The Effect of AmiSorb, a Nutrient Absorption Enhancing Polymer, on Pepper Plant Nutrient Status and Yield

Similar documents
Response of Pepper to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

Evaluation of Pursell Controlled-Release Polymer-Coated Urea for Tomato and Pepper George J. Hochmuth 1

Response of Cucumber to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

Response of Pepper to Fertilization with Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

Materials and Methods. Introduction

Response of Tomato to Fertilization with Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

RESEARCH REPORT SUWANNEE VALLEY AREC 92-5 August, 1992 COMPARISON OF VARIOUS N SCHEDULING METHODS FOR SNAPBEANS

Evaluation of Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizer Solutions for Tomato and Pepper Production in Florida George J.

Response of Mulched Tomato to Meister Controlled-Release Fertilizers George J. Hochmuth 1

Response of Mulched Lettuce, Cauliflower, and Tomato to Megafol Biostimulant George J. Hochmuth 1

Evaluation of Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizer Solution Effects on Vegetable Production in Florida George J.

Yield Response of Bell Pepper Cultivars to Foliar-applied 'Atonik' Biostimulant 1

Research Report

Additional index words. Virtually impermeable film, Telone C-35, InLine, plasticulture, soil fumigation, methyl bromide alternatives.

by Dow AgroSciences. 2 Robert C. Hochmuth and Wayne E. Davis, North Florida Research and Education Center

Snapbean and Sweet Corn Response to N Rate and Furrow-Placed Growplex Humate George J. Hochmuth 1

Robert Hochmuth Regional Extension Agent and Assistant Center Director, NFREC- Suwannee Valley Live Oak, Florida

Pepper Production Guide for Florida: Fertilization 1

Using Nitrate-N Petiole Sap-Testing for Better Nitrogen Management in Vegetable Crops

Evaluation of Compact Bed Geometries for Water, Nutrient, and Economic Efficiency for Drip-Irrigated Tomato and Pepper

Evaluation of Compact Bed Geometries for Water, Nutrient, and Economic Efficiency for Drip-Irrigated Tomato and Pepper

Response of Snapbean, Carrot, and Sweet Corn to Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Solutions George J. Hochmuth 1

Nitrogen Monitoring Techniques for Vegetable Crops

Vegetarian Newsletter

2012 Nitrogen Technology Evaluation Summary: Methods: Trial No. 1:

Irrigation Management Decision Tools for Economic and Environmental Benefit in Fruit and Vegetable Production

Reduced rates of MBR and C35 under LDPE and VIF for control of soil pests and pathogens. Introduction

Effects of Rye Cover Crop on Strip-Till Pumpkin Production in Northern Illinois

CAN WE USE CONTROLLED RELEASE FERTILIZERS (CRF) IN TOMATO AND PEPPER PRODUCTION?

Update and Outlook for 2005 of Florida's BMP Program for Vegetable Crops 1

Watermelon Response to Soluble and Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizers

Vegetarian Newsletter

Nitrogen Management in Cole Crops and Leafy Greens

C.S. Vavrina Vegetable Horticulturist

Determining the Correct Nitrogen Rate for Cotton Following Soybeans Final report Objectives Introduction Research methods

Tissue Testing Guidelines for Nitrogen Management in Malting Barley, Maricopa, 1998

UF-IFAS Nitrogen Fertilization and Management Recommendations for Fresh Tomato Production in Florida in the BMP Era

A Summary of N, P, and K Research with Pepper in Florida 1

Low biomass cover crops for tomato production

Improving Cotton Production Efficiency With Phosphorus and Potassium Placement At Multiple Depths in Strip Tillage Systems

CONTROLLED-RELEASE FERTILIZER A BMP IN TOMATO PRODUCTION. Monica Ozores-Hampton and Luther Carson

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria via a transplant plug delivery system in the production of drip irrigated pepper.

Production Budget for Tomatoes in the Manatee-Ruskin Area of Florida 1

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production

Yield quality response (YQR) of pepper under variable water application using micro-sprinkler system

From Soil Test Results to Practice: How to Develop and Implement a Fertility Plan

Improving Cotton Production Efficiency With Phosphorus and Potassium Placement At Multiple Depths in Strip Tillage Systems

Nutrient Management in Vegetable Crops

Effects of fluid nitrogen fertigation and rate on microsprinkler irrigated grapefruit

Nitrogen management in annual vegetable crops

ARKANSAS CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM. Final Report. Optimizing Soil Fertility Requirements for Corn. Leo Espinoza, Soils Specialist, University of Arkansas

Subsurface Fertigation In Highly Productive Soils Increases nutrient use and grain yield of corn and soybeans.

Nitrogen Management in Strawberries

Production Budget for Tomatoes in Southwest Florida 1

CUSTOM-MADE DRIP-IRRIGATION SYSTEMS FOR INTEGRATED WATER AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATIONS

University of California Cooperative Extension

Seedcotton Yield and Petiole Potassium Concentrations as Affected by Potassium Fertilization

Effect of Red Plastic Mulch on Early Tomato Production

Chart 1. Watermelon Fertility Programs

CENTRAL OREGON POTATO NITROGEN FERTILIZER TRIALS Progress Report. Alvin R. Mosley, Shelton C. Perrigan and Steven R. James'

Weed Control in Vine Crops: Consider All Your Options. Mark VanGessel, Barb Scott, and Quintin Johnson

SUSTAINABLE NITROGEN FERTILIZER REGIMES FOR SNAP BEANS IN VIRGINIA

MANAGEMENT FACTORS ENHANCING THE FEASIBILITY OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION FOR POTATO

SUPPLYING PLANT NUTRIENTS VIA FERTIGATION: PRINCIPLES AND EXAMPLES IN TRIPLOID WATERMELON. Shubin K. Saha, Ph.D., D.P.M. Purdue University, SWPAC

Alternative Systems for Cultivating and Side Dressing Specialty Crops for Improved Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Improving Irrigation and Nutrient Management in Ventura County Strawberry

Evaluation of Several Controlled Release Fertilizers for Irrigated Potato Production

January/February 2013

Fertilizer Management for Plant Health and Environmental Water Quality Protection

Andrew MacRae and Joseph Noling University of Florida/IFAS GCREC and CREC

Efficacy of Nimitz (Fluensulfone) Using Drip Irrigation in Tomato Production. Monica Ozores-Hampton, Gilma Castillo and Pablo Navia

Documenting Impacts of BMP Adoption by Suwannee Valley Watermelon Growers

Calculating Recommended Fertilizer Rates for Vegetables Grown in Raised-Bed, Mulched Cultural Systems 1

Results of Latest BMP Trials season

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Reflex Herbicide For Control of Weeds in Transplanted Tomatoes and Transplanted Peppers

What Are The Top 10 Advantages Of Fluid Fertilizers?

Drip Irrigation in High Tunnels

Archival copy: for current recommendations see or your local extension office.

Water Movement in Mulched Beds in Rocky Soils of Miami-Dade County 1

4R Nutrient Stewardship for Florida Agriculture

Effects of Potassium Fertilizer Sources, Timing, and Rates On Tuber Specific Gravity

Potato Nitrogen Management by Monitoring Petiole Nitrate level

Title: Nutrient Use Efficiency Assessments of Recently Released Strawberry Cultivars in Both Field and High-tunnel Production Report, Research

Nitrogen BMPs for horticultural crop production Tim Hartz UC Davis

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Fertility Management of Processing Tomato

Nutrient Management Update for Vegetables. Richard Smith UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey County

Corn Silage Potential in Central Oregon

Onion Variety Trials at New Mexico State University

A top issue: Quality. Manual of Tomato and Eggplant Field Production

Nitrogen Fertigation Requirements of Drip-irrigated Strawberries

SOIL NITRATE TESTS FOR WISCONSIN CROPPING SYSTEMS. L.G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Nutrient Management in Vegetable Production. Richard Smith University of California Cooperative Extension Monterey County

Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency for Horticultural Crops. Tom Obreza and Jerry Sartain Soil and Water Science Dept.

Strawberry: Drip Irrigation and Fertigation

Effects of Row Spacing on the Yield of Soybeans [Glycine max] Student name. Mentor Name

SOIL TEST N FOR PREDICTING ONION N REQUIREMENTS - AN IDAHO PERSPECTIVE. Brad Brown, University of Idaho Parma Research and Extension Center

EXPLORING CONTROLLED RELEASE NITROGEN FERTILIZERS FOR VEGETABLE AND MELON CROP PRODUCTION IN CALIFORNIA AND ARIZONA

Fertigation management for tomato production in saline soils

RE EVALUATION OF MISSOURI SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COTTON FERTILIZATION Gene Stevens, University of Missouri

Transcription:

The Effect of AmiSorb, a Nutrient Absorption Enhancing Polymer, on Pepper Plant Nutrient Status and Yield J. Fletcher, R. Hochmuth 1, G. Hochmuth 2 Madison County Cooperative Extension Service 900 College Drive, Madison, FL 32340-1426, U.SA. Abstract: Polyaspartates, nutrient absorption enhancing polymers, when applied fertilizers is reported to enhance the availability of N, P, K, and other nutrients resulting in increased yields. This study was conducted to determine the effect of the polymer AmiSorb on pepper N and K sap nutrient status as well as pepper yield. Plant sap N0 3 and K concentrations were determined 34 and 61 days after transplanting. Yields were determined for 4 harvests, June 2, 9, 19, and 26. There were no significant differences in sap N0 3 or K concentration levels or yields in the AmiSorb treatments versus the untreated plots. Keywords: Nutrient absorption enhancing polymers, polyaspartates, nutrient status Introduction Bell peppers in Florida were harvested on 20,300 acres in the 1995-96 season (Anon., 1997) with total costs of $9100 per acre for production and marketing (Smith and Taylor, 1996). New technologies have produced nutrient absorption enhancing polymers, polyaspartates. Polyaspartates were originally developed as water treatments for industrial applications. When these polymers are applied to fertilizer, they may enhance the availability of N, P, and K resulting in increase yields. These polymers are reported to artificially increase the area where the roots are located resulting in increased nutrient availability to plants (Anon., 1996). Past research has targeted agronomic crops such as com, cotton, and soybeans. Research is needed to determine the effectiveness of AmiSorb in peppers grown with drip irrigation and polyethylene mulch. Materials and Methods Experiments were conducted at the Suwannee Valley Research and Education Center near Live Oak, FL on a Lakeland fine sand during the spring of 1997 to test pepper response to rates and method of application of AmiSorb. Soil was prepared by plowing and roto-tilling. Total N of 180 lb/a and K of 180 lbs/a were applied based on University of Florida recommendations (Hochmuth and Smajstria, 1997). Preplant fertilizer 13-4-13 at the rate of 667 lbs per acre was applied to all plots in a 24-inch wide band. Remaining N and K was injected at weekly intervals using ammonium nitrate and potassium nitrate as N 'R.C. Hochmuth, Suwannee Valley Research and Education Center, Live Oak, FL 2 G.J. Hochmuth, Horticultural Sciences Department, Gainesville, FL. 260

and K sources. AmiSorb treatments were applied pre-plant incorporated (PPI) after fertilizer application and roto-tilled into soil with fertilizer. AmiSorb was mixed with water and applied via sprinkling can evenly to each plot. Untreated check plots received water only. Soil was bedded, pressed, and fumigated with methyl bromide:chloropicrin (98:2) at the rate of 400 lbs broadcast per acre. Final beds were 24 inches and across the top, 6 inches high, and were on 5-ft centers. Treatment plots requiring later injections of AmiSorb were made via injection of solution directly into drip tape. These injections were made by using C0 2 pressurized containers for each treatment. Injections were made on April 21 and May 23. At the April 21 injection, pepper flower buds were present but not open. On the May 23 injection, the pepper fruit was one-third mature size. Plots 20 ft in length were planted with 'Camelot X3R' on March 28,1997. Plants were placed in a double row on the bed with 12 inches between rows and 12 inches between plants. Experimental design was a randomized complete-block with six replicates. Plants were irrigated by drip irrigation to maintain a tensiometer reading between 8 and 12 centibars at 12 inch depth in the bed. Pest control was by timely applications of labeled pesticides based on field scouting. On two dates in the spring (34 and 61 days after transplanting), a sample of most recently matured leaves were harvested from each plot. Petioles were excised from leaves, chopped and sap expressed. Fresh sap nitrate-n and K concentrations were determined by battery operated, hand held ion specific electrodes (Cardy ion meters Horiba, LTD, Kyota, Japan). Peppers were harvested on June 2, 9,19, and 26. Fruits were counted and weighed, and all data were subjected to analysis of variance and regression techniques. Results and Discussion Yield. Early marketable yields (first harvest) ranged from 426 to 488 bu/a with no significant difference among treatments (Table 1). Early fancy yields were in the 300 to 350 bu/a range again with no significant difference among treatments. Average total season yield for bell pepper in Florida is reported at 800 to 1000 bu/a in 1994-1996 (Anon, 1997). Total marketable yields in this study were 1200 to 1300 bu/a with no significant differences among treatments. Likewise, no differences were detected within pepper grade categories of Fancy, U.S. No. 1, U.S. No. 2, or cull. All average fruit weights were 0.3 lbs per fruit. This would indicate what ever effects AmiSorb may have on root growth and/ or root uptake of nutrients, the application of recommended fertilizer in drip-irrigated peppers (Hochmuth and Smaj stria, 1997) is enough to ensure optimum yield. Nutrient Analysis. Petiole sap concentrations for nitrate-n for all treatments (Table 2) were above the critical levels of 1500 prior to harvest and 800 ppm at the onset of harvest (Fletcher et al., 1993). No significant differences were detected among sap N levels on either sampling date. Petiole sap concentrations for K for all treatments (Table 2) were above the critical levels of 3200 ppm prior to harvest and 2400 ppm at the onset of harvest (Hochmuth, 1994). No significant differences were detected between among K levels on either sampling date. AmiSorb rate and timing of application had no effect on plant petiole sap N and K or pepper yield. The lack of response in this study may be due to the high nutrient availability of N and K in the weekly drip fertigated program. 261

Literature Cited Anonymous. 1996. AmiSorb nutrient absorption enhancer. Amilar International Inc., Bedford Park, IL. 4pp. Anonymous. 1997. Florida Agricultural Statistics Vegetable Summary 1995-96, Fla. Agric. Stats. Serv., Orlando, FL,71 pp. Fletcher, J., R. Hochmuth, and G. Hochmuth. 1993. Calibration of N and K fresh sap quick-test procedures for polyethylene-mulched peppers. Proc. Natl. Agric. Plastics Congr. 24:147-152. Hochmuth, G. 1994. Plant petiole sap-testing guide for vegetable crops. Fla Coop. Ext. Serv. Circ. 1144. Hochmuth, G.J., and A.G. Smajstria. 1997. Fertilizer application and management for micro (drip)- irrigated vegetables. Fla. Coop. Ext. Circ. Serv. 1181. Smith, S.A. and T.G. Taylor. 1996. Production costs for selected vegetables in Florida, 1995-96. Fla Coop. Ext Serv. Circ.l 176, 65pp 262

Table l.the effect of Amisorb on pepper yield and quality in the spring, 1997 season at Live Oak, FL TOTAL METHOD" EARLY YIELD (bu/a) Y TOTAL YIELD (bu/al AVG.FRUIT WT. TREATMENT RATE (qts/a) of _ (LBS) APPLICATION TOTAL MKT. FANCY TOTAL MKT FANCY NO. 1 NO. 2 CULL Untreated check 0 NONE 488.5 290.9 1264.3 697.5 483.8 83.0 75.5 0.3 AmiSorb 1 PPI 462.0 352.6 1269.5 732.7 472.4 64.3 69.0 0.3 AmiSorb 2 PPI 439.2 311.1 1316.1 743.6 505.1 67.4 81.4 0.3 AmiSorb 3 PPI 438.2 328.8 1224.3 712.5 463.1 48.7 79.9 0.3 AmiSorb 2 PPIandINJ 456.3 334.5 1283.5 730.7 505.6 47.2 77.8 0.3 AmiSorb 3 PPI and INJ 425.7 301.3 ' 1282.9 717.7 513.9 51.3 67.4 0.3 NJ co Significance (P=0.05) z NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS x - Applications of Amisorb were preplant incorporated (PPI) or injected into the drip irrigation system (INJ). Where PPI and INJ were used the total rate was divided evenly over three applications, 1 PPI and 2 INJ. Y - Early harvest was first harvest. z - Treatment effects were not significant (NS) at the 5% probability level.

Table 2. The effect of Amisorb on pepper plant sap N and K levels in the spring, 1997 season at Live Oak, FL. Total Method x SapN(ppm) Y SapK(ppm) Treatment Rate (qts/a) of APPLICATION 1-May 28-May 1-May 28-May Untreated Check 0 NONE 2144 783 3950 3817 AmiSorb 1 PPI 2092 888 4100 3700 AmiSorb 2 PPI 2212 865 4083 3750 AmiSorb 3 PPI 2058 1005 3800 3733 AmiSorb 2 PPI + INJ 2231 805 3883 3617 AmiSorb 3 PPP + INJ 2227 933 3867 3600 Significance (P=0.05) z NS NS NS NS x - Applications of Amisorb were preplant incorporated (PPI) or injected into the drip irrigation system (INJ). Where PPI and INJ were used the total rate was divided evenly over three applications, 1 PPI and 2 INJ. Y - Stage of growth 1-May (prebloom) and 28-May (fruits one third full size). z - Treatment effects not significant (NS) at the 5% probability level.