THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE: RESULTS AND CHALLENGES

Similar documents
The Mighty Marcellus AADE OKC Presentation January 19, 2010

PennEnergy Resources. DUG East Richard D. Weber Chairman and CEO. June 22, 2016

Forward Looking Statements

The Marcellus Shale... By the Numbers*

Utica Point Pleasant Play - Range s View on a Key Appalachian Basin Unconventional Target & Plans for Future Development

RESOURCE PLAYS: UNDEVELOPED RESERVES THE LEARNING CURVE

Unconventional Gas Production in the United States

Investor Presentation. EnerCom's The Oil & Gas Conference Denver, CO August 12, 2013

3 rd Shale Play Water Management Marcellus and Utica COLLABORATION CASE STUDY

Investor Presentation. Tuohy Brothers 4th Annual Energy Conference New York City August 5, 2013

Will The Plays Be Commercial? Impact on Natural Gas Price

EnerCom's London Oil & Gas Conference 16 June 2011 London, England Danny D. Simmons

CONSOL Energy Inc. May 2011 Investor Presentation

Bakken Shale: Evolution of a Giant Oil Field

Lifecycle Water Management Considerations & Challenges for Marcellus Shale Gas Development

The Woodford Shale. Presenter Name: Sam Langford

Bank of America 2008 Energy Conference Bank of America Energy Conference

ENCANA CORPORATION. Eagle Ford. Eric T. Greager Vice-President & General Manager, Western Operating Area

DTE Energy Barnett Shale Overview. April 6, 2006

NEXUS Gas Transmission

February 2018 NYSE:CRK

Map Set 2: Impact on Land Cover

White Paper: Shale Gas Technology. September Shale Gas Technology 2011 NRGExpert Page 1 of 8

Environmental and Economic Considerations for Marcellus Natural Gas Development. Presented by Tom Murphy and Dave Yoxtheimer

NGA 2015 Regional Market Trends Forum

Copyright. Zacharias Petrou

The project consisted of 7 miles of 36-inch pipeline and associated facilities. UPI provide EPCM

TECHNOLOGY IS A GAME CHANGER

Water Issues Relating to Unconventional Oil and Gas Production

Learning through Subcontractors in an Emerging Technology

March 2011 Investor Presentation. The leading diversified fuel producer in the Eastern U.S.

New England Council Shale Gas Development. October 7, 2011 David J. Spigelmyer---VP, Government Relations Chesapeake Energy

WATER AND SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT

The Opportunities, Challenges, and Unknowns of Shale Gas Exploration

Haynesville Geology. Source: Plains Exploration & Haynesvilleplay.com

Shale Plays. Baker Hughes. Adam Anderson, VP, US Land Operations Completions Fred Toney, VP, Pressure Pumping Services.

Water Availability and Management in Shale Gas Operations

EOG_South Texas Eagle Ford-1

ENERGY BLUEPRINT. Energy

Rex Energy. Corporate Presentation. June Responsible Development of America s Energy Resources

Central Arkansas Vendor Forum. Conway Expo Center July 10 th, All

Chesapeake Energy. Shale Operations Overview

The Appalachian Basin

NEMC Challenges of Managing Water in the Marcellus Play. Nick Inkenhaus Water Resources Engineer

The New Encana: the clear energy choice. USA Division HAYNESVILLE SHALE & EAST TEXAS Danny Dickerson, Team Lead, East Texas & North Texas

Woodford Shale Development in the Ardmore Basin, Oklahoma

September 24, 2012 Oklahoma City, OK

Water Management Planning for Unconventional Resource Development

Legislative Budget and Finance Committee

Forward Looking Statements

Pennsylvania House Republican Policy Committee Thursday, November 16, Testimony of David Spigelmyer Marcellus Shale Coalition

There has been much speculation

Rex Energy. Corporate Presentation. December Responsible Development of America s Energy Resources

THE U.S. OIL AND NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY: MARKET DYNAMICS AND INDUSTRY RESPONSES

THE MARCELLUS SHALE AN ENERGY GAME

SAMPLE. US Shale. Insight Report

ACTS: Anadarko Completion Transport System. Jeff Dufresne Completions Manager, Greater Natural Buttes

Bryan Swistock Water Resources Extension Specialist Penn State University

Natural Gas: The Basics

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MARCELLUS

ENCANA CORPORATION. Operational Excellence. Michael McAllister. Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer

Marcellus Shale Gas Well Development in New York State

Management Presentation

The Impact of U.S. Shale Resources: A Global Perspective

BHP Billiton Petroleum Onshore US shale briefing. J. Michael Yeager Group Executive and Chief Executive, Petroleum 14 November 2011

Table of Contents See also Summary of Contents on the previous page.

DJ Basin. Dan Kelly Vice President Wattenberg

Marcellus Shale. Bill Wince, Vice President Transportation & Business Development Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc.

Chapter 9. Water Sourcing and Wastewater Disposal for Marcellus Shale Development in Pennsylvania

Origin of TENORM-containing Drill Cuttings and Treatment Sludges Generated at Well Sites and Wastewater Treatment Facilities in the 2012 Calendar

Questar Corporation A NATURAL GAS-FOCUSED ENERGY COMPANY. Third Annual Citi Power, Gas and Utilities Conference

AIChE: Natural Gas Utilization Workshop Overcoming Hurdles of Technology Implementation

Fracture Stimulation Just the Facts, Ma am

AADE Symposium 2011 Haynesville Shale. Presented by James R. Redfearn Vice President Drilling & Completions Mid Continent Region January 19, 2011

Health, Safety, and Environmental Building Collaboration and Culture

U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2016

August 19, EnerCom Conference Rick Muncrief President & CEO, WPX Energy

Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Recovery and CO 2 Sequestration in an Unmineable Coal Seam

Marcellus Shale Gas Play. Tetra Tech Capabilities

Development in the United States: Water Issues

EnerCom s London Oil & Gas Conference. June 16, 2011

J. Daniel Arthur, P.E., ALL Consulting. Author. Ground Water Protection Council January 2009 San Antonio, Texas. Presented at

U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015

San Juan, Raton & Uinta Basins

Department of the Environment

Changes in the Quantity and Quality of Produced Water from Appalachian Shale Energy Development and their Implications for Water Reuse

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

The Unconventional Reservoirs Revolution and the Rebirth of the U.S. Onshore Oil & Gas Industry

WATER RESOURCES ISSUES RELATED TO SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT

Shale Gas (D: unkonventionelles Erdgas )

SHALE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND IMPLICATIONS ON VALVE NEEDS JOHN D. SELDENRUST, VICE PRESIDENT-ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION

39 Roe Hollow Road, Middlebury Township, Tioga County, PA

Pryme Energy Limited ASX Code: PYM Turner Bayou Project Update and Investor Presentation

INTERVALS FOR NGL STORAGE APPLICATIONS

GOVERNOR S ENERGY SUMMIT

INFLECTION POINT. EnerCom s Oil & Gas Conference Jeff Ventura President & Chief Executive Officer

PENNSYLVANIA S ENERGY RESOURCES Powering Communities into the Future

UNCONVENTIONAL GAS RESOURCES

COLUMBIA MIDSTREAM BUILT TO LAST

STACK. Next Step in Completion Evolution: Improves Performance. Longfellow Energy s Nemaha Project

Transcription:

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE: RESULTS AND CHALLENGES Hart Energy Publishing Pittsburgh, PA October 19, 2009 Evaluating Eastern Shales is nothing new to us at Wright & Company, Inc. UNCONVENTIONAL Devonian Shales including Marcellus Coal Bed Methane Tight Gas Sands RELIABLE TECHNOLOGY Vertical Horizontal Fracture Techniques D. Randall Wright (615) 370-0755 randy@wrightandcompany.com www.wrightandcompany.com

PENNSYLVANIAN-DEVONIAN-MARCELLUS OVERVIEW DEVONIAN First commercial gas well 1821 Thousands of wells drilled Tight gas sands CBM Vertical Horizontal Multilaterals Patterns MARCELLUS Covers 65+ million acres Close proximity to premium markets Extends throughout eight states May ultimately be the largest natural gas field in the U.S. Over 500 Tcfe in place per Engelder and Lash study Source: Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Enercom 2009 Oil & Gas Conference Discussion Handout, August 10, 2009. Used with permission.

WHERE IS THE MARCELLUS SHALE? Source: EQT Corporation, Analyst Presentation October 2009, October 12, 2009. Used with permission.

LARGEST LEASEHOLDERS COMPANY STOCK SYMBOL APPROX NET MARCELLUS ACREAGE COMPANY STOCK SYMBOL APPROX NET MARCELLUS ACREAGE Chesapeake Energy CHK 1,450,000 XTO Energy XTO 152,000 Range Resources RRC 900,000 Cabot Oil & Gas COG 160,000 Talisman/Fortuna TLM 800,000 Southwestern Energy SWN 137,000 Dominion Resources D 685,000 Continental Resources CLR 88,000 StatoilHydro STO 600,000 AB Resources --- 85,000 Atlas Energy Resources ATN 555,000 Penn Virginia PVA 80,000 Chief Oil & Gas --- 500,000 Quest Resources QRCP 78,000 Equitable Resources EQT 400,000 Rex Energy REXX 70,000 Exco Resources XCO 395,000 Unit Corporation UNT 67,500 Anadarko Petroleum APC 312,500 Marathon Oil MRO 65,000 EnerVest --- 250,000 Petroleum Development PETD 54,000 EOG Resources EOG 240,000 Carrizo Oil & Gas CRZO 32,000 CNX Gas CXG 185,000 Source: Public Records TOTAL 8,341,000

2009 PA MARCELLUS ACTIVE WELL INVENTORY (permitted and/or drilled as of September 30, 2009) COUNTY SW Region Armstrong Beaver Butler Cambria Fayette Greene Indiana Somerset Washington Westmoreland # Vertical = 775 # Horizontal = 1031 NE Region Bradford Centre Clinton Elk Lycoming Potter Susquehanna Tioga Wayne 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Source: Pennsylvania DEP Number of Wells

WV & PA DRILLED MARCELLUS WELLS (as of September 30, 2009) Source: Pennsylvania DEP, West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey

BARNETT DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE Yearly Barnett Gas Production (Bcf) Year Source: www.geology.com

MARCELLUS DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE (as of September 30, 2009) 350 Number of Wells Drilled 300 250 200 150 100 Range Resources Renz #1 50 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: Pennsylvania DEP Year

SW PA & WV OPERATORS

NE PA OPERATORS

WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT THE MARCELLUS The Marcellus Shale covers a large area and has a tremendous volume of original gas in place. Development is in its infancy. Initial results are very encouraging. The Marcellus is a unique shale. Bigger may not necessarily always be better for the Marcellus. Lessons from the Barnett Shale model have accelerated the development of the Marcellus. Not all 65 million acres are created equal. Not all acres will be economically producible; OGIP, rock quality, and location are critical.

WHAT WE ALSO KNOW BY REVIEWING EARLY RESULTS Gross shale isopach may not correlate to productivity. Porosity and permeability are key to productivity. IP may not necessarily relate directly to EUR. Type curves tend to look similar for shales. Several b factors; initial declines; EURs on public websites Difference depends on location and reservoir quality Drilling and completion techniques Well results are widely distributed. Vertical less than 0.200 up to 1.2 Bcfe Horizontal Initially 2.5 3.3 Bcfe More recently 3.5 5+ Bcfe Averages now claimed to be 3.9 4.4 Bcfe

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE PHASE I Exploratory (Defining Reservoir Parameters) PHASE II Research & Development (Reasonable Certainty, Reliable Technology) PHASE III Exploitation & Optimization (Consistency, Repeatability, Economically Producible) Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE PHASE I Exploratory (Defining Reservoir Parameters) PHASE II Research & Development (Reasonable Certainty, Reliable Technology) PHASE III Exploitation & Optimization (Consistency, Repeatability, Economically Producible) Knowledge and experience gained in other shales are helpful, but each has its own learning curve. Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Vertical Well Program test acreage determine characteristics of reservoir wet vs. dry area over or under-pressured faulting natural fracture orientation completion techniques Vertical Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Geoscience (Defining Reservoir Parameters) depth thickness of shale total organic content (TOC) porosity pressure permeability gas analysis natural fractures original gas in place (OGIP) Vertical Geoscience Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Regulatory Concerns permitting to drill vertical and horizontal ground water protection recent changes in PA and NY unique by state expanded environmental considerations water management withdrawal treatment disposal recycling Regulatory Vertical Geoscience Number of Wells Drilled

REGULATORY CHALLENGES Discussions between Marcellus operators and regulators have had positive results. Recent changes/status in regulations PA re-wrote the regulations within six months; permitting is now at 45 days. NY issued its long-awaited draft plan for regulations on October 2, 2009. WV has been accommodating to the development of the Marcellus. Water everywhere, but none to use Any water usage in Susquehanna watershed requires approval by that agency along with state agency. Community meetings to discuss environmental impact Limited disposal wells in Northern Pennsylvania Current cost of water hauling is significant. Water salinity increases with time exposed to Marcellus which increases complexity of treatment.

P R E L I M I N A R Y REGULATORY AGENCIES Susquehanna Water District www.srbc.net Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection ww.depweb.state.pa.us/dep/site/default.asp West Virginia Dept. of Environmental Protection www.wvdep.org New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation www.dec.ny.gov Delaware River Basin Commission www.state.nj.us/drbc

PHASE I - VERTICAL EXPLORATION ROR Rate of Return (%) 100 80 60 40 20 1.2 Bcfe.9 Bcfe.6 Bcfe.3 Bcfe ASSUMPTIONS WI = 100% NRI = 85% D&C cost = $ 1.5 MM LOE = $1,250/month NO lease bonus costs included water hauling and disposal = $7/bbl dry gas only location dependent depth dependent 0 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 Price per MMBtu

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE PHASE I Exploratory (Defining Reservoir Parameters) PHASE II Research & Development (Reasonable Certainty, Reliable Technology) PHASE III Exploitation & Optimization (Consistency, Repeatability, Economically Producible) Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Horizontal Drilling Program lease configuration orientation to fractures lateral placement development spacing Horizontal Regulatory Vertical Geoscience Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Drilling efficient utilization of drilling rig vertical may continue to optimize development horizontal - multilateral pad system for drilling lateral placement upper middle lower lateral length (2,000 to 5,000 feet) Drilling Horizontal Regulatory Vertical Geoscience Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Completion Techniques frac design volume of proppant pump rates sand concentrations fluid type number of stages mechanical considerations Completion Drilling Horizontal Regulatory Vertical Geoscience Number of Wells Drilled

PHASE II - HORIZONTAL DEVELOPMENT ROR Rate of Return (%) 100 80 60 40 20 6 Bcfe 5 Bcfe 4 Bcfe 3 Bcfe ASSUMPTIONS WI = 100% NRI = 85% D&C cost = $4.5 MM LOE = $3,000/month NO lease bonus costs included water hauling and disposal = $6/bbl dry gas only location dependent depth and lateral length dependent 0 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 Price per MMBtu

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE PHASE I Exploratory (Defining Reservoir Parameters) PHASE II Research & Development (Reasonable Certainty, Reliable Technology) PHASE III Exploitation & Optimization (Consistency, Repeatability, Economically Producible) Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Infrastructure and Marketing in Place roads pipelines water procurement, usage and disposal gas treatment plants gathering compression Drilling Completion Infrastructure Marketing Horizontal Regulatory Vertical Geoscience Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Economy of Scale Cost Reduction effective drilling pad multiple wells multilateral completion custom rigs lower cost per unit of production Completion Infrastructure Marketing Economy of Scale Drilling Horizontal Regulatory Vertical Geoscience Number of Wells Drilled

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Statistical Optimization decline curve analysis type curve b factor initial rate/decline average EUR PUD, PROB, POSS (3P) assignments Completion Infrastructure Marketing Economy of Scale Statistical Optimization Drilling Horizontal Regulatory Vertical Geoscience Number of Wells Drilled

PHASE III HORIZONTAL OPTIMIZATION ROR 100 ASSUMPTIONS Rate of Return (%) 80 60 40 6 Bcfe 5 BCFe 4 Bcfe 3 Bcfe 0 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 20 WI = 100% NRI = 85% D&C cost = $3.5 MM LOE = $3,000/month NO lease bonus costs included water hauling and disposal = $6/bbl dry gas only location dependent depth and lateral length dependent Price per MMBtu

WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS FOR THE MARCELLUS Wright & Company, Inc. expects the development to become a statistical play. Over time, the results should continue to improve. The economy of scale should reduce costs. Lower drilling and completion costs Improvement in operational methods Clearer definition of Core, Tier 1, Tier 2, other Success largely determined by OGIP and rock quality Winners will have commitment and financial capacity. Strong and experienced technical team Rigs and service capabilities Good relationship with state and local governments Infrastructure for gathering and processing Transportation take away capacity

THE MARCELLUS SHALE LEARNING CURVE Cost per Mcfe Average EUR Number of Wells Drilled

CLIMBING THE LADDER OF SUCCESS You may work harder and harder at climbing the ladder of success only to discover you are leaning against the wrong wall. If the ladder is not leaning against the right wall, every step we take just gets us to the wrong place faster. (Stephen Covey, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People) FAILURE (Wrong Wall) SUCCESS (Wright Wall) last well was good repeatable results fast learner consistent results theirs good mine good quantity/quality data Marcellus is blanket rigs/services in place I have adjacent leases knowledge/experience hearsay good acreage/quality rock

THANK YOU! D. Randall Wright (615) 370-0755 randy@wrightandcompany.com www.wrightandcompany.com