Fracking Boom or Bust? Oil Drilling in Rural Ohio

Similar documents
The Benefits of Shale Gas

VILLAGE OF ALTO PASS, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO

Hydraulic Fracturing: Implications for Public Health. Physicians for Social Responsibility

Fracing: Basics and Concerns

Department of the Environment

Handout 1A: Benefits of Hydraulic Fracturing

MAYOR LINDSEY P. HORVATH (Kiran Hashmi, Council Deputy) a \-- (Janice Guzon, Council Intern)

Fracturing Overview: Fact vs. Fiction Andy Bond, Subsurface Manager December 8,

2.4.1 NATURAL RESOURCES CASE STUDY: WHAT THE FRACK?

Hinckley Seniors Group January 2, 2012

What is fracking and why is it controversial?

What s the Story With Fracking?

WATER RESOURCES ISSUES RELATED TO SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT

Comments on the Proposed Rules of the Tennessee Oil and Gas Board And Notice of Rulemaking Hearing

going back to the 1900s when President Taft started the Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale

The American Chemical Society and the American Institute of Chemical Engineers

Fracking in the Delaware Watershed. Laura Cassaro, Julia Rostron, Zachary Mendoza, Louis Brennan

The Opportunities, Challenges, and Unknowns of Shale Gas Exploration

Is the new boom in domestic natural gas production an economic bonanza or environmental disaster? Two experts face off

Fracture Stimulation Just the Facts, Ma am

Briefing to House Environmental Matters Committee February 9, Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Acting Secretary Maryland Department of the Environment

Chapter 11 Fossil Fuels

FRACKING & WATER USE. This publication provides an overview of these issues and what they mean for North Dakota. FEBRUARY 2014

SHALE DRILLING. Linda Nicholson and Colleagues November 11, 2009

Elevated methane levels from biogenic coalbed gas in Ohio drinking water wells near shale gas extraction

MARCELLUSBYDESIGN: PLANNING FORESTRY WITHIN THE MARCELLUS CONTEXT RYAN WALKER

Should Fracking be legal in the United States? Structured Debate video: Structured Debate Part 1: Clarifying Questions:

The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. Environmental Stewardship Advisory Commission. Hydraulic Fracturing. DATE: January 17, 2014

Marcellus Shale Gas Well Development in New York State

Fracking fluid isn't likely to migrate from shale wells, geologists say

Deep-Shale Gas Drilling

August 26, The primary conclusions that DRN reached based on these reports are:

NEVADA EXPLORATION PROJECT

Why Care About Contaminants in Groundwater?

Sentence Outline for Argument Essays

The proposed rulemaking does not address items required to protect Pennsylvania residents from water, air and noise pollution.

Hydraulic Fracking: Violating the Rights of Nature. Case Study: The United States

Oil and Gas Development in Lubbock. How changes to the Lubbock Drilling Ordinance can impact YOU

Fracking Safety & Economics November 9, 2017 America 1 st Energy Conference, Houston Tx.


Energize Ohio: Building Ohio's Energy Future 2012 Annual Report

Human Impact on Water

FRACKING AND CLEAN WATER: A SURVEY OF PENNSYLVANIA RESIDENTS. A Survey Conducted for the Civil Society Institute

What if the Gas Industry Really Wanted to Make Fracking Safer?

Division Mandates. Supervise the drilling, operation, and maintenance of wells to prevent damage to life, health, property, and natural resources.

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS EXTENSION FRACKING TASK FORCE. Presented By Task Force Co-Chairs Adam Feig & Connie Beck

Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus and Utica Shales: Environmental Regulatory Basics

Shale Revolution Creates Challenge & Opportunity for Water. Gray Peckham Coastal Consulting Concepts February 2012

PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and the Environment

Facts of Myths of the Marcellus Shale: A Scientific Perspective

Effects of Shale Energy Production on Cropland Land Rents in North Dakota. Markus Lang and Sayed Saghaian

What s Fracking in SoCal

The future for Fermanagh? Aedín McLoughlin Good Energies Alliance Ireland

May/June 2012 COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE & LIFE SCIENCES

ourenergysolutions.org

UGEE JOINT RESEARCH PROGRAMME

Food, Land and Water: Moving Forward

The (Re) Federalization of Fracking Regulation. Michael Burger April 19, 2013

Oil and Gas Study. March 2 2, 2012

State Representative Mark Mustio Workforce and Community Impacts. Jon Laughner Marcellus Shale Team Penn State Cooperative Extension June 1, 2010

Fracking and Shale Gas, Today and Tomorrow

THE MARCELLUS SHALE AN ENERGY GAME

Facts of Myths of the Marcellus Shale: A Scientific Perspective

Fracturing the Environment?: Exploring Potential Problems Posed by Horizontal Drilling Methods

Oil & Gas Regulation and Current Issues

GROUNDWATER. Water Resources of NYS: The Nature of its Underground Water. Composite Groundwater Environment. Groundwater Resources of NYS

Shale gas in Nottinghamshire how will they regulate fracking?

Hydraulic Fracturing For Gas What Would It Mean for NC?

DAVID SPEARS STATE GEOLOGIST

North Dakota Oil. May 2012

Board on Earth Sciences and Resources

Staff will monitor Bills as the move through the legislative process

Safely Harvesting Energy

The Importance of Affordable and Abundant Oil and Natural Gas for Colorado

Opportunities and Freight Transportation Needs from Marcellus and Utica in Ohio

Natural Gas Reform Campaign

Oil Production Activities & Hydraulic Fracturing Oil in California

SIERRA CLUB. Protect America s Environment. For our Families For our Future. 85 Second Street San Francisco, California 94105

White Paper Executive Summary from the California Independent Petroleum Association

ORDINANCE NO

Natural Gas from Shale: Potential Economic, Community, Environmental, and Health Implications

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on Petitions NOTICE TO MEMBERS

THE MARCELLUS SHALE Powering America s Future, Thanks to Hydraulic Fracturing. Travis Windle

ACID MINE DRAINAGE IN THE AMBLER MINING DISTRICT

Energy Classifications

Lifecycle Water Management Considerations & Challenges for Marcellus Shale Gas Development

What is fracking and why is it controversial?

11/3/2014. An Unexpected Turn. U.S. Shale Plays. Economic Implications of Unconventional Fossil Fuel Production

Fast-track fracking: why non-fracking drilling should not be treated as permitted development

Jordan Treakle - Mineral Rights Project Coordinator The Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI-USA)

Roadway Safety and Energy Development

Coal After the Paris Agreement

David Blackmon Managing Director for Public Policy and Strategic Communications FTI Consulting

The Fracking Debate. Title Page Headline

Proposed New 18 CFR Part Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale and Other Formations:

Hydraulic Fracturing in the U.S. Prestige World Wide

Fracking Regulations: Is Federal Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation Around the Corner?

ENERGY, WATER AND CLEAN AIR: WHAT KIND OF LEADERSHIP DO AMERICANS WANT?

Our Growing Need for Water Student Journal

Bottled Water: What s the problem?

Transcription:

\ NEWS OPINION EDUCATION STUDENT LIFE Fracking Boom or Bust? Oil Drilling in Rural Ohio Article written by: Krysta Ryan Date: February, 20th, 2017 Image by Daniel Beach: Picture of a Fracking Operation in Carrol County Carroll County in Ohio has been coined Ohio s Fracking Epicenter says David Beach a Harvard graduate and advocate for sustainability in Northeast Ohio. His report How the Fracking Boom Impacts Rural Ohio shows aerial views of the new drilling sites and the massive industrialization of the countryside. The Hydraulic Fracking for oil along the Utica/Point Pleasant shale formation, has given the resident farmers of Carroll County Ohio a new type of commodity to harvest, shale oil. Drilling operations like the picture taken by Daniel Beach are quickly changing the way of life in the small town. With more than 300 wells permitted in the area for horizontal hydraulic fracturing of the Utica/Point Pleasant shale formation, Carroll County remains Ohio s number one producer of shale oil explains Beach. American oil companies have found new and innovative techniques to extract shale oil on land. But many question at what cost?

The United States Energy Information Administration reported in 2017 that the production of crude oil and land leasing for fracking in the year of 2015, which for the seventh consecutive year has increased 7% in one year. Unconventional gas production via hydraulic fracturing; or for short "fracking" has increased the supply of crude oil over the short term, production is expensive and poses serious environmental risks. These oil rigs are popping up across the rural landscape and changing the way of life for many residents. Many environmental questions and concerns surrounding the controversial practices of oil companies have been at the forefront in Carroll County. As a universal goal, the United States has strived for energy independence by investing in alternative forms of energy such as shale oil. Daniel McGlynn, a California based freelance journalist who writes for the New York Times with a specialty in science and the environment wrote in 2011 extensively about the fracturing scene in Ohio. To understand the changing rural landscape, McGlynn wrote, hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a technique of extracting shale oil from rock deposits underground, also flushes massive amounts of chemicals, sand and materials with water at an extremely high pressure, causing shale formations to break.

Shale when cracked releases oil deposits which are then captured and then extracted. This process is being used throughout the country and more frequently on land creating new environmental risks, specifically to the underground freshwater sources. As with many of Earth's natural wonders humans have been finding ways to extract resources for hundreds of years. With the depletion of the world s oil supply, new and innovative fuel options have allowed for the development of other oil rich resources to be explored. Landowners are leasing sub-surface areas of their properties to oil companies for upwards $5,800 dollars per acre a month plus royalties of the oil mined on the property. 95 percent of Carroll County residents draw from well water, not city water, Interview with the President Paul Feezel of Carroll Concerned Citizens (2013) Enticing to farmers in the area, oil companies seem to promise Ohioan s wealth from underground shale deposits. Carrol County residents have seen an economic boom across the retail and housing markets, but there is still a considerable amount of concern says Paul Feezel, President of the organization called Carroll Concerned Citizens. There is a considerable amount of backlash towards the oil companies, who failed to relay to land owners the serious environmental risks, specifically related to groundwater contamination.

Hydraulic fracturing requires thousands to millions of gallons of water to crack rock holding shale oil and the process causes dangerous pollutants to seep into the ground causing contamination of freshwater underground. Terrence Bensel and Jon Turk, authors of Contemporary Environmental Issues (2nd ed.) explains in 2014 that over the life span of a single fracking well, 1 million gallons of toxic, briny wastewater is produced. Contaminated groundwater is the biggest environmental threat that could cause a serious amount of damage to the public. There is a controversial debate over the long term effects of the land after the fracking operation has depleted the well continues. Research is ongoing as many environmental activists and state regulators demand stricter regulations on the oil companies preying on small rural farm towns. Moreover, reports from residents near fracking operations have shown drinking water to be contaminated with hydraulic chemicals. Even though The Environmental Protection Agency or (EPA) released a report on June 5 th 2015 stating that contaminated drinking water from fracking chemicals is not widespread. Regardless the EPA s report, acknowledges contamination of groundwater is happening and the EPA suggests it is the state s duty to provide the necessary environmental services to control contamination. This is a big task for most states who lack the financial support to carry out large, in-depth studies. Carroll County with a population of roughly 28, 836.

51 % of Carroll County residents view gas drilling boom negatively. The Ohio Organizing Collaborative Listening Project interviewed residents who lived in Carroll County at the time drilling was introduced to their town. Surprisingly 51 percent of respondents view the oil and gas drilling boom negatively and 64 percent are very concerned about the damage to farmland and/or natural ecosystems reported Ted Auch in 2016 Ohio Shale Country Listening Project. There is a continued amount of activity in the area as drilling wells continue to produce oil. While the nation preaches for total energy independence, it is debatable whether shale oil harvested from fracking will be deemed the next wonder fuel. As previously stated, the long term effects on the land after fracking in Carroll County will be an ongoing study. Only time will tell whether or not our earth s underground resources will truly provide energy independence on foreign sources of fuel. Some activist suggest until further research is conducted and data is analyzed will the true environmental risks manifest.

References Auch, P. T. (2016, January 08). Ohio Shale Country Listening Project Part 1 https://www.fractracker.org/2016/01/oh-listening-project-part1/ Beach, D. (2013, August 23). Ohio fracking photo tour GreenCityBlueLake:http://www.gcbl.org/blog/2013/08/ohio-frackingphoto-tour Feezel, P., (2013). Interview with the President of Carroll Concerned Citizens McGlynn, D. (2011, December 16). Fracking controversy. CQ Researcher, 21, 1049-1072. http://library.cqpress.com/ Turk, J., & Bensel, T. (2014). Contemporary environmental issues (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis. (2017).