GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

Similar documents
GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

Share of global GHG emissions. GHG emissions per capita. (tco

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. Share of global GHG emissions. e/cap) (tco

MEXICO % 16, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

TURKEY % 19, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

RUSSIA % 24, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

SOUTH AFRICA % 12, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017

INDONESIA % 10, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017

ITALY % 34, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

INDIA % 5, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

BRAZIL % 14, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

FRANCE % 37, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

AUSTRALIA % 43, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017

22 Canada. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

0.75 BACKGROUND INDICATORS: CHINA CHINA S EXPOSURE TO CLIMATE IMPACTS 6 BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2018 FOOD WATER

8.8 China. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

ARGENTINA % 8.6 Argentina. 8 G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY Current NDC 2

Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

ARGENTINA % 8.6 Argentina. 8 G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY Current NDC 2

Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

6.5 Brazil. Brazil s NDC is not consistent with the Paris Agreement s temperature limit but would lead to a warming of between 2 C and 3 C.

6.5 Brazil. Brazil s NDC is not consistent with the Paris Agreement s temperature limit but would lead to a warming of between 2 C and 3 C.

CLIMATE CHANGE PERFORMANCE. G20 Climate Action a turning point? An overview of climate mitigation action by the G20 countries

9.2 Indonesia. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

9.2 Indonesia. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

(tco 2/capita) 19.3 Australia. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

0.92 BACKGROUND INDICATORS: UNITED STATES THE US S EXPOSURE TO CLIMATE IMPACTS 6 BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2018 FOOD

South Africa, the G20 and Climate Change: from Brown to Green?

Assessing climate action - Climate Action Tracker

David Hone World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy and Climate

COP 21 Paris journalist seminar

EU Climate Action Implementing 2030 targets

World Energy Outlook 2010

Overview of Global GHG Emissions 2.1

Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México Mexico City, 28 September 2015

Trends and drivers in greenhouse gas emissions in the EU in 2016

RIETI BBL Seminar Handout

Questions and Answers on the Decision on effort sharing

E R E F European Renewable Energies Federation

Electricity and Decarbonization U.S. Perspective

Energy & Climate Change ENYGF 2015

THE NEW EU FRAMEWORK FOR CLIMATE AND ENERGY POLICIES

Recent trends and projections in EU greenhouse gas emissions

Climate Analytics equity methodology

Assessing the missed benefits of countries national contributions

European Commission s 2030 framework for climate and energy: A key step in EU "domestic preparations"

Working Paper No. 4. November 2018

Ireland s Provisional Greenhouse Gas Emissions

First workshop for the facilitative sharing of views under the international consultation and analysis process

GE OIL & GAS ANNUAL MEETING 2016 Florence, Italy, 1-2 February

Implementation of the EU climate policy in the EU Member States: the case of Poland

Energy Matters. How COP21 can shift the energy sector onto a low-carbon path that supports economic growth and energy access

IEEJ:October 2016 IEEJ2016 The global energy outlook and what it means for Japan Paul Simons Deputy Executive Director, International Energy Agency Ja

Multilateral Assessment Czech Republic. SBI 49, Katowice December 2018

Trends and projections in Europe 2018

Trends and drivers in greenhouse gas emissions in the EU in 2016

World Energy Outlook Dr. Fatih Birol IEA Chief Economist Rome, 18 November 2009

Climate Change and Energy Sector Transformation: Implications for Asia-Pacific Including Japan

OECD/IEA Brent Wanner, Senior Energy Analyst Stockholm, 24 November 2015

Delivering on the clean energy agenda: prospects and the role for policy

Evaluations on the emission reduction efforts of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in cost metrics

The 2030 Effort Sharing Regulation

A Guidebook on Cross-Border Impact Assessment of Implemented Response Measures: Subsidies, Carbon Trading and Green Tariffs.

Climate change: Questions and Answers on the UN climate conference in Durban

Let s Green Power Tomorrow. Claude Turmes, MEP

The Vision Scenario for the European Union 2017 Update for the EU-28

As discussed in Chapters 2 and 5, energy fuel

For the Talanoa dialogue: Input from the Climate Action Tracker April 2018

The Green Vision. Scenario for Europe. How to achieve net-zero CO 2. emissions by 2050

UK experience of and plans for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases

How effective will the EU s largest post-2020 climate tool be?

Implementing the Paris Agreement: Belarus NDC challenges from MRV to sectoral actions. The case of large emitters and land use/forestry and bioenergy

Ireland s Final Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Denmark. Sources of information. The following communications have been made available for this study.

Indicators for monitoring global action to address climate change. in the context of sustainable development goals (SDGs): The WMO-UNFCCC proposal

The Paris Agreement and the EU NDC

Can Latin America Transition to Low Carbon Energy?

ENHANCED POLICY SCENARIOS FOR MAJOR EMITTING COUNTRIES

How? Establish a global power sector carbon budget

Global Carbon Finance (GLOCAF) model

2030 EU Climate and Energy Framework, the Energy Union and the review of the ETS

Energy and CO 2 emissions in the OECD

An Update on the EU's Energy Union Project

Australia s emissions and the economy

FULL REPORT. Key opportunities for transitioning to a zero emissions society. CAT Scaling Up Climate Action series EUROPEAN UNION

Pre-2020 action: trends and progress

Breaking the Climate Deadlock A Global Deal for Our Low-Carbon Future. Executive Summary. Report submitted to the G8 Hokkaido Toyako Summit June 2008

Ireland s Provisional Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Workshop on developed country targets. Bangkok, 3 April EU contribution

Key data supporting climate policy in Europe

Energy Economics: CO 2 Emissions in China

Environmental constraints: CO 2 and water. Dave Collins 5 th October 2018

Transcription:

CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER BROWN TO GREEN: G2 TRANSITION TO A LOW CARBON ECONOMY European Union This profile assesses the European Union s past, present and indications of future performance towards a low-carbon economy by evaluating emissions, decarbonisation, climate policy performance and climate finance. The profile summarises the respective findings from, amongst others, the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI, operated by Germanwatch and Climate Action Network Europe), the Climate Action Tracker (CAT, operated by Climate Analytics, NewClimate Institute, Ecofys and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research), and analyses from the Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Human Development Index N/A Share of global GHG emissions GHG emissions per capita (t e/cap) Share of global GDP GDP per capita G2 average 8.9% 9.3 8.7.82 1 G2 average G2 average 17% 28,89 15,71 Source: UNDP, data for 215 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 212 Source: IEA, data for 213 GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS Total emissions (Mt e/a) 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Emissions per capita (t /capita) Over the assessment period the European Union s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have declined from about 5,6 Mt e to about 4,5 Mt e. Future projections assume this reduction could continue until 23. In 212, carbon dioxide ( ) accounted for approximately three quarters of the EU s total GHG emissions. Energy-related per capita emission declined notably since 1996, but are still relatively high compared to other G2 countries. 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Composition of GHG emissions* Historic emissions Current policy emissions projections Energy-related emissions Historic forestry emissions/removals Energy-related emissions per capita G2 average of energy-related emissions per capita 8% N 2 O 8% CH 4 1% F-Gases 2% CCPI evaluation of emissions level and trend emissions from forestry -7% * emissions excl. LULUCF Source: Annex I countries: UNFCCC (215); Non-Annex I countries: IEA (214) and CAT (215) Sources: Past energy related emissions from the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI); past non-energy and future emissions projections from the Climate Action Tracker (CAT). CCPI calculations are primary based on the most recent IEA data; CAT calculations are based on national policies and country communications. Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

DECARBONISATION Energy intensity of the economy Total Primary Energy Supply per GDP PPP (MJ per 25 US dollar) 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 199 1992 1996 2 22 24 26 28 21 212 The energy intensity of the EU s economy (TPES/GDP) has gradually fallen and is already far below the G2 average. Energy intensity Average energy intensity in G2 Source: CCPI, 216 CCPI evaluation of energy intensity of GDP Carbon intensity of the energy sector Tonnes of per TPES (t /TJ) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 In the European Union there has been an observable trend towards fewer emissions per primary energy supply ( /TPES). It started just above the level of the G2 average and continuously dropped down to about 49 t per TJ, below the G2 average. While it is expected that the energy sector's carbon intensity will drop further by 23, it would still exceed the minimum value for the 2 C compatible benchmark corridor. 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Carbon intensity Carbon intensity (current policy projection) Sources: Past: CCPI; future projections: CAT Average carbon intensity in G2 Global benchmark for a 2 C pathway CCPI evaluation of carbon intensity of energy sector Share of coal in Total Primary Energy Supply (TPES) 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Total coal in TPES [TJ] In the European Union, the share of coal accounted for 27% in 199 but has since decreased. In 212 coal accounted for 18% of the total primary energy supply, which is nearly half of the G2 average share. Projections assume this development will continue and be on a 2 C-compatible pathway, even though it will still be above the minimum value of the benchmark corridor in 23. 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Evaluation of coal share in TPES Source: CAT % of coal Average % of coal in G2 % of coal (current policy projections) Global benchmark for a 2 C pathway (min & max) Total coal consumption (TJ) poor medium good Source: own evaluation Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

Renewable energy in TPES and electricity sector 5% 1 45% 9 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Total renewable energy in TPES [TJ] The share of renewable energy in electricity remained relatively constant around 12% -14% between 199 and 25. Since then, it has nearly doubled to 24% in 212. Further growth can be expected in the next decade. The share of renewables in the EU s total primary energy supply has slightly increased over the past years and, since 21, has been above the G2 average. 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 in electricity in electricity in TPES G2 average % of renewable energy in TPES Total renewable energy consumption (TJ) Sources: CCPI and CAT CCPI evaluation of renewable share in TPES The EU s electricity demand per capita has been rising since 199 showing the same upward trend as the G2 average. However, at around 55 kwh per capita in 212, the EU s electricity demand is far above the G2 average, and is expected to continue rising until 23. Emissions intensity of the electricity sector The emissions intensity of the EU s electricity has dropped by a third since 199. Compared to other G2 member countries, current levels are relatively good and can be expected to drop further. [kwh/cap] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Emissions intensity of electricity [g /kwh] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Average electricity demand per capita in G2 Emissions intensity Average emissions intensity in G2 Emissions intensity Good practice benchmark: without nuclear or large hydro potential (Denmark) Good practice benchmark: with large hydro potential (Norway) Source: CAT, 215 Source: CAT, 215 Evaluation of the electricity emission intensity poor medium good Source: own evaluation Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

CLIMATE POLICY PERFORMANCE Checklist of the climate policy framework Climate policy evaluation by experts Low emissions development plan for 25* 25 GHG emissions target The EU as a whole is not part of the CCPI policy evaluations. The CCPI evaluates a country s performance in national and international climate policy through feedback from national energy and climate experts. Building codes, standards and incentives for low-emissions options Support scheme for renewables in the power sector Emissions performance standards for cars Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) Carbon tax * Understood as decarbonisation plans and not specifically as the plans called for in the Paris Agreement Source: Climate Policy Database, 216 CCPI evaluation of climate policy Compatibility of national climate targets (INDCs) with a 2 C scenario Total emissions (Mt e/a) 6 5 4 3 2 1-1 -2 Historic emissions Current policy emissions projections CAT evaluation of the EU s Intended National Determinded Contributions (INDC) inadequate medium sufficient role model Fair emissions reduction range in a 2 C pathway Emissions in INDC scenario (min & max) Max Min Max Min Under its INDC, on 6 March 215 the EU proposed a binding, economy-wide target to cut domestic greenhouse gas emissions by at least 4% below 199 levels in 23. No individual EU member state has its own INDC. The Climate Action Tracker (CAT) rates the EU emissions target as medium, meaning the INDC is inconsistent with limiting warming below 2 C. It would require other countries to make a comparably greater effort, and much deeper emissions reductions. The overall level of GHG emissions reductions proposed in the EU28 INDC does not fall within the range of approaches for fair and equitable emission reductions. Current policies are projected to reduce domestic emissions by 23 35% below 199 levels in 23, and do not put the EU on a trajectory towards meeting either its 23 or 25 targets. The EU s Emissions Trading Scheme is an important instrument to achieve its 22 and 23 targets. However, an accumulated surplus of emissions allowances could dilute the 4% GHG target by 7% in 23. It is therefore important that the EU creates a robust market reserve for eliminating that surplus, to keep in line with the 4% GHG target. Source: CAT, 215 Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

FINANCING THE TRANSITION Investment attractiveness The European Union as a whole is not covered by the investment attractiveness indices. Allianz Energy and Climate Monitor RECAI* (E&Y index) Category (own assessment) Trend** not covered not covered no data Sources: Allianz Energy and Climate Monitor and RECAI reports The Allianz Energy & Climate Monitor ranks G2 member states on their relative fitness as potential investment destinations for building low-carbon electricity infrastructure. The investment attractiveness of a country is assessed through four categories: Policy adequacy, Policy reliability of sustained support, Market absorption capacity and the National investment conditions. The Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) produces score and rankings for countries attractiveness based on Macro drivers, Energy market drivers and Technology-specific drivers which together compress a set of 5 drivers, 16 parameters and over 5 datasets. *Adapted from RECAI and re-classified in 3 categories (low, medium, high) for comparison purposes with Allianz Monitor. **Taken from RECAI issue of May 216 Historical investments in renewable energy and investment gap Not assessed Carbon pricing mechanisms Emissions Trading Schemes (ETS) An ETS caps the total level of GHG emissions and allows industries to trade allowances based on their marginal abatement cost. By creating a supply and demand for allowances, an ETS establishes a market price for GHG emissions. The EU-ETS, which covers 2 Gt e of emissions and 45% of the EU s emissions, remains the world s single largest regional carbon pricing instrument. In 214, the EU approved a reform to strengthen and revitalise its carbon market. As a means of controlling the supply of allowances and enhancing the price stability within the EU-ETS, the EU will launch its Market Stability Reserve in 219. The European Commission has also proposed implementing a series of post-22 reforms to enhance the overall ambition of the scheme. Carbon Tax A Carbon tax directly sets a price on carbon by defining a tax rate on GHG emissions or more commonly on the carbon content of fossil fuels. Unlike an ETS, a carbon tax is a price-based instrument that pre-defines the carbon price, but not the emissions reduction outcome of a carbon tax. GHG Sources: World Bank and Ecofys, 216; other national sources Fossil fuel subsidies Not assessed Public climate finance EU is not listed in Annex II of the UNFCCC, and it is therefore not formally obliged to provide climate finance. While climate-related spending by multilateral development banks may exist, it has not been included in this report. Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy