees of the organization b) Loyalty to K-State Research and Extension Demonstrates commitment to the comprehensive mission of K-State Research and Extension c) Customer Service Provides effective customer service d) Service to K-State Research and Extension Contributes to K-State Research and Extension by serving as a mentor or as a leader or member of professional organizations, task forces, committees, etc. e) Professional Development Has identified and participated in a Program Focus Team and has enhanced professional knowledge through participation in professional development opportunities f) Dependability Completes assignments on time and follows through with commitments g) Work Schedule Practices professional scheduling in order to achieve the responsibilities of the position while balancing professional and personal responsibilities h) Work Ethic Makes effective use of work time and demonstrates ethical behavior i) Poise and Composure Maintains poise and composure in stressful situations j) Initiative Identifies and pursues opportunities; shows willingness to take risks

3) Volunteer and Staff (Office Professional and Program Assistant) Development Indicators a) Identification and Selection Implements and manages a comprehensive process for selecting and screening volunteers and staff, following K-State Research and Extension policies and procedures b) Orientation Provides orientation to equip volunteers and staff c) Training Provides ongoing training to enhance skills of volunteers and staff d) Leadership by Volunteers Encourages volunteers to take leadership roles within the local program e) Evaluation Evaluates and provides feedback to enhance performance of volunteers and staff f) Recognition Recognizes and rewards volunteer and staff performance

4) Interpersonal and Communication Skill Indicators a) Teamwork Recognizes the value of teamwork, works well with others, and values and respects team relationships b) Verbal Communication Articulates thoughts clearly c) Listening Skills Listens and responds appropriately d) Written Communication Skills Communicates clearly, accurately and thoroughly e) Marketing Actively markets and promotes local office and educational programming f) Public Relations Ensures that the local extension program is well-known and respected in the community

5) Administrative and Management Skill Indicators (For All County or District Directors) a) Works with Local Extension Board Works with local extension board as they partner with the area director to administer the local extension program b) Budget and Finance Provides leadership in developing budgets, securing extramural funding, supervising fiscal operations and expenditures, submitting financial reports, and reviewing audits c) Legal Responsibilities Provides oversight to legal responsibilities of local extension elections, annual meetings and legal responsibilities of extension councils or districts d) Supervision of Local Staff Supervises, coaches and evaluates office professionals and program assistants e) Supervision of Agents (in local offices with five or more agents or units with four agents adopting this responsibility) Supervises, coaches and evaluates agents f) Delivery of Comprehensive Local Program Works with other agent(s), board members, area director, volunteers and others to develop and deliver a comprehensive local educational program g) Underserved Audiences Provides leadership in identifying underserved audiences and developing and implementing a plan to reach them Board Member s Signature Date 8/1/08 KSU 8-30a