Economics of GMO Technologies

Similar documents
2005 Agronomy Update Meetings. Janesville, Platteville, Madison, Fond du Lac, Kimberly, Wausau, Eau Claire, and Sparta

Looking Back On 2000 Highlights And

Corn Observations For 2001

Potential Grain Yield Using Calculated Components Assume 90,000 kernels/bu and 56 lb/bu; kernel mass = 282 mg

2009 Wisconsin Corn Conference Sponsors

2010 Agronomy Update Meetings

Joe Lauer, Corn Agronomist

Department of Agronomy

Waunakee, Platteville, Janesville, Sparta, Eau Claire, Wausau,

Impacts of the 2004 Growing Season on Silage Quality

2010 Wisconsin Corn Conference Sponsors

Current Impact of Changes in Corn Plant Density

J. M. Gaska and C. M. Boerboom 1

Evaluating performance of corn hybrids for silage production on Wisconsin farms

Soybean Variety Test Locations. Yields Low-High Average. University of Wisconsin Spooner Chippewa Falls Marshfield

Corn Forage Production Profitable

CURRENT NITROGEN RATE RESEARCH FOR: OATS, WINTER WHEAT, Matt Ruark Dept. of Soil Science AND SWEET CORN

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Do We Grow Another Bushel or Save a Buck?

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN

Contracting Corn Silage Acres

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Production of Corn Silage in Northern Latitudes: Management Pointers

Corn Plant Population Response and Risk in the Northern Corn Belt

1. Biotech corn: Select hybrids, not traits 1 2. Wheat Quality Lab update 4

Maximizing the Value of Foliar Fungicides in Corn by Mark Jeschke, Agronomy Research Manager

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

GMO CROPS A M I S S OU R I PE R SPE CT I VE

Experiences with Kura Clover in Agricultural Systems in Wisconsin

DELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Corn Agronomy Update

freedom to choose proven to perform 2017 product guide

DELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Roundup Ready Xtend Crop System Benefits and Weed Management Recommendations

SILAGE AND GRAZING CORN

Corn Row Width and Plant Density Then and Now. Lauer, University of Wisconsin Agronomy

Response of DEKALB Brand Corn Products to Row Configuration and Population

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

FARMLAND OWNER ACCOUNT NO INVESTED CASH 7, CASH 0.00 ============ TOTAL CASH EQUIVALENTS 7, FARMLAND OWNER TRUST # ,887.

Roundup Ready Xtend Crop System Benefits and Weed Management Recommendations

Strategies to Maximize Soybean ROI Shawn P. Conley, J Gaska, A Roth, A Gaspar, D Marburger, E Smidt, and S Mourtzinis State Soybean and Small Grains

Market Outlook. David Reinbott.

SOUTHERN STATES HYBRID SEED CORN

Roundup Ready Xtend Crop System Benefits and Weed Management Recommendations

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN

The Wisconsin oats and barley performance

A Comprehensive Guide to CORN MANAGEMENT

SINCE 1996, several seed companies have commercialized

Market Outlook. David Reinbott.

Market Outlook. David Reinbott.

Roundup Ready Xtend Crop System Benefits and Weed Management Recommendations

Roundup Ready Xtend Crop System Benefits and Weed Management Recommendations

Market Outlook. David Reinbott.

Competitive Effects of Volunteer Corn (Zea mays L.) in Corn. Tye C. Shauck & Reid J. Smeda, University of Missouri

The Increasing Cost of Planting a Crop Does It Pay? Kraig Roozeboom Agronomy Extension Specialist Crop Production/Cropping Systems

UPDATE ON NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY OF CORN HYBRIDS WITH AND WITHOUT TRANSGENIC CORN ROOTWORM RESISTANCE BACKGROUND

COMPARISON OF THE NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY AND NITROGEN NEEDS OF CORN HYBRIDS WITH AND WITHOUT TRANSGENIC CORN ROOTWORM RESISTANCE

Nitrogen in Corn QR vs. NQR

Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

Agronomic Practices for Optimizing Corn Silage Production in Central Minnesota. Royalton, MN February 12, 2009

Three factor to consider Market, Market & Market. Some of our agricultural produce is actually utilized on the farm from where they were produced

1. What variable costs are associated with corn and grain sorghum production?

Corn kernel weight during postblack layer drydown. Aaron Prestemon

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Crop Rotation or Continuous Corn? Agronomic Considerations

AGRONOMIC TRAITS OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE IN TAYLOR SELECT RESEARCH WITH STRONG SOUTHERN MOVEMENT (#1 IN IN DAY MATURITY)

TOTAL $ PURCHASED INPUTS PRICE SEED $ LBS $45.00 $45.00 MANURE $ TON $21.60 $21.60 LIVESTOCK FAC & EQUIP $5.00 $5.

Volume 19 Number University of Wisconsin Crop Manager September 6, 2012

WISCONSIN Soybean Variety Test Results

Top 8 Recommendations for Winter Wheat Establishment in 2018 Top 8 winter wheat establishment recommendations: DO NOT

THE 2014 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Crop Enterprise Budgets

CHS. Midwest Cooperatives. Pre-Harvest Marketing Plan

Dairy Feed: a new cash crop. Mike Rankin Crops and Soils Agent University of Wisconsin-Extension Fond du Lac County

Impact of Agronomic Management on Nutritive Value of Corn Silage. Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

HOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION

Effect of Sampling Time on Soil Test Potassium Levels. Lauren F. Vitko, Carrie A.M. Laboski, and Todd W. Andraski Dept. of Soil Science UW-Madison

SEED CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS

What s New in Alfalfa February 2007

Frost seeding red clover: Current research on nitrogen and rotational benefits, production economics

An Agronomic Look at Low Lignin Crops.

Variety NDFD Tons/Acre Lignin RFQ Milk/Ton Milk/Acre

WISCONSIN Soybean Variety Performance Trials

WISCONSIN Soybean Variety Performance Trials

MULTIPLE CONTEST ENTRIES Any individual contestant may enter more than one entry in the contest. Any individual can win only one state award.

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Economic Issues and Trends with Transgenic Crop Production

2019 SEED GUIDE. An American Family Owned Seed Company

Research & Development and Product Development Update Scott Staggenborg, VP, Research & Development

YieldGard VT Triple : the stacked hybrids with enhanced trait performance.

Michael E. Salassi 1 and Michael A. Deliberto 2 1 Professor and 2 Research Associate, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness

Developed and Edited by

COVER CROP MANAGEMENT IN PROCESSING SNAP BEAN. A.J. Bussan, Michael Copas, and Michael Drilias 1

Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States

Harvesting / Pricing Wet Corn

2018 Field Crop Budgets. Updated 11/8/2017

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Agronomy with $3.00 Corn

FROM CHECKERS TO CHESS Same board, different players

BRAZILIAN SEED MARKET NEWS. By MNAGRO

Transcription:

Economics of GMO Technologies Joe Lauer University of Wisconsin

Overview Describe data set used and calculations Ranking of transgenic hybrids to the trial average Yield and grower return of transgenic corn hybrids compared to the: Trial average Normal dent corn hybrid average Sister lines Economics matrix

http://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/select/

University of Wisconsin Corn Agronomy Program 22 Spooner Rhinelander White Lake Chippewa Falls Galesville Marshfield Hancock Seymour Valders Fond du Lac Arlington Lancaster Janesville

Calculating l Grower Return Grower return = (Yield x Price) - Handling ($.2 per bushel) - Hauling ($.4 per bushel) -Trucking g( ($.11 per bushel) - Drying ($.2 per bushel-point above 15.5%) - Storage ($.2 per 3 day) - Seed ($1 per Acre) for Transgenic corn Marketing plan: 5% sold at harvest, 25% at 4 months, and 25% at 8 months. gr25: Price per bushel = $2.5 Corn price ($/bu) $4. $3.5 $3. Seed price ($/A) PEPS $4 Corn price Seed price $35 $3 Livestock: $. drying, $.1 storage, $. trucking $2.5 $25 On-farm: $.2 drying, $.2 storage Commercial: $.4 drying, $.3 storage grpeps: Weighted Price per bushel = 5% November Average Cash price + 25% March CBOT Futures ($.15 basis) + 25% July CBOT Futures ($.1 basis) November Average Cash price derived from WI Ag Statistics; CBOT Futures prices derived from closing price on first business day in December. $2. $1.5 1986 1988 199 1992 1994 1996 1998 2 22 Year $2 $15

Frequency of Specialty Hybrids Yielding Above Average in the 22 WI Hybrid Trials 1 Frequency above trial average 83 72 Frequenc cy (%) 5 5 48 47 44 39 61 29 37 1998 (n=1611) 1999 (n=139) 2 (n=1361) 21 (n=1266) 22 (n=949) Bt (n=42) Bt,LL (n=58) Bt,RR (n=14) IMI (n=7) LL (n=4) RR (n=13) Normal Dent

Frequency of Bt Hybrids yielding Above the Trial Average in the WI Corn Trials 1 1 Fre equency (%) 5 69 55 57 6 7 72 65 1996 (n=12)1997 (n=52)1998 (n=118)1999 (n=323)2 (n=321)21 (n=267)22 (n=42) Average (n=151

Frequency of Gene Stack Hybrids Yielding Above the Trial Average in the WI Corn Trials 1 83 83 Frequenc cy (%) 5 67 61 66 71 42 67 67 61 61 1998 (n=39) 1999 (n=46) 2 (n=72) 21 (n=74) 22 (n=58) Average (n=289) 1999 (n=12) 2 (n=18) 21 (n=24) 22 (n=14) Average (n=158) Bt,LL Bt,RR

Frequency of Bt Hybrid Events yielding Above the Trial Average in the WI Corn Trials 1 11 All Bt Bt-YG 96 (%) quency Freq 5 69 86 73 55 57 5 6 57 82 7 72 65 78 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 Average

Frequency of IMI Hybrids (IT and IR)Yielding Above the Trial Average in the WI Corn Trials 1 Frequency (% %) 5 39 62 47 48 43 39 25 25 3 38 13 1992 (n=3)1993 (n=24) 1994 (n=28) 1995 (n=13) 1996 (n=12) 1997 (n=15) 1998 (n=33) 1999 (n=7) 2 (n=21) 21 (n=12) 22 (n=1) Average (n=24

Frequency of Liberty Link Hybrids Yielding Above the Trial Average in the WI Corn Trials 1 86 Frequenc cy (%) 5 61 6 5 4 54 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 Average (n=18) (n=5) (n=12) (n=1) (n=7) (n=4) (n=56)

Frequency of Roundup Ready Hybrids Yielding Above the Trial Average in the WI Corn Trials 1 y (%) requenc Fr 5 55 57 6 46 37 47 1998 1999 2 21 22 Average (n=55) (n=42) (n=47) (n=121 (n=13) (n=333)

Relative Performance of Specialty Hybrids Compared to the Trial Average (through 22) Specialty Grain Grain GR GR Trait N yield moisture Lodging $2.5 PEPS Bu/A % % $/A $/A Bt 1513 6.4 4.6 1.95 Bt-LL 289 8. 9.3 5.77 Bt-RR 158 6.3 4.45 3.5 IMI 241-4. -15.44-14.57 LL 56 1 9.9-8.23-8.57 RR 333-2.3-2.19-9.71 Grower return = (Yield x Corn price) (Drying+Handling+Hauling+Storage+Trucking) GR PEPS = $2.24/bu Drying=$.2/point bu, Handling=$.2/bu; Hauling=$.4/bu; Storage=$.2/bu mo; Trucking $.11/bu

Relative Performance of Specialty Hybrids Compared to the Average of Normal Corn (through 22) Specialty Grain Grain GR GR Trait N yield moisture Lodging $2.5 PEPS Bu/A % % $/A $/A Bt 1513 8.5 4.82 2.3 Bt-LL 289 1.1 9.57 9.81 Bt-RR 158 9.4-1 8.16 5.68 IMI 241-3.1-16.52-15.86 LL 56 2 1 1. -9.64-1.23 RR 333 -.1-9.9-9.17 Grower return = (Yield x Corn price) (Drying+Handling+Hauling+Storage+Trucking) GR PEPS = $2.24/bu Drying=$.2/point bu, Handling=$.2/bu; Hauling=$.4/bu; Storage=$.2/bu mo; Trucking $.11/bu

Relative Performance of Specialty Hybrids Compared to Normal Sister Lines (through 22) Specialty Grain Grain GR GR Trait N yield moisture Lodging $2.5 PEPS Bu/A % % $/A $/A Bt 124 4 1. -5.9-6.42 Bt-LL 7 15. -3 22.13 13.79 IMI 9-17.6-44.84-42.18 RR 28-2.1-1 -13.37-12.36 Grower return = (Yield x Corn price) (Drying+Handling+Hauling+Storage+Trucking) GR PEPS = $2.24/bu Drying=$.2/point bu, Handling=$.2/bu; Hauling=$.4/bu; Storage=$.2/bu mo; Trucking $.11/bu

Grower return of Bt Hybrids Compared to Normal Dent Corn Hybrids in the WI Corn Trials 26 24 gr25 grpeps 22 Favors BT Growe er return ($/A) 15-15 -2-1 -2-9 -8-9 -1-4 9 4 18 5 Favors Normal 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 Average 2

Breakeven Matrix for Corn Hybrid Seed Sold at Various Technology Fees Technology fee= Technology fee= Technology fee= $1 / bag $2 / bag $3 / bag Yield Corn price ($/Bu) Corn price ($/Bu) Corn price ($/Bu) increase (Bu/A) 2. 2.5 3. 2. 2.5 3. 2. 2.5 3. -4.13 413-4.13 413-4.13 413-8.25 82-8.25 82-8.25 82-12.38-12.38-12.38 2 -.13.87 1.87-4.25-3.25-2.25-8.38-7.38-6.38 4 387 3.87 587 5.87 787 7.87 -.25 25 175 1.75 375 3.75-4.38 438-2.38 238 -.38 38 6 7.87 1.87 13.87 3.75 6.75 9.75 -.38 2.63 5.62 8 11.87 15.87 19.87 775 7.75 11.75 15.75 362 3.62 762 7.62 11.62 1 15.87 2.87 25.87 11.75 16.75 21.75 7.62 12.62 17.62 Assume: 8, seeds/bag planted at 33, seeds/a for final population of 3, plants/a

Summary Bt, Bt-LL and Bt-RR corn hybrids yield and return more than the trial and normal dent corn average. At this time IMI, SR, LL, RR, Bt-IMI traits do not add to yield or grower return. IMI, SR, LL, RR, and Bt-IMI corn hybrids should only be recommended for problem fields or difficult management situations. Variation for grain yield exists among commercial Transgenic hybrids sold in Wisconsin. Care must be taken in selecting individual hybrids.