Highway 11 Realignment

Similar documents
To: Steve Lines From: Fiona Christiansen. File: Date: September 15, 2015

Draft Mine Closure Plan. 17 October 2018 Longlac & Geraldton

Annex F Scoping Checklist

Hardrock Project Final EIS/EA Report Highlights

Activities that may Require Permit/Approval. Permit/Approval Required Electrical Safety Authority. Approval (CAA) process.

24.0 FOLLOW-UP MONITORING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANS

NICO COBALT-GOLD-BISMUTH-COPPER PROJECT Community Scoping Session Environmental Overview

Assessment of Landfill Footprint Alternatives West Carleton Environmental Centre. Option #4 Impact on Agriculture

Appendix C - Highway 400 Widening and Interchange Evaluation Summary Tables

Alberta Electric System Operator Yeo 2015S Substation Needs Identification Document

Grassy Mountain Coal Project Environmental Impact Assessment Project Summary Table

Information Request 37

GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN IN NEW BRUNSWICK

Site C Clean Energy Project. Monthly Environmental Monitoring Summary Report - February 2017

T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s

Côté Gold Project. Where is the Côté Gold Project located? Who owns the Côté Gold Project? Frequently Asked Questions. May 2018.

Giant Mine Remediation Project

HARDROCK PROJECT CONCEPTUAL EXPLOSIVES AND BLASTING MANAGEMENT PLAN

HARDROCK PROJECT Draft Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Assessment Summary

Comparative Evaluation Option #1 & Option #2

Magino Project Environmental Impact Statement. Technical Support Document Water Management Plan

Environmental Impact Statement for the Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Project

Please complete the sign-in sheet and review display materials.

HARDROCK PROJECT CONCEPTUAL GREENHOUSE GAS MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

APPENDIX 8-A. Valued Component Selection Rationale

Potential Impacts and Mitigations from a Saline Discharge into Marine Environment

APPENDIX O COMPREHENSIVE ALTERNATIVES ASSESSMENT TABLES. RAINY RIVER PROJECT Final Environmental Assessment Report

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINES

Planning a Complex Mine Remediation. Remediation Technologies Symposium October 14-16, 2015.

7.0 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER NEPA CONSIDERATIONS

Project Component, Impact Concern, and TK Recommendations that Informed Snap Lake Mine Designs

SITE C FIELD WORK FOR 2019

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE

BEFORE THE OHIO POWER SITING BOARD

E1184 v1. 6. Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

Carpinteria Valley Water District Carpinteria Advanced Purification Project

IMPACT ON LAND. 1. Will there be an effect as a result of a physical change to project site? Yes No

Preliminary Disclosure; Application for Approval; Operating Permits, Volume 2: Licences and Approvals; and Abandonment Approval and

Operations Mine Site, Tote Road and Railway

PIC Comment Responses. Geraldton November 18 th PIC. - Will the pit increase in size after the pit is complete or will they go underground?

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

List of Figures... xii. List of Tables... xiii. List of Appendices...xv. Glossary... xvii Project Summary and Facility Overview...

To reduce the environmental impact we should ISOLATE or CONTAIN the waste in an IMPERMEABLE BARRIER

Elko Project Water Use Plan. Revised for Acceptance by the Comptroller of Water Rights

Coastal Gaslink Pipeline Project

APPENDIX 2. Nova Scotia Department of Environment and Labour Environmental Assessment Terms and Conditions for Environmental Assessment Approval

Prepared for: Prepared by:

SHELL ONSHORE OPERATING PRINCIPLES

Environmental Review Process. Presented by Environment and Natural Resource Unit, Lands and Economic Development, BC Region

Environmental Design Criteria for Project Engineering

Information Sheet - Mountain Highway Interchange Noise Assessment and Sound Mitigation

Rights and Engagement of Indigenous Peoples. Workforce Safety and Health. Governance and Accountability. Economic Impact

HARDROCK PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Assessment

Alberta Transportation The City of Edmonton The City of Calgary

Whabouchi Project: designed to account for both environmental, social and economic concerns

Environmental Assessment Approval

SCHEDULE A DOCUMENTATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FOR THE PROSPERITY GOLD-COPPER PROJECT (Project) Produced by or for Taseko Mines Limited March 17, 2009 Ap

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS

HARDROCK PROJECT CONCEPTUAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN

Big Thunder Wind Park

CMPDI. 4.6 Mine Closure Plan

Grassy Mountain Gold Project Environmental Evaluation - Draft Outline

Forest Recreation Management

Holly Swartz and Jason Shirey

PERMIT APPLICATION FEES Fees must be paid at time of application

Independent Expert Engineering Investigation and Review Panel. Report on Mount Polley Tailings Storage Facility Breach. Appendix G: Water Balance

Factor Potential Effects Mitigation Measures

Chapter 4 ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON

Lloydminster to Spruce Lake 138kV Transmission Line Projects

Facilities Environmental Protection Plan: Burnaby Terminal

Wellhead Protection Issues Related to Mining Activities Minnesota Rural Water Conference March 4, 2014

Appendix 8. Petroleum Hydrocarbon Products, Ammonium Nitrate and Explosives Management Plan

Environmental Regulation & Mine Permitting in Ontario

Goffs Quarry Environmental Assessment OVERVIEW FOR CONSULTATION

Bahrain LNG Environmental Impact Assessment (2014) Summary

NAPA SANITATION DISTRICT SOLAR PROJECT

Public Information Centre September 19 th, 2017

Northacre Renewable Energy

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA PUBLIC NOTICE

Oil and Gas Study. March 2 2, 2012

Mohawk College Hamilton, ON. Project Description Report. Fennell Campus Wind Project

ENVIRONMENT ACT TERMS OF REFERENCE NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS. Beaver Bank Bypass

3.0 Natural Resource Management Policies. 3.4 Resource Extraction Policies

ROUND 2 OPEN HOUSE. Keeyask Transmission Project EA Report Appendix D: Public Involvement Materials D-81

AMHERST ISLAND WIND ENERGY PROJECT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ASSESSMENT REPORT. File No April Prepared for:

Comprehensive Study Scoping Document. for Lower Mattagami Hydroelectric Complex Redevelopment CEAR Reference Number:

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR DEWATERING

EIS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Project siting. Lanfine. Wind resource assessment. Wind Power Project

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Operating and Reclamation Plan

Appendix G. Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Plans. Site C Clean Energy Project

Introduction. They can help ensure that all key issues and elements have been considered; They help ensure that the review process is systematic; and

APPENDIX C. Public Consultation Centre (PCC) Displays. Appendix C1 PCC#1 Appendix C2 PCC#2 Appendix C3 PCC#3

Amisk Hydroelectric Project Update

Northwest Transmission Line. Public open houses: Dease Lake, April 27, 2010 Smithers April 28, 2010 Terrace April 29, 2010

A. INSTRUCTIONS (Please print or type all answers)

EPCOR Distribution & Transmission Inc.

Responsible Mining in the Lake Superior Basin Dec. 2013

Transcription:

Highway 11 Realignment Preferred Alternative Option 1D (optimized) Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) + Comparatively lowest cost to construct. Comparatively lowest construction complexity. + Optimal highway geometry to address design and traffic safety issues. + Lowest effect on watercourses and fish habitat. + Comparatively lowest wildlife habitat disturbance. - Moderate vegetation removal and wetland disturbance. -Higher effects on the Golf Course. 1

Hydro One Substation Relocation Preferred Alternative Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) Option 1A/B northwestof Old Arena Road + No wetland disturbance. + Lowest effect on wildlife and wildlife habitat. + Lowest cost. - Higher forest removal. -Site will require additional assessment prior to construction for areas of archaeological potential, but potential is low based on work to date. Note - Four alternatives (1, 1A/B, 2 and 2A) were considered in the comparative analysis. 2

Process Water Supply Reference: pumpsandsystems.com Preferred Alternatives Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) Reclaim water recycled from TMF and site contact water collection system + Closed system will limit effluent discharge and will not result in environmental effects on water features or fish habitat. + Provides the opportunity for the highest process efficiency through water reuse. +Reduced cost for water treatment. Groundwater form Historic Underground Workings + Closed system will limit effluent discharge and will not result in environmental effects on water features or fish habitat. + Provides a good supplemental reclaim water source to support process efficiency. + Reduced cost for water treatment. 3

Borrow Sources Preferred Alternatives Use Existing Quarries or Pits Use Mined Waste Rock Create New Quarries or Pits Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) + Limited potential for environmental effects since sites are already established. +Will provide government revenue through licensing. - Aggregate availability may be limited at existing sites and may not fulfill the project needs. - Increased use of existing roads. + Limited potential for environmental effects since operations will be localized at the mine site. + Provides a ready supply of usable waste rock. -May not fulfill all project needs. + Provides flexibility to ensure appropriate aggregate sources are available to fulfill the project needs. +Will provide government revenue through licensing. - May result in increased noise at local receptors. - May result in increased effects to vegetation, wetlands and wildlife. - Increased use of existing roads. - Increased cost to establish new borrow sources. -May result in the need to mitigate effects on land and resource uses and traditional uses. 4

Drinking Water Supply Preferred Alternative Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) Connect to Geraldton Municipal Supply + No expected effects to water features or fish. + No disturbance to existing vegetation, wetlands or wildlife. + Lowest capital and operating costs. + No additional treatment required to address water quality issues since water will be treated municipally. 5

Temporary and Backup Power Sources Preferred Alternatives Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) 44 kv Tie-in to existing Transmission Line Temporary Diesel or Natural Gas Generation + No GHG or air emission during operation. + Limited potential effect on the natural environment. + Lower capital and operating costs. - Potential reliability issues associated with severe weather events. + Increased reliability from the ability to store fuel on site for continued operation. - Ongoing GHG and air emissions during operation - Minor risk of groundwater effects from spills. - Higher capital and operating costs. 6

Fuel Type for Mining Equipment Preferred Alternatives Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) Diesel Fuel Supply Combination LNG / Diesel Fuel Supply (long term) + Lower capital costs. - Higher air quality effects. -Higher fuel costs over life of mine. + Reduced air quality and GHG emissions. + Increased cost savings over LOM. -Higher capital cost to establish diesel/lng operations, which may not be viable until production ramps up. - Technology not yet commercially available. 7

Fuel Source for Mining Equipment Preferred Alternatives Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) Diesel Truck Delivery and Tank Storage (long term) LNG Truck Delivery and Tank Storage (short term) LNG Liquefaction Plant (long term) + Lower capital cost. - Higher operating cost. - Higher GHG and air emissions from trucking. + Lower capital cost. - Higher operating cost. - Highest GHG and air emissions from long distance trucking. + Lower operating cost. + Reduced GHG and air emissions. - Higher capital cost. 8

Open Pit Closure and Decommissioning Preferred Alternative Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) Open Pit Enhanced Refilling + Will limit the time required to complete closure activities. + Reduced costs over closure period. 9

Preferred TMF Preferred Alternative Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) TMF-8 Conventional Tailings + Lowest effect on water resources + Comparably low effect on fish habitat + Lowest effect on air quality + Smaller relative surface area for closure + Lower capital, operational and closure costs - Higher effects on wetlands - Less favorable foundation conditions - Larger diversion requirements - Higher visual effect due to embankment heights 10

Goldfield Creek Diversion Preferred Alternative Key Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-) Option 6 Northeast diversion to SW Arm Tributary + Lowest cost. + Lowest alteration to existing channels. + Lowest effect on existing fish habitat. + Lowest vegetation and wetland disturbance. + Lowest effect on wildlife and wildlife habitat. - Higher risk of flood impacts by diverting all flows through northeast channel. 11