Principle 6. Verification & Validation

Similar documents
HACCP audit checklist

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point The Almond Board of California. Overview. Definitions

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Mobile Slaughter Unit

Jeff Chilton, VP of Consulting Services, Alchemy

HACCP Today: Critical Controls Concepts

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2012 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

Table of Contents. Introduction...1

MadgeTech Data Loggers

Thoughts on the Robust Systematic Approach to Humane Handling and Slaughter. Dr. Lucy Anthenill, DVMS Denver District Office

Brumund Foundry Inc.

QUESTIONS & EXPECTATIONS

Validation In Plant Findings

Plan Subject Index Number Section Subsection Category Contact Last Revised References Applicable To Detail PRINCIPLE:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

HACCP 03D Thermally Processed, Commercially Sterile

APPENDIX VI Guidelines for a Complete Written Program

While the previous chapter helped describe the process for conducting the hazard analysis and determining which hazards require a preventive control,

While the previous chapter helped describe the process for conducting the hazard analysis and determining which hazards require a preventive control,

APPENDIX K. HACCP PROGRAM

Procedure for Validation of Technical Procedures

INDUSTRY INFORMATION SESSION Agenda

HACCP 03D Thermally Processed, Commercially Sterile. GENERAL HAZARD ANALYSIS, FLOW DIAGRAM and HACCP

c) Have personnel been appointed to supervise the production operations across all shifts in order to ensure the product quality?

Quality Systems Manual

Auditing Policy and Procedures

SECTION L QUALITY ASSURANCE. 1) designating and managing quality control functions, including:

HACCP: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points A Food Safety Approach for Suppliers to the Food Industry

STANDARD FOR THE VALIDATION AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF FRICTION RIDGE IMPRESSION DEVELOPMENT AND EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES

How to Automate a FSMA-Ready Food Safety Plan

Public Health Consumer Protection Program

FSMA. An Industry Perspective Patty Harvey MCAFDO February 24, 2016

Quality Management System Manual

Course duration: Forty (40) hours over a period of five (5) days 9:00 am 5:00 pm

HACCP Guidance for School Nutrition Professionals

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

ABC Tuna Company, Anywhere, USA. Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) Tuna are purchased directly from the fisherman. Wild caught yellowfin tuna

Feed Quality Assurance and Certification Programs. Representing the Total Feed Industry

Perry Johnson Registrars, Inc. Licensed Copy #2 RECYCLING INDUSTRY OPERATING STANDARD. Prepared for ISRI Services Corporation

INS QA Programme Requirements

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIETARY INGREDIENT PROCESSORS

MDSAP Purchasing Process

UR Startup Inc. ISO Audit Checklist. conducted for. Conducted on (Date and Time) 02 Aug :06 PM. Inspected by Andy Dion

Listeria Management Plans

Packaging Operations Technical Subcommittee

FSMA d out. Now What?

YOUR TRANSPORTATION CO.

Assessor Assessment Pack

Use of Microbial Data for Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Verification Food and Drug Administration Perspective

Welcome to Introduction to ISO Food Safety Management Systems

Quality Manual. This manual has been written to the ISO 9001:2000 International Quality Standard

Beaver Machine. Quality Manual

QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR Dis tributor YFTFC005

Best Practices in Pathogen and Allergen Testing

ISO 22000:2005 SYSTEMKARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER SYSTEM KARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ISO 22000:2005

The Standard Illustrations ISO The International Standard for Quality Management Systems. Year 2000 Edition. Leland R.

American Society for Quality (ASQ) CERTIFIED HACCP AUDITOR (CHA) BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

HACCPEUROPA PUBLICATIONS ISO 22000:2005 FOOD SAFETY QUALITY MANUAL. ISO 22000:2005 Quality Manual

SUBCHAPTER E REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE FEDERAL MEAT INSPECTION ACT AND THE POULTRY PRODUCTS INSPECTION ACT

Quality Management Evaluation & Audit Policy

Quality Control Manuals

Wilson-Hurd ATF Quality Manual

SUPPLIER SURVEY FORM Instructions

instructions on how to use these model plans, as well as explanations of specific plan elements.

IMPLEMENTING HACCP PRINCIPLES IN THE FOOD MANUFACTURING SECTOR

AUDIT REPORT. Audit of Official Controls in Local Authority Supervised Establishments Westmeath County Council CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN

ISO 22000:2005 Standard INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS REGISTRATIONS

GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES - AUDIT REPORT FORM AKA GMP Standards Program

FSIS PERSPECTIVE ON PATHOGEN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Patricia S. Schwartz, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development FSIS, USDA

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Qualification of Highway Product Manufacturers Through the Use of NTPEP Audits

Air Monitoring Directive Chapter 5: Quality System

What a Preventive Controls Facility Looks Like. FSMA-HARPC vs. HACCP

METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS. Presented by : Jerry Parr, The NELAC Institute

ZOLL Document Number: 90A0036 Page 3 of 11 Equipment Maintenance TABLE OF CONTENTS

Verification: Can Your Food Safety Plan Meet the Rigors of FSMA s Proposed Preventive Controls?

21CFR Ventilation, air filtration, air heating and cooling. 21CFR211 Details, Details. 21CFR Equipment Cleaning and Maintenance

HACCP: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points A Food Safety Approach for Suppliers to the Food Industry

Installation Qualification Equipment (Reference SOP: )

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. RECAll OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

Safety Manual. SEMS Program

To establish supplier quality requirements applicable to the type of product or service procured by Hudson MFG LLC.

TAMKO s Statement of Policy on Safety

CAPA Management: Best Practices and FDA QSR Mandate WHITE PAPER. ComplianceQuest In-Depth Analysis and Review

CORPORATE QUALITY MANUAL

Quality System Regulation (QSR) Training

MANUAL QUALITY CONTROL & QUALITY ASSURANCE

Quality Manual. Index

Investigator Site File Index (Medical Devices)

Sanitation SSOP and SPS

SQF Storage & Distribution Food Safety Management System

Verification Program for a Voluntary Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Plan. Part I

Industry Best Practices for Customer Complaints of Foreign Material in Meat and Poultry Products. August 2018

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION SERVICE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

HACCP: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points A Food Safety Approach for Suppliers to the Food Industry

Results of Checklist and Reassessment of Control for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Beef Operations

Quality Management. Efficient Quality Management in a Regulated Environment

FSMA Food Safety Seminar Japan External Trade Organization

Good Weighing Practice

PRODUCT PROTECTION PROGRAM

Transcription:

Principle 6 Verification & Validation

Principle #6 - Verification Establish procedures to VERIFY that the HACCP system is working as intended

Verification - Defined Those activities, other than monitoring That determine the validity of the HACCP plan Confirm the system is operating according to the Plan

Verification Performed by HACCP Team Supervisors Quality Assurance Regulatory Agencies External Experts Verification of single process ie: mixing Review of the entire plan

Recognized Verification Activities 1. Routine document review observation of monitoring activities at a CCP & documentation review calibration or accuracy checks of processmonitoring instruments Have SOPs for calibration 2. Periodic testing end-product in-process

Routine Verification Documents 3. Flow diagram Audit diagram against process on floor 4. Monitoring records Is precision of measurements consistent with precision of instrument? Do records indicate consistency across lines, shifts, & monitors? 5. Deviation summaries any analysis done on deviation data

Routine Verification Documents 6. Corrective Action records Disposition documentation Corrective Action record corresponding to each deviation record? 7. Pre-shipment Record Review 8. Results from tests done on product samples

Routine Verification Documents 9. Review Hazard Analysis Valid consumer complaints New equipment New hazards 10.Identification of CCPs 11.Critical Limits at each CCP Adequate to maintain process control?

Periodic Verification Documents 1. HACCP Team documentation 2. Training documentation SOPs 3. Accuracy of product description

Routine Verification Observation Is CCP monitoring done? 1. By trained person? 2. At specified point in process? 3. In specified manner? (described in SOP or HACCP Plan) 4. At specified frequency? 5. How variable is the process based on these results?

Routine Verification Observation 6. Are Corrective Actions taken following a deviation done according to HACCP Plan? 7. Is calibration done according to SOP or HACCP plan?

Verification Calibration Accuracy checks non-adjustable instrument Calibration adjustable instruments Accuracy-check/Calibration Done on all instruments? Done at specified intervals? Done using a recognized standard?

Verification - Calibration If a monitoring instrument is inaccurate, Corrective Actions must be taken For non-adjustable instruments, Corrective Action is removal from service & replacement For adjustable instruments, Corrective action is Calibration & subsequent recheck on accuracy Document Corrective Actions!

All Verification Activities MUST Be Documented What was done? When was it done? Date & Time Who did it? Signature or Initials

Document Review Verification Must be done by an individual who did not generate the records being reviewed Removes possible conflict of interest.

RECORDKEEPING AND VERIFICATION Recordkeeping & Verification Product: Process Step/CCP Records Verification Procedures Grinding / CCP (1) B Grinder Log Daily check (verification and pre-shipment review) of grinder log by HACCP coordinator or designee, on days product is ground. Production personnel will be retrained and observed every 6 months by HAACP coordinator or designee.

Verification vs. Validation Verification: do we say what we do & do we do what we say? Validation: is what we re doing the right thing to do to prevent illness or injury to the consumers of this product?

Validation Confirm the HACCP Plan s adequacy to control the hazards identified in the Hazard Analysis CCPs Critical Limits Monitoring frequency Corrective Actions Verify that the HACCP Plan is effectively implemented (the HACCP System is working)

Validation Required Initially, after new HACCP Plan is written Typically, collect 60-90 days worth of data Following Reassessment & Revision good idea to validate annually Always document!

Validation May be accomplished by Expert advice Scientific studies Actual regulations In-plant records Use of in-plant observations, measurements, test results, or other data to demonstrate that the control measures can achieve the intended objective

What Type Of Documentation Does FSIS Expect For Validation? Two types documentation : 1. HACCP design type of documentation: Theoretical principles expert advice scientific data information demonstrating that particular process control measures can adequately address specified hazards

What Type Of Documentation Does FSIS Expect For Validation? 2. HACCP execution type of documentation: In-plant Observations Data measurements test results other information demonstrating that the control measures, as written into a HACCP plan, can be operated within a particular establishment to achieve the intended food safety objective.

Reassessment of the HACCP Plan Reassessment is a USDA-FSIS term for a audit of the HACCP Plan Required at least annually Food Safety Assessment (FSA) Conducted by EIAO Every 4 years

HACCP Plan Reassessed When New information on the safety of the product becomes available Recent food borne outbreak is linked to a similar product Information on a newly-identified hazard indicates a risk to your product

HACCP Plan Reassessed When An unforeseen hazard occurs A deviation occurs that isn t covered by existing Corrective Actions Government demands reassessment of plans for a particular product type

Reassessment of HACCP Plan Reassessment may or may not indicate a need to revise the HACCP Plan Document the outcome If the Reassessment indicates that the HACCP Plan must be revised Document why you came to this conclusion Make modifications ASAP & document Validate the modified HACCP Plan

REMINDER Verification: do we say what we do & do we do what we say? Validation: is what we re doing the right thing to do to prevent illness or injury to the consumers of this product?